Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 2nd, 2009
November 7th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
November 4th, 2009
November 3rd, 2009
November 2nd, 2009
October 31st, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
Larry Hansen — the city of Lodi's incoming mayor — stands in his office at city hall Thursday while talking about the issues he will be facing as mayor. (Brian Feulner/News-Sentinel)

Larry Hansen prepares to take helm as next Lodi mayor during continuing budget woes


Monday, December 22, 2008 5:11 AM PST

Larry Hansen has just begun his second term as mayor of the city of Lodi. Hansen recently discussed a laundry list of priorities he has for his next year in office with News-Sentinel Staff Writer Maggie Creamer. Hansen said his main focus will be the economy, but he also hopes to see progress on a new electric generation plant and a water treatment plant.

Q: What will be your top priorities?

A: Clearly, the No. 1 priority is the budget and what the state is going to do. We've got to find ways to live with what the state decides. We don't know what it is going to entail and how it is gong to impact us as a city. I will say I think the city, not by accident, is faring better than many cities. We have not had to do furloughs yet or major layoffs. But we've trimmed about as much as we can, and any significant cuts could lead to layoffs or furloughs.

Q: Other priorities?

A: I've stated one of my goals is that the city be a financially solvent and sound city.

Then, there are other high priorities. We are in the middle of a permitting process from the state to build a electric generation plant by White Slough (the city's wastewater treatment plant). It will provide an ability to control our costs and to ensure reliability of the system. California as a state really needs to build a lot more generation. And this is one of the few opportunities to do it.

Another priority is a water treatment plant for the water we purchased from Woodbridge Irrigation District. I think water could become a greater resource than electricity. We have an underground water table, and it's shrinking.

We purchased additional water every year from the Woodbridge Irrigation District. We were fortunate to get to do that. But it cost us $1.2 million a year. We've not been able to use a drop of that water because we don't have a delivery system. It's going to require some difficult financial decisions and, yet, it needs to be done. I want to put it in this context: What is it worth to know that you have water available?

Then, there is the ballot measure in March for redevelopment. It puts a lot of tools in the toolbox for us to address issues we cannot otherwise because we don't have the funds. It would be hugely disappointing to me if the voters rejected redevelopment. We are going to be very conservative in how we use redevelopment and, again, without it, our hands are almost tied about some of the needs that exist today in this community.

Also, affordable housing. Our goal is to provide something for seniors as the first step but eventually provide affordable housing for families. We are sorely lacking in affordable housing in Lodi. We are behind the curve on that.

My personal goal, I want to see us capture more sales tax. We have a lot of people leaving Lodi to spend their money. And sales tax is a major funding stream. I hope we see more retail come to Lodi.

Q: Do you think the Wal-Mart plan would be a good start to that?

A: Well, I supported it. It will be a miracle if we can get some retail to come to Lodi in these economic times, but I think it's possible.

Q: Any more goals?

A: I want to see us continue to improve Downtown. We can't give up on that. The Downtown, the connection with the wine industry and making Lodi a destination, I support all of that. Where I differ from some people is we can have on the outskirts of town retail that can provide funds to help Downtown. I don't agree that a Wal-Mart Supercenter would kill Downtown. Downtown's different. It's got unique shops and wonderful restaurants. A Supercenter is not going to impact that.

Q: Can you compare this term as mayor and the challenges we are facing to your last term?

A: My previous term was almost entirely focused on resolving groundwater contamination, and that was a difficult time for the city.

I spent hundreds of hours working on that with a lot of time in board rooms negotiating with attorneys and settling lawsuits. I was a brand new mayor, and I pushed about two weeks in to fire the city attorney and the entire outside counsel. And we were going to court the next morning to start the trial. Councimembers (Susan) Hitchcock and (John) Beckman collectively agreed we are going in the wrong direction. So we fired everybody. We went into court the next morning and asked the judge to work with us because we were starting at square one. And he was willing to do that, but I didn't get too much sleep that night.

But I guess what I'm pointing out is, I became a stronger person because of that. It will carry me through a very difficult year for different reasons in 2009.

Q: Having been mayor before, is there anything you'll do differently?

A: I'd like to see us focus on making decisions and not just debating it endlessly. The water treatment plant is an example. That's taking us too long. That makes me feel like we are cousins with to the state of California, that can't make a decision. I'm open to discussion and to debate, but at some point, we've got to make decisions and move on.

