Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Students 'protest' the eating of turkeys on Thanksgiving (78)
- Does citing the facts on immigration mean I am a hate-monger? (77)
- Minister takes to the streets to recruit new members (48)
- Bring Trader Joe's store to Lodi (35)
- Huber upsets Sieglock in 10th Assembly race (33)
- Is the U.S. Constitution obsolete? (30)
- Major cuts loom (29)
- First the banks, now the automakers (27)
- Former gang member hopes to make a difference in Lodi (26)
- Lodi Cricket Club delighted with Beckman Park field (22)
Reynolds Ranch expansion OK'd
Lodi council's 3-2 vote allows retail development to double
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Plans to double the retail space at Reynolds Ranch — and nearly double the traffic the massive project creates — were approved Wednesday night by the Lodi City Council.
The council's 3-2 vote allows the yet-to-be-built development to spike to 750,000 square-feet of retail space, dwarfing any other shopping center in the city.
When it is completed, which is not expected for several years, Reynolds Ranch will generate more than 50,000 vehicle trips per day in Lodi's southeast corner, according to a recent traffic study.
Council members OK'd an initial version of the project in 2006 that called for far more single -family homes and would create 28,000 vehicle trips.
A majority of the council Wednesday night, however, lauded the jobs and senior housing the new plans promise.
There will still be more than 1,000 housing units, most built as compact senior homes.
Two council members and more than a dozen residents expressed strong concern over the revisions, and at times bewilderment, during a vigorous debate at Carnegie Forum.
"Simply, this is (added) jobs," Councilman Larry Hansen said from the dais, downplaying visions of "nightmare" traffic the project might create.
Others weren't so sure.
As she questioned city officials, Councilwoman Susan Hitchcock expressed disbelief that the city is prepared for the added traffic the retail expansion will cause.
"My common sense just tells me that this is just going to be a huge traffic mess," Hitchcock said.
The project is planned along Harney Lane just west of Highway 99.
Public Works Director Wally Sandelin and Interim Development Chief Rad Bartlam defended a recent traffic study, paid for by the project's developer, that says already planned road improvements are sufficient to handle thousands more cars per day.
"I can assure you we're not playing a numbers game," Sandelin said, responding to one of Hitchcock's assertions.
Project developer Dale Gillespie asked to revamp Reynolds Ranch several months ago as the housing market crumbled.
"I don't think the project has changed that significantly," Gillespie said, speaking in front of the council and an audience of several dozen residents. "Yes there is less residential, and there is more commercial."
His plans increase the commercial acreage from 40.5 acres to 78.2 acres, according to figures provided by the city. That allows the retail space to grow 400,000 square-feet.
Gillespie defended his efforts to reach a compromise with Melissa and Charles Katzakian, who own and live in a historic home along the project's eastern edge.
The Katzakians, part of Councilman Phil Katzakian's extended family, alleged Gillespie gave them 24 hours to decide whether to sell their home, which they said they've lived in for 15 years.
Quotes from the Lodi City Council meeting
"Why can't we wait for the General Plan update? ... I'm not going to support (the Reynolds Ranch changes)."— Lodi Mayor JoAnne Mounce
"Please vote 'no.' This is not planning. ... This is greed, greed, greed and more greed."
— Bill Fuhs, a retired Lodi resident
"I don't think the project has changed that significantly. Yes, there is less residential, and there is more commercial."
— Dale Gillespie, Reynolds Ranch developer
"It seems to me the switch to senior housing might be a good thing."
— Lodi City Councilman Bob Johnson
"My common sense just tells me that this is just going to be a huge traffic mess."
— Lodi Councilwoman Susan Hitchcock
"Those three (council members) who voted for this are totally out of touch with the wishes of the community."
— Jack Dunn, a retired Lodi resident
"There will be no peace for us."
— Melissa Katzakian, owner of home on eastern edge of Reynolds Ranch project
— News-Sentinel staff
They said their daughter has experienced health problems as a result of the ongoing construction at the site.
Council members Katzakian, Hansen and Bob Johnson voted in favor of the changes. Mayor JoAnne Mounce and Hitchcock opposed them.
Gillespie told the council he made a "seven-figure" offer to buy the historic home from Charles and Melissa Katzakian, but the couple asked for between $300,000 and $400,000 more, a charge the couple refuted.
