Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Bible is entwined with American civic life (135)
- I predict: A conservative tide will rise in 2010 (63)
- David Diskin is first to give an invocation under new city of Lodi policy (60)
- The Treaty of Tripoli hoax (56)
- Universal health care solves big problems (42)
- Here's what my father knew about the assassination of JFK (35)
- Words from our forefathers (26)
- 27-year-old man shot to death Saturday night in front of Acampo home (18)
- Falcons trample over Galt's playoff hopes (17)
- Stuck in neutral? Hardly! (17)
Like NASCAR drivers, our politicians should wear uniforms clearly stating their sponsors
A most distinguished Highway Patrol retiree called me the other day to suggest some ideas he and a couple of his friends were tossing around that could, if put to use, save the state of California a little money and instill an additional modicum of honesty and real work ethic among the politicians and bureaucrats who presently run things, both in public and behind the scenes.
For one thing, he said for the sake of simplicity we should more clearly identify the primary players, their partners and sponsors. To start with, the various individuals who have their snouts in the public trough should be obliged to wear uniforms of a sort. The politicians' clothes might resemble those worn by NASCAR drivers and their crews, hard hats and all. Their political affiliation should be clearly marked by big "Rs," "Ds" and "Is" displayed on their chests sort of like the big red "As" that outed some less-than-distinguished persons many years ago. The politicos' sponsors' logos would be prominently sewn on their clothes and caps. That way, when you are out hustling their favors and votes on one matter or another, you'd know who else is kissing their rings to garner favors — it'd say so right on their uniforms. That way, you could temper your ardor based on the competition or lack thereof.
They already have special license plates on their (our) government-issued cars, and if we continue to pay for the use of the cars they should have the cars painted pink, or at the least have global petitioners so we will have some idea what kind of official business they are up to when we see them parked in front of an expensive or sinful joint spending our hard-earned money. There aren't all that many Mary Kay super sales people in Sacramento so they wouldn't get mixed up with the political hustlers very often.
Actually, if my friends had their way, the "Rs," "Is" and "Ds" would be driving their own cars just like the rest of us, and the gas in the tanks would be paid for the same way the rest of us do, from our own earnings. The perks used by those people sometimes exceed the cost of having the public servant in our employ in the first place, so such "incentives" would simply disappear and save the state a slug of dough.
The perk restriction would, of course, apply to who pays the hired help. When we hire someone, we pay that person out of our earnings. They should too; fair is fair.
We have heard the same lament for the half century I can attest to: "Unless you pay politicians more money, you won't get quality people, and that it is important to return experienced people to their jobs." I have only one comment: Look what experience and big pay checks got us so far. We have not had a workable budget on time in this state since Hector was a pup.
Besides, how does paying a person a salary make them more or less honest than they were or are?
While we are on this subject, serving one term in office shouldn't qualify those people for retirement any more than four years do for the rest of us. After they have been in office for one term, their pensions shouldn't start for at least 30 more years whether or not they were re-elected. That way they will have to work for a living exactly as we do or even President Ulysses S. Grant did after he left office. What the heck, if they could pull it off, let them go out on speaking tours representing ego-hustling companies and earn their own dang millions, but still not get one government pension penny until the minimum time elapses.
We are stuck in a mindset that says, "I know he is a dirty rotten scoundrel but he's our dirty rotten scoundrel, so we have to re-elect him."
My distinguished colleagues and I emphatically say, "Get over it and elect the right people. It'll do us all good to think before we punch out one more chad."
Bob Bader is a chiropractor and a writer. You can reach him at bobbyo@softcom.net.

Reader Feedback
wtf wrote on Feb 21, 2009 12:07 PM:
Obushma 'Yes We Can' **change** we can believe in!
NOT!
Obama widens missile strikes inside Pakistan
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29310523/
Obama: No rights for Bagram prisoners
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29308012/ "
LodiEye wrote on Feb 20, 2009 9:43 AM:
Bry wrote on Feb 20, 2009 1:39 AM:
Cogito wrote on Feb 19, 2009 11:14 PM:
loadeye wrote on Feb 19, 2009 7:52 PM:
Whoa Nellie! wrote on Feb 19, 2009 5:29 PM:
loadeye wrote on Feb 19, 2009 9:11 AM:
wtf wrote on Feb 19, 2009 9:07 AM:
T & C wrote on Feb 19, 2009 8:25 AM:
jramagic wrote on Feb 19, 2009 7:18 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.