Q: What do you think is the No. 1 thing Lodi needs?

A: Clearly, as a city, the No. 1 thing we need is financial stability.

As a community, we are divided. There are people that want to see Lodi not grow at all. There are people that want to see more services and opportunities in Lodi. So you have two camps. I hope the General Plan will be a good step in setting the parameters of what the future of Lodi is going to be. I just hope we can find ways to compromise and meet everybody's objectives to a certain level.

And you've led me to something I want to point out. I don't have any political ambition beyond being on the City Council. I just want to serve Lodi. And I work very hard at it. I put in between 30 and 50 hours a week. Sometimes I get e-mails from people saying, 'If you don't vote this way, I will never vote for you again.' My response is, That's OK. I'm not going to vote based on your vote. I'm going to vote based on what I think is best for Lodi. When the people of Lodi say we don't want you anymore, my feeling is they've kind of giving me my life back because I was retired before. I could enjoy being retired again. And if I'm not working hard enough then, yeah, you need to get someone else.

Q: What do you want for Christmas?

A: I got a brand new Toyota Tundra pickup. But what I want for Christmas, I'm also going to get, which is time with my five beautiful grandchildren. They are all going to be at my home on Christmas. That is the greatest gift.

Q: Are there any questions you wished a reporter would ask you about?

A: One of the things that bothers me about being on the City Council is the anger we receive from people. I know part of it is a hatred of government. I think City Council government is the purest form of government we have. If you're going to have a chance to influence something, it's going to be at this level. It might not go your way, but at least you have a chance.

Contact reporter Maggie Creamer at maggiec@lodinews.com

Reader Feedback

commonsense1 wrote on Dec 24, 2008 1:33 PM:

" Get that Mr. Hansen? Anyone who wishes you well in 2009 and cares more about what you do, not what you wear, must be your wife. I have this sneeking suspicion you would'nt want to wake up next to me in the morning. "

oldguy wrote on Dec 23, 2008 11:17 PM:

" commonsense: As to Hansen'sdress at Marc Yates funeral you must realize it was Marc Yates that gave Hansen his first job and promotion. Just a matter of respect not what you do on your own time. "

OTH wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:06 PM:

" If our esteemed mayor handles the projects he mention like he did the electric mess the citizens of Lodi are in for a rough ride. "

sam wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:09 PM:

" Dogs, no men's stores downtown anymore... but you could go to Lakewood Mall to Randy Heinez new store... Randall's

He is a realtor on your planning commision who does NOT what to be part of your downtown. "

sam wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:03 PM:

" Earth to Mayor Larry.. take our ag land on Armstrong off your General Plan, currently labeled Your Greenbelt, or face a hefty lawsuit. "

dogs4you wrote on Dec 22, 2008 6:00 PM:

" Nellie seems you know downtown better that I do, since I don`t have clue as to a better mens store in Lodi. Seems if you want anything of quailty, off to Stockton or Sacto. Sorry about that. Larry looks like he got his shirt and trousers off the rack, at the Salvation Army. He is really taking some flack, wonder if he has read any of this, if so maybe the next time he has his pic taken, at least a tie would improve his image. "

sam wrote on Dec 22, 2008 5:14 PM:

" Oh commonsense, you are soooo Mrs Hansen. OL. "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Dec 22, 2008 5:13 PM:

" Dogs- can you name me one downtown men's store? And dont say Toggery or Squire's. I know this is way off topic...

You've hit a nerve with me. I'd love to be able to go downtown and buy nice men's cloths of good quality. I'm forced to go to Dillards or Nordies, and even online. "

boonablis wrote on Dec 22, 2008 5:13 PM:

" Tell you what, he's got some nice stone washed jeans in that pic "

Observer wrote on Dec 22, 2008 5:11 PM:

" I don't think it's unreasonable at all for the Council to represent what over 60% of the voters approved in an election. Any one of them would love to have over 60% approval. "

commonsense1 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 4:31 PM:

" It must be my imagination, but I would swear everytime I see our mayor at a city council meeting he's dressed in a coat and tie. Of course, meeting with a LNS reporter for a "fluff article" calls for a tuxedo. Kind of amusing when folks want to dictate what you wear to a funeral on your own time. "

oldguy wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:45 PM:

