Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

November 30th, 2008
November 29th, 2008
November 28th, 2008
November 27th, 2008
November 26th, 2008
November 25th, 2008
November 24th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT

Lodi still deserves a fair share of Delta College bond proceeds

Updated: Friday, September 12, 2008 11:51 PM PDT

We think San Joaquin Delta Community College has a lot to lose if no Measure L bond money is allocated to Lodi next month.

By now, everyone knows the campaign for Measure L was oversold back in 2004. It's clear that $250 million was not enough to fulfill even a portion the promises made. There's little value in rehashing the mistakes of the past — but there is value in working hard to make amends.

With only $66 million of the $250 million bond money left for Lodi, Manteca and Tracy/Mountain House, a real campus is not possible without another bond issue.

There's not enough money left to appease voters with the Blue Shield Building. That apparently will cost nearly $55 million. Although that building has been reported to be available for less, it has to conform to the standards of the Field Act — the one-size-fits-all earthquake safety standards California puts on public school buildings.

So what can be done in Lodi?

Buried in the options is an apparent offer by an unnamed developer to sell the college 15 acres for $4 million. The land is apparently located in southwest Lodi "near Wal-Mart," according to the Delta administrator heading up the "bond team."

In an ideal world, another Delta campus in Lodi wouldn't be so close to the main campus on Pacific Avenue in north Stockton. But our ideals went out the window a long time ago.

A land purchase is the least Lodi should settle for.

The drive to the main campus in Stockton is an impediment to many Lodian's aspirations of higher education. Whether by bus or by car, the corner of Kettleman Lane and Lower Sacramento Road is much easier to reach from anywhere in Lodi than Pacific Avenue.

Careful readers may have noticed here our use of "apparent" and "apparently." Because the college is negotiating real estate deals with various developers, the board is allowed to discuss these matters secretly.

But is secrecy a must?

A Delta campus will enhance the value of any development. We would urge the board, the administration and the developers to be as transparent as possible in order to restore faith with the voters who are paying the bills now and will be in the future.

The final allocations of Measure L money are set for discussion Oct. 6 at a workshop on the main Delta campus, followed by a vote Oct. 7.

A month later, voters will have a chance to put some new blood on the Delta board.

It's tempting to delay a decision until the new board takes office, but new members will have to come up to speed. Even then, the decisions won't be easier.

This board and its bond team need to make a commitment to the people of Lodi.

Without one, we predict the devil himself will be worried about global warming before another Delta bond passes in Lodi.

Lodi News-Sentinel

Reader Feedback

commonsense1 wrote on Sep 17, 2008 4:37 PM:

" Conversion of Walmart sounds great. Let's not forget, they just found out the purchase and state mandated conversion costs of the existing Blue Shield building, were estimated to be $70 million! Cheaper to tear the Walmart building down and start over. How much would that cost? I would guess a few of the other business owners would be less than happy with the parking issues. If I owned a business in that center why would I want Delta College? Bring me another large "anchor" retailer. "

commonsense1 wrote on Sep 17, 2008 4:23 PM:

" Lodian2....What in the world are you talking about? "

Lodian2 wrote on Sep 16, 2008 1:39 PM:

" Come on Commonsense! Guillespie is the realtor in
all the Delta campus site on Victor Rd. mess, you should know that by now. "

Zinfandel wrote on Sep 16, 2008 1:18 PM:

" marzo2008 wrote on Sep 15, 2008 7:48 AM:

" when they build the New walmart delta can buy the old build of walmart and have the school there. everything will anyready be there for them it's just a matter of painting the building and a sign. doesn't anyone think around here? use what is available and not out in the woods. we need something within the city limits so those students who don't have a car can walk take the bus or ride a bike to student. "

marzo2008, I agree with you 100%. I have said the same thing myself over and over. The whole shopping center could easily be turned into a Delta College complex. JCPenny's, Food 4 Less and all the other small stores could easily mover across the street and the buildings could all be used for a Delta campus. It's a wonderful idea, but, unfortunately, it probably will never happen. It's just to easy a solution for our public officals to grasp! "

OTH wrote on Sep 15, 2008 10:22 PM:

" G. Wimman

I would like to see a campus in South Lodi. However with the bond funds as fouled up as they areI would prefer to wait and start anew down the road. When all of Deltas current board are gone and they have a new president. I know that sounds like a lot but I think it could happen sooner than later. There is too much chaos.

They need to have someone in there that gives the public a new taste in their mouths. We are going to have to have a new bond but right now it wouldn't stand a snowballs chance in you know where. "

G. Wiman wrote on Sep 15, 2008 5:53 PM:

" OTH: I AGREE with you abou the funds. I was just pointing out that if they did build closer to the southwest area of Lodi the costs would be less. I too was one of those voters duped into voting for a "Lodi" campus. My son currently drives to Delta in Stockton evryday. I know the campus could not have been ready for my kids but I had hope for future generations. "

OTH wrote on Sep 15, 2008 5:46 PM:

" Okay,Okay,Okay. The infrastructure is there without magic.

