Indexes
November 2nd, 2009
November 7th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
November 4th, 2009
November 3rd, 2009
November 2nd, 2009
October 31st, 2009
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Bible is entwined with American civic life (135)
- David Diskin is first to give an invocation under new city of Lodi policy (69)
- I predict: A conservative tide will rise in 2010 (67)
- The Treaty of Tripoli hoax (58)
- Universal health care solves big problems (53)
- Here's what my father knew about the assassination of JFK (35)
- Words from our forefathers (27)
- Stuck in neutral? Hardly! (22)
- City of Lodi staff looking into possibility of limiting number of taco trucks (19)
- 27-year-old man shot to death Saturday night in front of Acampo home (18)
ADVERTISEMENT
Writer comments on same-sex marriage
Monday, October 6, 2008 6:16 AM PDT
The current disputes over gay marriage miss two very important points: One, there is a distinction between marriage under God and marriage in the legal definition of the state.
Hence, state-defined legalese is a foreign language other than English which is defined within contractual code for the U.S. citizens to use and to contract; and, English-speaking peasants are deceived because these legalese definitions are not disclosed. Two, while we are arguing about this issue, as we are so antagonized by the courts and by the news media, the bank is about to crash.
It would be nice if government could speak in English, using the same Webster's Dictionary as its peasants, but currently this is not how U.S. citizens are "governed," or more accurately, contracted. In legalese, if the contract says the sky is yellow, then it's "yellow," wherever and whenever the contract is in effect.
Any preposterous statement can be established by contract if it is agreed upon, but there should be disclosure. I was married both under God and with a "marriage license" which I now view as nothing less than a permission slip from my former landlord, bank and/or king. In my opinion, stately "marriage" contract has nothing to do with God whatsoever and its signatures of contract can be rescinded just the same as a contract for "yellow" sky, without bearing any detriment to the holy sacrament under God. Such a rescission of contract is not a letter of divorcement.
Throughout American history, government has not included gay couples in its "marriage" contracts. Why not? Gay couples could not produce any children that could be certificated. In today's era of artificial insemination of lesbians and gay adoption, legal "marriage" would enable government to certificate the children.
Homosexuals yearn for equal treatment as peasant-class heterosexual U.S. citizens. (Please pardon the satire.) The bottom of my certificates read in fine print, "MIDWEST BANK NOTE COMPANY," and the individual sheets of stationary are serialized. In my opinion, this is pretty good notification for U.S. citizen-peasants, who are not going to understand how their banks are about to fail if they don't understand the legalese under which they are contracted.
Daniel Hutchins
Acampo
Search for Ads 
Today’s Print Ads 
RSS Feeds
Reader Feedback
Robb wrote on Oct 14, 2008 8:41 AM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 13, 2008 10:18 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 13, 2008 10:16 PM:
This implies that someone can present a public debt to the Secretary of Treasury, Henry Paulsen, Jr., including all the necessary routing numbers, and he will take care of the debt. This only works with sovereigns.
US Citizens are the last people to be informed of this benefit that was given to us during the FDR administration. Whenever we give our Socialist Security Number, they go to our account at US Treasury, and they hit the account on our behalf.
In a court of law, the court case is a debt, and Paulsen will discharge the debt, if only he is called upon to do so.
Actually, whenever we are presented with a bill from a corporation that is a subsidiary of the United States, they have already reserved funds through Treasury, and we only need sign it to complete the transaction. Instead, people say no way! We'll submit payment using our labor thorugh our checking account, instead.
With credit cards, the only catch is that the card is immediately cancelled.
