Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

December 1st, 2008
November 30th, 2008
November 29th, 2008
November 28th, 2008
November 27th, 2008
November 26th, 2008
November 25th, 2008
November 24th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT

Man better person for knowing Lord

Updated: Saturday, August 9, 2008 6:15 AM PDT

A pastor once said that when a man comes to know the Lord, even his dog and cat and farm animals will be the better for it.

It was William Jay who wrote that a person, when he comes to Christ, will be better in every relationship. He is a better husband, father, master, worker or friend than before, or else his religion is not genuine.

A missionary once said, "Do you hear one saying, 'I keep my religion to myself?' Well friend, you do not have to worry about it being stolen. You do not have to put it under lock and key. There is not enough of it to even tempt Satan to take it from you. A man who can keep his godliness to himself has so small a portion. I am afraid it will be of no credit to him, nor any blessing to anyone else."

I ask three questions regarding our faith. Does it cause us to pray? Worship God? Give thanks? Does it cause us to be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, even as God for Christ's sake hath forgiven us?

Willie Hebacker
Lodi

Reader Feedback

real facts wrote on Aug 23, 2008 4:54 PM:

" proverbs 10:25 "When the storm has swept by, the wicked are gone, but the righteous stand firm forever".
*************************************
making sure i stick to the edict that befalls billy in his pick and choose / one scripture here, and one scripture there methodology of "interpreting" scripture, this is not a "stand alone" scripture for which to build a case against billy's evil. this scripture is in the same theme as HUNDREDS of scriptures that deal with unchecked evil against God outlined in the psalms and proverbs.

so you can either stand with billy, or you can stand for Gods righteousness. the penalty for billy allegiance.....being swept away "

real facts wrote on Aug 23, 2008 12:58 AM:

" before i forget philadelphia37, THANK YOU so much for standing up for the truths of Gods word.

finally someone stood up "

real facts wrote on Aug 23, 2008 12:55 AM:

" i would debate, except for one thing....everytime i counter with something based around Gods word, "they" cry foul and start lying about me, and doing anything "they" can to shut me up, because "they" can't debate it. long ago the "debate" aspect went out the door. now it's all about defense. defense against the notion that "they" think "they" can run roughshod at will over Christians/Christianity. that's where i come in, doing the dirty work other believers are either not called to do, or are afraid to. i won't stand by and watch as evil has it's way against Jesus Christ. not going to happen anymore. part of that deal, is the daily back and forth of having to defend "me" against "them". me, because if "they" can succeed in silencing me, "they" win the battle of Gods authority over man.

usually you shake the dust off of your feet on these issues. but this ones different. Christians have for a long time been bullied into a corner so "they" can define what's right.

to that end, i go the distance, and it is TOTALLY worth it "

philadelphia37 wrote on Aug 23, 2008 12:19 AM:

" I hate reading blogs such as these when it involves the Lord and HIS Holy Word,but sometimes I can't help it. It instills in me a zeal for His Name that I must!! First of all---Those who question what the Word of God says concerning homesexuality, AS WELL as lying, fornications (sex without marriage),drunkeness,thievery,adultery and many others that GOD calls sin-not I-but GOD---it's written that these Shall NOT inherit the kingdom of heaven.Those that have a True relationship with him are forgiven of their past deeds and are a new creation and we are to REPENT (to turn away) from former wicked deeds (sins). If we then, as Christians, sin again we are to ask for His valuable forgiveness based on what the Lord JESUS the CHRIST has done- with all SINCERITY of heart. Read the WORD and KNOW that GOD does'nt change because our wicked culture starts to decide in its own warped sense of morality that good is evil and evil is good. To you who are TRUE brothers and sisters in CHRIST-- I ask In the name of my Merciful Savior -don't debate with unbelieving fools and scoffers, it's a dishonor. Proverbs 9:7 "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 9:18 PM:

" knock knock. hey ivan, where is the "proof" of your trumpeted character?

you didn't ask sam. sam posted in the other blog today, but her "input" here is strangely missing ivan. i wonder why that is ivan? since she thinks you are the cat's meow, maybe you can ask her why she is status interruptus.

remember how i handled your son leonard when he tried this garbage on me?
i NEVER let him off the hook for NOT walking thru a door HE opened either.

looks like you and i are "friends" now.

that is until you do what you are supposed to do.

i finish what i start, and now, i am going to make sure you do as well. "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 9:01 PM:

" "they have been waiting so very long for this".

for what? getting "married" doesn't validate a relationship, just look at the failure rate of heterosexual marriages, and those are the ones God DID design. plus, it ISN'T love, it's sex billy. sex that wasn't designed that way (square peg - round hole thingy). your friends are only destined for failure, once they realize that "marriage" won't justify what they do. nope, only confusion is the companion of those that fool themselves daily

gas is high billy. if i were you, which i will never be, i wouldn't go and waste your money. your just going to be reminded you can't father a daughter. then in despair, you will self medicate by passing yourself around, and then the vicious cycle repeats itself, then you will come back in here and try and take it out on God and the Christians (the real ones anyway). nope billy, your sickness is yours to own.....you can't inflict your daily choice driven misery out on "us".

square peg + round hole = no daughter for you "

Billy Rubin wrote on Aug 22, 2008 3:16 PM:

" Duane called back and got my voice mail. This stupid phone doesn't ring if I'm in the building.

