Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes


November 21st, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
November 17th, 2009
November 16th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
Lodi's Garrett Easley, 10, takes a short test run with his miniature dragster on Thursday afternoon. (Dan Evans/News-Sentinel)

Only 10, Lodi junior dragster burning up the strip

By Richard Banas II
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Friday, August 15, 2008 2:34 PM PDT

Comments (78 comment(s))

Garrett Easley has five years left before he can get his driver's permit. Yet, he is already the fastest junior dragster racer in Lodi.

The 10-year old Easley received a medallion for competing in the National Junior Dragster finals in Denver, Colo., in late July.

In the preliminaries, he qualified for the semifinals out of 54 racers but was eliminated in the third round after posting his best time of 12.90 seconds and hitting a top speed of 52 mph.

There's no question that the 4-foot-8, 70-pound Easley loves strapping himself into the roll cage of his 278-pound dragster and hurtling himself down an 1/8 mile drag strip at high speeds.

"I think it's pretty awesome not to be old enough to have a driver's license and yet still get to drive a dragster at 50 miles per hour," Easley said from his Lodi home this week.

Easley's fascination with speed began two years ago when Paul Easley, Garrett's father and a racing aficionado, took Garrett to look at a junior dragster that the neighbor of a friend had for sale. They didn't buy it, but they were smitten by the drag racing bug.

The Easleys then started looking around for the right car and found one on the East Coast and had it shipped it to Lodi. While most junior dragsters are made with aluminum and fiberglass, the younger Easley's 1989 dragster is entirely metal and is likely the oldest car racing on the West Coast.

Measuring 14.5 feet long with a 12.5-foot-long wheel base, the purple dragster is powered by a modified, 5-horsepower Briggs and Stratton lawnmower engine block that has been ramped up to 20 horsepower.

According to Paul Easley, the dragster, known in the junior drag racing circles has the "half-scale" dragster, has all of the latest safety gear.

"It has a beefed-up frame with a roll-cage made of chrome moly tubing that includes a five-point driver's harness with a quick-release," the elder Easley said. "A fire-retardant suit and a full face helmet protect the driver."

According to Garrett's stepmother, Wanda Easley, Garrett learned the importance of the quick release on the harness earlier this year when his engine caught fire and he needed to make a quick exit from the car.

"Normally, Garrett moves very slowly and deliberately when he is not racing," Wanda Easley said. "When his car caught fire, I didn't know he could move so fast."

Last year in his rookie season at the throttles, Garrett nabbed nine trophy finishes, including five first places, one second place and another two for reaching the semifinals as well as finishing third in his age group. In addition, he won a $100 savings bond from Samoa for third place as well as $50 in cash for best reaction time.

This year, Garrett, who normally races out of the Sacramento Raceway, has collected four trophy finishes, a second place and three semi-finals with a $100 savings bond.

Garrett, who is a student in the fifth grade at the University Public School in Morada, is currently in seventh place in the Junior Dragster Racing League with 276 points going into this weekend's Western Division JDRL Series races at Samoa racetrack in Redding.

(Editor's Note: This story was updated at 2:33 p.m. to correct a misspelling in the headline.)

Reader Feedback

Cogito wrote on Aug 19, 2008 9:15 PM:

" Garret, to me it sounds like you have an awesome family, I wish my parents would have let me chase my dreams at such a young age. You have been blessed with a family who supports your dreams of reaching to be something different. Thoreau would be proud of you and your parents. I hope to get to see you race. If I do, I'll come up and say hi to everyone. Best of luck! "

Report Abuse

senneferj wrote on Aug 19, 2008 7:54 AM:

" I told myself I wouldn't write again... the reason why people are so angry isn't LodiSafeway because our collective consciences are making us angry at ourselves...it's because you (even with your refusal to admit it) continue to make snide referrals about Dale Earnhardt and the people follow racing...as a matter of fact no one in our family actually watches any racing other than Garrett. And yes, I expect you to accept my statistics and facts about childhood accidents and traumas because I am actually a trained professional and have attended many statewide and nationwide conferences regarding child safety. As to your comment about being a first responder if my child was to be hurt, yes that would be devastating I cannot imagine seeing my little girl hurt, however I would be equally horrified if she were to sustain an injury jumping into our pool as I would if she were to decide to race like her uncle Garrett and get hurt somehow... the statistics show that she is MORE likely to be hurt swimming than racing.. maybe we should stop swimming?? My parents are very aware and educated and Garrett is very safe...case closed.. "

Report Abuse

Garrett is my HERO wrote on Aug 18, 2008 9:25 PM:

" WOW! As this amazing child's mother, I would just like to say that I have read every word of every comment posted here. Garrett has a large network of family members that actively participate in his life. He said he'd like to try drag racing, so after months of discussion, we collectively, as a family, decided, knowing the level of risk involved, to sign him up for jr. drags. As his parents, Garrett's upbringing, which undoubtedly includes his safety, is at the top of our list. We personally purchased the best of the best safety gear for our son to ensure his safety on the track. Garrett is much wiser beyond his years, and the thought of people saying or suggesting ineptness on the part of his parents really upsets him....Here's Garrett's response to Lodisafeway. "You should be told that you have no clue what you are talking about and I don't care what you do in your life just as long as it doesn't interfere in mine. You need to stop hiding in your little shell of protection and come out in the real world and live!!!" "

Report Abuse

ruffian70 wrote on Aug 18, 2008 6:16 PM:

" Last thing I want to say here is....
Thank you Mom & Dad!!!! I appreciate all your support, I Love you!!!! "

Report Abuse

ruffian70 wrote on Aug 18, 2008 2:42 PM:

" Again, lodisafeway no one has had a problen with your opinions, but again you attack my families character and responsibilty to thier children. What's with the #3 sticker about? You are not only ignorant, but continue to shy away from my original ??? Did or do your children play sports? By the way my 2yrd old son rode a horse yesterday, would you like my address so you can call CPS? "

Report Abuse

galtgirl77 wrote on Aug 18, 2008 2:35 PM:

" Cogito you are dead on about the safety of this sport..and you are right, laws would be in effect if it were really that dangerous!

Does anyone else think this LodiSafeway character is a little racisit...?!

Why all the references to Dale Ernhardt?! I guess those who are completely clueless about racing in general just assume Dale WAS the only recognized race car driver! Too funny.