In court cases... "
DanielH wrote on Oct 13, 2008 10:05 PM:
Here's an excerpt from HJR 192:
Every obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provision is contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment, dollar for dollar, in any coin or currency which at time of payment is legal tender for public and private debts. Any such provision contained in any law authorizing obligations to be issued by or under authority of the United States, is herby repealed, but the repeal of any such provision shall not invalidate any other provision or authority contained in such law. "
Lodian wrote on Oct 13, 2008 6:49 PM:
What the heck?? "
Robb wrote on Oct 13, 2008 4:16 PM:
Conspiracy theories abound! "
DanielH wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:28 PM:
For starters, I still emphasize that you can find HJR 192 (1933). Nobody's going to throw you in prison for looking at public policy, but if you use Google to search HJR 192, you might be reclassified as a suspicious person at the Justice Department. "
Lodian wrote on Oct 13, 2008 1:20 PM:
Well, I guess that counts me out. Can't risk PRISON! "
DanielH wrote on Oct 13, 2008 11:20 AM:
I have established a connection into US Treasury to take advantage of HJR 192, and they did not send me to prison. I am telling you this to give you a sense of authenticity, and knowledge that real living people are using it. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 13, 2008 11:14 AM:
As a teaser, I remind you that I said the principal amount of your mortgage can be recovered, and I even said twice, if the mortgage was taken out within the recent 3 years, but only once if the loan is older. Actually, I forgot to tell you that if the loan goes into foreclosure, the principal can be recovered twice, once again. "
Lodian wrote on Oct 13, 2008 2:10 AM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 13, 2008 2:07 AM:
" Mainframe: FYI: Nobody has made a commitment. If anyone wants to talk, they need to commit with contact information, preferrably e-mail. "
What commitment are you asking us to make? "
DanielH wrote on Oct 12, 2008 2:48 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 12, 2008 12:47 PM:
Or, have you recently changed your UserID. "
Mainframe wrote on Oct 12, 2008 1:55 AM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 12, 2008 1:14 AM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 12, 2008 1:01 AM:
How far into foreclosure is your friend?
How long before this letter goes into archives? "
DanielH wrote on Oct 12, 2008 12:53 AM:
http://www.wssic.com/
http://www.tapesite.com/index10.htm
Note: These websites will not give you any information. At most, they'll give you a list of topics, which you might find interesting. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 12, 2008 12:36 AM:
But, you can only do this if you are sovereign. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 12, 2008 12:23 AM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 12, 2008 12:17 AM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 12, 2008 12:14 AM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 11, 2008 11:24 PM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 11, 2008 11:17 PM:
Lodian wrote on Oct 11, 2008 11:15 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 11:00 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 11:00 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 10:59 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 10:58 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 10:57 PM:
Their investment is zero, zip, nada.
The amount of their own money that they loan is also zero, zip, nada.
The entity that was the source of funding was yourself. They understand the nature of money, and they tricked you into creating the money. They are holding it as collateral until you repay the loan, plus interest. Additionally, they intend to keep the original collateral.
They file 1099-A, informing the IRS that they found some money in their books, as if they don't know how to give it back. They pretend they don't know how to return it to source, which is you. You have a right to get it back - the initial principal value of your mortgage. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 10:51 PM:
Why would you need to start studying now?
The possibilities are endless.
The first time I took a baby step, I felt a wind of stress-relief blow out of my soul. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 10:47 PM:
If I give a commercial tool to someone and they are thrown into prison, because they don't know what they are doing, I would be at fault for disseminating the documents.
I already filed a couple very small documents into two of our local governments, and lets just say that they probably know my name. Some of my friends are threatening them much more severely. They know how to read this newspaper, and Im not interested in telling them too much about myself. "
Lodian wrote on Oct 11, 2008 10:30 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 10:16 PM:
People enter contracts unknowingly. Consequently, they are subrogated (controlled), taxed unnecessarily, and thrown into prison, which I call debtors warehouse.
People are hauled into court, and every judge who asks the defendant to confirm his identity is tricking the person to enjoin a contract by mistaken identity.
People get into trouble in court, because they dont know what is happening. Ditto police officers and sherriff. "
Lodian wrote on Oct 11, 2008 9:30 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 9:08 PM:
2) Uniform Commercial Code
3) House Joint Resolution 192 (1933) How powerful this one is, I dont want to post in this public column. I suggest you look it up and see if you find anything unusual in there.
4) United States bankruptcy
5) 14th amendment US citizenship, and US residency
6) Use of IRS form 1099. Absolutely I cannot post in the public what this one is.
7) Novation - substitution of a new contract.
8) Self-executing contracts, including self-executing power of attorney. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 9:03 PM:
1) commercial liens This is the very same process that corporations use against US Citizens, but if we can learn it, ourselves, we can use it in reverse. Moreover, if someone tries to use it on us, we can return fire, very effectively, and make them wish they never knew who we were.
When we send commercial affidavits to corporations or governments, they know what it is, because it is the same process they use against US Citizens, and I have heard they are astonished that a US Citizen knows how to use the process against them.
When this process is used on a court judge, their arrogance and their disrespect for US Citizens intelligence are so bad that they almost invariably ignore the submittal, until they can become liquidated by US Treasury Criminal Investigation Division.