Anyway, Duane says he's going down tomorrow with Agador. They're stopping at Half Moon Bay on the way down and they'll see us there. "

Jaycee wrote on Aug 22, 2008 3:14 PM:

" Its a plan. Ciao. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Aug 22, 2008 3:12 PM:

" David's mother breathed 35 years worth of fumes working on the production line.

Some people here would say she deserves to die now because the risks were becoming known. We're all just glad she can make it tomorrow. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Aug 22, 2008 3:08 PM:

" He's an animal and I can't keep up with Eric. We'll see enough of him anyway but let's take separate wheels.

Here's what we'll do: we'll take your Scion down tonight, hit Monterey tomorrow (yes the ceromony is tomorrow but it isn't until 8 - they wanted the sun setting). That will leave Sunday morning open we can hit some shops and get me back in time.

How's that?! And DON'T FORGET YOUR SUIT FOR THE WEDDING! NO T SHIRTS AND SHORTS!!

Twist an axle in that Scion, man. We're buring daylight. "

Jaycee wrote on Aug 22, 2008 2:47 PM:

" Eric wants to go this evening. But you know him, show up for a party and he will stretch out another day.

Your Sunday will be safe... or not.

Wait let's do the jet ski thing today and then road trip it down to Monterey and crash the wedding. Is it tomorrow?

Party time. I can feel it. "

Jaycee wrote on Aug 22, 2008 2:43 PM:

" Wow, so sorry to hear about David's mom. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Aug 22, 2008 2:11 PM:

" Oh Man YEAH I'M READY! That's a better offer than waiting around here for some closet case to tell me how evil I am.

You tell Eric I'll be standing on the sidewalk with my thumb out! All he's gotta do is slow down as he goes by; I think I could do a standing vault off the curb right into the back of his jacked-up F150.

I'll try to get Duane, too, we'll see how it goes. But he's got friends in town and they're making a day trip of going to Monterey for David's and Michael's wedding. You know how Duane loves to jetski, but Michael and David have been waiting so, so long for this. The chemo has prolonged her life, but David's mother won't last much longer and she wants so badly to see their wedding - they don't have a lot of weekends left to choose from.

Will we be back early enough Sunday for our shift? Or should I take my bike? "

Jaycee wrote on Aug 22, 2008 2:02 PM:

" D Dude, you on this blog?? Call me. "

Jaycee wrote on Aug 22, 2008 1:49 PM:

" Billy, OMG Eric is in town. He brought the jet skiis. R U up for Lost Isle? I am so ready.

Can you call Duane? Jet skiing into the sunset. What a killer end to gorgeous friday. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Aug 22, 2008 1:34 PM:

" I hope when the Reverend gets back from his daily visit to the fast food place to "see the sights" that are working there, he can devote some quality time to me.

He made promises. Oh, so many promises yesterday about how he was going to just trounce me. Pummel me.

And ya know what he did?

Nuthin. "

Ivan Dixon wrote on Aug 22, 2008 12:24 PM:

" real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 12:10 PM:

she didn't. she lied.

And why would we believe you? "

Billy Rubin wrote on Aug 22, 2008 12:20 PM:

" Reverend Gas Bag wrote:
"and i have WAAAAAAAAAAAAY more gas in the tank than you ever dreamed of."

Don't underestimate how much gas I think you have.

And, speaking of all your lies, remember when you actually said you "went down to the LNS offices"?

har!

Yeah, you said you WENT THERE, but later slipped in a pool of your own drool and said you sent an email! LOL.

Then you said you didn't lie because you "went there" electronically!

HAR HAR HAR

Oh, jeez. Religion has caused your insanity. "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 12:10 PM:

" ("Ivan Dixon wrote on Aug 22, 2008 12:03 PM:" I am confident that she told the truth the first time").

that's code for your not man enough to walk thru a door that YOU opened.

she didn't. she lied.

man you make me glad that i passed down to my son that edict that no matter what, you step to the truth above people and circumstances. that you man up and handle your business, and you don't run away from ANYBODY or ANYTHING, and you own what you say and do, which includes not running away from something you start.

did you hand paint that same yellow stripe that runs the length of your back onto leonard?

finish what you started "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 12:04 PM:

" ("Ivan Dixon wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:50 AM: " Isn't lying a sin? ").

refer all your biblical questions to leonard and billy. they are the "bible experts". (laughing)

did you ever ask YOUR SON (leonard) if lying was a sin? because he so easily ran to it when he could no longer qualify his position. you NEVER ONCE chided your son in here when he DID lie.

honor isn't a sliding scale based around people ivan. your older. you would think a man of your age would have learned that by now. unless of course it didn't matter

given your family DNA, my guess is your going to dismiss it as some brain/chemical imbalance. therefore it is not a choice to lie, and you two are off the hook responisibilty wise for doing it so easily.

i dunno. i am NOT dr phil (but i am good at telling the truth about people)

NOW ASK HER "

Ivan Dixon wrote on Aug 22, 2008 12:03 PM:

" I am confident that she told the truth the first time.

