Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 2nd, 2009
November 7th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
November 4th, 2009
November 3rd, 2009
November 2nd, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT

Though some recall President Bush as caring and concerned, I believe he's wrecked the GOP


Saturday, November 8, 2008 5:47 AM PST

The Sunday, Nov. 2 New York Times included in its editorial supplement a collection of short essays titled "What I Will Miss About President Bush."

Journalist Robert Draper, who interviewed Bush six times, wrote of Bush's human decency.

Two former Bush press secretaries, Ari Fleischer and Scott McClellan, spoke of his "moral clarity" and "sincere concern for promoting human dignity."

These insights — from people who have worked closely with Bush — comfort those, like me, who have had little good to say about the president since he took office in 2001.

In the 50 or so columns I have written for the Lodi News-Sentinel since Bush's inauguration, I have not written about his high moral standards or kindliness.

I have instead criticized Bush's policies from the beginning to the end of his administration, calling him the worst two-term president in American history. And, although it doesn't make me happy to say it, I believe my evaluation is accurate.

One of Bush's major pieces of legislation, No Child Left Behind, is a disaster. Bush's Iraq War was ill-conceived and it, as well his bloated government spending, has driven the nation into a debt hole so deep it may be impossible to climb out.

But since we can't really be sure if Bush's former inner circle truly believe their flattering remarks about their former boss or are merely being generous during his last days, let's move onto more solid ground — Bush's legacy.

Bush has, without a doubt, killed off the Republican Party. You can say goodbye forever to the Grand Old Party.

The choice of John McCain to represent Republicans in the presidential race was a bad one. But Bush's eight-year record dealt McCain a hand no one could win with.

In 45 states, McCain received fewer votes than Bush did in 2004. In California, McCain fell way off, getting only 37 percent of the total versus Bush's 44 percent four years ago.

So tiny were the gains in the remaining five states where McCain outperformed Bush that they are no comfort to the GOP. Oklahoma and Alaska, longtime Republican strongholds, each produced less than a 0.1 percent increase.

Another sober note for the Republicans is that new voters, especially those under 25 in key states like Florida, Illinois and California, predominantly register as Democrats. This may represent a repudiation of Bush's policies or perhaps an Obama infatuation. But the bottom line is the same: more Democrats.

Another journalist asked by the Times to comment explained the reason for Bush's failures that led to the Republican Party's subsequent collapse.

Paul Burka, senior editor of Texas Monthly, noted that while Bush was governor, he was "the best politician" he had ever seen. Bush, recalled Burka, worked with Democrats to improve public education, filled Texas Supreme Court vacancies with moderates, and ran his administration without scandal.

But Burka wrote that when "he reached the White House, Gov. Bush vanished to be replaced by President George W. Bush — a person I didn't recognize. He was never to return."

Without question, Bush's failures cleared the path for President-elect Barack Obama.

Now I have a few words about Obama.

Although it's too late now, he should have been more careful about what he wished for.

After Obama's two-year campaign and countless stump speeches, he has reached his goal. In some corners of America, euphoria reigns.

But now — and this is a tall order — Obama must deliver.

Obama's honeymoon with the American people, traditionally the first 100 days of a nascent administration, will be much shorter. In what could possibly represent a vote of no confidence and an ominous sign, since Obama's election, the stock market has continued its steep decline.

And, tellingly, in his first post-election speech, Obama hedged his bets, remarking that it may take more than one single term to fulfill his promises.

Sorry, that won't cut it.

Obama promised the moon. If he can't make good, he'll never get a second chance.

Joe Guzzardi is a former instructor at the Lincoln Tech Academy. Reach him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

Reader Feedback

Lodian wrote on Nov 17, 2008 9:14 AM:

" FYI, Obama's books were best sellers BEFORE he was elected as our next president. "

GFlossmann wrote on Nov 15, 2008 6:41 PM:

" Lodian, all T&C is capable of is crying the blues. The guy is clearly a loser, do nothing. "

Lodian wrote on Nov 14, 2008 11:47 PM:

" T & C: Yep, you begrudge the man writing a book that sells. Or maybe you just begrudge his ability to write. I don't know. It's a free country. You can write a book anytime you like. Well, you are "free" to try and write a book anyway. There's no guarantee that you "can" write. Go ahead and give it a try. Have you read Obama's book(s)? I bet you can find it at Wal-Mart the next time you stop in for a gallon of milk. "

Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Nov 14, 2008 11:30 PM:

" citizen I see you're out from under your rock and stalking me again. Get over it. You made a jerk comment, I called you on it, and it obviously hit a nerve because six months later you are still crying about it.