Many of the speakers at the meeting, including the mayor, asked the council to hold off on the changes until the city's General Plan update is finished next year.
Some wondered why the council would allow Gillespie to so drastically change plans approved just two years ago — questions the council majority responded to by citing drastic market changes.
"Why is the council rushing, apparently, to assist Mr. Gillespie in his economic need?" Jack Dunn, a retired Lodi resident asked.
Gillespie noted the first anchor retail stores could open at the site by the third quarter of 2009, on the 226-acre project's northeastern edge.
The new Blue Shield office building, a major part of the development, is now under construction along the highway's frontage road. It's expected to be open later this year.
The senior housing and care center, and several mid size retail stores, would tentatively be ready in 2010. The last few retail stores, on the west side of the property, would start leasing in 2010 or 2011, Gillespie estimated.
Not all residents are upset about more shopping.
Grace Puccinelli, who lives just yards from the development on South Stockton Street, said she welcomes the new plans.
"The southeast side has been underserved — all the commercial (projects) always goes on the west side," she said.

Reader Feedback
falcon wrote on Sep 25, 2008 3:57 AM:
falcon wrote on Sep 25, 2008 3:51 AM:
falcon wrote on Sep 25, 2008 3:40 AM:
falcon wrote on Sep 25, 2008 3:33 AM:
JF wrote on Sep 24, 2008 7:34 PM:
JF wrote on Sep 24, 2008 7:33 PM:
16925 wrote on Sep 24, 2008 8:05 AM:
falcon wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:24 AM:
The continued hindrance of these entities from forwarding these projects, costs us all more money. These projects pay millions in fees to the city and other ancillary entities. Your sales tax argument is peanuts compared to what is forgone in fees. I don't think you have any idea the amount of money that changes hands just for "permission" from the city. It is in the millions. Who pays for that? I will tell you. The consumer pays for it and it comes from profit that future businesses make. New profitable business pays employees salaries. Employed people spend their money on other things like cars, gas, food, insurance, houses, and everything else. This benefits others by allowing them to keep their jobs. It is not wise for our city and our citizens to ignore these needed benefits, especially in these times. "
falcon wrote on Sep 23, 2008 9:04 AM:
falcon wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:55 AM:
That conclusion I think makes us all worse off! "
16925 wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:46 AM:
and, lastly on the swm: the only diffence between the current store and the supper store will be the grocery factor. groceries are tax exempt. someone please tell me how a new swm with grocery component that is tax expempt will add to lodi's sales tax base. "
16925 wrote on Sep 23, 2008 8:40 AM:
Rhodie wrote on Sep 22, 2008 5:02 PM:
" Rhodie, What the hell? I would support a firing/gun range... "
I guess it depends on which way they are aiming their guns. "
falcon wrote on Sep 22, 2008 5:00 PM:
It is not all going to hell Lodian, It will be OK.
Lodian wrote,"If you have one of your undesirable family members staying at your house do you then just invite your whole undesirable clan as well?
Prejudice rears its ugly head again. Who are you better than Lodian?
Lodian wrote, "Have you no control? Do you not have a vested interest in what becomes of your surroundings, safety, health and peaceful home?"
Yes I do, but I do not subscribe to your doom and gloom pessimism regarding Wal-Mart because it is based in fear propagated from predatory competitors of Wal-Mart. Lodian, the sky is not falling. Breath Breath.. Flap Flap Flap. The falcon wings will cool you down. "
falcon wrote on Sep 22, 2008 4:33 PM:
Lodian you say "Shop anywhere you choose,", but I want to shop at SWM. I cant shop anywhere I choose can I. This is because you would take my choice away. Give me that feather back! "
falcon wrote on Sep 22, 2008 4:08 PM:
Zinfandel wrote on Sep 22, 2008 1:26 PM:
I would support a SAM'S Club. "
Zinfandel wrote on Sep 22, 2008 1:22 PM:
" Let me ask a question. What wouldn't you support being built in place of the SWM? "
SAM'S CLUB!!! "
Rhodie wrote on Sep 22, 2008 12:52 PM:
So ALL the problems in Lodi are directly attributed to the WM that lives in one little corner?
"Do you not have a vested interest in what becomes of your surroundings, safety, health and peaceful home?"
Super Walmart is Dangerous? It's unhealthy? They come into homes and stomp on your things? I'm sure you have facts to back this up.