I wonder what this person thinks about motocross! hahaha! Maybe I won't even open that "can of worms". All we will read is Blah, Blah, BLAH! "

Report Abuse

Cogito wrote on Aug 18, 2008 1:55 PM:

" Desperado you're wasting your time. People like Lodi safeway, even when totally ignorant of any real facts, won't admit when they're wrong. I mean, if it were THAT dangerous, there would be a law preventing kids from participating until a certain age. They think that wet nursing their kids until they're teenagers is good parenting. They refuse to believe that buying your kid a bicycle and letting them ride it outside your own backyard is inherently more dangerous than what your son does. I wonder if the kids will have to be grown up and out of the house before they're allowed to get a drivers license. I say that what you do for your kid, getting him involved in something like this, is great. I grew up in a neighborhood with people who owned, and raced, race cars. One was my uncle. We spent many great days at the track. I wanted to race when I grew up, but it never happened. Your son is one blessed young man. I hope Lodi safeways grandchildren get better support from their parents than hers obviously do. "

Report Abuse

desperado wrote on Aug 18, 2008 1:12 PM:

" I see you will continue to ignor the facts without regard for the proof. Every statement regarding the safety of Junior drag racing can be supported with facts and statistics,.. Yours on the other hand can not!
Since it is me you are accusing of borderline child abuse I am of course able to return said comments with some manner of ferocity. As for the memorial # on the window, I don't have one but I do have a sticker for a local kid who died playing football. Oh, but I forgot, you don't care about the facts as long as you hide behind the anomnemity of blogging about someone elses responsibilities. I don't believe you have any children and I dont think you are even remotely qualified to discuss track records of parenting with me as my record stands for itself with my grown children as well as my current one. clearly you have nothing but time to spend blogging on others behind your wall. Please stay there from now on.
Regards "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 18, 2008 12:40 PM:

" But let's see - what other "facts" do you expect me to consider: a modified Briggs & Stratton engine that was originally designed for 5hp now operates at 20hp; a vehicle that can travel at interstate speeds; and one that has the propensity to catch fire. What other facts do you wish to present that would persuade me that what is written above should be placed into the hands of a ten-year-old child?

I'm sitting here laughing my butt off at the absurdity of the defense of such a notion. This is the DEFINITION of "borderline child abuse" offered by another contributor. Just how irresponsible does a parent need to be in order to be held accountable?

Yet I still cannot help but wonder why there is such harsh response to my comments. If I am so wrong and others are so right, why do any of you care so much? Absent common sense and any idea of safety, I can safely assume that you (collectively) have consciences - and that is what is causing you such anxiety. Other than that I am at a complete loss to understand.

Now I am really done. Bye! "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 18, 2008 12:28 PM:

" I never insisted that the starting age was anything. We were discussing the 10-year-old child involved here.

I've stated my opinion and will absolutely NOT begin to discuss it with someone who simply desires to rehash the whole issue again with the nonsensical expectation that I will be persuaded into believing that I have no idea as to what I am "talking" about.
I don't need to be a racing aficionado to understand the dangers involved in the sport. To suggest otherwise is yet one more example of arrogance to the nth power. The same thing applies to anyone who suggests that I don't understand the issue of safety and how it applies to children. My track record in this regard is second-to-none. I wonder what it is about this crowd that simply cannot tolerate differing opinions. It truly baffles me. But then I don't own a pickup truck with a big #3 emblazoned in the window with "In Memoriam" in huge capital letters above it. That's the mindset of those who for whatever reason have no problem with a fire breaking out in a car driven by a ten-year-old. That alone speaks for itself. "

Report Abuse

desperado wrote on Aug 18, 2008 12:21 PM:

" I see we are limited to length here so I will just further say, did you let your kids (if you actually have any) ride bikes or skateboard on the street or sidewalk where they are really at the mercy of large vehicles being driven by irresponsible idiots. This is where the real safety issues of childhood lie. Being out on the street doing everyday stuff. Garrett is completely supervised and the whole family supports him and helps him with his racing. That's more than most people can claim about thier kids sports participation. Send them to practice or even games with a friend or let em ride thier bike cause your too busy to make it. Doesn't happen at the races.
Does he want to be a full time racer like Ashley Force or Erica Enders?? (Both started as Junior drag racers)
No, He wants to be a palientologist. Doesn't mean he can't enjoy drag racing.
In closing your opinion only really bothers me because you present it without the facts to support it.
Look up the stats and find out whats really dangerous before you call someone else a bad parent.
Regards "

Report Abuse

desperado wrote on Aug 18, 2008 12:09 PM:

" OK,
Now for the comment from the real people involved. Garretts parents
Lodisafeway, You have no idea what you are talking about either from the perspective of safety or whether Garrett decided what to do for a sport. As to what we decide is safe for our child we look at all the facts before making such a decision. If you let your children participate in any sports that are common these days, and yes I am referring to baseball,soccer, vollyball,football,etc.. And you did any research regarding safety you would find that all forms of junior motor racing have a better safety record than any of those sports.
But clearly you think your uninformed opinion is worth more than the truth.
Further, a little checking would have shown that they can start motor racing at age 8 not 10. The safety devices required in this sport are much more effective and extensive than any of the other sports mentioned. What's more they actually work as opposed to some of the ones required for after school sports.
The safety record of NHRA junior drag racers is better per capita than any of those sports. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 18, 2008 11:00 AM:

" Cogito - I will leave with a final thought (again). There is often a fine-line between "protective" and "over protective" when it comes to raising children. There are many ways to build self-esteem and to destroy it. Keeping our children safe, along with the love that we provide, is not only what we "should" do, it is what we are "required" to do. My kids have participated in all manner of activities as they were growing up yet before signing my name on the form to permit them to play whatever sport or activity that it was, their safety came first-always. If I ever placed their social status above that one responsibility then I WOULD be guilty of potential child abuse.

