Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- The country's mess is our fault (165)
- Obama is not a moderate (130)
- Sarah Palin's book hits the shelves: Locals react (70)
- Lodi City Council plans to cap number of taco trucks at 22 (48)
- The haves should help the have-nots (30)
- Public health care is a Christian option (29)
- Tokay in, traveling to unbeaten No. 3 Grant for football playoffs (25)
- Government-run health care is a bad idea (17)
- Young woman fatally shot at Acampo home (17)
- Sierra Adventure store to close after four years in Downtown Lodi (16)
An enduring local sports tradition
BOBS makes Lodi special, but it needs your help
I think that everyone who lives or has lived in Lodi recognizes that its unique, small community feel makes it a special place to live and raise a family. One of the reasons for this has been how youth sports have been run.
For nearly 50 years, the BOBS — The Boosters of Boys and Girls Sports — have offered sports for kids in Lodi and the Lodi Unified School District. The BOBS were formed by a group that included Lodi's Parks and Recreation Director Ed DeBenedetti because they knew kids needed something to do, and sports were not offered outside of school. When they were formed, the BOBS offered baseball and it was just for boys. As such, they were known as the Boosters of Boys Sports — thus no "G" in the name. Today, the BOBS offer baseball, basketball, softball, flag football and soccer for 3,500 to 4,500 kids per year.
In addition to the programs that they offer, the BOBS help with field maintenance and repairs. In the very recent past, they have helped with the construction of seating at Kofu Park, built two batting cages, paid for a new infield at Salas Park and made donations to the Save the Grape Bowl fund. These men and women have worked hard for our kids and for Lodi.
Now, many of you may be saying, "So what? What is so special about a volunteer group running youth sports?" Well, aside from the staggering number kids and programs, the real unique thing is the BOBS' relationship with the city of Lodi.
If you want to play one of these sports in Lodi, you go to the Lodi Parks and Recreation Department and register. You don't need to know little Sammy's dad or have enough money to be a team sponsor; you just need to want to play, and that is very unique. Unfortunately, I think that unique relationship is in trouble, and it may mean that little Sammy doesn't get to play.
The BOBS are in trouble for a variety of reasons. First, the BOBS lack internal executive leadership. They need people at the top who can keep the ship on course, draw on the community for support and keep the troops motivated. While their current board has fine people and friends of mine, it lacks the community and political pop to get things done. I think the best way to change this is a marriage between a local service group (Rotary, Kiwanis, Lions, etc.) and the BOBS. The service group's membership would be a long-term source of quality people for the BOBS' executive board, a source the BOBS just don't have today.
Second, the BOBS need workers and coaches, but they're not getting them. If your son or daughter is playing in a BOBS' program, check the box that says you will help. If you can't coach, volunteer for a shift in the snack bar.
On the Lodi side of the relationship, it is, unfortunately, all about money. (They may use the word "liability," but what they really mean is money.) Our city management wants the BOBS to continue so long as they pay for services that the city provides. While I have no problem with fees covering costs, the BOBS need to get some credit for the work they do. Our city management must know that assisting the BOBS is a great use of our tax dollars. There is no way that 3,500 to 4,500 kids per year can be served without the BOBS and the city working together; neither one can do it alone. Lodi's management and city council need to answer this question: How many tax dollars will be spent fixing problems that are caused by kids that don't get to play?
John Johnson, CFA, is a Lodi-based business appraiser. You can reach Mr. Johnson at john@johnejohnson.com or at 369-1451.

Reader Feedback
T&C wrote on Aug 16, 2008 9:39 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 16, 2008 9:34 PM:
Neo wrote on Aug 16, 2008 2:51 PM:
Rhodie wrote on Aug 15, 2008 12:36 PM:
Do anonymous postings lead to a sort of mob mentality where we do things we normally wouldn't do? Boy that would be a fasinating sociology study. Any psych students out there? This would could be your term paper. "
patton1 wrote on Aug 15, 2008 9:59 AM:
T&C wrote on Aug 15, 2008 9:46 AM:
WY wrote on Aug 15, 2008 8:45 AM:
WY wrote on Aug 15, 2008 8:43 AM:
T&C wrote on Aug 14, 2008 8:43 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 14, 2008 4:43 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 14, 2008 12:43 PM:
patton1 wrote on Aug 13, 2008 9:45 PM:
patton1 wrote on Aug 13, 2008 9:42 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 13, 2008 9:06 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 13, 2008 8:59 PM:
patton1 wrote on Aug 13, 2008 2:31 PM:
patton1 wrote on Aug 13, 2008 2:28 PM:
Rhodie wrote on Aug 13, 2008 2:24 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 13, 2008 12:39 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 13, 2008 12:30 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 13, 2008 12:17 PM:
Rhodie wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:40 AM:
Let's try again.
