Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 2nd, 2009
November 7th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
November 4th, 2009
November 3rd, 2009
November 2nd, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT

Writer gives his opinion on the candidates


Thursday, October 16, 2008 6:12 AM PDT

Soon the patriotic "sheeple" will once again dutifully surrender to the siren calls of the voting brothels, like good little citizens.

Emotion will shadow all reason and rationality. In the primaries, the criminal corporatrocracy that controls government financially backed hordes of candidates in both major parties and the party faithful were given their illusionary candidate choices. Now we have Obama and McCain.

Obama, in the beginning expressed the improprieties of our government, our aggressive foreign policy and the self-serving interests of the multinationals. Now he has flipped and come on board, serving his corporate masters, like his opponent. He wants to leave the mess in Iraq and create a larger one in Afghanistan in hopes of killing the bearded boogieman that dwells in caves. Obama is a mere populist college jerk with a textbook education that yields to political expediency and lacks the courage of his convictions.

The opponent, John McCain, political organized crime's other pick, is no better. Once a fighter pilot in another flawed polemical endeavor, was shot down while dropping bombs on civilian targets, killing innocent people. McCain ejected and landed in a lake, was dragged out by the neighborhood survivors he victimized and received a deserved beating, sustaining a majority of his injuries. Saved by local authorities, he spent the remainder of the war in the Hanoi Hilton, receiving special privileges because of his father. He claims he stayed longer so others could be released; enhancing his false war hero persona. As Senate member of 26 years, has proven he is an idiot. Robbing the elderly of their life savings in the Savings and Loan scandal in the 1980s, with a well known ill temper and he knows nothing about other cultures, history or how other governments operate. Voted to plunder Iraq and Afghanistan, he then voted for the most misnamed legislation ever — the Patriot Act, trashing our rights.

Any citizen who votes for either of these two toadies and believes their vote will produce a president who is going to bring real change or stability to this nation, is a useful idiot for the plutocratic elite.

Adam Dados
Lodi

Reader Feedback

Pat Maple wrote on Oct 20, 2008 6:47 PM:

" ID and Cogito: Never met you, don't know you. As I posted earlier...14yrs says different. Please give an instance or example. Otherwise it is nothing more than hot air. "

Ivan Dixon wrote on Oct 20, 2008 11:16 AM:

" Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 10:52 PM:

" Sam, I have met Pat on occasion. Being "kind", or respectful of differing points of view are not his strong suit. He's pretty much a bully, but he has his supporters. But if he doesn't get his way, he packs up his toys and goes home.

This is my take on the guy as well. He is for his agenda. The idea of representing constituents seems to be a little too much for him to grasp. "

Pat Maple wrote on Oct 18, 2008 7:16 AM:

" Cogito...please give an example...I think that spending 14 years serving the children of this community and Herald says I don't pack up my toys and go home. Fighting for their best interest doesn't make me a bully. My record on school reform speaks for itself. A passion for fairness comes to mind. "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 10:52 PM:

" Sam, I have met Pat on occasion. Being "kind", or respectful of differing points of view are not his strong suit. He's pretty much a bully, but he has his supporters. But if he doesn't get his way, he packs up his toys and goes home. Socially though, he's a pretty nice guy. Really. "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 10:44 PM:

" Leonard. I support financial redlining, not racial or geographical. If a bank is using federal monies, it is their duty to use it in a non-discriminatory way. If they're using their own funds, they should be able to loan it at their discretion. It's their money, it's none of the governments business. "

Pat Maple wrote on Oct 17, 2008 8:16 PM:

" Sam: maybe you are one of the broncs that busted out. Voter: again they took 50% of my profits. I am glad you got an education. So did I BA/Masters program. I also am a veteran, a contractor, 35yr in business, 14 yrs on school boards, 25 yrs as a coach, raised 3 children and have been married 38 years. I did my taxes for 35 of those years and am well versed in the code. Now, because I have invested into other areas, I have them done...by an ex-IRS supervisor. "

voter wrote on Oct 17, 2008 8:03 PM:

" Pat, my first bachelor's degree was in business administration. Profits are the difference between the money taken in and the cost of doing business--in other words, your income after expenses (but before deductions). I still recommend that you check with an accountant. "

wtf wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:24 PM:

" sam wrote: "I am a well-educated (graduate degree) business owner who pays a ton of taxes too."

