Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Bible is entwined with American civic life (135)
- I predict: A conservative tide will rise in 2010 (73)
- David Diskin is first to give an invocation under new city of Lodi policy (70)
- The Treaty of Tripoli hoax (60)
- Universal health care solves big problems (54)
- Here's what my father knew about the assassination of JFK (35)
- Stuck in neutral? Hardly! (35)
- Words from our forefathers (27)
- City of Lodi staff looking into possibility of limiting number of taco trucks (24)
- Majority cannot deprive the minority (23)
Larry Hansen prepares to take helm as next Lodi mayor during continuing budget woes
Larry Hansen has just begun his second term as mayor of the city of Lodi. Hansen recently discussed a laundry list of priorities he has for his next year in office with News-Sentinel Staff Writer Maggie Creamer. Hansen said his main focus will be the economy, but he also hopes to see progress on a new electric generation plant and a water treatment plant.
Q: What will be your top priorities?
A: Clearly, the No. 1 priority is the budget and what the state is going to do. We've got to find ways to live with what the state decides. We don't know what it is going to entail and how it is gong to impact us as a city. I will say I think the city, not by accident, is faring better than many cities. We have not had to do furloughs yet or major layoffs. But we've trimmed about as much as we can, and any significant cuts could lead to layoffs or furloughs.
Q: Other priorities?
A: I've stated one of my goals is that the city be a financially solvent and sound city.
Then, there are other high priorities. We are in the middle of a permitting process from the state to build a electric generation plant by White Slough (the city's wastewater treatment plant). It will provide an ability to control our costs and to ensure reliability of the system. California as a state really needs to build a lot more generation. And this is one of the few opportunities to do it.
Another priority is a water treatment plant for the water we purchased from Woodbridge Irrigation District. I think water could become a greater resource than electricity. We have an underground water table, and it's shrinking.
We purchased additional water every year from the Woodbridge Irrigation District. We were fortunate to get to do that. But it cost us $1.2 million a year. We've not been able to use a drop of that water because we don't have a delivery system. It's going to require some difficult financial decisions and, yet, it needs to be done. I want to put it in this context: What is it worth to know that you have water available?
Then, there is the ballot measure in March for redevelopment. It puts a lot of tools in the toolbox for us to address issues we cannot otherwise because we don't have the funds. It would be hugely disappointing to me if the voters rejected redevelopment. We are going to be very conservative in how we use redevelopment and, again, without it, our hands are almost tied about some of the needs that exist today in this community.
Also, affordable housing. Our goal is to provide something for seniors as the first step but eventually provide affordable housing for families. We are sorely lacking in affordable housing in Lodi. We are behind the curve on that.
My personal goal, I want to see us capture more sales tax. We have a lot of people leaving Lodi to spend their money. And sales tax is a major funding stream. I hope we see more retail come to Lodi.
Q: Do you think the Wal-Mart plan would be a good start to that?
A: Well, I supported it. It will be a miracle if we can get some retail to come to Lodi in these economic times, but I think it's possible.
Q: Any more goals?
A: I want to see us continue to improve Downtown. We can't give up on that. The Downtown, the connection with the wine industry and making Lodi a destination, I support all of that. Where I differ from some people is we can have on the outskirts of town retail that can provide funds to help Downtown. I don't agree that a Wal-Mart Supercenter would kill Downtown. Downtown's different. It's got unique shops and wonderful restaurants. A Supercenter is not going to impact that.
Q: Can you compare this term as mayor and the challenges we are facing to your last term?
A: My previous term was almost entirely focused on resolving groundwater contamination, and that was a difficult time for the city.
I spent hundreds of hours working on that with a lot of time in board rooms negotiating with attorneys and settling lawsuits. I was a brand new mayor, and I pushed about two weeks in to fire the city attorney and the entire outside counsel. And we were going to court the next morning to start the trial. Councimembers (Susan) Hitchcock and (John) Beckman collectively agreed we are going in the wrong direction. So we fired everybody. We went into court the next morning and asked the judge to work with us because we were starting at square one. And he was willing to do that, but I didn't get too much sleep that night.
But I guess what I'm pointing out is, I became a stronger person because of that. It will carry me through a very difficult year for different reasons in 2009.
Q: Having been mayor before, is there anything you'll do differently?
A: I'd like to see us focus on making decisions and not just debating it endlessly. The water treatment plant is an example. That's taking us too long. That makes me feel like we are cousins with to the state of California, that can't make a decision. I'm open to discussion and to debate, but at some point, we've got to make decisions and move on.
Q: What do you think is the No. 1 thing Lodi needs?
A: Clearly, as a city, the No. 1 thing we need is financial stability.
As a community, we are divided. There are people that want to see Lodi not grow at all. There are people that want to see more services and opportunities in Lodi. So you have two camps. I hope the General Plan will be a good step in setting the parameters of what the future of Lodi is going to be. I just hope we can find ways to compromise and meet everybody's objectives to a certain level.
