Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Couple appeals approval of Costco (74)
- We are the last beacon of hope when darkest day falls upon us (59)
- Elton John: Talented but 'cruel gay man' (59)
- Four Lodi Unified School District campuses could close (58)
- Lodi Unified School District rocked by threat of four schools closing (57)
- Clements School set to close doors (46)
- Lodi City Council accepts gift of statue, approves spending up to $27,000 on transport, installation (43)
- Is government able to think before acting? (41)
- Four Lodi Unified School District campuses deemed among state's lowest achieving (33)
- Retired judge Cinda Fox suing San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office (31)
Lodi City Council to decide how long an RV can park in same spot
With his recreational vehicle parked in front of his house, David Vera walked back and forth as he prepared for a two-month trip across the country.
Vera usually parks his RV on Vienna Street for two days before and after trips, even though he legally can leave his vehicle on the street in front of his house for 72 hours.
"No RV owner is going to make the street our parking spot," he said. "We respect our neighbors."
RV owners in Lodi could see the amount of time they can park their RVs on the street decrease if Lodi City Council members change the city's laws.
After receiving three complaints about RVs in front of people's houses, Councilwoman JoAnne Mounce asked city staff at a recent meeting to study other cities' policies regarding RVs. Mounce said the citizens she talked to would like to see RVs only allowed on the street for 48 hours.
"I am a true advocate of when a citizen has a major concern that affects the city at large, it is important to be able to give that citizen a voice," she said. "This must obviously be a larger concern than what I may be aware of."
Mounce said she had not noticed a problem with RV parking, but wanted the council to look into it after she received the complaints.

On Thursday afternoon, Mavis Dockter had her RV in front of her house and was charging it for a weekend trip. In the past, she has received a warning from the city to move her RV before it is ticketed.
"They should clean up other stuff in Lodi, before picking on RV owners," she said.
She said it irritates her to almost receive a ticket on her RV when other homeowners fill their front yards with trash and junk.
Lodi has more time built into its ordinance than most cities City Attorney Steve Schwabauer has looked at. He said most of the ordinances have a 24- to 48-hour limit.
After he compiles a report on other cities' policies, the council will consider what type of restrictions it wants to adopt.
Vera, who has owned RVs since 1977, usually parks them at a church near his home. He said he thinks the rule limiting RVs to only 72 hours in front of houses is a technical issue.
"You can take it to shop for a half a day, and then park it again," he said.
Describing it as the "missing part of the ordinance," Councilman Phil Katzakian also asked city staff to add a requirement that RVs be moved for a certain amount of time before being parked again in the same spot. His neighborhood requires RVs to be moved for at least 72 hours.
Lodi's RV issue at a glance
Current policy: All vehicles can only be parked on a city street for 72 hours at a time. To avoid this rule, people will often drive their vehicle briefly and park in the same space.Proposed changes: The Lodi City Council will consider decreasing the amount of time recreational vehicles are allowed on the street.
Councilman Phil Katzakian also recommended the city add a requirement that the RVs must be moved for a certain amount of time before being parked again in the same place.
News-Sentinel staff
While he understands people need to load and unload, RVs in front of houses can be inconvenient, Katzakian said. He specifically mentioned some of the newer developments that have narrow streets.
"Some of the streets, I'm surprised that you can have RVs in the front. It's tough when people bring them home in my neighborhood and let them sit for three days," Katzakian said.
While washing his car's windows in front of his house, Zane Grever said he is lucky to have a driveway that can fit his Luxor Winnebago and his son's RV when he visits.
"I feel for people who buy motor homes and trailers but have nowhere to keep them," he said.
While he thinks 72 hours is enough time for residents to load and unload for trips, he wishes more time could be allowed for people who come and visit.
"If people are visiting, give them two weeks," he said. "They could be coming from New York or Kentucky or who knows where?"
Contact reporter Maggie Creamer at maggiec@lodinews.com or read her blog at www.lodinews.com/blog/citybuzz.