You see, sam? If the Republicans had taken the party back from the neocons, we would have had Ron Paul as a choice for Pres instead of McLame.

Ron Paul wants to eliminate taxes and abolish the IRS AND he wanted to reduce the size of the government. Oh well, can't win them all and I've already written him in. "

wtf wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:19 PM:

" SportsGuru wrote: "Obama is basically the first political candidate EVER to acknowledge that his strategy is going to be "Take more money from those who make too much, and distribute it to those who don't make as much".

Well, turn about's fair play, I guess...probably to make up for all the YEARS the poor have been supporting the rich....kind of like the bailout bill that just passed. "

wtf wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:18 PM:

" SportsGuru wrote: "...it should have been a wakeup call to those people (whether they be liberal, conservative, republican or democrat) who do NOT want to live in a Socialist Society."

NEWSFLASH!!!! We already are under Bushco and his recent "nationalizing" of the banks under this last bailout is only the start. "

wtf wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:16 PM:

" Cogito, reading your post at 10:58 AM, I thought you might enjoy this.

http://www.poetv.com/video.php?vid=29095 "

sam wrote on Oct 17, 2008 6:52 PM:

" Pat, be kind. I am a well-educated (graduate degree) business owner who pays a ton of taxes too. I am a republican who already voted for Obama.

My spouse and myself have been republicans for 35 plus years. We are not morons.

Actually I was a huge McCain supporter in 2000. I am not one now.

You are NOT a moron for voting for McCain. We just differ on our choices. "

Pat Maple wrote on Oct 17, 2008 6:34 PM:

" Voter: Obviously you are not a businessman. Profits! I paid my bills first. My total income was not $62K just my PROFITS. AND in actuality I paid much more...state, local, county and additional federal taxes. These account for about 18% more taxes over the year. Try paying property taxes on tools that you own (SJ Co tax). It is no wonder that Obama has corraled the morons of this world. "

voter wrote on Oct 17, 2008 3:09 PM:

" Pat, your figures just don't make sense. Are you claiming that you made $62,000 and then paid half of that in taxes? That's what you said. You really ought to look into finding a new accountant--either that or stop filing your own taxes. "

Pat Maple wrote on Oct 17, 2008 2:03 PM:

" SGuru: I'm the rich contractor who works 10-12 hour days 6-7 days a week and then gets to pay my taxes. I paid $31K in taxes 06/07/08. My business was good...now not so good. 50% of my profits goes for taxes, isn't THAT enough? Joe the Plumber is only the poster child. "

Pat Maple wrote on Oct 17, 2008 1:58 PM:

" Voter: Businesses fail because of bad leadership just like government entities. There were contributing factors but the snowball started with Carter, picked up speed with Clinton and crashed into the tree with Bush. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 17, 2008 1:38 PM:

" Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:38 AM:

" Leonard, upon further study, the method used by Democrats to achieve that veto proof majority is that they had to add provisions to strengthen the "anti-redlining community reinvestment act


Do you support the practice of "redlining"? "

SportsGuru wrote on Oct 17, 2008 12:03 PM:

" .
Geez, when Obama told "Joe The Plummer" that it would be better for him to pay taxes so Obama could "spread the wealth around" it should have been a wakeup call to those people (whether they be liberal, conservative, republican or democrat) who do NOT want to live in a Socialist Society.

For YEARS the Democrats have spent an enormous amount of energy dispelling the "lie" that they are Socialist leaning.

In one moment, Obama crushed all of the work that the Democrate machine has done in preventing them from being classified as Socialist.

Obama is basically the first political candidate EVER to acknowledge that his strategy is going to be "Take more money from those who make too much, and distribute it to those who don't make as much".

That, at it's very core, IS SOCIALISM - and IS the core values of COMMUNISM.

Everyone should have taken note of that comment.

Obama believes that the Government best knows how to spend the money of those who make it. And best knows how to allocate money to those that don't make it.

