Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Bible is entwined with American civic life (135)
- I predict: A conservative tide will rise in 2010 (73)
- David Diskin is first to give an invocation under new city of Lodi policy (70)
- The Treaty of Tripoli hoax (60)
- Universal health care solves big problems (54)
- Here's what my father knew about the assassination of JFK (35)
- Stuck in neutral? Hardly! (35)
- Words from our forefathers (27)
- City of Lodi staff looking into possibility of limiting number of taco trucks (24)
- Majority cannot deprive the minority (23)
For many, the right to vote was won only after many battles over many years
Suffrage — the right to vote in a political election. On the eve of our nation's Election Day, I thought it would be important to examine this right because for many of you, this right has not always been absolute and I don't think it should be taken lightly.
No, I'm not talking about reading your voter pamphlet from front to back so you can be informed. Rather, I am just talking about the right to vote.
If you are about my age, 44, or younger, I am sure you look at voting somewhat like getting your license to drive. You turn 18, you register to vote and on Election Day you vote or you don't. No big deal. History, however, says it is a big deal and it also shows that a lot of people don't care about it.
Until preparing for this column, I thought that the United States Constitution guaranteed voting, and it does — but it's not that simple. It took four amendments to the Constitution, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and a 1966 Supreme Court decision for the Constitution to guarantee suffrage for everyone. So, the Constitution was nearly 180 years old and was amended 24 times before all citizens had suffrage.
People without suffrage fought for it and for that, I think you should vote. I don't care who or what you vote for, just vote. Please don't say that your vote doesn't matter, because it does. Take a look at what it took to make sure you get to vote:
Tomorrow's election will be historic for our country regardless of the outcome. If you are a registered voter and choose not to vote, I bet you will be disappointed. It may take a week, a month or a year but I bet you will be disappointed. I know some of you won't be able to get to the polls and I am sorry.
The polls open tomorrow at 7 a.m. and they don't close until 8 p.m.
In the 2006 election, about 52 percent of the registered voters in San Joaquin County voted. In Lodi, the percentage was higher but not by much. We can and should do better.
John Johnson, CFA, is a Lodi-based business appraiser. Contact him at john@johnejohnson.com or at 369-1451.

Reader Feedback
T & C wrote on Nov 9, 2008 8:33 AM:
T & C wrote on Nov 9, 2008 8:30 AM:
Election Year wrote on Nov 9, 2008 7:26 AM:
T & C wrote on Nov 8, 2008 3:10 PM:
http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/2008/11/was-reagan-quip.html
This type of "Casual Rudeness" by the person who will soon be in the Whitehouse, if "Pulled on other Countries leaders"...is sure NOT to improve our relations with those countries or the world!" "
T & C wrote on Nov 8, 2008 12:10 PM:
"Ask not what your country can do for you... but rather, "What you can do for your country!" "
T & C wrote on Nov 8, 2008 7:47 AM:
T & C wrote on Nov 7, 2008 9:26 AM:
Election Year wrote on Nov 7, 2008 1:11 AM:
T & C wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:19 PM:
T & C wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:14 PM:
OTH wrote on Nov 5, 2008 8:54 AM:
If that actually happens with Hispanics I'll eat my socks. If it doesn't happen you go away from these blogs and find some where else to peddle your driveling hatred. Surely there has to be a place called I hate.com. "
T & C wrote on Nov 4, 2008 7:48 AM:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20081104/pl_nm/us_usa_politics_poll_hispanics_2 " "
Scrutiny wrote on Nov 3, 2008 1:45 PM:
T & C wrote on Nov 3, 2008 12:48 PM:
"If Felons wanted to VOTE.... Then they SHOULD HAVE OBEYED THE LAW"! "
T & C wrote on Nov 3, 2008 12:47 PM:
marzo2008 wrote on Nov 3, 2008 11:55 AM:
Scrutiny wrote on Nov 3, 2008 10:34 AM:
John Johnson wrote on Nov 3, 2008 9:51 AM:
Scrutiny wrote on Nov 3, 2008 9:15 AM:
t jefferson wrote on Nov 3, 2008 8:18 AM:
Two editors from each of first-year class's seven sections (fourteen in all) are selected half by their first year grades and half by their scores on the writing competition. Another twenty are selected solely on their scores on the writing competition. The other seven to nine are selected by a discretionary committee, either to fulfill the review's race-based affirmative action program, to select students who just missed the cut by either of the other two processes, or by some other criteria as the committee sees fit.
No affirmitive action as Havard, no way no how. Right, join the real world. I've said if before, research before engaging fingers, you people give small townies a bad name. "
t jefferson wrote on Nov 3, 2008 8:12 AM:
Stella wrote on Nov 3, 2008 7:51 AM:
t jefferson wrote on Nov 3, 2008 7:32 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.