Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

January 8th, 2009
January 7th, 2009
January 6th, 2009
January 5th, 2009
January 3rd, 2009
January 2nd, 2009
January 1st, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT

Water facts and fiction

Think L.A. pulls the most water from the Delta? Think again

Updated: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 6:39 AM PDT

When the issue is a peripheral canal, it is tempting to fantasize about dividing California into two states at the Tehachapis and letting those people in La La Land worry about their own water.

We saw what they did to the Owens Valley, right? Let them desalinate sea water.

That wouldn't solve the problem because people in Los Angeles are not the biggest users of Delta water. We can fight a peripheral canal more effectively if we know the various interests behind it.

Here's the situation: Water leaves the Delta through two major water projects, California's State Water Project (SWP) and the federal Central Valley Project. The SWP delivers about 3 million acre-feet annually to farmers in the San Joaquin Valley and to urban users in both Northern and Southern California.

The SWP's South Bay Aqueduct provides water to users in Alameda and Santa Clara counties. The California Aqueduct takes water south over the Tehachapis to Southern California counties and, via the Coastal Branch Aqueduct, to areas around San Luis Obispo.

The other major water project, the CVP, is operated by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation. The CVP was built mainly to irrigate the Central Valley. According to Water Facts, a publication of the nonprofit Water Education Foundation, the CVP delivers 7 million acre-feet of water in a normal year, and about 90 percent of that is used to irrigate farmland.

To put it another way, the federal water project takes over twice as much water as the state water project that supplies L.A. and other urban and farm users, and it delivers 90 percent of what it takes to farming interests in the southern part of the Central Valley.

Over the decades, Delta water has been used to create a multibillion dollar agricultural economy in the southern Central Valley. At the same time, though, agribusiness has developed a sense of entitlement to that water.

The San Luis Unit of the CVP, including San Luis Dam and Reservoir west of Interstate 5 near Santa Nella, stores water pumped from the Delta, then releases it to the state and federal facilities when Delta flows are too low to meet project needs. Last January, the non-partisan General Accountability Office (GAO) reported that four large irrigation water districts in the Central Valley still owe federal taxpayers nearly $500 million for facilities constructed in the 1960s as part of the San Luis Unit.

Water exported from the Delta is distributed by contractors who pay for the water at a wholesale rate and can then store it or resell it. For example, the Kern County Water Agency contracts with the SWP to distribute water in Kern County. Recently, a Contra Costa Times investigation found that taxpayers paid $96 million to the Kern County Water Agency in a scheme that amounted to arbitrage. The Agency sold water at up to $200 an acre-foot to a publicly financed state environmental protection program. Meanwhile, it bought Delta water from the state for as little as $28 an acre-foot.

Another export contractor is Westlands Water District, which contracts with the federal government to deliver CVP water to farmers in western Fresno County and Kings County. Some of the lands irrigated by Westlands farmers contain selenium and other salts. In the 1980s, drainage from these lands deformed livestock and birds and caused a die-off of migratory waterfowl in the Kesterson National Wildlife Refuge. The cleanup cost taxpayers $26.6 million, and $19.8 million of that is supposed to be repaid by Westlands, according to the GAO report. Westlands still owes the money.

So much salt drains into the San Joaquin River from lands served by the Westlands Water District that there is a special monitoring station at Vernalis just to keep track of how bad the daily load of salt gets.

A third major export contractor is the Metropolitan Water District in Southern California. This district has gotten water not only from the Owens Valley and the Delta but also from the Colorado River. All those sources are threatened and MWD knows it. Through recycling, storage and conservation strategies, MWD has held its water use to early 1990s levels despite a growth in population. It has become a widely recognized leader in water-use efficiency.

Meanwhile, agribusiness in the southern Central Valley keeps using Delta water to grow crops on land where nature grows sagebrush.

Two-thirds of Californians depend on the Delta for drinking water, but it is agriculture that uses over 80 percent of California's developed water. So if you thought that Los Angeles is the main force pushing for a peripheral canal, think again.

