Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- The country's mess is our fault (165)
- Obama is not a moderate (130)
- Sarah Palin's book hits the shelves: Locals react (70)
- Lodi City Council plans to cap number of taco trucks at 22 (48)
- The haves should help the have-nots (30)
- Public health care is a Christian option (29)
- Tokay in, traveling to unbeaten No. 3 Grant for football playoffs (25)
- Government-run health care is a bad idea (17)
- Young woman fatally shot at Acampo home (17)
- Sierra Adventure store to close after four years in Downtown Lodi (16)
Illegal immigrants take water, too
After two weeks in Pittsburgh, one thing stands out: everything is green.
All around me — the trees, grass and rolling hills — is magnificently lush. In June, Pittsburgh had a record rainfall. And through August, there's been just enough rain to keep things verdant.
Here in Pennsylvania, we're not worried about water. We we're not choking on the smoky air that's engulfed northern California for most of the summer.
Californians will most certainly be paying more for water in the near future. And before too many more years pass, save for the possibility of a series of major winter storms, your access to water will be rationed. Not us, though. We've got plenty.
Driving away from California and crossing through the western part of Nevada, a gray haze followed us. But by the time we got to Utah, skies cleared. Then in Nebraska, the rain started. And it continued through Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio and then followed us into Pennsylvania.
To be sure, listening to heavy rain while you are curled up in your bed at night is peaceful. But it is an altogether nerve-rattling experience if you are negotiating heavy interstate traffic.
Nevertheless, the rain is refreshing. I've lived in Puerto Rico and Seattle, so I am no stranger to it.
Water, or the lack of it, is an increasingly hot topic in California politics.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger would like to dupe you into voting for a $9.3 billion bond issue that he proposes by using the typical politicians scare language like "the state is in a crisis," predicting that another dry season would be "devastating" and, my favorite, "What is needed is a comprehensive, statewide plan — and we must move swiftly."
I'm all for a comprehensive plan. The problem is that Schwarzenegger, and all the state's other elected officials, want only to put forward a partial plan that depends exclusively on your money but not at all on sound government policy.
Here's what I mean. It's really very simple.
People use water. The more people who live in the state, the more water will be consumed. Currently, California's population is 38 million, the nation's largest.
Ten years ago, in what now seems like the good old days, demographers projected that by 2050 California would have 50 million residents.
But today, that's just wishful thinking.
According to California's Department of Finance, the state's inhabitants will exceed 50 million by 2032 and reach 60 million by 2050, an upward adjustment of 10 million!
Applying the same percentage increase to Lodi means that the city's 2060 population will be about 95,000 people. In San Joaquin County, more than a million will be struggling over increasingly scarce resources.
The greatest population growth will occur in Los Angeles and San Bernardino Counties, already the state's densest areas where the least rain falls.
Good luck to you all.
If Schwarzenegger were as serious as he claims about "a comprehensive solution," he would address California's population as it impacts water usage. And any analysis of people and water has to include the approximately 300,000 illegal aliens who arrive in the state each year.
Obviously, they drink water, shower, cook and wash their cars. And while enlightened and environmentally aware Californians try to limit their water consumption, that may not be the case with aliens who might not be either as aware or as concerned.
Nevertheless, Schwarzenegger insists that it would be a "big mistake" to blame illegal immigrants for any part of California's $15 billion budget deficit or its water crisis.
One is left to conclude that Schwarzenegger would argue that aliens don't consume water.
If Schwarzenegger's bond proposal reaches the ballot, I urge all Californians to reject it. The measure would only impose additional taxes on an already over-taxed state.
Like the school bonds that many Californians have foolishly voted for over the years that have not ended the school shortage, a water bond represents only a partial solution.
The underlying problem is population. Too many people will always mean too few schools and too little water.
Cut Schwarzenegger off at the pass. Write to him to demand that he order a comprehensive evaluation of California's social woes that includes an honest analysis of illegal immigration's impact on the state budget deficit and its water shortage.
Joe Guzzardi, a native California bearish on the state's future, recently retired from the Lincoln Technical Academy and, with sadness but conviction, moved to Pittsburgh. Reach him at guzzjoe@yahoo.com.