Amazing stuff. Anyone can do it, but it requires that they know who they are. US Citizens who dont know who they are, cant do it. "
Lodian wrote on Oct 11, 2008 8:15 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 7:02 PM:
I am confident that you are ignorant of every single item, and you can't misconstrue just one single item to try to get out of this.
You'd be smartest to try to learn what I'm talking about.
I've been studying this for almost 10 months, 4-8 hours per day. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 7:00 PM:
This is happening all around us while we argue. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 6:57 PM:
for that reason, I suggest you learn about all these codes that you believe are law and find out if you are required to abid by them.
Additionally, I suggest next time you or a friend is dragged into court if you can stand on your own two feet and challenge a "judge" to show you where your charges are a violation of any law. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 6:54 PM:
Why do the statutory "people" of the State of California need statutory code to find God? "
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 6:48 PM:
I can.
In your face again. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 6:47 PM:
The person who you said this to, me, can do some incredibe things that are above your level, and you are saying that I don't know what I'm talking about.
I am a person who would not under any circumstances ever accept a lawyer to defend myself in court, against any charge, and I am confident that I can walk away a free man.
Can you say the same? "
Billy Rubin wrote on Oct 11, 2008 12:35 PM:
Prop 8 is about nothing BUT "marriage under God" and has been conceived, written, promoted, proposed and campaigned as a religious issue.
To deny that fact in voice or print is to lie.
There is not a single support organization in favor of Prop 8 that is not religion-based.
Not one. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 11, 2008 12:24 PM:
Government has created a fictitious foreign trust, which is named by the same spelling as our living names, but in all CAPS letters.
It was created when our mother completed an "Application for live birth," which was routed through Commerce and Treasury. Bonds were created and sold to fund America, based upon the hypothecated future value of the trust.
The trust is under the care of the Social Security Administration, under trusteeship of 6 people, including 2 which are appointed by the president. (They can be fired, and we can appoint ourselves as trustee.)
When 2 people are married under the state, these trusts are joined by contract, which has nothing to do with marriage under God.
When people are married under the state, a contract is formed. I believe it is a contract which promises certification of children.
Artificial insemination of lesbians creates a situation where children are produced but without contractual agreement to complete the"Application for live birth," which causes them to be certified. "
Lodian wrote on Oct 11, 2008 12:32 AM:
Billy Rubin wrote on Oct 10, 2008 3:33 PM:
You didn't share your information in confidence with anyone, you wrote an open letter to the newspaper, hoping it would be published for all to see.
Your writings are just nonsense. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 9, 2008 5:17 PM:
I'd be happy to sit down with people that show respect for my stuff, and I do it all the time.
People that are better than me do not argue or yell, and I am going to follow their example. "
Billy Rubin wrote on Oct 9, 2008 5:02 PM:
Bob Hussein Loblaw wrote on Oct 9, 2008 4:14 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 9, 2008 3:27 PM:
Billy Rubin wrote on Oct 9, 2008 12:44 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 8, 2008 7:37 PM:"Billy Rubin: How can you deny the fact that "MIDWEST BANK NOTE COMPANY"...you have the option of looking at your own...how can you deny the meaning of that word "BANK."...Doesn't the word "Bank" have any meaning to you?"
Billy Rubin wrote on Oct 9, 2008 6:34 AM:"DanielH, I have no idea what you're yapping about...I made no mention of Midwest Bank Note anything..."
DanielH wrote on Oct 9, 2008 10:13 AM:"Billy: I was the one that mentioned the "Midwest Bank Note" stationary, not you."
Maybe what you need is a fresh start to tell me what you mean - only this time without the creepy rambling conspiracy theories and wild accusations of invented denials of sinister bank notes. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 9, 2008 10:13 AM:
You used an interesting word, "strawman."
Where did you get that from, on this topic? "
Billy Rubin wrote on Oct 9, 2008 6:34 AM:
I re-read my comments, I even wasted the time to re-read your rambling manifesto to the editor.
I made no mention of Midwest Bank Note anything; but your strawman attempt to pin it to me, no matter how feeble and flat, was a brave play.
