Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- The country's mess is our fault (155)
- Obama is not a moderate (130)
- Sarah Palin's book hits the shelves: Locals react (67)
- Despite budget cuts, some Lodi Unified School District salaries continue to rise (58)
- Lodi City Council plans to cap number of taco trucks at 22 (48)
- The haves should help the have-nots (30)
- Public health care is a Christian option (26)
- Lodi Flames slim playoff chances vanish in setback to Tracy Bulldogs (25)
- Tokay in, traveling to unbeaten No. 3 Grant for football playoffs (25)
- Nightmares about America's future (23)
High tension at Lodi Wal-Mart meeting
Commission votes to deny certification of Final Revised Environmental Impact Report for Supercenter
Tensions ran high at a meeting over five years in the making Wednesday night. When all was finished, the Wal-Mart corporation suffered a loss as the Lodi Planning Commission voted 5 to 1 (with commission member Tim Mattheis recusing himself) to deny the certification of the Final Revised Environmental Impact Report of the retail giant's proposed Supercenter project.
Carnegie Forum was the scene of passionate discourse as a packed room of more than 100 people argued the pros and cons of the project. Most speaking to the Planning Commission voiced a dislike for Wal-Mart's Supercenter proposal, with a smattering of those in favor of the project.
With the denial of the FREIR, the Wal-Mart project will more than likely face an appeal that would then take the report to the Lodi City Council for review.
The commission was presented with the revised impact report by Community Development Director Rad Bartlam and city staff with a recommendation to certify the EIR, basically giving the project a "go" status. The Wal-Mart Supercenter, which would essentially develop 40 acres on the southwest corner of Lower Sacramento Road and Kettleman Lane, would occupy 340,000 square feet. Twelve additional business spaces would occupy the remaining areas.
"In 2004, I made the recommendation to the council to approve this project. Virtually nothing has changed in that recommendation," Bartlam said after giving an overview of the revised report.
Planning Commission members were then compelled to consider a few elements of the EIR, which was found adequate by city staff in all areas except for energy usage, agricultural impact, urban decay or blight, and project alternatives and objectives.
Of the concerns voiced by Planning Commission members, Randall Heinitz, a local business owner, wanted to be assured that the existing Wal-Mart building would be occupied, and he was also unsatisfied with answers as to why Wal-Mart needed a new space, rather than enhancing its current location.

"I think we're very fortunate that we have the Wal-Mart that we have," Heinitz said in a somewhat terse questioning of Aaron Rios, the Senior Manager of Wal-Mart Public Affairs. "Why not update the current Wal-Mart?"
Rios and project developer Darryl Broman cited many of the benefits a Supercenter would bring to Lodi, part of which was $400,000 in property tax revenue. Broman also pointed out that many of his properties in Lodi have had a 90 to 95 percent tenant occupancy rate.
Wal-Mart has to fulfill many conditions in order to gain approval of their project, one of which is finding new tenants for their existing space. That space is owned by Broman Development Company, and that requirement would fall to that entity.
Another condition is that Wal-Mart spend no less than $700,000 on a Downtown Lodi investment, which could take the form of a property purchase. That investment (which was put in place to offset any impact on Downtown businesses) would have to occur in less than 7.5 years. Commission member Dave Kirsten took issue with that requirement. He wondered what would keep Wal-Mart from purchasing a property, then turning around and selling it.
A parade of concerned citizens then appealed to the commission as to why the FREIR should be approved or denied certification. Many cited a closure of existing businesses as a con, while several seniors and Wal-Mart employees touted the ability to shop in one location as a pro.
After a session that lasted from 7 to past 11 p.m., the Planning Commission voted not to certify the FREIR. The five dissenting members cited a lack of information to make a decision. Since Mattheis' wife is an attorney for Wal-Mart, he recused himself from the session and voting.
