Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Bible is entwined with American civic life (135)
- Gated communities in Lodi (112)
- I predict: A conservative tide will rise in 2010 (99)
- The Treaty of Tripoli hoax (81)
- David Diskin is first to give an invocation under new city of Lodi policy (59)
- Here's what my father knew about the assassination of JFK (55)
- Universal health care solves big problems (37)
- Words from our forefathers (26)
- With resolve and imagination, Downtown Lodi can surge once again (24)
- 27-year-old man shot to death Saturday night in front of Acampo home (18)
Difference between 'avoid' and 'evade'
So let me see if I have this straight. I just witnessed the president of the United States on television (May 4) flanked by the Treasury Secretary and head of the IRS, talking about closing loopholes and other tax "avoidance" problems within the U.S. Tax Code that permit individuals and companies to store some of their money in so-called "tax havens" in foreign countries.
President Barack Obama referred to these few individuals and companies as practically scofflaws and dodgers for taking advantage of completely legal avenues to avoid paying income taxes. Keep in mind, we're talking about "avoid," not "evade;" something distinctively defined regarding our Tax Code.
If that weren't enough, Secretary Timothy Geithner stepped up to the podium and with a straight face exclaimed that he was going to go after these individuals and companies for not paying their fair share in taxes. Now just how preposterous is that?
Still, I suppose it does make sense. Ever since the last two weeks in January everything seems to have gone topsy-turvy within the Beltway. Actual tax-"evaders" are now permitted to enforce rules and laws of which they themselves find little reason to obey, and completely legitimate companies exercising legal relief afforded by the Tax Code are being labeled as nearly criminal for not voluntarily paying taxes that they have no obligation to pay.
The solution? Change the Tax Code — but don't vilify anyone for obeying the rules, especially when those very regulations are being enforced by bona fide tax cheats. The hypocrisy might be lost on some, but hopefully not on the majority of Americans, who are quickly realizing that there truly are rules and laws that those in power and authority don't need to bother themselves with, while successful and profitable Americans and American companies who now need to keep a close watch over their shoulders for the Obama revenue-generating machine begin running for cover.
The trouble is without a clear understanding about the definition of "right" vs. "wrong," all of us might find ourselves on the wrong side of the law, even when we've done nothing wrong.
Confusing? Apparently not to the President or Treasury Secretary.
Jerome Kinderman
Lodi

Reader Feedback
Billy Rubin wrote on May 30, 2009 9:23 PM:
Billy Rubin wrote on May 29, 2009 4:00 PM:
would find hisway
back here to show me the way
he says I used "hate spewing crap" someway
against Lodisafeway
Maybe someday
but hey
he works the rat way
so prolly no way "
Bob Loblaw wrote on May 29, 2009 12:46 PM:
Billy Rubin wrote on May 29, 2009 11:18 AM:
Billy Rubin wrote on May 29, 2009 11:14 AM:
I can barely speak, let alone hook two cogent words together.
No, no I fully realize I'm far too stupid to match wits with a towering intellect like Mr. Kinderman; and the Lodi News-Sentinel never stoops so low as to print drivel like mine.
Thanks for the compliment, though. "
tosh conn wrote on May 28, 2009 8:36 PM:
wtf wrote on May 28, 2009 9:05 AM:
Jerome, Jerome, girardway....(sigh) you just don't get it, do you? LOL!
It doesn't matter if it's Bush, Obama or any other politico, you have to realize that it's not the really big crooks who break the laws....
No, the ***really big*** crooks MAKE the laws. ;)
Now I've heard that the best way to make sure crime **doesn't** pay is to let the government run it; but I haven't seen any evidence of this yet. "
Billy Rubin wrote on May 28, 2009 6:48 AM:
Oh GOD yes, M. "
Comments on this story are now closed.