Someone suggested that I had no knowledge of my position here because I wasn't a "first responder." I just wonder what that person would think if she was to be in that position if it was her own child that she was responding to as a result of a modified lawn-mower engine blowing up and the child not being as quick as Garrett evidently was. That's my specific point. "

Report Abuse

Cogito wrote on Aug 18, 2008 10:27 AM:

" Lodi safeway, I agree that we are all entitled to our opinions. That being said, I believe over protective parents do more harm to their children's long term emotional, social, and psychological well being than good. They force their children to be outsiders looking in. I started playing tackle football at 11 years old. By the time I got to high school, I already had 3 years experience under my belt. The kids whose parents made them wait until high school to participate, had to learn the game I already knew. I played, while kids who were better athletes than me sat the bench. My football abilities made me more self-confident, and more socially accepted, than those kids. I'm not saying that it was fair, that's just the way it was. Activities build self-esteem. They give kids an identity. How do you think this kid will be received by his peers at school? Most of the kids will think he's cool, making him b.m.o.c. for a little while, making him feel good about who he is. The kids who are too protected by their parents will be envious, and maybe just a little bitter too. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 18, 2008 10:09 AM:

" In any event I've exhausted much more time and energy than I had planned on this issue and will move on to other projects. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 18, 2008 9:54 AM:

" Now Cogito, if you're referring to me in your statement regarding not letting a child participate in any sport until they reach age 13, you are distorting the facts here. Each decision that a parent makes regarding their children should be based upon the set of facts and circumstances that lead to that decision. Based upon this story there was a fire involved in a modified engine that was attached to a mini-dragster driven by a 10-year-old child at 50+mph. That alone gives rise to concern. Even the kid's step-mother was surprised that Garrett could move as fast as he did while escaping the vehicle. The fact is they didn't know.

Most childhood sports are not designed to be inherently dangerous. Drag racing is. Yes, accidents happen. But once again it comes down to "acceptable" risk. And for me (and this is my opinion - as if I need to actually state that again), such a risk for a ten-year-old child is not acceptable.

Do I care that others don't agree with me? Not at all. I've only voiced my opinion. Those who cannot tolerate other's opinions are who I feel sorry for. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 18, 2008 9:42 AM:

" And Cogito you are entitled to your opinion (as are all others), which I respect. Others have not been as generous (not that I'm surprised, especially on a blog). My original statement that "just because parents "can" permit their children to do something doesn't mean they "should"" was met with fierce opposition. Yet I've maintained my position as well as my composure in spite of what was thrown my way.

What has ultimately come of this is a simple difference of opinion. Unfortunately, there are those who actually believe that those who do not agree with them are "terrible" people and not worthy of voicing those opinions. I find when people don't have the capacity to maturely and/or intellectually argue their position they resort to childish retorts and accusations that have nothing to do with the debate in progress. I suppose they hope that such behavior will distract others who might otherwise at least consider what the opposing side is putting forth. But again, I'm certainly not surprised at their reactions; but neither am I bothered by them. In fact, I am rather amused. "

Report Abuse

Cogito wrote on Aug 18, 2008 9:40 AM:

" O.K., I just did a quick lookup of soccer injuries in children. I found out that between 1979 and 1993, there were 27 "serious" injuries in youth soccer resulting from "falling soccer goalposts". Now remember, this is ONLY from "falling soccer goalposts". 18 of those 27 were fatal. "The mean age of the subjects in this study was 10 years". 3 more were killed the very next year. There you go. Not letting your kids participate in any youth sports until they are 13 is borderline child abuse in my opinion. I remember having friends with overprotective parents. I always felt sorry for them, and still do. "

Report Abuse

Cogito wrote on Aug 18, 2008 9:25 AM:

" Lodi safeway, I know a guy who got his sons involved in racing starting at the age of 4. They drive quarter-midget racers. These kids live, eat, and breathe this stuff. His oldest is maybe 8 years old, and their garage is LOADED with the trophy's his boys have won. I would bet these parents are every bit as good a parent as you or I. They have their children involved in a positive, wholesome outlet. Sure there are risks, but you can't raise your kids in a bubble. Finding a wholesome activity you can build a lifelong bond involving you and your kids is a good thing for them, AND you. At 10 years old, driving a little car in a straight line, even at 55 m.p.h., is a piece of cake. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 18, 2008 9:08 AM:

" Cogito - No, I turn to her for an "opinion" that only a 17-year-old can provide. What is hysterical (and potentially tragically pathetic) are those who believe it should be up to a ten-year-old child to decide what he should or should not be able to do. Relying upon Garrett's wishes or "passions" to dictate what should be wisdom-based choices by his parents is what is at question here.

Also, if you had read the seemingly unending responses, there was much ado about just how happy my own children are with a parent like me who would forbid any one of them from participating in an activity (before they reached 13 years of age) as was described in the original article and the responses that followed.

It was also suggested that my kids might be happier with Garrett's parents; I simply wished to dispel that idea - not that I had any doubt, of course. "

Report Abuse

Cogito wrote on Aug 18, 2008 9:04 AM:

" I just read this blog this morning, so I apologize if I have repeated the thoughts of others. "

Report Abuse

Cogito wrote on Aug 18, 2008 9:00 AM:

" All you people who are critical of this family, can you find any stories of any kids suffering serious injuries as a result of their participation in this sport? Because there are myriad horror stories of serious injuries from kids playing little league baseball and soccer. I'm sure that this isn't the first time you have formed an opinion based on ignorance. Some people start their kids racing quarter midgets and karts at around 5 years old. "

Report Abuse

Cogito wrote on Aug 18, 2008 8:55 AM:

" Lodi safeway, when you want a well thought worldly wise opinion, do you usually turn to your 17 year old daughter for wisdom? That's HYSTERICAL! "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 17, 2008 11:42 PM:

" And one final point (really) - tonight I decided to discuss this matter with my 17-year-old daughter. After I explained the sport as it has been described herein and elsewhere on the Internet, I asked her at what age would she think it appropriate for a child to engage in the sport. Amazingly, she said 13. I did not mention the matter of an engine catching fire - just a pint-size dragster traveling at 50+ miles-per-hour. When I brought the fire into the discussion along with the ensuing "conversations" that I have had here, she was simply amazed.

Now while I have not participated in the racing of cars of any type during my lifetime (by choice), I DO know something about 10-year-old kids and their capabilities, having raised more than just a few to adulthood. And has been my opinion from the outset and remains so now, 10-years-old is too young to engage in a sport whose primary intent is to go as fast as possible in a vehicle that can easily become a pile of rubble and flame with just the slightest of errors. It's not worth the risk. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 17, 2008 10:19 PM:

" senneferj - Your discussion about leaving children in hot automobiles requires further response.

First, read my "entire" comment at 10:02 am today in this regard.