Now, if you would please, continue with The Revelation you began with your use of the buzz words "miracles" "witness" "testify the truth". It's unlikely, but possible, you can keep that thought collected while you write out a new cipher. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 8, 2008 7:37 PM:
Doesn't the word "Bank" have any meaning to you? "
DanielH wrote on Oct 8, 2008 7:34 PM:
I know that this letter was difficult to understand, because it offends a lifetime of habit training and understanding.
Whereas my new friends who are training me in patriotism have informed me of the dangers of entering into the public (e.g. Billy Rubin), I have received some favorable comments and not knowing who is interested, I thought it would be good to publish again.
I am witnessing some miracles in the courts, in financing, in foreclosures, and in many more areas. In spite of people like Billy Rubin, the miracles that I am witnessing testify the truth much more strongly than Bill Rubin. Therefore I know that I am telling the truth. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 8, 2008 7:18 PM:
I don't make it a secret that it's me; but I also don't need to come out and claim it is me either. I don't see any reason to do so. If the readers in these columns would feel more comfortable with me referring to myself another way, I'd be happy to. "
Lodian wrote on Oct 8, 2008 1:23 PM:
Billy Rubin wrote on Oct 8, 2008 12:06 PM:
So, what's the deal with referring to yourself in the 3rd person, DanielH? Your muliple posts on the other blog about "Mr. Hutchins' letter" are curious. Was it a half-hearted attempt to disown this meandering, confused letter? "
DanielH wrote on Oct 8, 2008 10:10 AM:
How are you going to get your soap after the banks crash? "
Billy Rubin wrote on Oct 8, 2008 6:55 AM:
What friend?
Who are you talking about?
The one in the soap?
You need to step away from the rendering kettle and get a breath of fresh air. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 7, 2008 4:01 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 7, 2008 8:12 AM:
edumacation wrote on Oct 6, 2008 10:55 PM:
edumacation wrote on Oct 6, 2008 10:54 PM:
edumacation wrote on Oct 6, 2008 10:52 PM:
edumacation wrote on Oct 6, 2008 10:51 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 8:40 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 4:43 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 4:42 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 4:38 PM:
It was a remedy offered in response to FDR's seizure of not only the gold, but also the property. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 4:31 PM:
I was solicited by a local political party to give my name for political writings, and I refused, mainly because I don't support their neo-conservative cause. That's how I know who wrote so many of the ghost-written stories in the Stockton Record.
I haven't exchanged either letters or names, in this newspaper, except once during our global warming exchange.
The Stockton Record rejects all my letters unless someone else puts their name on it, and I haven't donated any for over a year. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 4:26 PM:
The end result is loss of freedom. "
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 4:25 PM:
This is not a mere difference of whether to use a Bouvier's, a Black's or a Webster. The definitions section of any law supersedes the dictionary. In essence, the back end of a law contains new definitions which supersede the dictionary.
This deceptiopn is so bad that if a person gets into court, they often respond "yes" to questions which get them into trouble with the judge, whereas unknowingly, the factual answer would have been "no." "
Leonard wrote on Oct 6, 2008 3:42 PM:
Sometimes Danny H writes these letters, sometimes Tyler writes them for him. "
jeff wrote on Oct 6, 2008 3:30 PM:
Oh, I get it.
And how's that working out for you?
Being clever. "
Leonard wrote on Oct 6, 2008 3:26 PM:
You can use old Motor Oil to fertilize your lawn? "
Leonard wrote on Oct 6, 2008 3:20 PM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 2:48 PM:
Leonard wrote on Oct 6, 2008 1:47 PM:
" Leonard, do you know what a duvet is?
Indeed. I like the ones that have been lovingly hand crafted by the hard working indigenous people of.... wherever. "
Jeff wrote on Oct 6, 2008 1:08 PM:
Leonard wrote on Oct 6, 2008 1:04 PM:
Clean food please..... "
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 12:50 PM:
Billy Rubin wrote on Oct 6, 2008 12:32 PM:
Leonard wrote on Oct 6, 2008 10:41 AM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 10:35 AM:
Which is it? "
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 10:32 AM:
DanielH wrote on Oct 6, 2008 10:29 AM:
If you don't think that is true, ask yourself how easy it is to get married without a marriage permission slip. "
lodisafeway wrote on Oct 6, 2008 10:10 AM:
Letters like this one fall into the same category of those one-line blatherings that undoubtedly emit from folks who simply enjoy seeing their name in print. The only logical response to these pathetic utterances is a resounding, "huh?" "
Bob Loblaw wrote on Oct 6, 2008 8:59 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.