You, on the other hand are, by your own admission, a proven liar. "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:56 AM:

" does that mean your chicken and you won't ask her to see if she lies again?

she never did answer how she slipped up in her description of who real_facts was. once i busted her on that issue, she left the building so she didn't HAVE TO answer that question.

i wanna see her lie about it, then i want to copy and paste the email that the LNS sent me where THEY said the know something was going on behind the scenes.

it happened on HER computer.

now, step to your word and lets do this.

i will be back in here later to check in and see where your family DNA dictated that you chickened right out of it.

honor. what a joke. if you HAD honor, you would walk thru a door that YOU opened "

Ivan Dixon wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:50 AM:

" Isn't lying a sin? "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:49 AM:

" semantics, but yes, YOU billy and your evil little God-hating vile is WHY i came back, after you thought in your depraved mind that you could take a swing at me behind my back.......sam was the reason i COULD come back.

now it's on. and i have WAAAAAAAAAAAAY more gas in the tank than you ever dreamed of. like my promise stated, if "they" don't keep your vulgar perversion in check, then it will be my honor to rake you all over these blogs for as long as it takes.

someone said something to me recently about what i do being "worth it". oh yeah. i won't sit and watch as unbridled/unchecked perversion perverts God without a conscience. nope, i have had enough, and YOUR mine.

you think you talk trash about Christianity and get away with it, your in denial. the kind that insures you and i are "friends".

you either keep your disrepectful trash to yourself, or we will take this as far as you want, as long as you want.

i am fired up, and i have my track shoes on......BRING IT

i guarantee it 560% "

Ivan Dixon wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:40 AM:

" Sam has said before that she was not real_facts as has Lodian and thus, by the terms of your own promise, you are obliged to leave these blogs and never post again.

I don't see any point in asking them to repeat their statement given the fact that you have already demonstrated that you lack the honor necessary to keep your word. "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:38 AM:

" just like your son.

can't stand and defend your position, so you have to stick your fingers in your ears and pretend "it" goes away.

like i said, it runs in the family.

do you have hit and run liability insurance? because some day, the "truth cop" is going to catch you "speeding", and your going to get a FAT "ticket".

one that you won't be able to talk your way out of "court".

next time ivan, don't bring a "knife" to a "gunfight" (truth/intellectually speaking)

good day "

Billy Rubin wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:37 AM:

" Reverend Fruit Cake wrote:"sam is the reason i AM back in here..."

Oh, no you don't.

I am the reason you're back here and you said so.

Sam can rustle up her own ghoul to haunt the blogs.

You are mine - all mine. "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:31 AM:

" i am stepping away from the computer for awhile, but i will be back in here later.

in the meantime ivan, since you trumpeted your a barometer of character, let's see you walk thru the door that YOU kicked open. make it happen. don't pull your chicken hit-and-run garbage when you yourself judged me. now it's time to demonstrate what kind of man you really are.

ask her. and don't think for a minute that just because this blog ends, this liitle "fun in the sun" you started ends here. oh no, now that you challenged my integrity by lying about it, it's game on, and i will make sure you have this boat anchor around your neck until YOU cut it loose.

can you tell i am a scosh bit weary of people giving billy a free pass, but i am the "bad guy"?

nope. not no more. you guys don't keep him in check, and you step to me about my position, it's on.

you want peace in here, you will either be equitable about what goes on in here, or-be-responsible-for-me-having-to-defend-against-it. EVERYDAY

i guarantee it 549% "

Ivan Dixon wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:23 AM:

" Did someone say something? "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:19 AM:

" actually ivan, this is where you address SAM. because she lied about her involvement in the real_facts debacle. ask her to qualify "she is a friend of the family", and "she is a family member"? go ahead and ask her, because it ain't me that lied, as i came back in here because i left on the premise that I was wrong....i wasn't.

sam is the reason i AM back in here, and now YOUR the one that's lying, because your defense against me is weak, and now you resort to lying because you have noting left. funny, that was the last resort of leonard when he couldn't bring it.

you just opened a huge can of worms. now sam will either be silent, and hope the wind blows this away, OR she will attempt to lie and cover herself, something NO ONE can get away with considering my "talents" of seperating people from their words.

ask her ivan, or are you going to be like your son leonard and skate away when challenged?

i am up for the truth. how about you?

ASK HER "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:05 AM:

" ("JD wrote on Aug 22, 2008 10:36 AM:
" Well, you guys have resurrected RealFacts. I wonder if we'll be seeing Richard McIntyre next? (Whatever did happen to him?) ").

since i have this tendancy to tell the truth about people, richard mcintyre isn't exactly the "peaceful muslim" he claimed to be. since no one else had the guts to expose his anti-american stance, i did.

the guy is a terrorist "symphathizer". so my guess, is his darkened heart has come full circle, and seeing opportunity staring at him in the face, he is probably living in pakistan
"studying".

mark my words, there are alot of peaceful muslims that are good people in lodi, but there are also alot of "them".....and they are patient (if you catch my drift).

i should know, i talk to them at my job and ask them side-door questions to see where they are at, and they spill it without realizing it. i am good at bringing to the surface what people REALLY believe. it's what i do... "

Ivan Dixon wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:03 AM:

" You may say whatever you like about me I am just happy that we have all arrived at a consensus that you, Sir, are a liar, by your own admission.

With that fact now in mind, there does not seem to be much of a point in you continuing to post here since everyone reading your words will regard them as the out put of a proven and admitted liar.