Second, the use of the word "accident" only goes so far as to describe intent. Most parents do not intend to kill their children by leaving them in hot cars. That certainly does not relieve them of their responsibility - hence my comment regarding prison time.

Again here, while it won't be Garrett's parents' "intent" to cause harm to him if he experiences an event that causes him injury or death, it will be their responsibility. And once again, this comes down to the assumption of risk. No child of Garrett's age can assume that risk; it must be taken solely by those who are charged to take care of him. When I question the wisdom behind these decisions I have been met with answers such as it is his "dream" or that he is "only 10 once." Neither those answers (or any others presented here) have come close to providing a sound reason for permitting him to operate a vehicle (as described herein) that has already once burst into flames. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 17, 2008 9:51 PM:

" senneferj-the fact of the matter is I have answered your questions. You simply refuse to acknowledge them.

This is a forum for people to discuss the articles and the opinions set forth about them. If you would have taken the time to actually read what I have written, you will realize that my comments have never been put forth as anything other than my opinion. I base those opinions upon what I read and what I know. You and others have taken a defensive posture to those opinions to the extent of sheer ridiculousness.

You seem to believe that your "facts" are better than anyone else's and since someone presented statistics that support your contention that this activity is not dangerous (which is absurd), that you now believe I should abandon what I believe to be true. That is arrogance, plain and simple.

Even here I am becoming "redundant" again certainly to the dismay of others who would rather I go away. The thing is I am the one who decides when I am finished here; not anyone else.

As for "name calling," I suggest that you closely re-read what I wrote. You're wrong. "

Report Abuse

senneferj wrote on Aug 17, 2008 8:47 PM:

" .....something such as carpentry because I don't know enough to have a real opinion...
I just wish you would admit that you formed your opinion before you knew all of the facts.... "

Report Abuse

senneferj wrote on Aug 17, 2008 8:46 PM:

" Although I think I already know the answer, I'm wondering why you never reply to any of my posts...
1) you now know that racing isn't anymore (and possibly less) dangerous than any sport that could be played at your local elementary school... so can you just admit that your perception of how dangerous it is, and therefor how irresponsible my parents are, was wrong?
2) You said that the majority of the time people leave their children in a hot car, it's an "accident"..have you ever been a first responder to an incident like that? You speak many times as if things are fact, and they're aren't...again they are your (somewhat uneducated) opinion. Unfortunately living in Phoenix has exposed me to many every year, and rarely is it ever a true accident. Most of the time the parents are involved in drugs and/or alcohol and simply forget... it's really not the same.
I speak to you about child safety because I'm the person who ends up taking care of the children left in the car, the pdestrians vs auto, the near drownings..those things I know about, I would never try to pass off my opinion as fact about "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 17, 2008 11:17 AM:

" To WY: surely you're not suggesting that skydiving is not dangerous are you? Whenever someone applies for life insurance, their activities are always considered when determining whether or not they are insurable and in calculating the premium cost. While there are many things are considered, skydiving is one of just a very few activities that are specifically asked about during the underwriting process. And during that process the difference between tandem and any other type of skydiving isn't given special consideration. The fact is skydiving is dangerous. That is what makes it so inviting to many people. I never went beyond the one tandem jump that I made fifteen years ago, but I clearly remember those 6,000 free-fall feet that had my heart and head racing at the thrill of hurtling toward the ground at such a high rate of descent. I freely admit that as I waddled to the door of the aircraft with some guy I had just met strapped to my back I had my reservations before rolling out. It was great!!

But there is a reason why one must be at least 18-years-old to participate - risk. "

Report Abuse

ruffian70 wrote on Aug 17, 2008 11:03 AM:

" You still have not responded, did or do your children play sports?? If so, then due to the statistics, I would have to call you a hipocrit. Who said anything caved into Garretts demands. Once again you speak of something you know nothing about. Did the article say that he stomped his feet and said I want a race car now!!! No, it didn't.
Last thing I would like to know is, when an article is written about a 10 year old showing a horse at a horse show, do you also jump on that band wagon and label those parents irresponsible. Whats the difference, please tell me. "

Report Abuse

GALTGIRL77 wrote on Aug 17, 2008 10:47 AM:

" Helpful...hahaha! Your too much, Lodisafeway. Ignorant maybe...helpful-NOT EVEN CLOSE. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 17, 2008 10:21 AM:

" And finally (yes, after this I'm done) - my children are happy. They are also healthy and well-adjusted. As their mother and I have raised them their happiness was never derived from us caving into their demands that they be permitted to engage in any activities that we deemed to be an unnecessary threat to their health, welfare and continued happiness in life. There are risks that must be taken; risks that could/should be taken; and risks that should never be taken as it pertains to raising children. At ten-years-old had any of our children wished to engage in the activity discussed in the article above, we would have determined that 13 years of age would be a more appropriate time to consider it. By that time, most children have a better understanding of risk and responsibility that very few children of eight to ten years of age do. Most often we've used common sense as well as our awesome responsibility FOR them to guide us in these types of decisions. It has worked well for us.

So, that's it. I hope I've been helpful. Have a nice day. "

Report Abuse

ruffian70 wrote on Aug 17, 2008 10:09 AM:

" Your comments now fall upon deaf ears....The anger is not because of your opinion, it is because you choose to label, and call these people bad parents. The point I am trying to convey, is that there are alot of sports that are dangerous in some way. Would you be a redneck or bad parent for letting your child play football? Do your kids play any sports? Did you know statisticly more kids have been injured playing football, riding skateboards, riding horses than racing a car. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 17, 2008 10:02 AM:

" As for the example of someone leaving a child in a hot car, I was referring to something that was posted earlier. However, since you asked - while there is absolutely no excuse for any parent to leave their child strapped into an automobile AT ANY TIME alone and with no breathable air, the majority of these incidents are "accidental." Regardless, because parents are ultimately responsible for the health and welfare of their children (yeah, that's redundant), they should appropriately be held accountable for their actions to include prison time. Children are much too important to be treated in this manner.

Here we have parents who "deliberately" strap their child into the cockpit of a little racing car powered by a modified lawn-mower engine with a propensity for bursting into flames that travels at freeway speeds. Now, if you really want me to finish this comparison, I will. But I'll leave it to your imagination (not common sense, since it is apparently lacking) as to how a court might react in the event of a disaster. Of course this is just my opinion - as are all of my comments.

