Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
Lodi's Haley Ring, left, and Tokay's Katelyne Herrington don blueseventy Nero Comp swimsuits during Thursday's Sac-Joaquin Section swim championships. The suit is designed to reduce friction drag through the water, and the fit is supposed to allow a better stroke. (Jennifer M. Howell/News-Sentinel)

High-tech swimsuits may equal faster times for local athletes, but can cost over $400

By Joelle Milholm
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Friday, May 15, 2009 6:01 AM PDT

High school swimming may never be the same again.

High-tech swimming suits, similar to the sleek Speedo LZR Michael Phelps wore to win his record eight gold medals at the 2008 Beijing Olympics, have filtered down to the prep level.

Thursday marked the first day the high-tech suits have been allowed in the Sac-Joaquin Section swimming meet. While one section record was broken and another was tied in Thursday's girls trials, which is a common annual feat, numerous swimmers notched All-American times and set their fastest personal marks ever.

"There are a lot of fast times today and I think that is why we are seeing so many All-American times," said Lodi head swim coach John Griffin. The new suits are made of special material designed to fit tightly to the body and repel water, minimizing drag and helping swimmers glide through the water faster. Some even have polyurethane membrane panels embedded in the fabric and placed on strategic positions, causing the suit, and the swimmer, to be more buoyant.

The result is faster times. The problem is cost and equality. The suits vary from the LZRs at $435 to Finis suits, which reduce drag and repel water but don't have the polyurethane element, for $200. Not all swimmers can afford to buy the expensive swimwear, especially considering the suits only last about 40 swims before it becomes too stretched out and lose its benefit.

"I think that it is unfortunate because it is so expensive and you have the haves and the have-nots," Griffin said. "Your kid has to be fast anyway for them to work, but they are a benefit. I would recommend them to anybody who wants to go fast."

Tokay junior Katelyne Herrington was one of the fast swimmers. Herrington, a previous All-American who is already being recruited by schools like UCLA, USC, Texas A&M and Arizona State, wore a blueseventy high-tech suit. It was her first time using it for the 200 freestyle and the 100 butterfly. She was fastest in both events and will enter Saturday's finals as the top seed. She said she liked wearing the suit, which is being worn by many of the Tigers thanks to a donation from Tokay's booster club.

High-tech swimsuits at a glance

Made famous in the 2008 Olympics by swimmers like eight-time gold medalist Michael Phelps, high-tech swimsuits are taking over the sport. This is the first year high school swimmers can use the suits in Sac-Joaquin Section meet, which started Thursday and will go through Saturday.

Here are some of the suits at the meet:

Speedo's Fastskin LZR Racer: $435

  • Made from ultra lightweight, water-repellent LZR Pulse material.
  • Features ultra-thin polyurethane membrane panels precision cut by laser and embedded into the fabric at important points on the body.
  • Has an internal core stabilizer allowing for optimum support and body position in the water
  • 100 percent ultrasonically bonded seams and an ultra low profile zip that all combine to dramatically reduce drag resistance in the water.

    blueseventy Nero Comp: $394.95

  • Aggressive ultra light competition-inspired fit featuring a hidden low-line racing zipper.
  • Water and UV resistant Power Lycra that reduces water absorption over long distances, whilst providing flexibility, durability and a comfortable fit.
  • Yamamoto SCS fabric with hydrophobic skin that reduces friction drag through the water.

    Finis Hydrospeed Race Tight 24: $199.99

  • Comprised of a light-weight, hollow-core Scalex material, which allows for less water absorption and a comfortable compression.
  • The embossed, scale-like finish and additional water-repellent characteristics further reduce drag for increased speed.

    (All prices are for full-legged suits)

    Sources: www.speedo.com, www.blueseventy.com, www.finisinc.com
  • "It is different. You are all sucked in and high in the water. It is nice. Everyone is wearing them. It is the new thing," Herrington said. "But I feel that it doesn't matter what suit I wear, I feel like I can swim fast. I have confidence, but I thought that I would try it out and I liked it."