" As to Hansen's dress. He is much better dressed in this picture than he was at former Police CHief Marc Yates funeral. There he wore shorts, an hawaiian print shirt and tennis shoes. What you see is what you get. Now to the serious stuff. He says with our local government you get a chance. What he meant was Fat Chance. The three amigos had their minds made up before they entered the Council Chambers on the last Wal Mart vote. Why bother to have an larger forum for the next vote. It will be the same with the same disinterest shown the public. "

wtf wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:16 PM:

" Hey! What's that really loud sucking up sound? Oh. Just an earlier poster to the board. Must live in lala land with Hansen. "

dogs4you wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:16 PM:

" common 1 concerning the mayors attire, only thing missing are the flip flops. Seems your OK with the mayor, that being the case, there`s more than enough tar and feathers for two. I would like to see a proper suit and tie for the man that is representing the city of Lodi, does the mayor have a problem with that, it`s not like he didn`t know his pic was going to be taken. Next time lets hope he plays dress up, he can afford it. "

commonsense1 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 3:01 PM:

" Mr. Hansen, it must be refreshing to get all of this positive feedback from the same old bunch. Don't you love all of these great tidbits of advice, including what you should wear. Thank goodness for your thick skin and good humor. I wish you much success in 2009. "

dogs4you wrote on Dec 22, 2008 2:30 PM:

" With all the retirement pay that comes in on a monthly basis, perhaps daaaaa mayor could visit one of those pricey Downtown men`s store and get something presentable to wear on the front page of the paper, rather that a fish or cut bait outfit, perhaps the mayor changes his own oil on that new truck he bought himself for Christmas. From the posts I have read, he wasn`t elected by the popular vote of the people of Lodi. As for quesions, that cream puff reporter must be a rookie at her chosen profession. Warm up the tar and break out the feathers. I`s going to be a long year. "

reality wrote on Dec 22, 2008 1:33 PM:

" maybe another goal for the new year would be to be somewhat better dressed - at least for a photo which will be featured in the paper "

loadeye wrote on Dec 22, 2008 12:56 PM:

" I'd like Mayor Hansen to address the role he played in the 2005-2006 Lodi Electric Utility District purchase of electricity with the NCPA after they fired Allan Vallow and then blamed him for the tremendous loss on the deal that raised Lodians' electric rates 17%. I believe Ms. Hitchcock was a major player, too. Then shortly thereafter, decided they wanted to be attorneys instead and let Donovan con them out of tens of millions of dollars. And then they let gross polluters Katzakian's Lodi Printing and Weybret's News-Sentinel off the hook without paying anything but the paltry amount their insurers coughed up. Now we citizens are picking up the tab while people like these are still living their lavish lifestyles. And no one can seem to account for the many millions of dollars that were collected for these issues. Why do some council members say it's there while others say it isn't and can't be accounted for? Mayor Hansen, it's time for a public forum to be scheduled so we taxpayers of Lodi can ask these questions of you and the entire council and management team without your computers in front of you? Got any guts? "

wtf wrote on Dec 22, 2008 12:04 PM:

" Correction: "...rather than paying those..."

Should read: "...rather than BLAMING those who are burdened with his lame brain and greed based decisions."

This kind of thing just riles me up. When are the politicos - at ALL levels of government - going to take responsibility for their actions? "

wtf wrote on Dec 22, 2008 12:01 PM:

" You're right, Whoa Nellie! It was just the fact he was on the council during that time. BUT he is involved either directly or indirectly with the current electricity fiasco.

Reading about people in town having trouble paying their electric bill; single moms with kids getting their electric turned off and then being threatened with the CPS and **then** reading about Larry's "concern" with how people at angry at the CC and that's just because they "hate" the government.

Geez! I have to agree with dyan on this one; what planet is he living on?

Maybe it has to do with the CC's mismanagement of funds and perhaps Larry should look in the mirror rather than paying those who are burdened with his lame brain and greed based decisions.

Still say we need an LNS article following the money....especially that of the three aymeegoes. "

Patricia wrote on Dec 22, 2008 10:33 AM:

" Mr. Hansen said: One of the things that bothers me about being on the City Council is the anger we receive from people. I know part of it is a hatred of government.----YOU have never been more wrong, Mr. Hansen. And that comment made me very angry, indeed. You and the council are letting the people and Lodi down, on every level. YOU do not listen to the people. You follow your own agenda. "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Dec 22, 2008 10:00 AM:

" I agree, a soft Monday morning piece.

WTF- what did Hansen do wrong with the contamination law suit?