Good day. "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 10:54 AM:

" ivan, since you suffer from selective memory, how about you explain to the reading audience about the very first time you posted to me? you know, where you tried to play your hit and run "shellfish" game? oh yeah, i remember it. do you? thought you could get away with it, but the stalwart in me wouldn't let you. despite repeated requests by me for you to qualify your position, DEAD SILENCE (just like leonard). you must have taught him that too. hit and ran me because you are NOT a man of character.

like your son, your a hit and run artist at best. men of character that start the battle, finish what they started.

not you though. ever since that day, you have been hittin and runnin ever since.

your a "character barometer" (laughing) "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 10:47 AM:

" Robb wrote on Aug 22, 2008 10:36 AM:
" I, for one, do not appreciate being lied to... ").

good. then you can address the billy situation for him lying about who we are, and twisting biblical scripture into "go have sex with your own daughter".

ok robb, are you a "pillar of truth"? or is your "truth detector" only people specific?

what say you now robb? "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 10:42 AM:

" attack"? there we go again. semantics designed around discredidation. your son leonard couldn't do it, and neither can you. you have that in common also. i told the truth about your methodology, and the "honor" of passing that down to your son.

listen, if you don't like the simlarities that YOU passed on to leonard, is that my fault? you wanted to play with me in here, so i was merely putting you in your place for attempting it. if you lie about my intent, you WILL pay the price for trying it. if you don't like it, don't address me, because one thing i am is succint and straight to the point about who people are/aren't.

as far as "estimating character", i am none the least bit concerned about your "ability" to determine character, when you yourself have to resort to lying about others, just because you disagree with them, and you want them to "go away".

you would have demonstrated personal character if after the first time you played your chicken hit-and-run act, and stuck around to debate me. YOU DIDN'T

you-don't-have-a-clue-what-character-is "

Robb wrote on Aug 22, 2008 10:36 AM:

" I, for one, do not appreciate being lied to... "

JD wrote on Aug 22, 2008 10:36 AM:

" Well, you guys have resurrected RealFacts. I wonder if we'll be seeing Richard McIntyre next? (Whatever did happen to him?) "

Ivan Dixon wrote on Aug 22, 2008 7:59 AM:

" Your attacks on my children do nothing to improve my estimation of your character.

You made a promise and you broke that promise.

That, good sir, has defined you. "

real facts wrote on Aug 22, 2008 7:35 AM:

" mike.....long time no see. where have you been? remember the good old days on the discussion boards with the nice guy "dan" (billy rubin)? at least as a Christian you had the guts enough to stand up against his vile. before you and i took him on in the discussion boards, "dan" the billy rubin was running amok of humanity and CREATING thread after nasty thread of hate against Christ/Christianity/Christians. the guy for two years has NEVER shown respect for others beliefs, he just swings for the fences. nasty "dan" will always be nasty. but guess what mike, the so called "Christians" in here (except for rhodie and metric) STILL give billy rubin a free pass to talk trash about Jesus Christ. they actually support him AFTER he called the bible "trash".

what-true-Christian-supports-and-confirms-evil-against-God-himself?
i know you know the answer to that question.

anyway mike, hope all is well. if i were you, i wouldn't stick around too long. billy the pillar of all that's right in the world will tell you to have sex with your daughter, like he did me. he's still a pervert "

mike wrote on Aug 22, 2008 4:52 AM:

" I must say I do appreciate Real Facts efforts to debate the "babbling baffoon dan" type blogs. but,for me, it only takes a few reads and I thnk not to throw the things that grow in clams to piglets.

And also, for those inclined, I recommend reading William Jays' Short Discourses to be Read in Families(it can be googled n read) "

real facts wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:15 PM:

" putting sam on the hook like i said i would, (when someone refuses to hip-check the reigning master of all things perverted)......what happened to your integrity sam? you said NOTHING to billy for saying nasty things about your faith, calling it "trash". he said it and included anyone that believed it. where were you on that one? can't get yourself to pick truth over people? billy more important to you then God?

if your lucky, maybe one day you will make him mad, and then he will tell your husband to go have sex with your daughter. because afterall, the bible you claim to "love" says it, right?

billy can't control anything about himself. the ONLY chance he has in here is YOU people keeping him in check. if you refuse, then you get me riding you and billy all over the ring everyday.

respect is a two way street. you demand it of me, and say NOTHING to him. i am willing to "play nice". however, if billy continues his perversion, and you don't attempt to keep him in check, you know what happens "

real facts wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:01 PM:

" rhodie, the "science" of homosexual sex is actually pretty simple when you break it down to one thing......would God create someone TO sin (i.e. with a homosexual gene, or tendancy, or whatever), then turn right around and call it sin when someone engages in it?

the answer is an easy no.

the science AND the physical design say absolutely not.

the "science advocates" are in it to win it, in the game of anything goes as they seek to exclude God out of the design, for self autonomy purposes.

if God did design homosexual sex, he would have high fived it. he didn't.

or voter (or anybody), you can show the design proponents just ONE scripture that qualifies your position of homosexal sex as "Gods design".

just one. no one can ever provide even one "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:55 PM:

" Ooh, ooh, next time can we discuss the reality of ghosts vs. cognitive imprinting on an area instead? That would be fun and I can still bring in spiritual experiances to show you all how insane I really am.