Have you seen the plans for the new SWM? Do you know what it is going to look like?
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3092/is_n20_v36/ai_19930066
http://www.uwex.edu/ces/cced/downtowns/ltb/lets/LTB0806.pdf
Lodian, would you support this concept:
http://walmartstores.com/factsnews/newsroom/6210.aspx "
Rhodie wrote on Sep 22, 2008 12:44 PM:
Lodian wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:25 AM:
Lodian wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:23 AM:
So, your attitude is to just let it all go to hell. If you have one of your undesirable family members staying at your house do you then just invite your whole undesirable clan as well? Have you no control? Do you not have a vested interest in what becomes of your surroundings, safety, health and peaceful home?
(Pluck... My collection of falcon quills is growing.) "
Lodian wrote on Sep 22, 2008 10:16 AM:
I'm not telling anyone where to shop. Shop anywhere you choose. You, on the other hand, want to force this dirty monstrosity they call a SWM into my backyard. Shame on you. "
falcon wrote on Sep 22, 2008 7:12 AM:
falcon wrote on Sep 22, 2008 7:06 AM:
Is Lodi peaceful, clean, healthy, and a pleasant town environment now? If so, how could it be that way with the current Wal-Mart? If not, then, SWM does not matter. How is the new SWM going to change that? Also, who are you to tell me where to shop? Is this the Soviet Union? Lodian when you say "We dont need a SWM in Lodi," it makes me shake my head in disbelief that one person could think that they speak for the needs of an entire city. It sounds like there is a lot of pressure up there and you need the falcon to pick your brain. "
Lodian wrote on Sep 21, 2008 11:36 PM:
Trying to find what you're lacking? LOL! "
Lodian wrote on Sep 21, 2008 11:25 PM:
Look at it this way... SWM supporters are taking away our right to a peaceful, clean, healthy, pleasant town environment. You can go to the current WM for your Wally needs. We don't need a SWM in Lodi. "
falcon wrote on Sep 21, 2008 8:58 PM:
falcon wrote on Sep 21, 2008 8:58 PM:
Lodian wrote on Sep 21, 2008 4:34 PM:
You mean the Wal-Mart shoppers? "
Lodian wrote on Sep 21, 2008 4:32 PM:
Lodian wrote on Sep 21, 2008 4:23 PM:
falcon wrote on Sep 21, 2008 10:28 AM:
Lodian wrote on Sep 21, 2008 12:27 AM:
Lodian wrote on Sep 21, 2008 12:23 AM:
midtowner: Youtube has tons of useful information. There are plenty of newscasts, clips, segments, interviews and plenty of things caught on tape to be seen in full. What do you have against this information? "
Lodian wrote on Sep 21, 2008 12:17 AM:
" New Flash: t&c, etal has admitted on the Record website (eyewhitie) that he has once again been banned from the LNS website. I would speculate that several of his other blog names will disappear as well. "
I can think of one or two other bloggers that should have been banned a long time ago. "
Observer wrote on Sep 19, 2008 10:35 PM:
edumacation wrote on Sep 19, 2008 9:50 PM:
commonsense1 wrote on Sep 19, 2008 6:39 PM:
Observer wrote on Sep 19, 2008 2:59 PM:
commonsense1 wrote on Sep 19, 2008 12:24 PM:
edumacation wrote on Sep 19, 2008 11:12 AM:
You remind me of a little kid who runs around crying " Joey made me do it"? LOL ROFL. So what happened? Too much truth on the posts? Go back to your legumes! "
Observer wrote on Sep 19, 2008 6:13 AM:
Observer wrote on Sep 19, 2008 6:11 AM:
t&c attacks wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:29 PM:
dogs4you wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:27 PM:
OTH wrote on Sep 18, 2008 6:59 PM:
All that money and you're worried about $10 a month to go to Stkn. LOL "
Giovanina wrote on Sep 18, 2008 6:04 PM:
oldguy wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:55 PM:
oldguy wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:46 PM:
We the people just bailed out Freddie Mack and Fannie Mae, AIG, and Bear Sterns to the tune of almost five hundred billion dollar. Why shouldn't the City of Lodi bail out Gillespie. "
oldguy wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:37 PM:
peek wrote on Sep 18, 2008 4:21 PM:
Zinfandel wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:33 PM:
Zinfandel wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:30 PM:
" Zinfandel 12:20 PM: the only upside about your comment on Susan setting a poor example as the Principal for her school kids is that she is in a Stockton school.... rofl "
Whoa Nellie! I can appreciate your humor, but, I still feel sorry for the kids, the parents and the teachers who have to deal with her on a daily basis. Just attending CC meetings and having to listen to her gives me a splitting headache. "
Timothy wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:22 PM:
Whoa Nellie! wrote on Sep 18, 2008 3:01 PM:
Whoa Nellie! wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:57 PM:
If you have any money at all you are a GOB, and part of a huge conspiracy. "
Whoa Nellie! wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:50 PM:
I hope a Costco does come to town. That will save me about $10 a month in gas. There is nothing at Trader Joes that I cant find elsewhere in Lodi. And, NO, I dont drink Franzia's 'Two Buck Chuck' swill.