Reader Feedback
Bob Loblaw wrote on May 8, 2009 11:43 AM:
95240 wrote on May 7, 2009 7:32 PM:
Lodian wrote on May 4, 2009 3:33 PM:
johndoe wrote on May 4, 2009 2:28 PM:
Lodian wrote on May 2, 2009 8:46 PM:
OTH wrote on May 2, 2009 1:51 PM:
Sounds right out of the Stepford Wives. I'm curious are we paying city personnel to do your nightly traffic patrols or do you have a special little car posse? "
lodidian wrote on May 1, 2009 9:03 PM:
Store it elsewhere---it's not all you! "
commonsense1 wrote on May 1, 2009 7:42 PM:
danieliii wrote on May 1, 2009 5:47 PM:
Gee whiz...we have enough micro-managing of our lives with Obama in office, YUK! "
davidd wrote on May 1, 2009 5:05 PM:
Then when the owner claims the vehicle, they pay the towing company whatever the fee is.
At least, that's how it works when a vehicle is towed from private property. "
weezer wrote on May 1, 2009 4:55 PM:
I see t-shirt sales booming for the one with the design, "Don't blame me, I didn't vote for them!" "
papershredder wrote on May 1, 2009 4:32 PM:
new2cali wrote on May 1, 2009 4:11 PM:
justlookin wrote on May 1, 2009 3:44 PM:
Robb wrote on May 1, 2009 3:34 PM:
Lodian wrote on May 1, 2009 2:14 PM:
" My HOA rules state that our RV can be parked in front of our house -- NEVER. Not only that, no cars can sit on the street overnight. If they do, they are tagged and towed the next day. I love those rules. That's why I bought in this master-planned community. Everything -- including yards -- stay immaculate 24/7/365. "
Journey: That sounds like a terrible way to live. "
Lodian wrote on May 1, 2009 2:13 PM:
Lodian wrote on May 1, 2009 2:08 PM:
That's simply not true(maybe you were being sarcastic). "
jramagic wrote on May 1, 2009 11:57 AM:
Holy Cow....its huge! Gorgeous, too. But he pays to store it in a big hanger locally...not at his home. That's the way to go, I think. He does bring it home for a day or two before and after trips...not a big deal. My gripe is the characters who try to save the storage and / or try to create a guest house by parking them at home.... "
reading wrote on May 1, 2009 11:50 AM:
Bottom line, 72 hours is fair and enforcing tickets for violators beyond that should be the focus. The Nazis can move into their gated communities to stay happy.
The City council should focus on the more serious issues we face. "
Leonard wrote on May 1, 2009 11:45 AM:
" My HOA rules state that our RV can be parked in front of our house -- NEVER. Not only that, no cars can sit on the street overnight. If they do, they are tagged and towed the next day. I love those rules. That's why I bought in this master-planned community. Everything -- including yards -- stay immaculate 24/7/365. "
Ugh...
That sounds like a pic and span, tidy little Hell on Earth. "
Journey wrote on May 1, 2009 10:20 AM:
midtowner wrote on May 1, 2009 10:03 AM:
Journey wrote on May 1, 2009 9:55 AM:
T & C wrote on May 1, 2009 9:40 AM:
Mad Dog wrote on May 1, 2009 9:14 AM:
Observer wrote on May 1, 2009 9:12 AM:
midtowner wrote on May 1, 2009 8:50 AM:
Journey wrote on May 1, 2009 8:41 AM:
bigskytrader wrote on May 1, 2009 8:40 AM:
DeputyChief wrote on May 1, 2009 8:32 AM:
max stanfield wrote on May 1, 2009 8:02 AM:
jimp wrote on May 1, 2009 7:39 AM:
x209x wrote on May 1, 2009 7:28 AM:
al da long wrote on May 1, 2009 7:19 AM:
midtowner wrote on May 1, 2009 7:09 AM:
jramagic wrote on May 1, 2009 6:39 AM:
jramagic wrote on May 1, 2009 6:35 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.