    Herrington's time of 25.74 seconds in the fly and 1:49.24 in the free were the fastest she's ever recorded. Her fly time tied the section record.

    Thursday's swimmers were dressed in all kinds of suits. There were high-tech suits of all costs and lengths, from traditional cut at the hips, to midthigh or to the ankle. There were older high-tech suits with less technological advancements. There were also traditional suits that have been worn for years.

    The Galt High swimmers were wearing their usual traditional suits. Warrior coach Kalah Westlynn said she sees the issue from both sides.

    "I have heard they can take a half second off per lap, so it's a disadvantage to people who can't afford them, but it is great for people who can," she said.

    The majority of the faster varsity swimmers had some sort of high-tech suit. Griffin, whose swimmers had to individually buy high-tech suits if they wanted them, said he expects that number to go up in Saturday's finals. That's because swimmers like Lodi High's Lori Scheideman are saving their fast suits for the finals.

    Scheideman wore a traditional suit on Thursday and still qualified for the finals in the frosh-soph 200 and 500 free, as well as in a pair of Lodi's relays. Her 400 free relay team, with two Flames in high-tech suits and two in traditional, placed second and shaved six seconds off its seeded time.

    Scheideman admitted she wanted a blueseventy, which many of Thursday's coaches and swimmers said was the best, but settled for a Speedo Fastskin II. The Fastskin doesn't have the polyurethane and floating ability the blueseventy does, but it still limits drag and helps swimmers move faster through the water. Scheideman said wearing more buoyant suits is both fair and unfair because the fastest swimmers — who would probably win anyway — will wear the suits. She also sees the other side.

    "It is almost unfair because, it's a wetsuit and it is so much more buoyant," she said.

    Federation Internationale De Natation, the international governing body for swimming, and the National Federation of State High School Association's swimming and diving rules committee consider both high-tech suits with and without polyurethane legal. FINA is currently in the process of considering possible rule amendments relating to requirements of legal swimwear. FINA is expected to make a decision and new rules will go into effect January of 2010.

    A memo from the NFHS said that any proposed changes would most likely have an impact on NFHS rules. Griffin doesn't see the new suits going away.

    "I don't know how we would not ever have them around," he said. "The door is open."

    Under current NFHS rules, swimmers are even allowed to wear two high-tech suits for maximum buoyancy. According to Scheideman, that crosses the line.

    "You would be so buoyant, that's what I find really unfair," she said.

    Contact reporter Joelle Milholm at joellem@lodinews.com.

    Reader Feedback

    Robb wrote on May 22, 2009 7:17 PM:

    " Yea, high school swimming... nuff said.. "

    Lodian wrote on May 16, 2009 6:25 PM:

    " Ah geez, Lou, save it for your attack Lodi website. "

    Lou wrote on May 16, 2009 8:37 AM:

    " No, I've got it. Let's fire the top administrators at L.U.S.D. and buy everyone in the league a high-tech swim suit..."No Child Left Behind." "

    Cogito wrote on May 16, 2009 8:11 AM:

    " Bob, could be this computer chair. "

    Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on May 16, 2009 12:05 AM:

    " Cogito, I think your rubber suit is cutting off the blood flow to your brain. "

    Cogito wrote on May 15, 2009 10:31 PM:

    " I left out large handed. "

    Cogito wrote on May 15, 2009 10:31 PM:

    " Tosh, I'm really not sure of the physics, but I couldn't imagine being able to create much velocity with a polo mallet in an atmosphere as dense as pool water, thus making equine aqualine cannon bone/fetlock guards unnecessary. As far as humans, none swim faster than the big footed, long torso, short legged, flat gleut, sufficient body fat, well muscled variety. No suit can give you all those attributes. "

    max stanfield wrote on May 15, 2009 8:34 PM:

    " To: Swim Mom.....you are right. They could pack me into 3-6- or 10 of these suits and i could not swim like these kids. Swimming requires hours and hours a day of training. I had two nephews how missed the olympics years ago because of the boycott and they worked out 10 hours a day. They ate their meals on the paddle board. Would the suits have helped them ? Yes, by a second or two. But they were olympic grade with our without the suit [not available then] but you cannot make a swimmer out of a slug. "

    tosh conn wrote on May 15, 2009 8:28 PM:

    " Cogito....you are all over the board on many issues, but help me on this one because you could be right....don't polo ponies wear some kind of "leggings" to keep their "ankles" from getting pounded by the polo mallets? Soccer players wear shin guards, baseball players wear helmets as well as state of the art mitts, baseball bats, specially formulated whitish crud-powder sd gripper enhancer, skydivers wear webbed suits to speed n control their dives. Gawd, i think i agree with you. What if a kid had a web foot [we knew one years ago] "

    swim mom wrote on May 15, 2009 7:40 PM:

    " This is what my college swimmer says: The suits do not swim, they don't put in the long hours of work. They only give a small edge. My daughter says her LZR makes her feel good mentally. So what percentage of any game is mental? If they are serious about swimming, they've had this suit for other meets, I bet most did not buy just for sections. On another note, if you are a varsity, knowing that college scouts and coaches are on the sidelines you might want to make a $400 investment could pay off. "

    Cogito wrote on May 15, 2009 6:07 PM:

    " Bob, in water polo, they should allow the horses to wear the suits also. All that swimming with a guy on your back has to be tiring. "

    Bob Loblaw wrote on May 15, 2009 2:50 PM:

    " Just out of curiosity, are water polo players allowed to wear the suits too? Would it even make a difference in water polo? "

    dogs4you wrote on May 15, 2009 2:13 PM:

    " tanner if you don`t take a swimming meet seriously, you drown. "

    dogs4you wrote on May 15, 2009 2:11 PM:

    " Swimming meets like all sports come down to the have`s and have nots. Perhaps they should be sperated into two different groups, the one`s with the new suits and the one`s that don`t simply because mom and dad cannot afford it. It`s one way to level the playing field even though no one ever said that life had to be fair. "

    tanner b wrote on May 15, 2009 12:32 PM:

    " a swimming meet is unfair to those who never took swimming seriously "

    Taxman wrote on May 15, 2009 12:10 PM:

    " I can see Lou's point about everything improving. Cutting drag is one thing but buoyancy is totally different. How much buoyancy is allowed? For a suit to qualify, why not just drop it in the water with say a 1 lb weight. If it floats it's illegal. "

    Emily09 wrote on May 15, 2009 10:24 AM:

    " i mean 'not' what i want to be hearing about, not 'now' :) "

    Emily09 wrote on May 15, 2009 10:24 AM:

    " This is highschool not professionals, i see this as an unfair advantage for those who can afford it. And really though with such drastic cuts in education a couple of new expensive swimsuits is now what i want to be hearing about. "

    Cogito wrote on May 15, 2009 8:41 AM:

    " Life will never be a level playing field. Some golfers have better, custom fit, clubs than the other players. Some baseball players have better gloves and lighter spikes. Some cyclists have faster bikes. It all comes down to doing the best with what you have. There are millions of kids who compete at sports. Very few will ever making a living at it. The life lessons learned from competition far outweigh winning and losing. Sometimes you win easily, but sometimes you do your best and get trounced. But the bottom line is that you need to strive every day to do your best with what you have. Others will always have better, and that's no excuse to quit. "

    what22 wrote on May 15, 2009 7:45 AM:

    " lou and midtowner need a life "

    midtowner wrote on May 15, 2009 7:02 AM:

    " Ms. Scheideman has a well reasoned point of view. It appears that she has thoroughly researched this issue and has concluded that these tech suits are unfair. Good luck to Lori and all the competitors at Sections! "

    Lou wrote on May 15, 2009 5:46 AM:

    " Yeh, the caps make them faster, the googles help them see better, the speedo suits (when introduced)were more effective and efficient than what came before. Baseball players have better gloves, bats and surfaces to play on. Over the years, every piece of equipment has gotten better and better.

    And the point would be? "

    Comments on this story are now closed.