Okay, now I'm done. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:51 PM:

" I'm done. We can continue this on the next letter if there is one and if anyone wants to. Obviously I'm not shy about my faith or misconceptions. Maybe someday I'll tell you how I know there are real demons in the world. "

real facts wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:51 PM:

" voter wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:40 PM:
" Thanks, Rhodie. A good discussion for the night. Maybe more later. RF kills the possibility of any thoughtful discourse").

"sometimes", because i have business to take care of, so these blogs disintegrate when i have to.

your a hypocrite voter..... for always blaiming me when you give your buddy billy a free pass because as YOU stated, "it takes a real man to adjust to truth despite his world view" (or something like that). billy says the most vile untrue crap, and you high five him.

tonight, i made "thoughtful discourse" on the homosexual issue by offering a respectful but strong countering view. you can't blame me because your too afraid to engage in debate with me about the subject matter.

i told you. you blame me for your failures, i will take you to task for it "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:48 PM:

" And lastly (I meant to say two last things last time), as I said I don't know the science of it, whether it is a chemical marker or brainwave pattern that science says proves it is biological. I don't know the level of bias in the study, could have been no bias. But despite being called "science" what it really is is interpritation of information.

When I took a sociology class in college they talked about a study that linked snow cones to violent behaviors back in the 70's. It was published in all the right papers and conferances were given on how the sugar and chemicals in the syrup caused this behavior. And it wasn't until a couple of years later when some critical thinker said, "don't they sell more snow cones when it is hot out?" It turns out the scientifically accepted explination missed a simple explination, people get cranky when it's hot.

When it's comes to the science of homosexuallity I don't know if it is right or not (I'll know when I die), I'm just asking, "don't they sell more when it's hot out."

Then again "Baaaa" "

real facts wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:43 PM:

" i think it was voter that mentioned "science" when talking about homosexual sex, and it's justification based on "science".

that's not true. trumped up by justification "scientists" bent ON justifying an anything-goes-behavior. "they" have attempted to do the same thing in other behavioral arenas, including heterosexual sex (people prone to not sticking to one mate), alchoholism as if it is "genetic", etc. in an attempt at excluding personal responsibility.

nope, all choices. creation design stipulates and defines design. if that defintion falls outside stated design, it's false science.

if there is a God, science cohoberrates(sp) Gods design. it doesn't seek to change it just because it doesn't like it, and wants to do whatever it wants.

besides, even a common sense approach dictates i take my cues from God. i WILL be standing before HIM someday, not some "scientist" who wants to redefine what God has already defined.

you cannot re-define what God has already defined. you can try, but you can't "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:41 PM:

" Last thing then I'm done with this thread since my back hurts and I think we've beaten this one to death.

First is I love Angel. You know, from Buffy the Vampire Slayer and then his own series. He is the epidomy of living above your wrongs. A vampire who always has the urge to kill but his soul gives him the strength to over come it and use it to be stronger. That kind of inner strength should be a lesson for all of us. It is not what we are that defines us but what we do with it. "

voter wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:40 PM:

" Thanks, Rhodie. A good discussion for the night. Maybe more later. RF kills the possibility of any thoughtful discourse. "

real facts wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:30 PM:

" ivan, i noticed you replied to me, but somehow "forgot" your responsibility to say something to billy.

are you proud that you fostered into your son leonard that same hit and run/refuse to answer mentality?

you must be. you share the same "honorable" assets 548%

well, i think we have established that you aren't exactly the pillar of picking the truth of life.

tree, apple. apple, tree. rotten apple at the base of the tree. good job ivan "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:30 PM:

" voter wrote "Rhodie, I hope one day that you love a gay person--a child, grandchild, niece or nephew. someone close. Maybe then, you will understand."

My first girlfriend dated two guys (one before me and one after) that let her know at the end of their relationship they were gay. She said she'd kill me if I ever called her and said I was gay (jokingly) because then everyone of her boyfriends before her husband would have been gay. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:27 PM:

" What do I know of sin? BAAAA. There is one passage which seems appropriate here I was given a thorn in my flesh, a messenger from Satan to torment me and keep me from becoming proud.

2 Corinthians 12: 8 Three different times I begged the Lord to take it away. 9 Each time he said, My grace is all you need. My power works best in weakness. So now I am glad to boast about my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ can work through me. 10 Thats why I take pleasure in my weaknesses, and in the insults, hardships, persecutions, and troubles that I suffer for Christ. For when I am weak, then I am strong."

It is this passage that guides me to say even though I think Homosexuality is a sin, if you are still acting in a way that brings honor to God, still living in a way that says you love him, yourself and your neighbor then I consider you superior to (or having risen above) your sin, that is better than. And in that case I hope we share a big feast in Heaven in the future. "

real facts wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:21 PM:

" it's simple. God designed what love is, and homosexual sex is not in that description of the sexual manifestation of love. if it were, he would have noted it at least once. he didn't. not once. if you are going by the God of the bible, everytime it mentions homosexual sex, it condemns it. in fact, it is referred to as "lust" everytime, not love.

in every arena of life God determines the definition(s). no matter what you call it, it isn't "love", because HE didn't call it love

otherwise you all that argue that it is, have some explaining to do when an adult male says he "loves" little boys sexually.

you don't draw the line in the sand and define what is love.....God does (and he did) "

voter wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:20 PM:

" What makes gay sex in a loving, committed relationship "bad", Rhodie? "

voter wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:18 PM:

" Rhodie, your whole assumption in your 9:14 post is that humans must control "bad", rude, aggressive, or otherwise inappropriate behavior. Your underlying assumption is that gay sex is bad. Don't you see that? Your analogy does not work. "

voter wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:16 PM:

" Rhodie, I hope one day that you love a gay person--a child, grandchild, niece or nephew. someone close. Maybe then, you will understand. "

sam wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:16 PM:

" Rhodie and voter, I am out of here. We are harvesting and it is my turn to get out there. See ya tomorrrow... or should I say Read ya tomorrow. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:14 PM:

" sam wrote " Rhodie, you cannot tell me what a homosexual feels because you already said you love your wife ... a woman. You controlling your sex drive for your wife is not the same as denying yourself the right to be with the person you love."