Personally, I'd like to see the new map with estimated building sizes vs the parking lots. Code requires alot of parking. Look at Spanos' 8-Mile center, its like 50%+ parking. The numbers sound large, but to look at it on a map it might not look so bad.
I like Hitchcock, but I think she was just pandering to some citizens with her asking what tenants will be in the RR project. We all know she is smarter than that. "
dogs4you wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:24 PM:
falcon wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:15 PM:
Rhodie wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:10 PM:
Yesterday I had a petition signer come to my door to get signitures for the RDA. In his words my signiture would "Help get it on the ballot." He went on to say we should have had a chance to vote on it. Being somewhat informed and aware of political tricks I asked to see the measure info so I knew what exactly I was signing. The wording was "we the undersigned PROTEST the RDA." "IT be HALTED." or we demand the right to vote on it. The signiture was not to get a vote on it but to stop it.
If any of you get these policitcal scam artists at your door, sign if you agree but make sure you read what you are signing first before you agree to something that you didn't mean to. "
realist wrote on Sep 18, 2008 2:10 PM:
I for one am excited about new stores, especially in this location.
And to Acampo Mom: the majority of college graduates earn more than non-college graduates. It has nothing to do with appreciation of books or food. It ALWAYS comes back to money. "
wtf wrote on Sep 18, 2008 1:16 PM:
You forgot:
8) If the banks go under, the TAXPAYERS bail them out "
falcon wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:56 PM:
falcon wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:54 PM:
Zinfandel wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:42 PM:
Surprising that as much as she HATES Stockton, she is willing to work there! LOL "
Zinfandel wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:38 PM:
Zinfandel wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:33 PM:
" For once, this was a SMART decison by the City Council. "
T & C, yes, it was a smart decision by the CC. It is about time that a major commerical development be built on the eastside of town. "
Zinfandel wrote on Sep 18, 2008 12:20 PM:
" Hitchcock is entitled to her opinion but she is increaingly angry and rude. Her performance last evening demonstrates that she is burned out and should resign from the council ASAP. "
patton1, I agree with you 100%. Hitchcock's attempt to control and manipulate the discussion regarding RR was absolutely disgusting! Her complete lack of respect towards Ms. Mounce was inexcusable. There is no way she can justify her rude behavior. And this woman is a principal responsible for setting an example for our children? God help the children under her influnce!!! "
jon wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:56 AM:
judy wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:53 AM:
T & C wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:26 AM:
patton1 wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:10 AM:
patton1 wrote on Sep 18, 2008 11:04 AM:
Acampo_Mom wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:53 AM:
" Acampo Mom, go look at the Costco shopping center in Stockton. That is what is going into Reynolds Ranch. Big Box stores and a lot of asphalt. "
I highly doubt it will be Costco SPECIFICALLY, the Stockton store is only 6 Miles away from the Reynolds Ranch site. But I don't doubt they'll find some big box store to go in there. I would much rather see a bunch of small retailers and specialty stores in there than a couple of big department/discount stores. Yuck. "
edumacation wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:47 AM:
4) "install the infrastructure"...you for got to go to the bank and beg for a loan. LOL GOOD LUCK AFTER TODAY!
5) "endure the Litany of critics"...that why you hire a mouthpiece. Thats what they do--talk and sell and talk and connive.
6)"build the buildings" Construction companies do that with BANK LOANS.
