Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 2nd, 2009
November 7th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
November 4th, 2009
November 3rd, 2009
November 2nd, 2009
October 31st, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
Lab technician Sandy Nord holds up wastewater that has gone through the entire White Slough wastewater treatment plant process. (Maggie Creamer/News-Sentinel)

Lodi residents’ sewer rates could go up by more than 70 percent

By Maggie Creamer
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Monday, April 27, 2009 10:48 AM PDT

Residents may soon see a large increase on their utility bills to pay for the pumps, pipes and treatment plant that handle Lodi’s sewage. Here’s a breakdown on the rate increases.

What is the increase?

In the next four years, Lodi residents are facing a 73.3 percent rate increase that would take a three-bedroom home’s sewer bill from the current $27.74 to $48.06 by July 2012, which in total is a $20.33 increase.

“We are operating in a deficit, and that’s no way to operate a city,” Mayor Larry Hansen said. “Yes, it’s going to be painful. But it’s just something that needs to be done.”

The rate increase will partially be used to pay off $40 million in bonds for the White Slough treatment plant upgrades, said Public Works Director Wally Sandelin. The money will also be used for operations and maintenance, and to hire new employees that are needed to run the upgraded plant. A 25 percent reserve will also be established in case of emergencies, like a sewer main collapsing, Sandelin said.



Sewer system upgrades at a glance



The city of Lodi began upgrading its White Slough wastewater treatment plant in 2004, adding new treatment equipment to clean the city’s effulent before its discharged into the Delta.

When the grayish water rushes from Lodi down a five-mile pipeline to White Slough wastewater plant, it still goes through a multi-step process of passing through screens and sitting in ponds to separate solids from the water and eliminate bacteria.

What’s new is that state mandates have required that the water also pass through a material that looks like brown shag carpet to take out any fine particles, said plant superintendent Del Kerlin.

Before the water is discharged, it must be also treated with ultraviolet light to make any bacteria left in the water sterile so it cannot reproduce. Before the plant used chlorine gas to kill the bacteria, but there was concerns from the state that when the water is dumped in the Delta that the chlorine could kill other bacteria, Kerlin said.

Besides the millions of dollars in upgrades, the plant will be more expensive to run because it will need more employees and supplies. The new UV bulbs alone cost $145, and the plant uses 1,760 of the lights.

What rates will look like over the five-year period



2009-10: 25 percent increase

Three-bedroom home: $34.68, a $6.94 increase

2010-11: 20 percent increase

Three-bedroom home: $41.61, a $6.94 increase

2011-12: 10 percent increase

Three-bedroom home: $45.77, a $4.16 increase

2012-13: 5 percent increase

Three-bedroom home: $48.06, a $2.29 increase

2013-14: 0 percent increase

Rates in other cities for single-family homes



Galt: $51.87 per month starting July 1.

Manteca: $39.50 currently; $51.25 by January 2013.

Lathrop: $34 currently; $52 by January 2011.

Rio Vista (has two residential rate structures): $27.67 currently for all residents; $51.60 by July 1 for those who use newer plant; $77.36 by July 1 for all other customers.

Source: Public Works departments



Why is it needed?

City staff say the increase is needed because of state-mandated upgrades. The city took out $40 million in bonds to pay for the upgrades, and the current sewer rate is not collecting enough to run the utility and pay the debt service.

Sandelin said the city’s 73.3 percent increase over four years is the maximum amount the city can raise, and he will reevaluate each year to see if the rates can be lower.

Lodi’s wastewater fund

In Lodi, state mandates have also come at a time when the utility has already been collecting less than what is needed to cover the costs of running and maintaining the plant.

The wastewater and operations fund, along with the account paying off the bonds to upgrade the plant, have about a $14.2 million deficit.

The city plans to combine those funds with the $17 million still available in the sewer’s infrastructure replacement fund. With these combined, the city will be left with $2.8 million for the utility.

State-mandated upgrades

Since 2004, the city has completed $40 million in upgrades to meet California’s requirements and to expand the plant.

Other cities are also raising rates to pay for millions in plant upgrades to meet new state standards that require wastewater to receive additional treatment before being discharged from plants.