You asked the question. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 17, 2008 9:49 AM:

" First, a number of you have no understanding as to the purpose of this blog. You do need to educate yourself in this regard. I have merely offered my opinions based upon the article and the responses to it. Since my posts have caused you so much anger, I suggest you look inward (or to Garrett's parents) rather than to me for resolution.

For whatever reason there are those who are disturbingly cavalier with the safety and welfare of their children. I have taken a different approach to raising mine, yet I've never insisted that anyone follow my lead.

A few of you have insisted that I cease discussing this matter as it disturbs you so much. I can only imagine that it is your consciences that have caused the majority of you who purport to care so much about Garrett to react in the way that you have, yet now it appears that being labeled a "redneck" is much more important. I am not responsible for Garrett; his parents are. If they believe it is appropriate to risk his life in this fashion, then that speaks volumes about them. "

Report Abuse

ruffian70 wrote on Aug 17, 2008 7:22 AM:

" Lodisafeway, Now you are comparing leaving a child in a hot car to my brother drag racing. Who is the one with issues here? Did you ever put a football helmet on your child, did your daughter ever want to ride a horse, or have your children played baseall? Of, course if you were not anal enough to let them play these sports, you will say that it isn't the same. Ask Mr. Banas about footabll injuries, or what about the 10 year old boy that has a brain injury because he got hit in the head with a baseball, but he is 10. Should he be playing baseball, are his reflexes quick enough, should his parents have let him play baseball??? According to you, we should call CPS, or are they just REDNECKS?? I hope your children really are happy! "

Report Abuse

senneferj wrote on Aug 17, 2008 5:05 AM:

" With the statistics and information that myself and Mr. Banas have provided I would think that you would be able to conclude that a sport that you PERCEIVED to be dangerous is actually not. Therefor you are arguing that my parents are letting Garrett participate in a sport that isn't actually dangerous... and the rest of your argument is name calling... I think that it is interesting that you are are making assumptions about the people responding to you by using the term "redneck" does that mean that if someone does not share your opinion they must be less educated? While you may know people who "take pride in that connotation" I suggest you reserve it then, for people you know and for people you are not disagreeing with... in this context calling someone a redneck, or anything for that matter is just name calling. "

Report Abuse

galtgirl77 wrote on Aug 16, 2008 11:37 PM:

" I am not a redneck nor do I come from a family of rednecks. I have many friends who "YOU" might consider rednecks and label. I on the otherhand am AMERICAN, like the Easley's and everyone in this country (legally)! But then again you might be the one to argue with me about that. What does it matter what one's background is? How does that play into this article...IT DOESN'T.

Don't worry about my age...I am wise beyond my years. I am not related nor do I know the Easley's or Garrett. I just get tired of people speaking out on the behalf of others when those who they are speaking of do not condone their views. We'll just say that I am between the age of 10-99 years old! Make your own assumption.You seem good at that! "

Report Abuse

WY wrote on Aug 16, 2008 8:00 PM:

" I don't think it's a good idea to try and convay the message of safety when the dragster is on the sidewalk. I think there are better places to take it for a spin. "

Report Abuse

WY wrote on Aug 16, 2008 7:57 PM:

" I'm missing a few letters on that last post... it bugs. but that's me. sorry "

Report Abuse

WY wrote on Aug 16, 2008 7:56 PM:

" richard... that's the same as ski diving. People think it's SO dangerious. But if you talk about how many jumps made to injury there really are. well then. I bugs when folks around here talk about all the death/injury out at the parachute center in acampo. I don't think I have ever heard of a issue with tandem jumps and I pretty much know all about the accidents in the last fifteen years. Compared to ALL the jumps that are made. Hundreds of jumps are made every month. People only know the bad stuff and remember it. Our local DZ is known world wide. People come from Russia, Japan, China, Great Britian, lockeford....

I say race on young ones. BUT! remember the rules,don't push the envelope to hard, and keep your head in the game.
RULES... Rules rules! follow them. That's how that guy lost his plane. He didn't follow the rules. "

Report Abuse

WY wrote on Aug 16, 2008 7:41 PM:

" The pic is loopsided for what reason? "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 16, 2008 6:14 PM:

" They're only redundant because you keep arguing with me. It is you who should give it a rest.

I wonder just how old you are. Here you are with your righteous indignation over me suggesting that Garrett's safety should be of more concern to his parents yet you have the audacity to recommend the types of risks I should be taking with my own children.

You also seem to believe that I am "against" Garrett. As far as I can tell I am the only one FOR him. Most everyone else actually believes he is able to make his own decisions at ten-years-old. I'd like to believe he'll be alive or capable of making those very decisions when the responsibility for them will rest solely with him.

If your family is not "redneck," then why all the concern? Regardless, there are many who actually take pride in that connotation. If your family would rather not be thought of in that manner, then perhaps they might want to consider changing their behavior.

My children are very happy with the parents they have, thank you. I don't think they're in the market for a change at this time. "

Report Abuse

galtgirl77 wrote on Aug 16, 2008 5:44 PM:

" No, you are not terrible for being concerned about the welfare of a 10 year old...you are terrible because you labled his parents as rednecks and passed judgement on people and a sport that you have NO KNOWLEDGE of! Grow up and get a life! Allow your children to take risks other wise they are going to grow up wishing that they parents more like Paul and Wanda Easley!

Oh and your posts are very redundent...please give it a rest. You are a one many crew taking on a very large support for Garrett! "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 16, 2008 2:08 PM:

" While that's interesting information, I find it difficult to believe. Moreover, the use of the word "serious" was inserted for a reason in that response.

My point is (and has been) that 10-year-old children do not have the capacity to understand what is best for them. And most kids (up to and beyond 18) have little concept of the true dangers that exist out there for them. It is up to us - their parents - to ensure that they reach adulthood safely. By exposing them to the inherent risks within this type of activity at such a young age decreases their chances of becoming adults. My very first post said it clearly and I'll put it out there again - just because parents "can" permit their children to do something doesn't mean they "should."