No but let's go back the the story of how I met her. The girl I was madly in love with wanted to be a nun. I thought it was wrong of me take her away from that calling so for the five year I knew her I was her friend but never dated her. I refused to let what I wanted to rule what I thought was right.

We all control our impulses to do what we know is wrong. We don't cut in line when people have been waiting longer than us because it is wrong but it is what we want. "

real facts wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:13 PM:

" Billy Rubin wrote on Aug 21, 2008 2:30 PM:" Reverend Fruit Cake wrote:"...telling rhodie to sell his daughter into sexual slavery."

You act like it was MY idea, rev").

it WAS your idea, because you purposefully perverted the text even after rhodie explained it's historocity.

it's what you are.....taking something pure, and perverting it intentionally.

now when you were caught in your perverted "leap" of interpretation, now your back peddling on the "if it was sexual".

no billy. you can't bring us into the sewer were you modulate "

voter wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:11 PM:

" No, Rhodie, you only question science when it contradicts your beliefs. Reread your examples--most are a refinement, not a contradiction, many are real science (peer reviewed studies) vs. pop science/psychology (no studies, just "beliefs"). If you are going to condemn a behavior as wrong, don't you think you ought to check the science? As for rules that have guided society for thousands of years--let's talk slavery and a whole host of other once excepted egregious practices. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:06 PM:

" I like what one of my favorite Comedians said once. God calls us sheep, why, cause sheep are the dumbest animals on the planet. Take all we know and compare it to God and all it amounts to is "Baaaa". We like to think we are smart but in reality there is infinitly more we don't know than we know and that is excluding the spiritual aspects of creation. Take time, I think what we know about the "laws" of time are equivalant to what a 5yrold understands of the world. What I understand about God equates to a three week old baby's understand of the world. This is why I say I believe it is wrong and I am against it because that is my understanding. Is it the will of God? Next time we go for a walk I'll ask him. If one of you see him first you can ask him. Until then none of us know. The only referance we have for what God "thinks" is what is in the Bible. And it says "Baaa" compared to what is. "

sam wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:01 PM:

" Rhodie, you cannot tell me what a homosexual feels because you already said you love your wife ... a woman. You controlling your sex drive for your wife is not the same as denying yourself the right to be with the person you love.

If I came up to you and told you it was a sin to love your wife, you honestly can say you would walk away from her? "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:58 PM:

" Let's address the science of homosexuality. I can't talk to the studies done, the chemistry of it or any of that technical stuff. But I can talk of the history of science. The world is flat, no it's round we know that now. Nothing can travel faster than light, no scientists are in fact finding that things can move faster than light in the right conditions.
How about more biological: Cholesterol is bad, oh wait now there is good and bad cholesterol. Fat is bad, no only this kind of fat is bad. Science says eat no carbs for a healthy life style, of didn't that doctor die of heart problems stemming from his scientific diet? One study says kids who act up in school need to be drugged, another study says no place them in a low stimulant enviroment. Phychology says telling you child no hurts their self esteem, wait, now you have to set boundries.
See, I am as sceptical of science with it's continuing parade of "oops we were wrong on that" issues as you are on a collection or rules that has guided societies for 3000+ years "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:49 PM:

" voter wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:35 PM:
" Rhodie,
Saying that homosexual sex is wrong or against God DOES stigmatize gays. How is it possible that you do not see this? And for what?"

Sorry Voter, I wasn't ignoring your posts, there's just so much I think I'm only saying half of what I want to.

I believe in free will. I believe God gave us the ability to choose right from wrong. I am predisposed twords anger. In the 10th grade I shattered my hand out of frustration with something that was in reality, stupid. I'm sure that if you compared my brain makeup with some badies in jail we'd share a lot of commonalities. I choose to control that side of my personality. To be blunt my sex drive still thinks I'm 18, my wife's is considerably lower. Do I act on what my biology is telling me to do? No, because my body is not my boss. Am I the one living the lie? No, I choose to live above my instincts. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:41 PM:

" Thanks Sam. all this fighting over what is a sin(or "wrong") or what isn't is really just a distraction. I always thought brothers and sisters in Jesus should share their commonalities rather than fight over their differences. I think homosexuality is wrong, I've ran into men who were fiercly sure that a stay at home dad was a sinful life style since I was not providing for my family. Religion breeds insanity, I've heard that somewhere. Fortunately Spirituallity restores sanity. Religion is rules, what to do what not to do. It is the kind of house you live in. Spirituality is how you decorate the house. Religion gives you structure, spirituallity gives you expression. "

voter wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:41 PM:

" Rhodie, reread my posts. We decide what is "bad" based on our social and scientific understanding compared with the basic tenets of love, honor, and respect for all humans. If an act is loving, harms no one (and may in fact bring great joy, reenforce personal commitment, and even contribute medically to a longer life), breaks no laws--tell me, why would that be "bad"? "

voter wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:35 PM:

" Rhodie,
Saying that homosexual sex is wrong or against God DOES stigmatize gays. How is it possible that you do not see this? And for what? A few verses in an ancient text based on erroneous assumptions? Could it just be that the thought of gay sex repulses you, so therefore you look for reinforcement that it is "bad"?