As my old memory serves me, it was Hitchcock who was repeatedly stating that she did not like the strategy of Envision, and finally she convinced Hansen and Beckman to see it her way after Donovan kept bleeding the city of cash.

How does Larry take credit for this? Am I wrong? I dont think so... I bet Susan was fuming when she read that this morning. "

DeltaPenguin wrote on Dec 22, 2008 9:33 AM:

" Ra: The financial fiasco that is being blamed on benefits has more to do with the city than it actually does the benefit.

For nearly 20 years, CalPERS saw such huge numbers that they informed local governments that the employer contributions were not needed. They advised all local governments to bank that money, warning that it would not be that lucrative forever.

None of the local governments listened. Instead, they spent that money against the warnings of CalPERS and now, when those costs would have been unseen, they are cumbersome.

Not because of the benefit, but because YOUR local government failed to follow the sound fiscal advice of one of the most successful retirement plans ever created. "

dyan wrote on Dec 22, 2008 9:25 AM:

" Let's see. The new mayor's priority is the budget so he gets city employees a 3 percent raise! He wants "affordable housing" even though prices have been cut in half? Larry, what planet are you living on? "

wtf wrote on Dec 22, 2008 9:00 AM:

" Hansen said, "One of the things that bothers me about being on the City Council is the anger we receive from people. I know part of it is a hatred of government."

Wrong, Larry. It's not a "hatred" of government (I really am tired of the use of that buzzword "hate"); it is ***disgust*** with corrupt politicians. No one has a problem with *good* government. Given your history with the underground contamination and the hike in our utility bills; the anger is at you, your buddies and your greed NOT the government per se. "

LODI-LAW wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:59 AM:

" The only way to make change at this level is to have a large influence either with wealth in town or show up to metings with large numbers of support. "

wtf wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:56 AM:

" I'd like to know what Hansen plans on doing to lower Lodi ratepayers electric bills. "

lodibandito wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:19 AM:

" Here's my question Mr. Mayor: Can you please respond to the citizen who said to you at the special Wal-Mart meeting, "Mr. Hansen, when you campaigned the only question I asked was if you supported the Super Center, and your answer was, "We don't need another grocery store on that corner." Are you going to follow the answer that you campaigned on then?" You didn't even acknowledge this citizen when he asked you that question. In fact you blatantly ignored him. My 2nd question is, were you just lying to this gentleman to get his vote or did you just decide to be a flipflopper? "

loadeye wrote on Dec 22, 2008 8:16 AM:

" Just a fluff article done by some rookie reporter afraid to ask hard questions for the Sentinel "protectors". With Mayor Hansen, Katzakian and Johnson controlling the vote for the wealthy who own them here in Lodi, the three ayemeegos will continue the decline and plunder of this once great city. How about fixing the gang problem and sanctuary city of Lodi you completely in your nine year tenure as police chief? All of you bureaucrats at city hall need to know that most educated citizens in Lodi think you three dolts are the laughing stock of this city once you leave your government feed trough after approving more funding and ludicrous projects to further enrich your wealthy friends and owners of your votes. We want a Mayor like Ms. Mounce, who isn't afraid of your bully regime, who does think for the city of Lodi and not the wealthy interests. When you three corrupt bimpkins overruled your own planning commission, you showed us where your hearts and vote were at: the wealthy owners of Lodi city council. Your continual three ayes on issues have devastated Lodi and now you steal money from all other sources to pay your bill.Bank's empty. "

santaclause209 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:45 AM:

" WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO FOR OUR SKATEBOARDING TEENS AND PRETEENS. NOBODY CARES WHAT YOU WANT FOR CHRISTMAS, WE CARE ABOUT WHAT YOU ARE GOING TO DO ABOUT GETTING THE SKATEPARK OPEN FOR OUR YOUTH. "

16925 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:43 AM:

" Is this an example of "what one cc does can not tie that hands of a furture council?" "

16925 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:41 AM:

" I remember back in the 90's cc voted that "no individual council member shall have an office at city hall." What has changed that Hansen has an office now? "

ra wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:29 AM:

" Unfortunately, Larry is the poster child for the insane, irresponsible and ever escalating benefits paid to safety/fire employees that has bankrupt Lodi and many other cities. I don't expect this practice to change under Hansen. I hope he will surprise us and not pander to the special interests of Police and Fire union members. "

Comments on this story are now closed.