Indexes
February 9th, 2010
February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Will terrorists be given Miranda warnings? (75)
- Lodi Unified School District president issues warning to speakers over cuts (64)
- President Obama's first year (45)
- Many reject the politics of 'no' (45)
- Islamic symbol in mosaic — what is all the fuss? (44)
- Writer comments on Neely column (42)
- The Home Depot hopes to join Costco at Reynolds Ranch (41)
- Time to shed the convenient sham of 'Don't ask, don't tell' policy (34)
- We need to conduct respectful conversations (30)
- Tasered suspect claims he is Yosemite Sam (25)
ADVERTISEMENT
Time for City Council to cut its pay
The savings would be quite real
Tuesday, May 26, 2009 6:28 AM PDT
This week I received my copy of the city of Lodi draft budget for 2009-10, a 551-page beast.
While there is some double accounting because of transfers, such as from the electric utility to the general fund, the budget covers spending for $170,270,688 — down from $187,032,383 in the original budget for 2008-09.
Those are all really big numbers, from the pages to the dollars, and I can tell you that very few people have any idea what is in it except perhaps the city manager, deputy city manager and the budget staff.
The electric utility is the largest fund in the budget at about $73 million, and, as I have said before, it has the least amount of oversight. The general fund, which covers basic government, is proposed to be just short of $40 million, yet the city council will pick it apart all the way down to the contribution to the Downtown Lodi Business Partnership.
Yes, the city council wants to again subsidize the DLBP. Why? I don't have a clue. It cannot be to keep the thing running, because without the $28,900 subsidy from yours and my tax dollars, the DLBP could charge their members — of which I am one — more money.
The problem with this subsidy to the DLBP is that it now maks an otherwise balanced budget unbalanced by $28,900. In other words, unless the city manager or city council cuts something else, they will dip into our savings to subsidize the salary of Jaime Watts.
Well, since I don't like the subsidy and I don't want further cuts, I have an idea — cut the City Council pay to pay for it.
At a recent meeting of the budget and finance committee, I proposed a cut in the pay for City Council members. At that meeting, the city manager labeled it a symbolic gesture and he spoke of how hard they work. Another member of the committee dismissed the cut as small dollars relative to the total budget. On the latter I absolutely agree, but I do not see it as symbolic at all because it is real money — money that could employ a part-time person to clean our parks or to fund the travesty that is the DLBP.
According to the budget, our City Council members will each receive $10,322 for the year, about $860.17 per month. Up from $6,000 at their previous pay of $500 per month. Yes, an increase of 72 percent brought forward by Bob Johnson and approved by the council.
Now, if you think the council pay stops there, not a chance. The total budget for city council pay and benefits is $112,720. An increase of nearly 11 percent from the prior year.
Benefits, you ask? Oh, yes! Everything above their pay of $51,610 ($10,322 times five members), $61,110 is for benefits. The benefits are for: medical insurance; dental insurance; vision insurance; medicare insurance; a California Public Employees Retirement System contribution; unemployment insurance (can they collect if they don't get re-elected?); chiropractic insurance; and an insurance refund to JoAnne Mounce for, I guess, not taking some of the insurance.
Oh, let's not forget the $2,900 each for conference expenses with $500 added for Mr. Hansen, and the good times just keep getting better.
Wasn't it our mayor, Mr. Hansen himself, who suggested in this paper last week that the state of California should cut everything across the board like the Lodi City Council already has? Well, Larry, you didn't cut everything across board, now did you?
So, here's my proposal for the city council — cut the pay back to $500 per month each until such time that property taxes and sales taxes increase in Lodi and you get a percentage increase that equals the percentage increase in those two, according to the limits set by law. When things improve, you get more money — what a concept.
Now, assuming the city council benefits would not change, and they probably would go down a bit, this would be a savings to the general fund of $21,610.20. Since this is not quite enough for your subsidy to the DLBP, cut your conference budgets in half and you save another $7,500 for a grand total of $29,110.20 — more than enough for the subsidy to the DLBP.
By the way, the energy cost adjustment will be a negative $0.0053 on your coming bill. Yes, it is negative. If you use 1,000 kilowatts, your bill will go down by $5.30.
John Johnson, CFA, is a Lodi-based business appraiser. Contact him at john@johnejohnson.com or at 369-1451.
Search for Ads 
Today’s Print Ads 
RSS Feeds
Reader Feedback
dyan wrote on Jun 2, 2009 1:46 PM:
lodibandito wrote on May 29, 2009 5:10 PM:
ameriCAN wrote on May 29, 2009 2:39 PM:
reality wrote on May 29, 2009 12:45 PM:
lodibandito wrote on May 29, 2009 8:46 AM:
onestooge wrote on May 28, 2009 11:38 PM:
wtf wrote on May 28, 2009 12:53 PM:
http://www.berkshares.org/
And this link is to an article dated a little over a month ago on April 10, 2009:
Communities print their own currency to keep cash flowing
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2009-04-05-scrip_N.htm "
Whoa Nellie! wrote on May 28, 2009 9:18 AM:
Perhaps Lodi should split from the union too? Imagine what that will do to our taxes! "
wtf wrote on May 28, 2009 7:16 AM:
http://www.banknd.nd.gov/about.jsp "
wtf wrote on May 27, 2009 5:52 PM:
I had suggested several months back that Arnold create a scrip money for California; turns out, he can create a BANK for California.
THE INNOVATIVE BANK OF NORTH DAKOTA
"North Dakota boasts the only state-owned bank in the nation. The Bank of North Dakota (BND) was established by the state legislature in 1919 specifically to free farmers and small businessmen from the clutches of out-of-state bankers and railroad men. The bank’s stated mission is to deliver sound financial services that promote agriculture, commerce and industry in North Dakota."
Read on...
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=BRO20090527&articleId=13751
Regarding scrip money, that's something even the City of Lodi could do on a local basis. "
Whoa Nellie! wrote on May 27, 2009 5:05 AM:
Now, taxpayers, get this: two of our five CC members already have their health insurance paid for by our tax dollars.
Susan work for LUSD and, of course, Larry has his benefit rich LPD retirement. Two of the biggest blowhards are doing the dreaded "double dip."
It is "hidden cost" items like these that elected officials vote for themselves that make me sick.
Do the math- Currently the benes are 150% of the cost of the salary. "Houston, we have a problem." "
lodidian wrote on May 26, 2009 9:57 PM:
I watch the council meetings and it makes my hair hurt when Larry drones on and on and "um and ah um ya know um and um ya know um ahhhh". Ya know.
His muddled thinking is reflected in his "Um ya know". "
journey wrote on May 26, 2009 3:30 PM:
ameriCAN wrote on May 26, 2009 3:14 PM:
kidsalami wrote on May 26, 2009 2:16 PM:
lodidian wrote on May 26, 2009 8:53 AM:
It seems to me an "honest and competent mayor" would be worth a lot more than Larry is paid. That said, I think it would be good to pay Larry to stay home. We need an honest and competent leader who has no hidden agendas. "
Comments on this story are now closed.