You truly are a poor loser. "

T & C wrote on Nov 14, 2008 9:00 AM:

" Oh "Heaven's No Lodian!" I hope 50 million people BUY his books, and better still, "One hand "Greases" the other, so when Hillary is placed as Secretary of State, to "Repay her" for the Hispanic vote, I hope 50 million people will buy Hillary's Book too! After all, It is the "American thing to do, plus it stimulates the "Economy"! Both Hillary and Obama deserve to be "Rich" while the rest of the country "Struggles!
http://www.amazon.com/Living-History-Hillary-Rodham-Clinton/dp/0743222245
It is less then $20.00 in Hardcover! Come on Demo voting Lover's! This would make a great Christmas gift under the tree for you and a friend! "

Lodian wrote on Nov 14, 2008 12:54 AM:

" tired wrote on Nov 10, 2008 7:44 PM:

"We are all lucky to have a president like G.W. Bush for the past 8 years. He will be known as the best president of all times."


Can you state reasons why? "

citizen wrote on Nov 13, 2008 7:40 PM:

" Thats ok tired there are some people out here that agree with some of your views. Its just not the "popular" thing to beleive right now. Its just so cool to be an Obamamaniac right now. Dont worry I'm sure it wont last long. Once the honeymoon ends people will start to turn on him just like do every president. "

citizen wrote on Nov 13, 2008 7:35 PM:

" Oh dear Bob I see you continue to be the real jerk here. "

Lodian wrote on Nov 13, 2008 2:09 AM:

" T & C wrote on Nov 12, 2008 8:18 AM:

" What an unexpected coincidence! Merry Christmas!

http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news/2008-11-11-obama-sales_N.htm "

Do you have a problem with people buying a book? "

Cogito wrote on Nov 12, 2008 10:26 PM:

" The Republican Party is not in as bad a shape as when Nixon left office. The next election put a Democrat in the White House. 4 years later, the Republicans were back in. Your prediction of the demise of the GOP is only wishful thinking on your part Joe. History will have other plans. "

T & C wrote on Nov 12, 2008 8:18 AM:

" What an unexpected coincidence! Merry Christmas!

http://www.usatoday.com/life/books/news/2008-11-11-obama-sales_N.htm "

Leonard wrote on Nov 11, 2008 7:18 PM:

" tired wrote on Nov 10, 2008 7:44 PM:

He will be known as the best president of all times.


By Al Queda perhaps.... "

Lee wrote on Nov 11, 2008 12:21 AM:

" tired wrote on Nov 10, 2008 7:44 PM:

" We are all lucky to have a president like G.W. Bush for the past 8 years. He will be known as the best president of all times. "

I find it hard to believe that there is anyone with this view. Bush will not be remembered as a great president let alone the best president. "

tired wrote on Nov 10, 2008 7:44 PM:

" We are all lucky to have a president like G.W. Bush for the past 8 years. He was never afraid to make a command decision, even if it is against popular opinion. Most politicians, even the kool aid drinkers in Lodi, can't make a command decision to save their lives. He will be known as the best president of all times. "

DanielH wrote on Nov 10, 2008 5:05 PM:

" Bush's legacies will persist into the Obama administration and I expect him to build more upon them:

war.
spying.
violation of habeas corpus.

Possible further attacks to justify more "change." "

DanielH wrote on Nov 10, 2008 5:03 PM:

" Joe: I am not at all comforted about how US 14-th amendment citizens (with a lowercase "c") pretend like nothing is wrong, and voted for either of two candidates who didn't question the Bush Administration at all. "

DanielH wrote on Nov 10, 2008 4:59 PM:

" Joe: I can't count all of the constitutional violations that occured during the Bush administration. "

DanielH wrote on Nov 10, 2008 4:58 PM:

" Joe: Are you comforted by Bush's legacy of spying on the family household, and violation of habeas corpus? "

DanielH wrote on Nov 10, 2008 4:58 PM:

" Joe: How can you say that it is comforting to have a president who did not allow an unimpeachable public hearing on 9/11, who was not rescued from possible air attack while he was talking to school children, as if they knew he was safe? "

DanielH wrote on Nov 10, 2008 4:56 PM:

" Joe: The New York Times has several members of the Council on Foreign Relations, which is supposed to support its own members, and members of a sister organization, Skull & Bones. "

OTH wrote on Nov 10, 2008 8:47 AM:

" jramagic

I am a liflong Democrat but have always voted the man instead of the party. If GW in 04 would have come out and said there were no WMD's I would have voted for him. He would have been honest but he couldn't even do that. "

jramagic wrote on Nov 10, 2008 7:31 AM:

" Right On, Joe. Bush was but a spokesperson puppet for the Neocon Jingoist right wing extremists that have hijacked the great Republican party and turned it into a "RINO" (Republican in name only) group that benefits the very very fat cats and draws its support by pandering to the fears of mostly less-educated and mostly good God-fearing people. I hope the TRUE Republicans can regroup and reform their party because TRUE Republican ideology is Good for America. "

T & C wrote on Nov 9, 2008 9:36 AM:

" This is still America and I agree we have the right to disagree! "

OTH wrote on Nov 8, 2008 11:27 PM:

" Oh that we could have the original t&c back. But when you get a wannabe you kind of have to go with flow. "

Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Nov 8, 2008 10:17 PM:

" ...and you have no clue how to correctly use apostrophes. "

Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Nov 8, 2008 10:15 PM:

" No T & C, I said you were a downer, that's all. Now I will add you are a bad reader as well as a downer. "

T & C wrote on Nov 8, 2008 7:40 PM:

" T & C is not tc and all the other combinations being used and the moderator is aware of this. "

OTH wrote on Nov 8, 2008 6:30 PM:

" It's going to be a long miserable time kids. "

Leonard wrote on Nov 8, 2008 6:22 PM:

" Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Nov 8, 2008 4:45 PM:
" T & C, are going to be a bitter blogger for the next eight years? Please tell me so I can put you on mute now.


My count is that there have been 4 different bloggers posting under some variant of the T&C moniker during the last year.

I liked the one that got banned OK but now I can't keep them apart so I just skip over the lot of them. "

T & C wrote on Nov 8, 2008 5:03 PM:

" There are pros and cons to everything.... not just the side "You want to see"! Unless you only have 1 sided coins Bob! Or are you saying as an American Citizen, I can only make comments that you approve of? "

Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Nov 8, 2008 4:45 PM:

" T & C, are going to be a bitter blogger for the next eight years? Please tell me so I can put you on mute now.

You are a downer dude. "

T & C wrote on Nov 8, 2008 3:09 PM:

" "President-elect Barack Obama said during his news conference this afternoon that he has consulted with all the living ex-presidents, but added that "I didn't want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about doing any seances" with those who have passed away"!

http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2008/11/was-reagan-quip.html

This type of "Casual Rudeness" by the person who will soon be in the Whitehouse, if "Pulled on other Countries leaders"...is sure NOT to improve our relations with those countries or the world! "

OTH wrote on Nov 8, 2008 3:09 PM:

" I have never rea an article promoting bush's about his caing or humanity

The man's ego wanted to be presdident. He wasn't going to do anything. He can bask in the glow of being and elder statemen althpuogh I sereiuosly think anyone will call him on for advise. "

T & C wrote on Nov 8, 2008 12:09 PM:

" "Because "Demo's represent "SOCIAL PROGRAMS"... it's not hard to see why they have "Abandoned" the the foundation of America, "Best explained" by President John F. Kennedy!

"Ask not what your country can do for you... but rather, "What you can do for your country!" "

T & C wrote on Nov 8, 2008 7:37 AM:

" Prsident Elect Obama supported the most radical gun control agenda that's ever been imagined. He voted to ban single shot and double-barrel shotguns. He's voted to ban almost all hunting ammunition. He supported a 500 percent tax increase on guns and ammunition. So this guy is bad news when it comes to the Second Amendment Right to gun ownership. Up until now, The right to bear arms was a fundamental right of "We the people"! Time will tell if President Obama, will leave gun ownership laws alone, or if he will ensure only criminals, the military and the poilce can own guns! Saying he will not change The Second Amendment "Before he is elected, and then changing the Second Amendment thru the help of a more liberal Demo Senate, House and Supreme Court though are clearly two different things! "

educated reader wrote on Nov 8, 2008 6:11 AM:

" So, Joe, how do you account for Bush being re-elected in 2004 when it was already evident that the war in Iraq and Bush's policies were unpopular? Just because Kerry seemed to be a worse choice? Maybe you think that the difference is that an African-American president should "put up or shut up."

Oh, by the way, since you are the English expert, perhaps you forgot the rule - you ended paragraph 10 with a preposition. "

Comments on this story are now closed.