Disturbing. "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 10:58 AM:

" T Jeff, the Kennedy's are a great example of hypocrisy. They stand for an increase of inheritance taxes, yet paid less than one half of one percent on Joe Kennedy's estate. They have enough money to hire the people necessary to hide their money to avoid taxes. Some people may have a lot of money on paper, but the business only makes a middle class income for the family. Someone should not have to sell out the family business just to pay the inheritance taxes on it. "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 10:07 AM:

" Thanks Sam, I feel the same. Give respect, get respect. Although it's sometimes hard to tell when the tongue's in cheek. "

sam wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:45 AM:

" Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:09 AM:" Leonard, I just sent the guy an email and reamed him a new one for making me look bad."

I thank you for that. I love info, but hate the lies.

I do love just reading you and Leonard going back and forth. You both have some great stuff and you both admit if you made a mistake.

Add Voter to that list too. The 3 of you are excellent on political stuff. Thank you ! "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:38 AM:

" Leonard, upon further study, the method used by Democrats to achieve that veto proof majority is that they had to add provisions to strengthen the "anti-redlining community reinvestment act". Which really meant that they had to make lots of risky loans. BUT, the Republicans went along with it. There were only 8 no votes in the senate, and Clinton signed it. Then the Wall Street greed kicked in. "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:30 AM:

" T jeff, I'd be all for the lack of deductability of any corporate salaries plus bonuses of anything over 20 million. They could still give them, but the board would have to run it past the shareholders who may not be so keen on the idea. "

t jefferson wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:14 AM:

" Cog,

Tax rates are one thing, what companies actually pay are something completely different. Those other companies with lower rates have far fewer deductions. I am all for low rates with no deductions - like flat taxes or consupmtion taxes. Take the Kennedy's - they have million, but through all thier foundations, deductions and tax shelters, they pay very little in tax, nowhere near the 39% tax rate. Could have said the same about a rich CEO. Go look at the Fair tax...it's a pretty good plan. Deductions/Credits are all welfare, it is the govt trying to engineer society, doesn't work.... "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:11 AM:

" And thanks, that was fun! "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:09 AM:

" Leonard, I just sent the guy an email and reamed him a new one for making me look bad. He actually sent it out on his companies website with their logo all over it. I got it second hand from another Realtor from a different company, so no telling how many people he sent it to! LOL! "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:02 AM:

" Government is the problem, so a smaller government is less of a problem. Always vote for the candidate who wants less government. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:02 AM:

" t jefferson wrote on Oct 17, 2008 8:44 AM:

Since the political spectrum is circular and not linear, the farther right you travel, you eventfully meet your counterpart on the left. There is not much difference between fascism and communism to the common person


This is well put. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:01 AM:

" Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 8:40 AM:

I got some info from a bad scource, a Realtor.


LOL! You're certainly not the first. "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:00 AM:

" T jefferson, the U.S has the 2nd highest corporate tax rates in the world. Do all the rest of the countries, except Japan, believe in "corporate welfare" more than we do? Or are they smart enough to help their countries businesses compete in the global/national/local marketplace? "

t jefferson wrote on Oct 17, 2008 8:48 AM:

" Forgot to add: They are not my leaders... I think this country is headed down hill fast. I think the liberal dems will put us in the fast lane and the republicans just through up a few speed bumps....Neither offers a true choice or will make a difference in the long run. In your and my lifetime this great experiment will be tested in ways it has never been, I question if the current "citizens" are up to meeting the challenge "

t jefferson wrote on Oct 17, 2008 8:44 AM:

" L- I don't disagree with you. The current administration has done much to destroy civil liberties. NO ONE currently in politics is with out blame. Look at the recent corporate welfare, terrible... Since the political spectrum is circular and not linear, the farther right you travel, you eventfully meet your counterpart on the left. There is not much difference between fascism and communism to the common person. I get nervous when either side has total control. Look at FDR, LBJ and what they did. Look at Bush and what he did. Checks and balances are important and political parties are the death of the nation. "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 8:40 AM:

" Leonard, you're absolutely right. I got some info from a bad scource, a Realtor. I apologize. Although, signing on to a bill still makes Clinton culpable. If Clinton had had his veto overrode, he could have washed his hands of the whole thing. His presidential signature will forever be on it. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:57 AM:

" t jefferson wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:51 AM:

" thanks Leonard, I knew you would finally agree with me that the founding documents, (especially the preamble to the constitution) are pertinent today just as they were 230 years ago.