Now can you explalain to me how we stretch 66 million left for just one campus? And that's not the only money the merry little group of trustees and president promised. Somehow I may end up in jail but I will have some company. You just can't pass out anymore money than you have. An idiot knows that. They may as well be out of money and they really don't have a lot to show for what they got. "

G. Wiman wrote on Sep 15, 2008 3:51 PM:

" OTH: For the 3rd time: There is no "Magic" involved. Go to the City of Lodi website (lodi.gov) select "mapping", enlarge the area of Lower Sacramento Road. Use the toolbar on the left to have it show the utilities. If you don't believe that, get a shovel and go dig a hole until you hit the pipes. But don't call me for bail money. "

OTH wrote on Sep 15, 2008 9:18 AM:

" marzo2008

In this mornings Stkn Rec they stated there is approx 66 million left from the original bond. I'm not sure what that would buy in the way of a usuable structure for Delta. Has anybody thought about just waiting until down the road when more money is available?

Delta has done a good job of what so many cities have done. They spend more than they have and you can only do that so long. "

marzo2008 wrote on Sep 15, 2008 7:48 AM:

" when they build the New walmart delta can buy the old build of walmart and have the school there. everything will anyready be there for them it's just a matter of painting the building and a sign. doesn't anyone think around here? use what is available and not out in the woods. we need something within the city limits so those students who don't have a car can walk take the bus or ride a bike to student. "

OTH wrote on Sep 14, 2008 11:22 PM:

" In todays dollars how much is the original bond money worth? My guess is it hasn't appreciated alot so what people are fighting over isn't there to begin with. "

TandC wrote on Sep 14, 2008 9:47 PM:

" angryeyes, nor greedy developers trying to steal a buck anywhere they can. They assume if the three ayemeegos on the Lodi city council can help them that it's ok? "

angryeyes wrote on Sep 14, 2008 8:28 PM:

" What I keep hearing is that they didn't get an agreement from the person in charge of Mountain House. Without the agreement the bond people have to install it and it isn't located right next to Mountain House. Tracy gave property with hook up not a problem. That is money that doesn't go to government contractors. "

OTH wrote on Sep 14, 2008 7:50 PM:

" So let me see if I can get this right. The infrastructure magically appears and then we can the bond money or what's left (hopefully) for the buildings. Am I close? "

angryeyes wrote on Sep 14, 2008 5:44 PM:

" I do recall before the election, in the Bond literature being mailed to voters, plans for satellite campuses. Lodi/Galt,was one of the areas that a satellite campus would address. When I read the literature, contemplated how much money they wanted, I concluded the financial figures didn't add up to the extensive promises being made to the voters. I asked someone trying to win my vote on this bond measure how $250 million, considering this would be built by government bureaucracy, could possibly cover so many ambitions projects. The answer I got was that they knew it wasn't enough but ways of gaining future funds would be addressed. I felt at the time that the leaders of the Bond Measure were giving the voters a song and dance. Sadly the measure passed and now the Delta campus, outside of athletic fields and Gateway buildings, is fading into a mess as every dollar they can get their hands on is put into trying to make a Mountain House glass cathedral. I bet if they had taken up Tracy on the free land deal we would be seeing something actually happening in Lodi/Galt. "

commonsense1 wrote on Sep 14, 2008 3:07 PM:

" Delta has been offered 15 ac on the west side for $4.5 mil (that's $300K per acre). Why would they do that? The land they had in contract was $185K per acre and they already have $4 mil invested in it! I thought Delta wanted to draw students from the foothill communities, Galt and Sacramento. What in the world is going on? "

commonsense1 wrote on Sep 14, 2008 2:32 PM:

" t&c..What ever is eating you must be suffering horribly. You don't hesitate in speaking your mind because you obviously have nothing to lose. Perhaps your whole purpose in life is simply to serve as a warning to others. I'm going to heed that warning and put my time to better use. "

TandC wrote on Sep 14, 2008 2:12 PM:

" common, when did I say or indicate that Gillespie was the developer of the Delta scam? He was the developer, so it goes, that was buying up all the land he could bamboozle anyone out of that he thought would ten times its value if that Victor Road Delta site were used. Why are you so transfixed on this prozac thing? You seem to know the effects of them so well, why don't you tell us if they make you high and delirious and paranoid to make your inane and duplicate posts time after time? Maybe you're one of the wannabes that stand to lose some of daddy's money if things don't go your way and with the grand jury watching every move going on with Delta, Parises, and the developers that're trying to sneak in that back door of the Delta college board and Lodi city hall for those "secret", er Brown Act midnight meetings. Sober up, common one! ROFLMAO By the way, didn't that deeveloper try to trick us taxpayers into letting him provide the retail and residential to provide the college with funds to build a campus until the truth came out and he was laughed off? "

commonsense1 wrote on Sep 14, 2008 1:07 PM:

" T&C......One more time; Gillespie was not the developer or owner of the ground for the proposed Delta site. Take a bottle of Prozac and sit down. Please explain this "trade" thing your talking about. "

DeltaPenguin wrote on Sep 14, 2008 10:21 AM:

" Looks like I posted 5 minutes too late. "

DeltaPenguin wrote on Sep 14, 2008 10:20 AM:

" I agree with G. Wiman.