The state requirement is a “tragic example of unfunded state mandates,” Hansen said.

During the last overhaul of the treatment plant in the mid-’80s, the city received funding from the federal government for 87 percent of the project, Sandelin said. But this time, there was no state or federal funding to cover the project .

Hansen also said customers have received a break because they could have been paying the rates for the past four years to fund the plant upgrades and the additional cost of operating it. All the upgrades will be complete in May, Sandelin said.

Some cities, like Galt, which is getting ready to start construction to bring its plant up to state standards, has charged a fee on customers bills since 2005 for plant upgrades. The fee on the city’s bills that come out every two months is currently at $25.

Reaction to the increase

As a member of the newly formed anti-tax group Citizens In Action, Arlene Farley said she does not understand why the city would need to more than double its rates when it has known there was not enough money in the fund.

“Why has it gone on so long? Why hasn’t someone been watching this?” Farley said.



Wastewater swirls in ponds as solids separate from the water at White Slough wastewater treatment plant. Since 2004, the plant has undergone $40 million in upgrades to meet state standards. (Maggie Creamer/News-Sentinel)




The council has always known it would have to raise rates. It was just a matter of when, said Councilwoman Susan Hitchcock. She said city staff took the approach of using all the reserves in the sewer fund instead of bringing a rate increase to the council.

“People are having a very rough time, and it’s a huge increase,” she said.

She has suggested tying the sewer rate increase with a decrease in the water rates because she believes the city has been collecting more than it will need for the PCE/TCE water cleanup.

Sandelin said the city has not started the cleanup, so it does not know if it is overcollecting. He said staff is looking at the issue and will decrease rates in the future if possible.

Protesting the increase

If half of the city’s ratepayers protest the increases, they will not go into effect.

Ratepayers can send protest letters to:

Lodi City Clerk

P.O. Box 3006

Lodi, CA 95241



Tubes connect to ultraviolet lights that treat wastewater at the White Slough treatment plant. The ultraviolet lights are part of a $40 million in state-mandated upgrades. (Maggie Creamer/News-Sentinel)




All protests must be received before the July 15 public hearing at 7 p.m. in Carnegie Forum, 305 W. Pine St.

If a majority of rate payers protest the increase by that date, it will not go into effect.

What happens if the city does not increase the rates?

If the sewer fund keeps operating at a deficit, it will run out of money by the end of 2010, said city spokesman Jeff Hood.

The city would also most likely be in violation of the its wastewater permit, which is issued by the state, because it would not have enough resources to hire the personnel and the equipment to complete tasks like monitoring the groundwater. Violating a permit can result in fines of up to $1 million a day.

Contact reporter Maggie Creamer at maggiec@lodinews.com or read her blog at www.lodi-news.com/blog/citybuzz.

Editor's Note: This story was updated at 10:49 a.m. Monday, April 27 to correct the percent change of the rate increase.

Reader Feedback

Robb wrote on May 2, 2009 10:31 PM:

" But of course, I moved out of Lodi 2 years ago... "

Lodian wrote on May 2, 2009 1:05 PM:

" Robb wrote on May 1, 2009 7:16 PM:

" This is BS, but either way, I will NOT be paying... "


Are you moving? "

RADMAN1 wrote on May 1, 2009 8:13 PM:

" I HAVE A FRIEND WHO LIVES IN A THREE BEDROOM WHO IS ALWAYS ON THE ROAD. WHY SHOULD HIS RATE INCREASE? OH THATS WRITE THIS GOVERMENT STEALS FROM THE WORKING TO PAY FOR THERE GREED!!! I HAVE AN IDEA WHY DONT I CRAP IN A BUCKETT SEND IT TO THE CITY MANAGER HE CAN WAY IT THEN LET ME KNOW WHAT THE GOING CHARGE IS FOR DUMPING IT. IF I DONT LIKE THE CHARGE HE CAN SEND IT BACK THEN I WILL SEND IT TO STOCKTON. HELL THEY WILL TAKE ANYTHING. "

Robb wrote on May 1, 2009 7:16 PM:

" This is BS, but either way, I will NOT be paying... "

Maggiecreamer wrote on Apr 27, 2009 4:45 PM:

" wdsjr55: Thanks for pointing out my math error. I will have a correction in the paper tomorrow.
edumacation: Lodi had to upgrade the White Slough wastewater treatment plant because the state governing board required in the city's permit that it treats the wastewater at a tertiary level, which requires UV light. I'm not sure of the status of Woodbridge's permit, but other cities are being required to do this too.
Thanks,
Maggie (the reporter) "

edumacation wrote on Apr 27, 2009 2:38 PM:

" RaiderHater_ I agrees with your conclusion. "

edumacation wrote on Apr 27, 2009 1:33 PM:

" Dogbark: That's funny! I have heard that version of it before at a Creedence concert. What do you think? Should we bottle our own Lodi Gold? Napolean defeated the Austrians in Lodi, Italy. We need more national recognition than the Creedence song, Zinfandel wine, and a hideout for an "Islamic terrorist cell". Our own White Slough plant could put us on the map with Lodi Gold? "

dogbark wrote on Apr 26, 2009 11:09 PM:

" Oh Lord, don't you know, STUNK in Lodi again. "

edumacation wrote on Apr 26, 2009 6:53 PM:

" wdsjr55- You have a point. What do you think about bottling and selling "Lodi Gold". We could ship it from the treatment plant to a bottler? That way, we could actually make a profit. If Donald Trump can sell his water for $25/bottle , we can sell ours for $1/bottle. "

edumacation wrote on Apr 26, 2009 6:50 PM:

" Patricia--Don't you think we could bottle and sell our own water? We bottle and sell wine. We need Mr. Patrick to get some creative ideas to use the valuable resources we already have. "

edumacation wrote on Apr 26, 2009 6:48 PM:

" Pooreastside: Its true the lab tech is not drinking the water in the photo, but something is makng her grin! Maybe she already ahd a sip of Lodi's finest beverage? Not the adult beverage, the other one. "

edumacation wrote on Apr 26, 2009 6:42 PM:

" Patricia: I agree! How many cars do you need to drive? How many houses do you need? How many boats? "

pooreastside wrote on Apr 26, 2009 3:20 PM:

" Measure W would have been just another cost in a different way added on to the sewer increase. The GOBs are going to do what the GOBs do best-increase cost for everyone.
The downtown area looks worse than it did,k so lets see how the city wastes this money.
Notice the lab tech is holding the water not drinking it. "

Patricia wrote on Apr 26, 2009 7:56 AM:

" Wonder what CC is going to do, when the majority of middle class working tax-paying citizens of Lodi decide that lovable, livable, Lodi is too expensive to live in. If things continue as is, we may soon see an exodus of people leaving Lodi. It’s certainly something I’m seriously considering. The thought breaks my heart, but the move may be economically necessary. "

edumacation wrote on Apr 25, 2009 11:04 PM:

" RaiderHater--We need to have you run for Mayor. At least you are honest. The CC is a disaster---trying to squeeze every drop of tax money out of us for profiteering and the delight of the GOB. Let the sewers flow! It's all downhill. I still think we might be able to sell someone the clean water we manufacture. That lab technician looks like she enjoys that stuff. Stir in a little sugar and a packet of Kool-aid and we have a new Lodi beverage special. HHmmm good! "

edumacation wrote on Apr 25, 2009 5:19 PM:

" wdsjr 55: It looks like the LNS got their figures wrong? I got the same numbers that you did. It's an increase of 73.29%. Which is almost DOUBLE. Thats a lot different than "only" 60%. "

edumacation wrote on Apr 25, 2009 5:16 PM:

" Cogito: I agree! "

edumacation wrote on Apr 25, 2009 5:15 PM:

" Edumacation: The photo impolies that the waste water is safe. Can you really drink it? If so, we should bottle it and sell it under our own Lodi appellation. I hear that Mr. Trump sells his own brand of bottled water, maybe we should try to sell LODI water to pay the bonds down. We could use it at city council meetings to celebrate how clean or waste treatment plant can be? Any volunteers? "

edumacation wrote on Apr 25, 2009 5:12 PM:

" Maggie: Do you know what law requires that Lodi cleans up the wastewater from the White Slough poop plant, and not the other local wastewater treatment facilities? "

edumacation wrote on Apr 25, 2009 5:10 PM:

" If Lodi has to zap bugs with those powerful UV lamps, why doesn't the poop plant in Woodbridge? "

wdsjr55 wrote on Apr 25, 2009 1:21 PM:

" oops. Make that a 73.29% increase. "

wdsjr55 wrote on Apr 25, 2009 1:17 PM:

" The Public Works department is misleading the public. A $20.33 increase
on a base of $27.74 is a total increase
of 74.63%, not 60%. Is it any wonder the
City of Lodi cannot balance it's budget?
If the s
Sentinel is going to publish numbers on this and that, perhaps an accuracy gopher should be hired. Of course, a price increase for the paper would follow and they could hire the public works folks to figure the percent of increase. "

Scrutiny wrote on Apr 25, 2009 1:08 PM:

" Another rate increase? What a shock! We rich GOB`s don`t really mind paying alittle more. It`s you po folk who are REALLY gonna feel it when ALL the other rate increases take effect! HAHAHAHA!! Too bad you po folk didn`t vote for Measure W, woulda helped lessen the rate increases!! LMAO! "

T & C wrote on Apr 25, 2009 10:27 AM:

" What about the city's 20 Contaminated wells, especially on the East Side? Cancer causing chemicals in our drinking water only serves to ensure a continued Cancer patient stream, from which few survive! Yes in many cases you can put Cancer in remission for a few years but the percentage of truely Cancer free patients is very very low. We deserve Clean water whether one is a small child or a senior citizen! "

lodidian wrote on Apr 25, 2009 10:18 AM:

" Larry Hansen says "Yes--it's going to be painful. But it's just something that needs to be done".
FINE! DO IT!
This is good time to do it given the economy. Competitors will bid aggressively if the cc and city staff do their job annalyzing and questioning bid prices, ITEM BY ITEM.
The good news is--- this increase should kill most proposed pet projects such as the grape bowl upgrade, not to mention the river water purchase and water treatment plant. "

edumacation wrote on Apr 25, 2009 8:51 AM:

" The offical name of the Woodbridge "poop plant" is the Woodbridge sanitary district. It's on the South side of the Mokelumne river next to the housing tracts between Windwood and Benedict streets North of Riverwood. Who knows where the sewage goes on the North side of the river near the golf course? Why doesn't that plant need to be upgraded? I don't see anyone claiming they can drink "that" treated water. Is it clear and pure like the water that the smiling lab tech is holding? Or is there another reason she is smiling? You can take the first sip! I'll stick to bottled water.

Maybe "its the water" that makes Lodi Zins so ZINsational? "

edumacation wrote on Apr 25, 2009 8:37 AM:

" Sandelin: "...The rate increase will partially be used to pay off $40 million in bonds..."

After reading this article I realize how lucky we to stop the RDA! You mean MUNICIPAL bonds? yes! 40 million dollars is chump change compared to the billions of debt the GOB has planned to have us spend on them.

The Lodi "poop plant" as Lodi treatment plant employees call it, will cost us big time. I wonder why the Woodbridge "poop plant" doesn't require upgrades? Most don't realize that the Woodbridge "poop plant" is nestled along the Windwood housing tract. It's a low budget plant with large swimnming pools of "wastewater" that areate the poop. I wonder why the Woodbridge "poop plant" doesn't have those expensive UV lights to kill the bacteria before it's dumped back into the river. I hear the fish are really biting on the Mokelumne river between Woodbridge and Thornton? It must be the tender morsels of bait in the water? No fish for me. "

Cogito wrote on Apr 25, 2009 8:15 AM:

" Another sewer rate increase! Well, ain't that the sh*ts! "

RaiderHater wrote on Apr 25, 2009 8:00 AM:

" It's obvious... no one knows what they're doing... the people who make these decisions. "

t jefferson wrote on Apr 25, 2009 6:40 AM:

" Pay for the upgrades? ya right, this rate increase is going to pay for the big hole in the budget due to the pension obligations and overstaffing of the city departments....oh and lets not forget the the great projects like the grape bowl, downtown and other stupid ideas this city comes up with to waste money. "

Comments on this story are now closed.