I would say that it is the Right that is trying to rewrite the Constitution with their blatant disregard for civil liberties. The Founders would be appalled by the Police State that your leaders have tried to establish. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:53 AM:

" Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:41 AM:

" Leonard and Voter, how can you ignore the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act of 1933. It was a Democrat bill


How do you figure that? It was a Republican bill authored by McCain advisor Phil Graham (R-Texas) in the Senate and James Leach (R-IA) in the House. Clinton only signed it after Graham and McCain managed to assemble a veto proof majority in the Senate. "

t jefferson wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:51 AM:

" thanks Leonard, I knew you would finally agree with me that the founding documents, (especially the preamble to the constitution) are pertinent today just as they were 230 years ago. Now quit trying to change them with social and corporate welfare, nanny statism and a huge federal govt. Do you suffer from cognitive dissonance?, because the views you have expressed on this site do not match with the founding fathers beliefs - except in the most twisted liberals mind. "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:48 AM:

" P.S., I meant to add "chuckle" to that last one. "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:44 AM:

" Leonard, you are as much an intellectual lemming as anyone who blogs here, you shouldn't be calling anyone names. "

Cogito wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:41 AM:

" Leonard and Voter, how can you ignore the repeal of the Glass-Steagall act of 1933. It was a Democrat bill signed into law by President Clinton. The Glass-Steagall act prohibited commercial banks from collaborating with full service brokerage firms or participating in investment banking activities. The act was enacted during the depression to protect bank depositors from the risks of securities transactions. It was dismantled in 1999 and now many banks OWN brokerage firms. It allowed banks to co-mingle with Wall St. It worked fine for 66 years, but it got in the Democrats way for their attempts at social engineering. It's a big part of what's going on now. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:29 AM:

" t jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 2:16 PM:

I believe the government exists to serve me, not the otherway around. I believe the government exists for common defense, foregin affairs and conflict resolution between the states, not as a hamock for everyone who doesn't want to work. I believe that opportunity for indivduals should be equal, but individuals are far from equal. What do you believe in?


I believe that the government exists to establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity.

If you disagree with that, you can take a long walk on a short pier. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 17, 2008 7:25 AM:

" voter wrote on Oct 16, 2008 3:50 PM:

" Pat, out of curiosity, do you believe that any of the current Republicans running the country have any culpability in the current crisis, and if so, who exactly?


People like Pat believe whatever they are told to believe. "

Lodian wrote on Oct 16, 2008 11:37 PM:

" voter wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:46 PM:

" There is plenty of blame to go around in our current financial crisis. The public, including lots of middle class folks, are living on credit beyond their means. Both Republicans and Democrats made decisions that contributed to the meltdown. It amazes me that anyone's identity is so tied to their political affiliation that they will believe absolutely anything that absolves their party of blame. This will not solve the crisis and will only divide us further. "

voter: Really good comments. "

voter wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:46 PM:

" There is plenty of blame to go around in our current financial crisis. The public, including lots of middle class folks, are living on credit beyond their means. Both Republicans and Democrats made decisions that contributed to the meltdown. It amazes me that anyone's identity is so tied to their political affiliation that they will believe absolutely anything that absolves their party of blame. This will not solve the crisis and will only divide us further. "

voter wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:41 PM:

" Pat, your information is simply not correct. CRA only prohibits discrimination. Participants in that program must qualify the same as anyone else. Only a small fraction of loan defaults were connected with CRA. Fannie and Freddie got into the loan swap business late in the game after other mortgage lenders were taking more and more of their market share by giving and selling bad loans--this does not excuse their participation, but they didn't start this mess. If you are interested in causation, please read about the Gramm-Leach-Bliley bill which deregulated the banking industry. That was a republican deal. "