It wasn't I who got upset over the discourse that ensued from that post. It was the collective consciences of those who choose to risk the health and welfare of their children that created the brouhaha. I have never made decisions about my children based upon statistics. Those who do should be prepared for the results that are sure to follow. "

Report Abuse

Richard Banas II wrote on Aug 16, 2008 1:46 PM:

" Upon further research into accidents involving Junior Dragster Racing League members so far, apparently there has been just one serious accident since the league was formed in 1992. Eight-year old Kaylee Greer was critically injured in 2007 in a post-race mishap similar to Dale Earnhardt's where she collided with a wall at approximately 30 MPH as she was turning off the track.
Kaylee has made a full recovery. With only one serious accident in 16 years of JDRL racing I would say it is very safe sport considering the number of participants and total races held during that time frame. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 16, 2008 1:11 PM:

" See what I mean? I am "terrible" because I have an opinion and desire to voice it. And because I am more concerned for the safety of children than for their immature desire to participate in an activity that could easily cause them so much damage, I am the one who is "feared."

Parents are responsible for the safety and well-being of their children - that is first and foremost. While it is hideous that anyone would leave their child inside of a car on a hot day, how is it not as equally egregious to strap their cherished kids into a modified vehicle that exceeds 50-miles-per-hour AND catches fire? This is only exacerbated by the fact that this particular child isn't even eligible for his drivers permit for another five years. For me, it simply defies logic; and I've read nothing here or elsewhere that justifies such irresponsible behavior on the part of those who are charged with the health and welfare of their kids.

If that makes me "terrible" and someone to be "feared," then I welcome the labels. "

Report Abuse

galtgirl77 wrote on Aug 16, 2008 1:01 PM:

" Lodisafeway you are a terrible person and one that I feel has now taken this story way out of context. How dare you call these people rednecks! Not just "white people" tune into or get involved in racing. You are an ignorant human being and I feel sorry for you. I hope that someday you come out of your bubble and into the real world.

Your point is very clear to me and that is that you have no clue what you are talking about in reference to this sport. People like you are what I really fear in this society! "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 16, 2008 12:46 PM:

" As I was offering my opinion regarding the wisdom of putting ten-year-old children in harm's way as Garrett and others are by participating in this type of activity, there were some here who truly believe that these kids possess an elevated sense of wisdom, experience and skill that somehow prevents them from being harmed. This is a dangerous message to convey to others because it is simply not true.

My recent post was prefaced with the words, "On the lighter side of all this . . ." suggesting that what followed should be taken as humor, albeit more satirical than slapstick. With all humor however, there must be an element of truth in order for it to work. I think I hit a nerve.

However, while talking with a few NASCAR fanatics I asked them what they enjoy most about the sport. Of course "winning" was near the top of the list, but far and away the best part they offered were the dangers and risks involved followed by the spectacular crashes that invariably occur. I suggest that you and your family take a breather now. I rest my case. "

Report Abuse

senneferj wrote on Aug 16, 2008 12:04 PM:

" To the utmost of their ability. LodiSafeway stated that he was not directing the comments at Garrett but instead at my parents, wondering what planet they came from?? This is sad to me because I ask myself that question when I have to deal with parents who left their child in the car for hours on a hot day, or parents who "accidently" shake their baby because it's crying. I do not ask myself that however, when I see my parents supporting something Garrett wants to do and making sure he does it with EVERY safety feature available. And also if you are simply stating your opinion I would like you stop making remarks about my family being redneck, or having a shrine to Dale Earnhardt. It is not only ill mannered of you to do so, it also keeps people from really listening to your opinion because it is peppered with uneducated insults. You do not know our family, so you do not know of what you are speaking... "

Report Abuse

senneferj wrote on Aug 16, 2008 11:53 AM:

" So I know I'm a little late but I HAD to comment because Garrett is my brother also. I agree we all have a right to our opinions, that is what makes this a country great, however it is sad to me when people makes their opinions known without looking at any facts or statistics. Again I am one of Garretts older sisters and have been a Pediatric nurse now for a little over 5 years, I am also the Critical Care Coordinator for the Childrens Hospital that I work at in Phoenix. I say all of this because in the last 5 years I have NEVER seen an injury from drag racing of this kind, I have seen many children devastated from car accidents where their parents did not have a car seat, or buckle their child in, I have seen many children burned from home accidents, I have even seen a little boy who had a traumatic brain injury because his father was lifting weights and one of the weights fell off the bar and hit the boy in the head... my parents love Garrett and would never put him in a situation where he wasn't protected "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 16, 2008 12:02 AM:

" On the lighter side of all this, however is the unbelievable material some of you continue to provide. "He's only 10 once" as an example!! While that was being written, did the writer actually have a straight face? I was busting a gut at that one! It's as if some of you actually think that life is passing this youngster by at such a fast clip that his parents should simply disregard the fact that his entire life is actually still ahead for him. Therefore any parental responsibility for his safety to insure he reaches 11, 12, 13 and beyond is worth taking the chance that he might be injured or killed in order for him to live life to the fullest now before it's too late. Now that's authentic redneck thinking in my opinion. I can only imagine the #3 Dale Earnhardt shrine set up in the den for daily devotionals. If it weren't so patently absurd it actually might be funny. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 11:16 PM:

" I don't need a breather. That's for people on these blogs who truly believe that the only opinions that matter are theirs. I've only voiced mine, as is its purpose. If you tire of my writing, simply move on to something else. How arrogant is it of those who think anyone here should "shut up" because they don't like what is being discussed.

I'm worried about people pretending to care about their children yet have no hesitation about putting them in harm's way for fear of having to say "no" when they beg to do something dangerous. The idea that a ten-year-old has any level of "wisdom" is laughable on its face. By the time our children reach that age it is hoped that the wisdom is on the side of the parents - here it obviously is not.

Oh, by the way - all of my children of driving age have their driver's licenses and went through the process legally. They all have insurance and are driving legally. For any who do not, they don't drive until they pass the test, take their first driver's training lesson and follow the rules. It's that simple. "

Report Abuse

GALTGIRL77 wrote on Aug 15, 2008 9:51 PM:

" Wow I missed a lot in the few hours I have been away from my computer. Lodisafeway...you are truly unbelievable!

i agree with dogs4you....go outside and take a breather.

dogs4you, I am sure that when lodisafeway's kids are old enough to drive, he will not allow them because "how will they be able to handle a front tire blow out at 50mph", he said that it was really scary. Lord knows that he wouldn't want his precious children experiencing the same scare! haha!

