Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- California a 'separate but equal state' (73)
- It is not bigoted to announce a truth (63)
- National groups prepared to head to court on council's prayer policy (45)
- Lodi Unified School District's Barbara Johnston secures job in Berryessa (23)
- Civil liberty groups should focus on crime (22)
- Creepy crawlers on the move in Lodi (22)
- Jose Hernandez scheduled to go on his first space mission in August (18)
- Ragusa responds to Bob Johnson (16)
- Obama is bringing change, socialism (16)
- Cash for clunkers (16)
'I'm lucky I didn't die'
Woman seeks more than $12 million from state after Highway 12 crash
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
If "rumble strips" had been installed in the center of Highway 12, might they have kept Alicia Schmid from a lifetime of pain and medical problems?

The answer is up to a San Joaquin County jury that is debating whether the California Department of Transportation bears some responsibility and should pay Schmid as much as $12 million in damages.
After a number of fatal wrecks on the two-lane road, Highway 12 has spent much time in the public spotlight, with numerous lawmakers grandstanding and lobbying to make the road safer.
But Schmid's case against Caltrans is apparently the first one to make it all the way to a jury trial, according to her Fresno attorney, Rick Watters. Other attorneys, including one who represents the family of a 10-year-old girl who died in a crash, are watching the case.
Schmid, now 21, and her boyfriend were driving home from her boyfriend's grandmother's house on the night of Aug. 13, 2006. She was near Tower Park when an oncoming driver fell asleep and drifted across the center line.
Schmid tried to avoid the other vehicle but couldn't, and the cars hit head-on. She suffered major injuries and was flown by medical helicopter to Stanford Medical Center, where she stayed for more than a month.
More than two years later, the University of the Pacific student still walks with a cane. She wore a medical boot on one foot Wednesday, later explaining that it helps hold her foot in place so she can walk.
Schmid, who had to take a year off from her business studies at University of the Pacific, quickly rattled off her long list of injuries when asked after court — lost spleen, torn intestine, shattered pelvis, shattered wrist, shattered foot, nerve damage in both feet, concussion and a torn knee.
She has no memory of the crash or the hours before it, but she thinks something needs to change.
"I think that the road needs to be fixed so this doesn't continue to happen," she said, drawing a breath and fighting tears as she added: "I'm lucky I didn't die."
In closing arguments Wednesday, her attorney asked a jury to award her more than $450,000 in unpaid medical bills and $5.5 million for a life care program, which would pay for future medical expenses, including hip replacements, for the next 60 years.
He also asked for punitive damages of between $6 million and $12 million, or $100,000 to $200,000 a year.
Showing documents detailing annual updates on Highway 12, Watters argued that Caltrans had known since 1996 that the roadway needed to be improved.
Had rumble strips been in place, he argued, the other driver would have woken up. Rumble strips are corrugated sections of asphalt. When a vehicle's tires hit a strip, it makes a loud noise and the car vibrates.
Meanwhile, Caltrans attorney Lauren Machado argued that the crash was entirely the fault of the other driver, Marisela Aquiniga. The Fairfield resident had worked all day, driven to Los Angeles for a family function, gotten four hours of sleep and was up the whole next day before driving home.
She also countered Watters' claim that Caltrans hadn't done enough to make the road safer. The roadway had reflectors and bumps in the center, and she reminded jurors of expert testimony they'd heard that a sleeping driver probably wouldn't have been able to wake up and react in time to avoid a crash.
"The road didn't cause this accident. There was nothing about this road," she said. "You can see that Marisela Aquiniga was so impaired she couldn't save herself from herself, but the State of California isn't responsible for that."
The jury can decide how much, if any, responsibility falls to Caltrans and how much was the other driver's fault.
In many such civil cases, a number of parties are involved, and jurors are asked to sort out who is liable.
For Stockton attorney Doug Gessell, that's part of the investigation involved in his case that includes Caltrans. He represents a family that was struck head-on by a driver whose tire blew out and caused him to lose control on Highway 12. A 10-year-old girl died when he crossed over the center line.
Gessell believes there are likely only two permanent fixes for the road: Make it four lanes or install a concrete divider down the middle.
