Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Students 'protest' the eating of turkeys on Thanksgiving (82)
- Minister takes to the streets to recruit new members (73)
- Does citing the facts on immigration mean I am a hate-monger? (65)
- Huber upsets Sieglock in 10th Assembly race (34)
- Former gang member hopes to make a difference in Lodi (34)
- Automakers need a simple car (30)
- Lodi fills position of deputy city manager (17)
- Update: Huber appears to have made comeback victory (16)
- Timing is everything (12)
- Will my house in Lodi sell before my grandkids graduate from high school? (12)
Rich lobbyists are bullying out regular voters
Plus: Why I am no longer a Democrat
Over the eight years that my column has appeared in the Lodi News-Sentinel, I've received bundles of mail.
Much of it has come in response to articles wherein I referred to myself as a Democrat.
Among the angry charges made against me were that I am a "tax and spend liberal," "a Teddy Kennedy-loving radical," and, regarding my numerous columns pointing out the folly of George W. Bush's Iraq War, "an unpatriotic bum."
Efforts on my part to dissuade readers have been futile. I've pointed out that my affiliation with the Democratic Party is technical only. Although registered, I haven't voted for any Democrat — except myself in 2003 during the California special gubernatorial election — in 20 years.
And I have no more interest in paying higher taxes and having my hard-earned money wasted on failed government programs than you do.
Since nothing I wrote convinced skeptical readers, I have taken the ultimate step to gain the favor of the doubters.
While I was at the Pennsylvania Department of Motor Vehicles, I changed my party registration to Independent.
My gesture was a symbolic protest aimed at the useless leadership of the Republicans and Democrats and their completely revolting presidential candidates.
Apparently, I am one of millions. Over recent years, Independents have grown to nearly 35 percent of registered voters.
Interestingly, although I am a newly-minted Independent, I plan to continue my well-established pattern of ignoring my party.
I'll not be voting for Ralph Nader, another relatively new Independent running for president. But I do support his call for a "Jeffersonian revolution" to lessen the influence of big money in Washington, D.C.
If there's a revolution going on, please tell me where to enlist.
Washington, once just a sleepy southern town, is now the nation's big money capital.
According to the latest census data, five counties neighboring D.C. are among the top ten wealthiest in the country. They are Loudoun, Fairfax, Howard, Montgomery and Prince William.
The wealth is generated by the most threatening villain democracy could ever imagine: the lobbyist.
The number of registered lobbyists in Washington, whose salaries start at $300,000, has more than doubled since 2000. Insider estimates place the number at more than 40,000. In the meantime, lobbyist fees have increased by 100 percent.
Lobbying, sadly, has become an integral part of the American political system because politicians depend on corporate donations, kickbacks or supportive media exposure.
Not long ago, corporations figured out that the high lobbyist fees — ranging up to $50,000-a-month retainers — could be profitably offset by the special interest earmark rewards Congress began making available. In other words, America is for sale. Sorry, your interests are of no interest to either the legislators or the fat cats.
To keep the vicious cycle going, the most successful lobbyists are former Congressmen and Senators who, because of their personal relationships with their ex-colleagues, can grease the wheel.
According to Public Citizen's Congress Watch, nearly half of all lawmakers who return to the private sector when they leave Congress become lobbyists.
And for those who turn to a second career in influence peddling, their Congressional record isn't nearly as significant as their contacts.
Robert L. Livingston, the Louisiana Republican and former chairman of the U.S. House of Representative's Appropriations Committee, is now president of his own thriving six-year-old lobbying firm, called one of the "most influential on K Street."
In 1998, Livingston was briefly House Speaker-elect until Hustler Magazine uncovered unsavory details about his extra-marital affair that forced him to confess and resign.
In fact, had Fred Thompson's timing been better and his campaign more energetically managed, he could have been America's first lobbyist president.
In the 20 years leading up to his Senate election in 1996, Thompson lobbied on behalf of the Tennessee Savings and Loan Association, the deposed Haitian President John-Bertrand Aristide and the National Planning & Reproductive Health Association.
I wish I could tell you that as the money is exchanged between the fat cats and the pols, your interests are addressed — or even that they are acknowledged.
But they aren't. Your only recourse is to use your vote wisely by withholding it from all of the major candidates.
Your vote is all you have left.
Joe Guzzardi cast his first presidential vote for Barry Goldwater. The ultimate political skeptic, Guzzardi says that he does not believe one word uttered by either John McCain or Barack Obama.

Reader Feedback
Rhodie wrote on Aug 23, 2008 4:28 PM:
Under this plan either there is less going to each canidate so they are making less and hopefully we gat people who care more OR the schools are getting everything they need to educate our kids properly.
Imagine having enough $$ for the schools to have to ADD programs like music and art so they use most of the $$ while they still have enough to save a portion every cycle for those emergencies like mold and resurfacing Tokay high's parking lot, again.
Maybe even be able to give the teachers a school year end bonus to help them through the summer and put more into their retirement. "
Rhodie wrote on Aug 23, 2008 4:23 PM:
You'd have to establish a base line. So let's say there are 10,000 students registered in the LUSD. They represent 5% of the total students for the entire state of California. The lobbiest for the Capitol One "donates" $200K to the next governors campaign race. 5% of that 200k would then go to the general funds for the LUSD, or about 10K. Multiply that by the millions given by both local and national lobbiests as well as coorporations to get "their guy" into office and we'd have plenty of money in the LUSD for more teachers, new schools and transportation. Maybe even enough for lockers at school. The same would apply for non-monitary "gifts" to officials or running officials. A trip to the Bahamas for "Fact Finding" (what facts are they looking for?) valued at 50K would require a 50K gift to the districts. this would equate to $2500 for LUSD, but that is a lot of binders to be tossed out by students;). It makes sense to me. And I believe that the "donation" to the school funds would be considered a tax write-off for the corps. "
russinlodi wrote on Aug 23, 2008 2:09 PM:
russinlodi wrote on Aug 23, 2008 2:07 PM:
Rhodie wrote on Aug 23, 2008 10:58 AM:
I also believe that all lobbiest contributions must be matched to that politition's districts education funds. If they give Senator Glumndum $300k then the schools in his area get $300K. If the Governor of Montana gets $150K from the timber industry then the schools in Montana get $150K into their general fund. Individually it may not be much but given the money that changes hands in D.C. then I could add up. This would extend to coorporate campaign contibutions. Obviously some tuning would have to be done for presidential races, maybe instead of the $$ going to a national distribution where each school would only get a few dollars then the $$ given to a presidential campaign is mached into a hational teachers retirement package.
It's easy to fix government, the average person just has to care enough to do something, vote, help, or run. "
wtf wrote on Aug 23, 2008 9:14 AM:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W7r27Az_Mns
http://rally.campaignforliberty.com/performers/?first_name=Barry&last_name=Goldwater%20Jr. "
wtf wrote on Aug 23, 2008 9:09 AM:
This is true, to an extent; but with Diebold "counting" the votes, even this is questionable. However, if one uses their vote, as I am in this case, to express their will and their conscience, then, yes, my vote is all I have left.
You also wrote: "If there's a revolution going on, please tell me where to enlist."
This is my cue :)
The "Revolution" going on is the Ron Paul Revolution and the kick off for the Campaign for Liberty will be taking place at the Rally for the Republic. Links below:
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/
http://rally.campaignforliberty.com/ "
Comments on this story are now closed.