Oh yeah...I learned how to handle, load and shoot a gun at age 10 thanks to hunter safety. I was also taught how to properly clean a gun at 10 as well as respect the power that it has. My children will do the same. It's a risk yes... one that you think I am irresponsible to show my children. But then again you would probably be the first to bash me as a mother if my child put a bullet thru another because he thought the gun was a toy! Just my opinion! "

Report Abuse

dogs4you wrote on Aug 15, 2008 6:57 PM:

" Lodisafeway: I now believe everyone gets you point, go outside and take a break. You say you drive your kids to school, I`ll take it they are still much to young to drive. Ahhh but wait till they get to that majic age of 15 1/2 and want a drivers permit. Thats when the real test of being a perent starts. And when 16 years old rolls around, then you will know what its like to wait for him or her to put the car in the drive way. At least with this young racer, he is surpervised and his folks support what he does. Remember, when your kids, as good as they are leave, and the door closes behind them, you have no control or idea what they are going to do. So relax and let this youngster enjoy what he does, he`s only 10 once. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 5:48 PM:

" Oh, by the way "I" drive my kids to school; they don't drive themselves. And yet they don't feel sorry for themselves because I am so unfair to them in this regard. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 5:47 PM:

" What, no one is permitted an opinion if it doesn't agree with yours? Is that how this works here? Me thinks you protest too much.

I've only stated that I question the wisdom of placing a ten-year-old child in such a high-risk "sport." Such a child cannot possibly have the requisite capacity to determine what is in his own best interest. So, his "passions" aside it is up to his parents (not his brother) to determine what is best for him.

Whether or not you deem it silly or whatever, the point is that this young man survived one fire as a result of something going wrong with this very vehicle. I only presented other possible (and quite probable) things that could go wrong with such an endeavor and asked how this child might react to a front-tire blow-out (for example); I received no answer because no one knows, do they? As a parent of children (that you seem to feel sorry for, but they do not), I would have never put them at such a high risk for the sake of driving a modified lawn-mower at 50-miles-per-hour. But this is just an opinion. "

Report Abuse

ruffian70 wrote on Aug 15, 2008 4:27 PM:

" This has gotten a little silly here. Lodisafeway, there are risks in driving your kids to school!!!! My parents are not jepardizing my brother, they support him in a sport that he enjoys!!! If my 2 year old twins decide to join jr rodeo, then so be it. Life is a risk, everyday. Live.....Some 10 year olds are much wiser tahn some 13 year olds. So, enough about my parents. I feel sorry for your kids!!! "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 4:07 PM:

" And once again, I am not tearing anyone down. I am merely questioning the wisdom of placing such a young child (with very little experience, maturity and reflexes to adequately react in the event of a problem) behind the wheel of such a machine. Sure, he "survived" the fire - and how much of that was pure luck? How many of us have experienced a front-tire blow-out at 50mph (I asked that earlier and curiously was not answered by anyone). I know that I have and it is not only a very scary event, but one fraught with danger. One move the wrong way (over compensating I think it's called) and disaster is certain to follow.

I am questioning the risk that this little guy has no possible way of accepting on his own. Every bit of the risk and responsibility belongs to the parents; and they aren't behind the wheel. Ten-years-old is simply too young. I would think 13 would be a more reasonable age to start a child in this sport. Surely waiting until then won't have an adverse impact on his ability to earn all those millions of dollars someone mentioned earlier. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 3:59 PM:

" Ok, I was mistaken on the modified horsepower. It is from 5 to 20; not 5 to 50. I apologize for that error. But the speed is still 52mph, correct? In a crash at that speed would it make any difference if it was 20hp or 50hp? I think not. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 3:56 PM:

" So let me get this straight. We've got a 10-year-old kid out there driving a car powered by an engine that has been re-designed to produce ten times its rated horse power (that means very high compression for those of you who have any understanding at all about internal combustion engines; it also means that the amount of pressure within an engine running at 50HP is incredibly higher than one that runs at 5HP - hence my question as to just "how" the engine was modified); said vehicle now travels at freeway speeds and has shown a propensity for bursting into flames. And very few of anyone out there has a problem with that.

Now I really don't understand why or how anyone would wish to place their child at that level of risk, but hey, it's legal (I assume); Garrett is not my child; and I've stated my opinion. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 3:38 PM:

" Who cares how a 5HP engine is modified to deliver the power of 50HP?!? Tell me you're kidding or you simply don't have a clue. Could that modification have been the reason why there was a fire on this particular racer?

There IS a "real" story here if the Lodi News-Sentinel crack reporter had taken the time to dig a little deeper. Rather than create what is really just a fluff piece, the issue of responsibility and safety in how we raise our children is at the heart of this story. Yet they chose to dismiss it. I wonder why.

Oh, and for the individual raising the issue of a 10-year-old having hunter training. That's an easy answer for me. Absolutely no 10-year-old child should ever be trusted with a hunting weapon - period. Talk about literally begging for disaster! I really wonder on what planet some parents were born. And frankly I don't need to meet this young man - my comments aren't directed "at" him. They're directed at those responsible for him and others with 10-year-old children who assume outrageous risks for their children just so they can live vicariously through them. Simply amazing! "

Report Abuse

Richard Banas II wrote on Aug 15, 2008 3:34 PM:

" According to Paul Easley, Garrett's father, modifying a 5HP Briggs and Stratton engine means adding a special cam, stronger valve springs, racing rod, high compression head gasket, lighter fly wheel, larger alcohol carburetor in addition to a larger exhaust pipe and extra timing advance which takes it from 5HP to about 20 HP.

Also, the junior dragster drivers wear the safe safety outfits as do the adult drivers.

Founded in 1992, the Junior Drag Racing League has approximately 6,000 drivers aged 8 to 17, 25% of whom are female and is a fast-growing family friendly sport. "

Report Abuse

galtgirl77 wrote on Aug 15, 2008 2:40 PM:

" ruffian70, not a lot of people DON'T understand the world of drag racing. They are quick to associate it with these street punks who reek havoc on our public streets. I bet you could read any drivers bio and he/she will tell you that he/she started racing long before Garretts age. Racing isn't as big in good' ol liberal California, you have to head to the mid west/east coast for the really support! "

Report Abuse

galtgirl77 wrote on Aug 15, 2008 2:36 PM:

" Lodisafeway, all I am saying is that risks are inherited with anything that we do in todays society. Yes, what Garrett does runs a higher risk of injury but just think of what a great defensive driver he may become once he is driving on our public streets at 15 years old. It's not a matter of who is right or wrong here. It's a matter of a little boy who has a passion to be at the top of this sport ten years from now. Maybe you weren't tearing him down but you were tearing down his parents decision to support him in his dream. That's why I responded the way I did.