I also see where he was lambasted for saying more bond monies could go toward facilities.

Nowhere in his post did he mention going out and getting another bond. He simply stated that more bond monies could be allocated for actual facility construction, as opposed to having to pay for installing the infrastructure. It was a very intelligent comment (whether accurate or not, as I am not certain as to what infrastructure is in place there).

OTH - Calm down. No need to berate one another here. Keep in mind, the people that deserve your attacks are the Board of Distrutees. "

G. Wiman wrote on Sep 14, 2008 10:15 AM:

" OTH: I was refering to existing Bond funds - not a new one.

TAnDC: Maybe you should drive down Lower Sacramento Road. The PG&E main power lines runs on the west side - which could supply power to Lodi Electric. The sewer main to White Slough is largest there. There is a 10" water main. Storm drain is at Debenedetti Park. That would be infrastructure. The new projects you are refering to are east of Lower Sacramneto road and require thier own infrastructure. "

TandC wrote on Sep 13, 2008 9:17 PM:

" Oth, from the indicators from the grand jury and the Stockton Record, it looks as if the developer and Parises have some connections or favors traded or owed one another. Why would Parises sell the developer land for Reynolds Ranch and then let this same developer squander some or all of that $4 million on land option deals that were negated? Did Parises promise this developer a %6 or so brokerage fee for selling these option deals or what? If so, it sounds like the grand jury should be asking plenty more questions about who, if anyone got commission or brokerage fees for options on this property before any contract was signed? Grand jury, quit playing games with these shysters and start handing down the indictments if the law or the Brown act was violated. "

OTH wrote on Sep 13, 2008 9:09 PM:

" One thing I would like to know. At anytime in writing was anything promised Lodi in writing from the last bond?

If not stop schmoozing at cocktails with the doers of the dirty deed. The board of trustess put us where we are now and why they haven't been run out of town I'll never know. "

taNdc wrote on Sep 13, 2008 8:02 PM:

" realty, one thing I do know is not to listen to your constant about anyone knowing nothing but yourself. Sound like one or two of our city councilmen. "

taNdc wrote on Sep 13, 2008 8:00 PM:

" The infrastructure is there? Where do you plan to get the utilities to put into it? Water? Electricity? LEUD is overloaded now and power outages are a common occurence because the dilapidated lines and equipment. Some equipment so old it can't even be replaced or repaired again. I hate to tell you Gwiman, but the infrastructure is not there. The new Sutter Gould project and surrounding development will need what little is there and much more. "

OTH wrote on Sep 13, 2008 2:41 PM:

" G. Wiman

Another bond? What at you smoking or drinking? They've wasted millions of this bond, refuse to be accountable
to the public and you think people will vote for another bond?

I will never vote for another bond as long as Serna, Rodriguez, Bugarin or any of the rest of them are affiliated with Delta College. They got their bond and they chose to piss it off. Oh well!

Better yet if your so gung ho on another bond you pay my share
everybody else who doesn't want one. "

reality wrote on Sep 13, 2008 12:16 PM:

" thank you g wiman for pointing out the fact that tandc knows absolutely nothing "

G. Wiman wrote on Sep 13, 2008 10:10 AM:

" TAnDC: You are incorrect in assuming who owns the 15 acres. There are numerous other benefits to the residents of Lodi if the campus is located in the southwest area, mainly that all of the utilities: electricity, water, sewer and storm drain already exist in that area. Saving residents millions on infrastructure costs. Meaning more bond money could actually go toward facilities. "

TAnDC wrote on Sep 13, 2008 9:45 AM:

" That 15 acres for $4 million "near Walmart" being considered is owned by Randy Snider, isn't it? Doesn't he own the same land that superWalmart is going to build on? With this new "tentative" plan to buy and build a Delta College campus there, how in the world do you propose to pass any kind of an Environmental Impact Report to even handle the traffic, congestion and smog it'll bring to Lodi? And how about the roads? Will Snider pay to widen Hwy. 12 from 99 to I-5 to handle the traffic? And how about the water, power, infrastructure? You have just shown us the overall scheme to keep the good ol' boys counting their cash and simply crapping on the business owners and citizens of Lodi to make a few wealthy families wealthier. We need some new, honest developers here to even up the playing field that really care about bringing commercial business in here that complement our current businesses, and not some gigantic superWalmart whose intentions are to bankrupt every local business they can to create their own new customer base. Let's get rid of these local bamboozling wealthy wannabe developers that have already destroyed Lodi. "

TAnDC wrote on Sep 13, 2008 9:17 AM:

" Lodi News-Sentinel, after the three names, Gillespie, Parises and Rodriguez, in one sentence,and the land grabbing going on at the same time, only two words come to mind rather Lodi campus-grand jury. My opinion, and I hope the grand jury pursues where that $4 million that was already wasted and who got the money for land option deals and who got the brokerage commissions on those deals. "

Comments on this story are now closed.