Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Bible is entwined with American civic life (135)
- I predict: A conservative tide will rise in 2010 (63)
- David Diskin is first to give an invocation under new city of Lodi policy (60)
- The Treaty of Tripoli hoax (56)
- Universal health care solves big problems (42)
- Here's what my father knew about the assassination of JFK (35)
- Words from our forefathers (26)
- 27-year-old man shot to death Saturday night in front of Acampo home (18)
- Falcons trample over Galt's playoff hopes (17)
- Stuck in neutral? Hardly! (17)
Tax group seeks attorney fees from North San Joaquin water district
The Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association is requesting the North San Joaquin Water Conservation District pay the taxfighting group $110,520 in attorney fees for a lawsuit in which the district tried to keep Measure V off the November ballot, according to papers filed in San Joaquin County Superior Court.
North San Joaquin board members, at their meeting Monday morning, expressed disgust over being asked to pay Howard Jarvis' attorney fees. Minutes later, they discussed the issue in a session closed to the public.
"We were kind of shocked," North San Joaquin board President Tom Hoffman said Tuesday. "They initiated it, so why are we having to pay for it?"
Hoffman noted that if Howard Jarvis prevails, fees to provide Measure V petitioner Bryan Pilkington legal advice will come out of the taxpayers' pockets.
"Instead of getting a groundwater recharge program, they'll get expensive legal advice," Hoffman said.
Judge Elizabeth Humphreys ruled in August that Measure V would remain on the Nov. 4 ballot. The measure was aimed at repealing a groundwater recharge fee imposed by district directors. Exactly what the measure means, in legal terms, remains hotly debated.
Attorneys from Howard Jarvis worked without pay on behalf of Measure V petitioner Bryan Pilkington, who won a seat on the five-member North San Joaquin board on Nov. 4. Since Pilkington won the case, his attorneys are entitled to fees from the water district, according to the brief, filed by Jonathan Coupal, Howard Jarvis' director of legal affairs, and attorney Tim Bittle.
According to the brief, Bittle has worked 133 hours and plans to work 18 more hours on the case involving the North San Joaquin district. Coupal also worked 2.5 hours. Both attorneys say they are entitled to $480 per hour.
The tax-fighting organization operates only on $15 annual dues from association members and charitable donations, according to the brief.
A Feb. 3 court date has been set for Superior Court in Stockton.
Contact reporter Ross Farrow at rossf@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
DavidD wrote on Jan 7, 2009 10:33 PM:
I think they should have to prove that is their actual going rate (with normal clients, win or lose) before anyone offers them a dime. "
GetUrHeadOut wrote on Jan 7, 2009 8:15 PM:
t jefferson wrote on Jan 7, 2009 11:37 AM:
Zinfandel wrote on Jan 7, 2009 10:02 AM:
" That's what happens when you lose a lawsuit.
BINGO!!! Well said Mad Dog. Maybe if they have to pay, they will finally start being honest with the property owners and quit lying to them! "
Mad Dog wrote on Jan 7, 2009 8:57 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.