Not voted on was the approval of the use permit allowing the sale of alcoholic beverages by the Supercenter, a tentative map of the project and the architectural approval of the proposed new location. By doing that, the commission members were informed by Bartlam and special counsel to the city Jonathan Hobbs that they could basically review those requests at a later time.
Bartlam said that if the commission had approved the certification of the FREIR, groundbreaking on the Supercenter could have taken place as early as November.
Contact Business Editor Marc Lutz at marcl@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
Lodian wrote on Oct 15, 2008 9:29 AM:
...
PBS Frontline: Is Wal-Mart Good for America?
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/walmart/
... "
essayjay wrote on Oct 14, 2008 8:56 PM:
The very Northe End of School St.? Vacant Lot, Church St. and Lockeford? Vacant Lot? How many empty building are there in that area? Go over to whichever shopping area, vacant stores, and you are going through with or still considering WalMart? Get your head out of the Sand or elsewhere!!!! Put the money into encouraging the city's infrastructure and quit encouraging spread into new buildings. then all you are doing is encouraging decay. There should be no more growth towards I5 and Grupe and Spanos and no more growth East Build up and build over. "
essayjay wrote on Oct 14, 2008 8:45 PM:
Cogito wrote on Oct 14, 2008 7:42 PM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 14, 2008 4:12 PM:
" Extra burden on police? okay now I have heard it all. Like I said screeching, annoying minority. "
citizen: Don't be so ignorant. Why would you think that a SWM doesn't put in calls for service from the local police department? Maybe you should do some research because you are wrong. Maybe check out the SWM, just a few miles away from Lodi, which is in Stockton. Then come back and tell me they don't add to the burden of their local police department. "
citizen wrote on Oct 14, 2008 2:59 PM:
Observer wrote on Oct 14, 2008 7:38 AM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 14, 2008 12:53 AM:
dyan wrote on Oct 13, 2008 7:57 PM:
Keep Walmart out. Instead, help the little business guy by forcing increases in minimum wage, requiring he buy health insurance for employees, and whatever he has left, tax everything from the county, to the city, to the state, to the feds! "
Lodian wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:44 PM:
" We don't need a supersized Wal-Mart."
I agree.
You see there, dyan, we can agree on something. "
dyan wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:20 PM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 12, 2008 7:58 PM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 12, 2008 7:54 PM:
" Citizen....You hit the nail on the head. Those at the meeting represent a very small minority of our community. They just whine a lot. "
And I'm glad they thought it important enough to take time out of their day to address this important issue. "
commonsense1 wrote on Oct 12, 2008 4:40 PM:
citizen wrote on Oct 12, 2008 9:12 AM:
Mainframe wrote on Oct 12, 2008 1:12 AM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 11, 2008 2:32 PM:
citizen wrote on Oct 11, 2008 9:32 AM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 11, 2008 12:35 AM:
citizen: It's easy to explain. These are people that make informed decisions. They know exactly what they are talking about! "
SportsGuru wrote on Oct 10, 2008 12:37 PM:
Congratulations to those who lobbied against the new Supercenter.
Everyone in Lodi can expect a tax increase to cover the additional money the city needs to cover Lodi's inadequate financial planning.