For Large city projects that are more than what is in savings, then a loan is needed like a citizen would need for a house. But before that project goes through a payment plan has to be established and a clear end to the debt set. If not then it will stay on the books so long it starts to look like a city mascot.
Also no new projects can be started until the old ones are paid off. The Water plant gets paid off before the new city hall, the city hall paid off before the new police station. If a city has only minimal debt and large cash flow then these project should be paid off in a relativly short time.
Having the water plant, city hall and police station going all at once leads to a debt snowball that put's the city in $250mill in debt. "
Rhodie wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:34 AM:
Rhodie wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:32 AM:
Then maybe you see the wisdom of buying used, split the money and buy a 6K$ that lasts you five year and you put the other 6K into paying off your credit cards, student loans or what ever else. And you still don't have a car payment for five more years to save even more.
Even better, you and your family have 400$ extra a month in case something comes up.
People have to be smarter than their debt. "
patton1 wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:24 AM:
Rhodie wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:23 AM:
When we were looking to move down here we found a house we liked. But the owner had a debt is king mentality with three morgages on his house. He owed more on it 8 years after buying the house than he did when he bought it. And he needed more than 80K over the houses value to be able pay it all back. We weren't going to pay for his debt, passed on the house. A few months after we moved down here we drove by just to see and the house was in foreclosure. "
Rhodie wrote on Aug 13, 2008 11:16 AM:
I admit it would be ugly for a while when a government entity tightened its belt, but after it's debt is gone it would run much smoother with a higher cash flow. Debt if not a fact of life despite what Visa and Wells Fargo want you to believe. A city can operate without debt, the problem is we elect people who think spending is better than saving. "
patton1 wrote on Aug 13, 2008 10:35 AM:
Rhodie wrote on Aug 13, 2008 10:20 AM:
But your right P1, I must be poorly educated to think this is the way to live. How's your life in debt going? "
Rhodie wrote on Aug 13, 2008 10:14 AM:
Contrary to P1's beliefs you don't need credit to survive. You don't need a credit card to get a plane ticket or rent a car or even to buy everything you want. A debit card works to reserve items (tickets, cars and hotels rooms) and, believe it or not P1 cash is still accepted just about everywhere. We haven't used a credit card in five years, last car was paid for in cash and things we need we budget for. It took some adjusting in the beginning but now we can plan on getting just about anything we need without debt.
P1, you pay people to use your own money and then call me stupid for planning a budget I can live with (or at least infer stupidity with the H.S. statement). Your mentality leads to foreclosures. "
patton1 wrote on Aug 13, 2008 8:27 AM:
Rhodie wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:52 PM:
" Lodi's debt load is higher than I would like but the credit agencys are fine with it. Our credit rating is AAA- I believe. "
Well, credit is bad and debt is dumb. For a city and for individuals. A credit rating is their way of saying you owe a lot of money. The less you owe, the lower your credit rating. I know a few people whose credit FICO scores are under 100 and have more useable income than most millionaires. "
patton1 wrote on Aug 12, 2008 4:51 PM:
patton1 wrote on Aug 12, 2008 4:50 PM:
patton1 wrote on Aug 12, 2008 4:42 PM:
patton1 wrote on Aug 12, 2008 4:40 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 12, 2008 3:30 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 12, 2008 3:26 PM:
patton1 wrote on Aug 12, 2008 1:26 PM:
Rhodie wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:52 AM:
radone wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:22 AM:
patton1 wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:34 AM:
Scrutiny wrote on Aug 11, 2008 8:57 PM:
patton1 wrote on Aug 11, 2008 2:53 PM:
reality wrote on Aug 11, 2008 9:45 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.