Pat Maple wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:29 PM:

" I am sure that somehow, some were. Carter started it in 1977 with his Community Reinvestment Act. That did not work. 92/93 Clinton re-wrote Fannie and Freddie's rules and started handing out the $$. In 1994 Clinton started his National Home Ownership program 1995 through 1999 billions were dumped into "no doc", "no income", communities requiring no down and no verification of income. Google 1999 and Treas Sec Lawrence Summers and Undersecretary Gary Gensler. See what happened after they took over. "

voter wrote on Oct 16, 2008 3:50 PM:

" Pat, out of curiosity, do you believe that any of the current Republicans running the country have any culpability in the current crisis, and if so, who exactly? "

Pat Maple wrote on Oct 16, 2008 2:36 PM:

" My brother died for this country. He and thousands of other veterans died a horrible death from Agent Orange poisoning. Millions went to Viet Nam out of duty and loyalty and to serve this country just like John McCain. Not once has Sen McCain put himself first. This country is not perfect. It is limited only by small self serving minds and people like Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid and some of the minnows on this blog. Our current crisis started with Jimmy Carter not George Bush. "

t jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 2:16 PM:

" If you have trouble understanding what I mean, here is an example. I believe in personal responsiblity. I believe the government exists to serve me, not the otherway around. I believe the government exists for common defense, foregin affairs and conflict resolution between the states, not as a hamock for everyone who doesn't want to work. I believe that opportunity for indivduals should be equal, but individuals are far from equal. Actions have consequences. Merit should be rewarded. These are not relative beliefs. What do you believe in? "

t jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 2:10 PM:

" pretty standard for you to not have a substantive argument isn't it....but that is to be expected when everything is relative and someone has no principles they can point to and say this is what I belive. Typical liberal doublethink.... "

Leonard wrote on Oct 16, 2008 1:40 PM:

" Man TJ, you are so full of it you ooze. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 16, 2008 1:39 PM:

" t jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 1:22 PM:

" You worked for the University of California? Didn't know a state job required a loyalty oath


Yeah, the McCarthyites put that one through during the witch hunts back in the 50's. "

t jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 1:33 PM:

" Researched more, the "loyalty oath" is a relic of the McCarthy era witch hunts. Amazed you signed it. It doesn't really mean much, look at Berkely and SF those people violate the constiution daily, yet they all signed. If you truly belived in your "oath" you would side with me and defend the constitution form the domestic enemies: Judges and politicians (obama) who try to change the constitution without an amendment. Don't worry, since you don't work for the UC any more, your not bound by your "oath" and you can contiune to elect people that see the constution as a "living" document that means whatever they want at the time.... "

t jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 1:22 PM:

" You worked for the University of California? Didn't know a state job required a loyalty oath, kindof proves my point....big government begets bigger govt.
I love this country I just think it needs to rediscover its roots. It is pretty clear that those that work in the government don't know or understand where this country came from.
BTW you tried to ask a loaded question much like the "Why do you beat your wife?", but it didn't quite work, go back to the drawing board..... "

Leonard wrote on Oct 16, 2008 12:28 PM:

" Man, T.J. you just hate America, don't you?

I can feel your virulent hate in every post you write. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 16, 2008 12:27 PM:

" t jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 10:58 AM:

" What oath have you taken to uphold the constitution? Are you an elected official, in the military?


I worked for UC in college.

My word is my bond and I take all of my oaths seriously, regardless of how long ago I took them. "

Bry wrote on Oct 16, 2008 11:14 AM:

" Yes, today's government officials and so called "representatives" need to be ousted from office. All of them! Unfortunately this will not happen because Americans no longer stand united and care for fellowman and family. This government along with non conservatives have pushed for diversity for so long that America is no longer a united people. It is all about self today.