And you've led me to something I want to point out. I don't have any political ambition beyond being on the City Council. I just want to serve Lodi. And I work very hard at it. I put in between 30 and 50 hours a week. Sometimes I get e-mails from people saying, 'If you don't vote this way, I will never vote for you again.' My response is, That's OK. I'm not going to vote based on your vote. I'm going to vote based on what I think is best for Lodi. When the people of Lodi say we don't want you anymore, my feeling is they've kind of giving me my life back because I was retired before. I could enjoy being retired again. And if I'm not working hard enough then, yeah, you need to get someone else.
Q: What do you want for Christmas?
A: I got a brand new Toyota Tundra pickup. But what I want for Christmas, I'm also going to get, which is time with my five beautiful grandchildren. They are all going to be at my home on Christmas. That is the greatest gift.
Q: Are there any questions you wished a reporter would ask you about?
A: One of the things that bothers me about being on the City Council is the anger we receive from people. I know part of it is a hatred of government. I think City Council government is the purest form of government we have. If you're going to have a chance to influence something, it's going to be at this level. It might not go your way, but at least you have a chance.
Contact reporter Maggie Creamer at maggiec@lodinews.com

Reader Feedback
commonsense1 wrote on Dec 24, 2008 1:33 PM:
oldguy wrote on Dec 23, 2008 11:17 PM:
OTH wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:06 PM:
sam wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:09 PM:
He is a realtor on your planning commision who does NOT what to be part of your downtown. "
sam wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:03 PM:
dogs4you wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:00 PM:
sam wrote on Dec 22, 2008 5:14 PM:
Whoa Nellie! wrote on Dec 22, 2008 5:13 PM:
You've hit a nerve with me. I'd love to be able to go downtown and buy nice men's cloths of good quality. I'm forced to go to Dillards or Nordies, and even online. "
boonablis wrote on Dec 22, 2008 5:13 PM:
Observer wrote on Dec 22, 2008 5:11 PM:
commonsense1 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 4:31 PM:
oldguy wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:45 PM:
wtf wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:16 PM:
dogs4you wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:16 PM:
commonsense1 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:01 PM:
dogs4you wrote on Dec 22, 2008 2:30 PM:
reality wrote on Dec 22, 2008 1:33 PM:
loadeye wrote on Dec 22, 2008 12:56 PM:
wtf wrote on Dec 22, 2008 12:04 PM:
Should read: "...rather than BLAMING those who are burdened with his lame brain and greed based decisions."
This kind of thing just riles me up. When are the politicos - at ALL levels of government - going to take responsibility for their actions? "
wtf wrote on Dec 22, 2008 12:01 PM:
Reading about people in town having trouble paying their electric bill; single moms with kids getting their electric turned off and then being threatened with the CPS and **then** reading about Larry's "concern" with how people at angry at the CC and that's just because they "hate" the government.
Geez! I have to agree with dyan on this one; what planet is he living on?
Maybe it has to do with the CC's mismanagement of funds and perhaps Larry should look in the mirror rather than paying those who are burdened with his lame brain and greed based decisions.
Still say we need an LNS article following the money....especially that of the three aymeegoes. "
Patricia wrote on Dec 22, 2008 10:33 AM:
Whoa Nellie! wrote on Dec 22, 2008 10:00 AM:
WTF- what did Hansen do wrong with the contamination law suit?
As my old memory serves me, it was Hitchcock who was repeatedly stating that she did not like the strategy of Envision, and finally she convinced Hansen and Beckman to see it her way after Donovan kept bleeding the city of cash.
How does Larry take credit for this? Am I wrong? I dont think so... I bet Susan was fuming when she read that this morning. "
DeltaPenguin wrote on Dec 22, 2008 9:33 AM:
For nearly 20 years, CalPERS saw such huge numbers that they informed local governments that the employer contributions were not needed. They advised all local governments to bank that money, warning that it would not be that lucrative forever.
None of the local governments listened. Instead, they spent that money against the warnings of CalPERS and now, when those costs would have been unseen, they are cumbersome.
Not because of the benefit, but because YOUR local government failed to follow the sound fiscal advice of one of the most successful retirement plans ever created. "
dyan wrote on Dec 22, 2008 9:25 AM:
wtf wrote on Dec 22, 2008 9:00 AM:
Wrong, Larry. It's not a "hatred" of government (I really am tired of the use of that buzzword "hate"); it is ***disgust*** with corrupt politicians. No one has a problem with *good* government. Given your history with the underground contamination and the hike in our utility bills; the anger is at you, your buddies and your greed NOT the government per se. "
LODI-LAW wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:59 AM:
wtf wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:56 AM:
lodibandito wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:19 AM:
loadeye wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:16 AM:
santaclause209 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:45 AM:
16925 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:43 AM:
16925 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:41 AM:
ra wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:29 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.