I am not questioning your spirituality, which is universal throughout all cultural customs, only your dogma. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:34 PM:

" On to some Catholic teachings. First no meat on Fridays. This has always been taught to me as done in a way to honor Jesus during Lent. It was a sacrafice you did in order to remind yourself of all of his sacrifices and to, hopefully, get you moving into a deeper understanding of what His sacrifices did for us. The second Vatican, a meeting of the Catholic leaders (only the second in 2000 years), looked at many of the traditionally taught rules and softened on them. The priest now faces the congregation, we are allowed to take the Host in our hands (before the Vatican we were thought to be to unclean to touch the host which is the spiritual body of Jesus.) In all there were dozens pushing into well over a hundred changes in the rules taught to Catholics from this Vatican council. This was an effort by the church to move into modern times. Most notably, this was when the Church started saying mass in the common tounge rather than Latin. "

sam wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:29 PM:

" Rhodie, I agree with almost all you say. I still cannot accept that homosexuality is wrong. I believe that God does not create mistakes. But then that is my belief. That is how I feel. I do not think homosexuaity is a choice.

I do however respect your beliefs. AND I do love your religious views and your love of God. Your blogs are refreshing to read. I thank you for sharing.

God Bless You. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:24 PM:

" Now I know that upsets more than a few of you but we all make judgements based on what we think is right or wrong. How many of us agree with poligamy? Having sex with animals, can we all agree people who do this are wrong, that's frowned upon in the Bible too. How about people who gamble so much their families lose their home and then still gamble? Are these people wrong? How about my favorite group to beat on, cheating spouses? Are we all in agreement that cheating spouses are not behaving in a Moral way? How come no one here pulls quotes out of the Bible condemning the cheating spouse and posts them here as examples of "outdate" laws? according to some more that 50% of husbands cheat on their wife. Should this be written out of the Bible then since it is apparently accepted?

Somewhere in here I tried to get the opposing side to list some of the things they found deviated from their moral compass but I never saw that listing. "

sam wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:19 PM:

" Rhodie said "Jesus gave us only one and it was an easy one. Love God, Love self and Love neighbor. After this all the other laws fall into place. This is the only test I have as to who I call a brother or sister in Christ. "


I agree. I AGREE 100%. Thank you Rhodie for sharing. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:18 PM:

" "Picking and choosing a few verses to stigmatize and degrade an entire group of humanity is WRONG when modern science proves the assumptions of the ancients wrong. Think about it." I believe I addressed this when a letter writer said discrimination was a God-given right. It isn't and never has been. As a Christian and the way I interprit the Bible I believe homosexuality is wrong. I believe gambling to excess is wrong. I believe cheating on a spouse is wrong. I believe cussing as a main part of you vocabulary is wrong but if you stub your toe or a zombie is attacking you, I'll understand. Now before anyone gets to upset with me read what I said carefully. I believe the "Actions" are wrong not the person. The person maybe doing more good and more of God's work on Earth than I so who am I to say the person is wrong. Not even the Pope has the authority in the Church to dismiss an entire group of people based on their behavior. He can say the behavior is wrong but not the people. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:10 PM:

" The "slave" wife had more power than the husband did. She could ruin him if she wanted to and the courts found merit to her charges. In extreme cases the women could be awarded the ownership of the man's estate.

So which laws do we follow. Jesus gave us only one and it was an easy one. Love God, Love self and Love neighbor. After this all the other laws fall into place. This is the only test I have as to who I call a brother or sister in Christ. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:07 PM:

" Take one of my books, the editor didn't read through very carefully because he/she let through that the Christians were not taken to a Re-education center but a Reduction center. Instead of being brainwashed they were sent to Jenny Craig. The entire word and the meaning became meaningless because it two letters were removed.

So which laws do you follow and which ones don't you? That is for you and your religious leaders to decided. I Catholic school in the 90's it was explained to us by the Bishop that most of the laws written in the old Testimant were written as a way to establish, build and continue the Hebrew Culture which was based on a belief in God. So you say they built their culture on selling thier daughters off for sex. No, as I stated many times, they sold their daughters off so they would have rights and be protected by the Hebrew Laws. Hebrew women of the day could file complaints about their husbands and the husbands, if found guilty, could be beaten, jailed, fined or even sold into slavery themselves. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:00 PM:

" For this reason, unlike a lot of Catholics, I believe that as long as a Church is teaching the living Word with the Bible at it's core then they are brothers and sisters. I may disagree with large or small parts of what they teach but in the end we still have the same belief that Jesus died for our sins. That is the very core and singular thing that Christians must hold dear and true.

So for those who are interested, and the fuel for all the debate here, do I think homosexuals will get into Heaven? Well, I don't know, what else have they done in their life? Do they believe in Jesus or is their life based on loving good, loving self and loving neighbor? I'd rather go to heaven with a million homosexuals who are joyful to the Lord that one fellow Catholic who is bitter and wears their faith like a burden.