7)"take the risk?" IT THE BANKS MONEY! "
Acampo_Mom wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:45 AM:
I've already requested Trader Joes to consider Lodi (as well as Borders and Barnes and Noble) several times, and was told that they didn't find the demographic desirable (Not enough college graduates).
So I suppose unless you have a college degree, you can't truly appreciate a good book or good food? LOL "
patton1 wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:33 AM:
commonsense1 wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:31 AM:
midtowner wrote on Sep 18, 2008 10:25 AM:
wtf wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:45 AM:
http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=d73KlhUq1W8 "
wtf wrote on Sep 18, 2008 9:03 AM:
Tax Code Encourages Export of American Jobs
http://hubpages.com/hub/Tax-Code-Encourages-Export-of-American-Jobs "
wtf wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:34 AM:
12 year old invents highly efficient solar cells.
http://presskit.ditd.org/2008_Davidson_Fellows_Press_Kit/2008_DF_William_Yuan.pdf
On another note, if this show airs again on PBS on NOVA, for those interested in science and history, don't miss it.
Einstein's Big Idea
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/einstein/ "
JF wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:25 AM:
stucknlodi wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:24 AM:
How much longer do we have to deal with the 3 stooges on CC? Harney Lane is going to be a traffic nightmare. When the city starts to build the underpass at the railroad and the hwy 99 interchange at harney all these cars are just going to drive thru the subdivisions on the north side. Poor planning. RR should front the money to build the interchange and underpass right now. "
JF wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:22 AM:
Timothy wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:20 AM:
Whoa Nellie! wrote on Sep 18, 2008 8:08 AM:
Hence, the CC approved the RR project.
Granted, we need to increase our sales tax revenue stream. NEW businesses are needed. Everyone of us goes to Stockton for something. Heck, I spend $3K alone a year at Costco for my family.
But, just because DG builds a center doesn't mean the retailers we want will come to Lodi. Many people talked about Trader Joe's in the past. Like all retailers they, or Costco, or whoever, will do serious research to make sure they can turn a profit.
THANK YOU to Susan & Joanne for taking a stand.
The other three CC's are out of touch with the wishes of the majority of the citizens. "
Acampo_Mom wrote on Sep 18, 2008 7:50 AM:
I'm curious to see what kind of retailers will end up there... "
jramagic wrote on Sep 18, 2008 7:44 AM:
wtf wrote on Sep 18, 2008 7:32 AM:
Gillespie's Plan "A" was shelved by Gillespie due to the housing market...or didn't you know? His Plan "B" is just as bad.
I remember all the talk about Blue Cross and the jobs it would create - to me, **that's** what got the ball rolling.
Going green protects the environment, too.
Oh, I get it, you must have a stake in this current scam.... "
edumacation wrote on Sep 18, 2008 7:30 AM:
falcon wrote on Sep 18, 2008 7:11 AM:
I see that Tesla is getting free rent for 10 years and rebates on development fees as an incentive from San Jose. That is how you attract business! "
wtf wrote on Sep 18, 2008 6:23 AM:
wtf wrote on Sep 18, 2008 6:21 AM:
Plan "B" is just as bad because if people don't have jobs; people won't go shopping. This whole thing was originally sold because of job creation by building Blue Cross.
Why not start a "green" manufacturing base here in Lodi. That would be a first, OK, maybe a second, and give San Jose and the Silicon Valley a run for their money.
On top of this, being green, it wouldn't pollute and this **is** the wave of the future; getting in on this market now could only put Lodi ahead of the game.
Most important, it would provide middle class jobs and help to begin a rebirth of manufacturing - so sorely needed in the U.S. due to all the outsourcing. "
wtf wrote on Sep 18, 2008 6:17 AM:
This would be the wisest course of action; but the greedy b*stards who want to push this through are not only venal and short-sighted, they're provincial.
About a year or so ago, I mentioned in the blogs the Tesla car. It was in the news last night. Here are a few articles on it.
http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7012340760
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/09/18/BUF312VVPP.DTL
http://www.uturnmegreen.com/2008/01/10/2008-tesla-roadster/
In the second article above, this jumped out at me: "Like Silicon Valley as a whole, the city has many jobs at the top of the economic spectrum - such as executives and engineers - and many in service industries at the bottom. But it has few manufacturing jobs or others that pay middle-class wages."
(cont.) "
Comments on this story are now closed.