Jane Wagner-Tyack of Lodi is a freelance writer, writing consultant, and former educator who serves on the board of directors of Restore the Delta (restorethedelta.org), a grassroots campaign focused on protecting recreation, agriculture, and the environment in the Delta. You can reach Jane at janetyack@gmail.com.

Reader Feedback

jwt wrote on Sep 25, 2008 5:27 PM:

" Jane here with one more comment.

Someone is going to read what I said about people not eating alfalfa and point out to me that cattle eat alfalfa and people eat beef. That would give me an opportunity to point out that it takes a lot more water to produce a pound of beef than it does to produce a pound of, say, wheat or apples. (Those cattle eat a lot of alfalfa.)

Estimates of water necessary for beef production vary widely, from under 1000 gallons per pound to over 5000 gallons. (The figure I found for wheat is 25 gallons per pound; for apples, 49 gallons per pound.)

Interestingly, the lowest water use figure I found for producing a pound of beef--435 gallons--assumes that the cattle are raised on grazing land not suitable for farming. So these must not be factory-farmed, feedlot, alfalfa-eating cattle. "

jwt wrote on Sep 25, 2008 4:47 PM:

" This is Jane again.

The GAO obviously thought that beneficiaries of the San Luis Unit were taking too long to finish paying for it.

And I don't think taxpayers intended to loan Westlands almost $20 million for over 20 years to clean up Kesterson. Apparently the GAO didn't think so either.

Regarding users paying this year for water they didn't receive, I didn't know that. Thank you for telling me. My goal is to get myself and everybody else educated about what is going on. "

jwt wrote on Sep 25, 2008 4:38 PM:

" Hi--this is Jane (the author of the article). Bulldog, people around here need to know that 80 percent of developed water in the state goes for agricultural rather than for urban uses. Most people don't realize that. I'm not taking a shot at farmers for growing food, although there are questions--and not just from me--about whether they are using water as efficiently as they could. Also, not all those crops feed people. Nobody I know eats alfalfa or cotton.

Bullpup, you're right. No water comes from the Delta. It all comes from somewhere else and goes through the Delta.

Are you saying that beneficiaries of the San Luis Unit have until 2030 to repay the construction costs? Let's see--mid-1960s to 2030. We should all get 60 plus years to pay back a loan. These water projects were not free to users, but they have been very heavily subsidized over a very long period of time by U.S. taxpayers. And I wish I believed that small and mid-sized farmers had benefited from this subsidy as much as agribusiness has. "

Bullpup wrote on Sep 20, 2008 11:22 AM:

" Too bad the bias of this author is allowed to be printed almost as if it is fact. Here are the facts---

Water that flows to water users south of the Delta originates in northern California at Shasta Reservoir and Oroville Reservoir and not the Delta as the author states.

Water users were required to sign contracts to repay all construction costs before the first shovel of dirt was ever dug for these reservoirs. Neither the State nor the federal government built the water system with the intent to provide a "free" service to anyone.

Yep, those federal contracts require the water users to completely repay the construction costs by the year 2030...which means, yeah, there is an outstanding balance to be paid.

Along those same lines, water users receiving water from the State system must make their annual payments as if they receive 100 percent of their contracted supply. This year they only got 50-60 percent of their supply but paid the bill as if they received a full delivery.

Too bad current and update facts are not included. "

Bulldog wrote on Sep 17, 2008 7:16 AM:

" Wow - and how do you think CA became the number one agricultural state in the nation? WATER. Do you know that Fresno and Tulare Counties are the number one and two Ag counties in the nation year after year? And you said it yourself, the CVP was created to provide AG water for farming.

If you take that water, or start charging market rates for it, you will see food prices climb. Prices are already moving up because of the cost of fertilizers and pesticides keeps climbing.

Our country relies on a cheap food policy. Everything we do is underpinned by the fact that we can feed our population. We may have some poor people, but 99% of our country is not hungry.

This article's tone takes a shot at farmers for using water to grow food. It is very one sided. These water districts are doing the best thay can, and with all the regulations and treaty rules they face, they do a pretty good job. "

Comments on this story are now closed.