Billy, you keep wanting me to take the Bible in a bit by bit explination. It can't be done. It is a singular work and must be taken as a singular work. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 7:52 PM:

" four weeks later, while watching the Abyss with a group in our church lounge I was being silly with a girl I didn't know. We called a truce from the silliness, she turned around on the ground in front of me and I gave her the agreed upon shoulder rub. Three rubs into it I recognized the shoulders from the dream. There are more details but this is the shortest I can tell the story.

So when I say I believe in the Bible, it is not an abstract concept. It is something I believe in because I have felt the power that inspired it working in my life.

So what is the Bible? It is the living word of God. While some have twisted and distorted parts and bits, it is still the word of God. There are many versions of the Bible from King James to New American to whatever else you think of, even Klingon. These are different pronounciations of the same living Word. Is it "creek" or "Crik"? It is still the same thing no matter how you say it. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 7:45 PM:

" The evening passed and I kind of dismissed it. Then a week later I had a very vivid dream with a woman in it that I felt a very strong connection with. I called my friend the next day and told her about the dream (it was clean). As a test, which I always do with vivid dreams like this one, I only described half of the lady I saw in my dream. My friend described teh other half. She had had an emotional dream with the same person in it connected to me. We went to our Bible study leader the next day and told her, again only descibing half. my bible study leader finished the second half, not in a dream but a vision while she was praying. I took the two year promise more seriously after that.

Over two years I had more than 40 dreams with the same person, always PG rated. The last one was on a retreat in December just a month before the two years was up. I was giving her a shoulder rub. "

Rhodie wrote on Aug 21, 2008 7:40 PM:

" Wow, so many questions and so few words per posting. Okay, let's start with the basics. Billy, this is probably not going to make sense to you and sound like hogwash, but that is what faith is; believing in something that may not make sense and that others think is hogwash. For example, in 1991 I was with a dear friend, I wanted to marry this girl. Never tried to date her because for as long as I know her she wanted to be a nun, then she endes up engaged and married to a guy with a very similar personality to mine. Anyway, she and I were talking one night out in the farm fields where she lived. I was feeling alone like most teens do. Suddenly I was over come with a feeling so strong it left words in my mind. "In two years". With out thinking I repeated it out loud. She asked what and I said in two years I would meet my wife." "

sam wrote on Aug 21, 2008 7:08 PM:

" ... this muggle needs a nap. "

sam wrote on Aug 21, 2008 6:56 PM:

" Billy, I was watching Fall From Grace with fred Phelps and INSTANTLY I thought of you...

He looks just like Lord Voldemort. I kid you not. Youtube him... He is a dead ringer for him. I thought you might find that interesting.

Maybe a Patronious Charm would be in order. "

sam wrote on Aug 21, 2008 6:37 PM:

" Rhodie, I do believe in God and I am not trying to challenge your beliefs.

I am asking you to share any knowledge you have. This is not a test, nor is it a game.

I have never been able to understand who gets to pick what is God's Law. I thought you said you were Catholic. I remember when eating meat on Friday was a sin. Now it is not. I remember when Sunday was the Lord's Day. Now going to church on Saturday is ok instead.

What gives man the right to mess with the WORD of God?? "

sam wrote on Aug 21, 2008 6:31 PM:

" Rhodie, my question is similar. How does one pick and choose ... take Leviticus... what biblical verses are relevant and which are outdated.

When one uses Leviticus to condem homosexuality, why can I not condemn football for handling pigskin. (Now heaven forbid, because I am the BIGGEST football fan ever.)

That is one thing no one has been able to explain to me logically. I also have to say that went to the University of Santa Clara, a Jesuit Catholic college. "

sam wrote on Aug 21, 2008 6:26 PM:

" Nice Voter. I always enjoy your blogs. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Aug 21, 2008 5:33 PM:

" What Voter said @ 5:00 and 5:09.
(applause) "

Billy Rubin wrote on Aug 21, 2008 5:31 PM:

" Rhodie, reading from the bible scriptural quotes which speak of stoning and burning people alive as punishement and bashing out brains and having sex with relatives and selling humans as chattel, or repeating those scriptural quotes is one and the same thing.

Attempting to sound believable while insisting that the bible doesn't actually say those things is something else altogether. Claiming they must be interpreted is a curious spin; it implies the word of the bible is not absolute.

The person who claims the bible doesn't say those violent things loses all credibility and when it is said that passages are either to be ignored or interpreted so as to change their meaning, it reduces the entile biblical work to suspect status or as merely mythological literature.

It's true or it's not.
It isn't stew.
It is being used as an excuse to oppress, subjugate and sometimes KILL people.
When the bible says certain people must put to death, is the bible wrong?

Going back to one of your earliest posts here, what other biblical texts should be ignored? "

voter wrote on Aug 21, 2008 5:09 PM:

" So, given those facts, how can the Bible be more than just a snapshot of one culture's view of the divine, filled with that culture's myths and erroneous assumptions? Were the wise men of that time inspired with some great universal truths? Yes, I think. Love one another, treat your fellow man with respect, etc. But each new era must reexamine these words in light of what they know to be factual and true, not by the assumptions of an ancient world. Picking and choosing a few verses to stigmatize and degrade an entire grou