For those who do care and might work to get rid of today's corrupt government officals, there are over 800 Rex 84 FEMA camps. These camps were justified by govt as holding camps for illegals aliens waiting to be deported back to Mexico. In reality, these camps will be for those who don't acquiesce to government's corruption and for those who revolt against today's socialist and facist US politicans. Unfortunately, I don't see America coming together to usurp our traitorous government. "

t jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 10:58 AM:

" What oath have you taken to uphold the constitution? Are you an elected official, in the military? Citizens don't have loyalty oaths. Is this something you are advocating? the old soviet union had those, I think China and cuba still do, is that what you are after? Lot of free thinking going on there. Scratch, scratch, scratch.... "

t jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 10:55 AM:

" Glad you are for the constution, would that be the orginal document or that living one that people make up? From what you have written in the past I am going to assume it is the latter. FDR destroyed the constitution and since then it has only gotten worse at the judical has become the most powerful part of the govt...keep it up, bondage around the corner. "

Bulldog wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:28 AM:

" Trashing McCain's war record is an insult. Whaterver you think of his policies (And I don't think much of them myself) the man spent years being beaten and tortured, and it is reprensible to mock that service. Perhaps you should spend some time in Hanoi yourself before you go there with your letter.

Otherwise, I agree that neither candidate deserves our vote.

T Jefferson is right. Yes, we need to abolish the current government. It has become self serving and forgotten the people. The beaurocratic elite in this country rule rather than serve. Don't beleive me? Go to your local government office and ask for the services your tax dollar pays for. You will get a number and a form and an attitude. Go to a local school and question the ciriculum. You will be escorted off campus. Go to the bank and take 10 grand out of your savings account and watch them report you to the government.

Our country is a mess. Neither candidate is the answer.

Abolishing and starting over may be a better solution. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:25 AM:

" T jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:07 AM:

Glad to see you are against the US


I am for the US Constitution which I have sworn to uphold. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:24 AM:

" lodisafeway wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:53 AM:

So, are you still certain that McCain will be the winner on 11/5? "

wtf wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:09 AM:

" T jefferson, you nailed it...with the recent "socializing" of the banking industry by Bush and his corporate crooks, we are fast going from being the U.S.A. to being the U.S.S.A.

lodisafeway, your comment is so typical of you,"Whatever "valid" points might have been raised in his letter...."

Yeah, in girard's world this would mean any negative references to Obama - that's what you would consider "valid" LOL!

Leonard, it doesn't seem like T jefferson is advocating treason at all; he is only stating unfortunate facts. Regarding getting rid of a crooked government, you might want to re-read the "Declaration of Independence" but then there are a lot of posters who probably would have voted to waterboard the Founding Fathers. LOL! "

Cogito wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:09 AM:

" Ahhh yes Mr. Dados, malinformed, but always entertaining. "

T jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:07 AM:

" Ah leonard, I know I am going to get fleas but here goes. Glad to see you are against the US. How do you think this country was started, a peaceful vote and the British left? Go read the declaration of independence. Does the phrase: "...That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government..." Stay in Texas and spout your gibberish, it will get you far there. For the rest of the people who are sick of seeing this country go down the toilet take solace in the cycle of democracies, we are moving past apathy to dependence and people like Leonard are cheering the way. Great.... "

wtf wrote on Oct 16, 2008 9:04 AM:

" EXCELLENT letter, Adam...straight and to the point! "

lodisafeway wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:53 AM:

" Once again, another dolt who believes that McCain got what he deserved at the hands of the enemy. Whatever "valid" points might have been raised in his letter (and there very few) are erased by his reprehensible comments regarding John McCain's military experience. "

Leonard wrote on Oct 16, 2008 7:30 AM:

" T jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 5:45 AM:

I do have hope that they will try to move to fast and ignite the revolution. A lot of the military is a little sick and tired of the politicians these days. "


All those in favor of a military coup, follow TJ.

Apparently, the man is down with treason. "

T jefferson wrote on Oct 16, 2008 5:45 AM:

" Adam,

While I agree with you assessment of the candidates, I disagree with your conclusion. Voting for either of these candidates will lead to real change. Take a look at what FDR did in the last great depression, he formed the basis of our current welfare state all on the backdrop of fear. What do you think one of these will do. I just hope we don't end up with tattoos on our necks in a complete communist state. I do have hope that they will try to move to fast and ignite the revolution. A lot of the military is a little sick and tired of the politicians these days. "

Comments on this story are now closed.