Who cares how they got a 5hp briggs and stratton to reach 50mph. I am sure if you had a chance to meet with Garrett and see him in his element you might change your tune. I can't wait to see what he is going to do in the future! "

Report Abuse

ruffian70 wrote on Aug 15, 2008 2:26 PM:

" Thank You GaltGirl. I agree, risks are risks, so is playing, football, riding horses, water skiing, skateboarding, jr rodeo..... At least Garrett is not playing video games all day, or loitering at the mall. He has parents that spend time with him and encourage him to do what he enjoys, what a concept these days. These races are supervised meets it's not like they are dragging down Lodi Ave at 4 a.m. Yes, there was a fire in his car, and he has a fire retardant suit, rolls bars, quick release, etc.... And he is ten not two. Garrett is my brother and my parents have always encouraged my dreams... I became a successful jockey with many injuries. Of course it scared them but I am proud to have parents that supported my dreams. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 2:13 PM:

" But since you guys are loaded for bear, I wonder if you could field a question or two?

Just how is a Briggs & Stratton 5HP lawn mower engine modified to produce 50HP? Is there any official oversight as to the safety of such a modification or to the vehicles themselves? Just who could expect a 10-year-old kid to successfully manage through a front-tire blow-out at 50mph? Many lives have been severely altered because of such incidents.

There are many other activities better suited for a child of his age, experience and maturity level. There's a reason why our children are not permitted to receive a driving permit until they are 15 1/2 years old. The limitation of driving "off the street" is just one of many risks associated with moving that fast. At least while I am teaching my 17-year-old how to drive I sit right next to her poised to grab the emergency brake in case something goes wrong. This kid sits alone in the cockpit of that little dragster.

I'd rather tell my kid "no" and have him mad at me than to have to visit him in a burn unit or worse. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 1:55 PM:

" Now just who is "tearing the little kid down?" I am amazed at the audacity of people on the Internet. Someone offers an opposing opinion and bingo - it's time to attack. What a load of crap. "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 1:53 PM:

" No, I would rather the little guy live to be 18 when he can make these decisions on his own. The article mentioned a fire that erupted on this very vehicle; just how does that make me somehow desiring of him to be a bum just because what his parents permits him to do is inherently dangerous?

Oh, and driving a modified 5HP Briggs & Stratton engine at speeds of 50mph is decidedly ". . . different then any other risk associated with being a 10 year old." To suggest otherwise is simply silly.

However, I never attempted to pass judgment upon anyone regarding this matter. I only offered questions that should certainly be raised in response to an article like this one. You've got a ten-year-old driving at freeway speeds in a dragster that already had a fire onboard - this doesn't evoke questions from anyone else regarding the sensibility of such an endeavor? That's surprising (and disturbing). "

Report Abuse

Peeps wrote on Aug 15, 2008 1:43 PM:

" Congratulations Garrett on your accomplishments. I am glad your are doing something you like. Bet you can drive a lot better than many of the 16 year olds when they get their licenses. Keep on keeping on!!! "

Report Abuse

dogs4you wrote on Aug 15, 2008 1:24 PM:

" If this young boy can compete in a safe manner, I say go for it. For the last 15 years there`s a nascar racer that started out driving midgets in the dirt, he still makes a rather good living driving the # 24 Chevy by the name of Jeff Gordon. He`s a local product on Northern California, and by the time he`s hangs up his helmet will have made over $100 million dollars. "

Report Abuse

galtgirl77 wrote on Aug 15, 2008 1:21 PM:

" Maybe it's not worth the risk to you, lodisafeway but to others it's no different then any other risk associated with being a 10 year old. I assume that you are against 10 year olds taking the hunter safety course too?! "

Report Abuse

galtgirl77 wrote on Aug 15, 2008 1:17 PM:

" Sorry Garrett, looks like lodisafeway and edumacation would rather you hang out in front of the movie theaters rather then chase your passion of racing. C'mon guys, this kid is racing in a controlled, safe environment. I know you think it is unsafe but how is it any more of a risk then sitting in the passenger seat next to a driver doing 65mph or more down hwy99 with less safty gear. Risks are risks, but you can't live your life in a bubble. I am sure that his parents are very aware of what could happen to him. Don't tear the kid down...show him a little "small town" support! "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 1:17 PM:

" I simply wonder if such an activity is worth the risks for a ten-year-old child whose reflexes and other senses have not yet developed enough to overcome what could easily be catastrophic results from just the slightest of errors. Sure, what youngster wouldn't jump at the chance to race a car like that - it's up those who are responsible for him to make that decision. So again, is it really worth the risk - on or off the street? "

Report Abuse

Wan_66 wrote on Aug 15, 2008 11:46 AM:

" I would like to make something clear. This car is not street legal, and is never driven on the street. It was rolled out of it's trailer and standing still when the outdoor photo was taken. "

Report Abuse

T&C wrote on Aug 15, 2008 10:10 AM:

" What was he doing driving that "dragster" around those buildings in the background? "

Report Abuse

edumacation wrote on Aug 15, 2008 9:19 AM:

" I think I saw him driving down Century Blvd near the high school? Now that I think about it maybe that was another 10 year old street dragging. LOL "

Report Abuse

lodisafeway wrote on Aug 15, 2008 8:31 AM:

" Yeah, that's what we need. Ten-year-old kids at the wheels (and mercy) of speed-cars going over 50 mph. Oh, and the fact that his vehicle "caught on fire" is relegated to a mere mention near the end of the article is telling. Just because parents "can" permit their children to do something doesn't mean they "should." "

Report Abuse

Comments on this story are now closed.

Special Sections

Photo Reprints

Find Ads




Leaf Pickup

Services

Contact Us

Office

125 N. Church St.
P.O. Box 1360
Lodi, CA 95241
(209) 369-2761
Fax: (209) 369-1084

Newsroom

E-mail

(209) 369-7035
Fax: (209) 369-6706

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Problems with your subscription?
(209) 333-1400

Advertising

E-mail

(209) 369-2761
Fax: (209) 369-1084

Classifieds

Place an ad E-mail

(209) 333-1111
Fax: (209) 369-1084