Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- The country's mess is our fault (170)
- Obama is not a moderate (130)
- Sarah Palin's book hits the shelves: Locals react (73)
- Public health care is a Christian option (62)
- Lodi City Council plans to cap number of taco trucks at 22 (50)
- The haves should help the have-nots (30)
- Tokay in, traveling to unbeaten No. 3 Grant for football playoffs (25)
- Government-run health care is a bad idea (24)
- Young woman fatally shot at Acampo home (18)
- Sierra Adventure store to close after four years in Downtown Lodi (16)
Non-traditional marriage and Web sites
Gay marriage has been legal in only three states, but already the new "right" has become a potent lever for prejudiced attacks against traditional Americans.
Dr. Neil Clark Warren started eHarmony in 2000, distilling all he had learned from a successful psychology practice into 29 key measures of marital compatibility. Based on careful research, the site aims solely at putting together great marriages. In its eight years, the site has found soulmates for hundreds of thousands of couples who had patronized eHarmony specifically because it was not just another "hookup" site. They were seeking lifelong, compatible, moral relationships — traditional marriage.
But gays can't abide that. Over the past three years, eHarmony has spent millions of dollars battling homosexual litigants. A California judge this summer classified a lesbian's suit against eHarmony a class action. A New Jersey judge last week accepted a settlement for gay activist Eric McKinley against eHarmony. And eHarmony fears litigation in a dozen other states.
Gays do have equal access to eHarmony. But the site makes clear its aim is to serve one market, those seeking traditional life partners. It weeds out applicants unable to form healthy relations, those already married, those with emotional impairment and those seeking sex only. It recommends two years of writing and phoning before marriage.
Gays easily access the largest hookup site, Match.com, which lists homosexual seekers. An all-gay site, ManHunt.com, caters just to them. Enterprising gays could easily create a site aimed at uniting compatible gay friends.
Not disruptive enough for liberals. The New Jersey judge fined Warren $55,000 for not finding McKinley a mate and forced the doctor to open a dubious gay match site for which he has neither expertise nor heart.
Nobody goes into a Cadillac dealership and demands Kia parts. We respect the aim and limit of business. How would owners of a fine vegetarian restaurant feel, harassed and sued by meat eaters for not serving hot dogs? Gay marriage certainly does attack Americans.
Peter Stearns
Lodi
Editor's note: Comments on this letter are closed.

Reader Feedback
election year wrote on Dec 3, 2008 4:06 AM:
Stearns fails to mention the other groups that eHarmony discriminates against and who have filed suit also (short people, for example). By pinpointing "gays" as "troublemakers," Stearns only purpose is to stir up animosity. "
Comments on this story are now closed.