Instead of more revenue through sales tax, the city will get more revenue through increased fees and taxes on you - the citizens of Lodi. "
citizen wrote on Oct 10, 2008 9:06 AM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 9, 2008 11:03 PM:
Citizen: SWM will chip away at Lodi even further. It's hard enough to hold on to a charming town, but allow a SWM and there goes the neighborhood. Just look at Stockton. The Stockton SWM is a prime example of city regret, but once there the city cannot get rid of the pest. "
Neo wrote on Oct 9, 2008 7:33 PM:
edumacation wrote on Oct 9, 2008 5:46 PM:
T & C wrote on Oct 9, 2008 5:12 PM:
Patricia wrote on Oct 9, 2008 5:03 PM:
Exactly! And I would like it to stay that way! The current Wal-Mart could be renovated to accomodate those who like to shop Wal-Mart. We do not need the big box. "
Vickster wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:32 PM:
edumacation wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:31 PM:
edumacation wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:28 PM:
edumacation wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:24 PM:
edumacation wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:22 PM:
Lakewood meats, Fioris Butcher block and Lockeford meat and sausage. I know a meat cutter at Apple who I also have cut roasts. "
4AStrongLodi wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:22 PM:
Call or email your CC person and tell them you want the Super Wal-Mart built. They will have the final say. "
caveman wrote on Oct 9, 2008 3:52 PM:
citizen wrote on Oct 9, 2008 3:18 PM:
citizen wrote on Oct 9, 2008 3:13 PM:
oldcrow wrote on Oct 9, 2008 3:02 PM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 9, 2008 2:46 PM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 9, 2008 2:45 PM:
dogs4you wrote on Oct 9, 2008 2:02 PM:
4AStrongLodi wrote on Oct 9, 2008 1:59 PM:
Like most people in Lodi, you all fail to focus on the real issues. "
edumacation wrote on Oct 9, 2008 1:57 PM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 9, 2008 1:34 PM:
" As far as the loud music goes, I am a caucasion women in my 40's who loves rap music..."
You are an extreme minority...and I think you know that. "
Lodian wrote on Oct 9, 2008 1:32 PM:
PAL wrote on Oct 9, 2008 12:56 PM:
PAL wrote on Oct 9, 2008 12:49 PM:
dogs4you wrote on Oct 9, 2008 12:31 PM:
4AStrongLodi wrote on Oct 9, 2008 11:42 AM:
I'm going to assume that you're comments are not racially motivated, but I have my doubts.
BTW, what does music choice have to do with whether a Super Wal-Mart should be built? Very ignorant comment.
In case you haven't noticed, Lodi is full of your "lowest common denominator". Why do you think Wal-Mart has fought so hard to open? Because their business excels in low- to middle-income communities.
I don't think because you are poor means you are a "lcd", but I know that in the big picture it contributes to more crime and blight. That's why need these businesses and a healthy pro-growth approach.
This City has no new jobs or revenue coming in. It's all econimics. I'd try to explain it, but I don't think you'd understand when your opposition to a Super Wal-Mart is based on the music coming from someone's car. "
commonsense1 wrote on Oct 9, 2008 11:36 AM:
dogs4you wrote on Oct 9, 2008 11:15 AM:
dogbark wrote on Oct 9, 2008 10:25 AM:
Nobody remembers the old 'Buy American' Walmart stock set up? The posters and USA made goods were all on the top shelf so you'd see them across the store, but when you got to the aisle the Chinese knock-offs were at eye level and deeply discounted.
I suspect this is the same thing going on, only now its whole stores, not just products big W is targeting. "
edumacation wrote on Oct 9, 2008 10:25 AM:
4AStrongLodi wrote on Oct 9, 2008 10:11 AM:
I understand why the grocery store union wants to fight this, but it's good for the City and we need to make sure our leaders know that.
I loved seeing all the people wearing the "Not in My Neighborhood" stickers. HA HA! It would be built ACROSS the street from the existing Wal-Mart. How is that a different neighborhood?
I'm sad for some of those ignorant people who can't possibly understand the positive impacts of approving this. They're just imbeciles trying to keep "everything from changing". Back when I was a kid... "
edumacation wrote on Oct 9, 2008 9:46 AM:
edumacation wrote on Oct 9, 2008 9:38 AM:
Vickster wrote on Oct 9, 2008 9:28 AM:
classof72 wrote on Oct 9, 2008 9:13 AM:
stucknlodi wrote on Oct 9, 2008 8:24 AM:
T & C wrote on Oct 9, 2008 7:46 AM:
edukater wrote on Oct 9, 2008 7:13 AM:
Mad Dog wrote on Oct 9, 2008 7:04 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.