"Put a barrier between two opposing lanes and nobody's going to pass. Nobody's going to cross into another lane," Gessell said.
Contact reporter Layla Bohm at layla@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
chipper320 wrote on Nov 18, 2008 7:44 PM:
sam wrote on Nov 16, 2008 7:07 PM:
mainframe wrote on Nov 16, 2008 3:59 PM:
LodiJoe wrote on Nov 15, 2008 7:59 AM:
Lodian wrote on Nov 14, 2008 12:50 AM:
Whoa Nellie! wrote on Nov 13, 2008 7:33 PM:
So, to protect us from said idiot drivers, and those who "honestly" fall asleep, Cal Trans needs to do something. They need to put up the cement center divides. Simply too many crashes over too many years. It is unacceptable. "
dogs4you wrote on Nov 13, 2008 5:43 PM:
jramagic wrote on Nov 13, 2008 4:53 PM:
But when YOUR loved ones are turned into TOMATO PASTE by a head-on collision caused by some fool texting or nodding off...you may just change your tune and start lobbying for a guardrail...as was installed on SR37- a FORMER "Blood Alley" that is now as safe as any divided freeway. Think about THAT, eh?? "
PAL wrote on Nov 13, 2008 2:33 PM:
If this does end up going in her favor california, and the taxpayers, better get ready as every accident will be blamed on not having a rumble strip median. "
reality1 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 12:36 PM:
Scrutiny wrote on Nov 13, 2008 12:25 PM:
reading wrote on Nov 13, 2008 12:16 PM:
reading wrote on Nov 13, 2008 12:11 PM:
czmtnw wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:57 AM:
"HW 12 aka blood alley has one of the highest rates of fatality in the entire nation."
"since 1996 the state has known about how dangerous the road is yet did NOTHING to fix it. that constitutes negligence."
Not only did they know about it, They've had money set aside since 96 for this particular purpose and did ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to prevent it from happening. "
czmtnw wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:55 AM:
Have you heard of DMV. In order to get behind the wheel of any vehicle you must have a valid drivers license. The STATE issues those drivers licenses based on tests that prove or disprove your ability to safely operate a vehicle according to California laws and regulations. By issuing a license to a person they are insuring that that person is able to safely operate a vehicle on our roads.
Also, I'd appreciate not being misquoted,
"Blatently Negligent" for not "controlling who IS and IS NOT on our roads". is not what I said.
"A law suit against the state for blatant negligence of highway 12 repairs is not what is causing the state bankruptcy." THIS WAS ONE SENTENCE!
WHO DO YOU THINK IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTROLLING WHO IS AND ISN'T DRIVING ON OUR ROADS? this was a whole other sentence. "
Scrutiny wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:50 AM:
bigbertha wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:42 AM:
" bigbertha you need to round out or maybe you have already have as your user name implies "
good argument man, way to represent your view point... lol it's obvious you can't debate this issue if you must resort to such childish statements... "
reality1 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:35 AM:
class of 007 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:33 AM:
Or if someone hits the stupid cememt planter all the way down Kettleman and their car flips or hits someone else, can you sue the state for that too? "
Rhodie wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:25 AM:
The horse is dead? Let's sue the stable! "
bigbertha wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:20 AM:
I think I am going to file a lawsuit against lodi for how many stop lights they have........ So friggin stupid
***** SUCH AN INTELLIGENT ARGUMENT*****
"HEY EVEN THOUGH HW 12 IS THE **ONLY** ROAD TO GET TO YOUR FRIENDS/FAMILY'S HOUSE, EITHER DON'T GO BECAUSE IT COULD KILL YOU, OR TRAVEL AT YOUR OWN PERIL AND PLAY RUSSIAN ROULETTE WITH YOUR LIFE...
the moral of the story is...
WE PAY TAXES SO WE DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT DYING ON OUR ROADS!!!!!
wake up people!!!!!!!! "
bigbertha wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:17 AM:
so, since 1996 the state has known about how dangerous the road is yet did NOTHING to fix it. that constitutes negligence.
if you want to argue tax dollars, where are our tax dollars going if not to fix and make our roads SAFER?? i don't pay taxes to have the state spend it on unnecessary junk while ignoring our roads (ie safety)
funny how after this lawsuit was filed, the state decides to start paying attention and upgrading hw 12!!! THAT MEANS THE STATE IS ADMITTING HW 12 IS DANGEROUS AND IN DISREPAIR!!!
i hope she wins! "
czmtnw wrote on Nov 13, 2008 10:51 AM:
Jeremy Taylor (1613 - 1667)
I refuse to argue any further. No sense in beating a dead horse. "
Bry wrote on Nov 13, 2008 10:48 AM:
Then we have excuses for bad conduct, justified by so called mental disorders, ie ADD, ADHD, Autism etc. There is no longer accountability in this country. When someone jusifys their children's bad behavior by claiming they have ADD, Autism or ADHD etc. You should realize that the child doesn't have ADD, ADHD or Autism, the parent has LAS. So many parents ask me, "What is this LAS which you claim that I have?" I always explain that LAS is 'Lazy Ass Syndrome'. Oh, they hate that because that makes them responsible for their childs bad behavior. We all need a reality check! "
reality1 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 10:34 AM:
In my personal opinion Cal trans should not be sued. Between Lodi and Terminous the road is not really bad. Beyond that you have ground which settles all the time making a bumpy ride. Drivers are the main danger and way too many on weekends, during commutes and holidays. However a driver that falls asleep? That could happen on any road. Bad luck. So sue the driver and their insurance company. Yes the state has more money and things like this are what is destroying our state and country. Take the 100 to 500 k from insurance and live with it. She is lucky to be alive. "
dogs4you wrote on Nov 13, 2008 10:29 AM:
Bry wrote on Nov 13, 2008 10:24 AM:
Finally, many people have been injured and sadly died on Hwy 12. If you win the law suit, are you going to split the money with all the others who have seriously been injured on Hwy 12 or just keep it for yourself at the expense of hard working citizens. You should just thank God you're alive rather than greedily working to gain an excuse for robbing the hard working people who have nothing to do with your situation. "
Cogito wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:51 AM:
weezer wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:46 AM:
Drivers cause accidents.
'Nuff said. "
jay dubb wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:36 AM:
I agree that she was not at fault but she needs to be in court with the other drivers insurance company. Not the State of California. "
Scrutiny wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:30 AM:
Audi 5000 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:23 AM:
The road is very safe, it's the poor decisions of a few drivers that have caused the problems. The only way to truly make any road accident free is to close it.
The only difference rumble strips would have made in this case is the negligent driver would have awoken just before impact. "
czmtnw wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:09 AM:
reading wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:47 AM:
Scrutiny wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:46 AM:
Scrutiny wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:46 AM:
deblaw wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:38 AM:
I agree, why Cal Trans? The other driver was at fault.
On the other hand who entered the road, knowing it was a dangerous stretch? No one is accountable for their own actions these days.. Things go wrong, Sue!! "
jramagic wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:34 AM:
reading wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:31 AM:
gail1 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:29 AM:
Scrutiny wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:26 AM:
Lulu_Oni wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:15 AM:
jramagic wrote on Nov 13, 2008 7:48 AM:
"Put a barrier between two opposing lanes and nobody's going to pass. Nobody's going to cross into another lane," Gessell said.
That's absolutely correct. It has worked PERFECTLY on Highway 37, on the Antioch Bridge, even in SF's Golden Gate park.
Without such, various knuckledraggers who want to "save time" will put others at risk of sudden death when they make their simpleton choices to speed and pass. A barrier simply removes that option, period. Let's fight for the Barrier! Lawsuits are tools for such. "
jramagic wrote on Nov 13, 2008 7:32 AM:
boonablis wrote on Nov 13, 2008 7:05 AM:
I think I am going to file a lawsuit against lodi for how many stop lights they have........ So friggin stupid "
KenH wrote on Nov 13, 2008 3:12 AM:
The more people who fight for the concrete barriers at SJ County meetings, and SJCOG meettings, the more chance they'll listen and actually implement them. "
Comments on this story are now closed.