Reader Feedback
edumacation wrote on Aug 16, 2008 8:30 AM:
"It just so happens that I am an illegal alien who has lived in this country for 25 years undetected even though I have brown skin. I have collected welfare and foodstamps and used (and paid for)the water (with welfare money!). What are you personally going to do about it? I am sure Americans who are not hiding from the law (like you) are sleeping well, thank you. I never wonder who "that person is". Why? Because I have a clear conscience, no sneaking, lying and hiding among the people of MY homeland.
I don't know about Giovanna, but if I ever found this fact about anyone, I would IMMEDIATELy contact my friends in the Border Patrol. ICE is building a database of criminal aliens -the new name for illegal aliens. You are the one who will be looking over your shoulder. "
edumacation wrote on Aug 16, 2008 8:23 AM:
My my, aren't we testy? Your statement proves MY point that liberals are erally not liberal in the dictionary definition of the word, but are angry, guilty and seek to vent hate on everfyone who disagrees. You admitted you were breaking the law by being an illegal alien. Do you feel a catharsis now that you have admitted violating the laws of MY country? You should be asahmed. I can't speak for Giovannina, bvut from my perspective, it is the duty of each one of us to attempt to make our hom,elamnd the best that it can be. Only a coward sneaks out of their homeland to avoid their responsibilities. You are doing a disservice to your country of origin. If your life becomes difficult, will you sneak out to another country to take from them as well? Thats why we have formal citizenship procedures. Its obvious that your "loyalty" is to you alone. This is the ultimate selfishness. Your fogging thinking is typical of liberals today. USA Liberals=fascism of thought. "
educated reader wrote on Aug 16, 2008 12:07 AM:
It just so happens that I am an illegal alien who has lived in this country for 25 years undetected even though I have brown skin. I have collected welfare and foodstamps and used (and paid for)the water (with welfare money!). What are you personally going to do about it? Go about town with your "illegal alien detection system" and look for me? ID me as you claim you can do so easily? I doubt you even leave your home with the severe case of xenophobia that disables you. And if you do venture past your front door, you must have a very sore neck from looking behind you continuously for the boogeyillegals that are waiting to conk you over the head. Might be good, maybe they could knock sense into you. "
T & C wrote on Aug 15, 2008 7:54 AM:
Giovanina wrote on Aug 14, 2008 7:30 PM:
4AStrongLodi wrote on Aug 14, 2008 12:14 PM:
T C wrote on Aug 14, 2008 8:03 AM:
Giovanina wrote on Aug 13, 2008 9:29 PM:
http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/date.asp
click on this article
2008/07
Edward J. Erler: Birthright Citizenship and Dual Citizenship: Harbingers of Administrative Tyranny "
Giovanina wrote on Aug 13, 2008 9:26 PM:
" And T & C: Yes, the US did pay Mexico 15 Million, but that was not for the land - the US won that in the Mexican-American War. The $$ was to pay for war-related damages to Mexican property. YOU need to learn your history and not just "google" some garbage that agrees with your opinion.
Also, the Treaty included provisions for the protection of Mexican nationals living within the ceded territory. The "wonderful" "white" citizens of California promptly took it upon themselves to begin hunting down and lynching Mexicans and stealing their property under "squatter's rights." Those Mexicans who had received land grants had to fight (and lose) in court to maintain their rightful property.
"
The 15 million was for compensation for the land, and taking on $3.25 million in debt owed to American citizens, not damages.
Maybe you should also read Article IX of the treaty. "
Giovanina wrote on Aug 13, 2008 9:14 PM:
" T & C: Good point, but then again Guzzardi was an ESL teacher and can't be expected to be at par with teachers who teach more important courses.
And leave it to Guzzardi to start his bigoted columns again once he has left California. He had toned down his rhetoric for the last few years, but now he feels compelled to put fear into people's heads about illegals "stealing" water resources. I'm sure he could have found some other blatent abuser of our water - like maybe all of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA!!!!
Earth to Socialist Reader the majority of illegal aliens are in SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA. That was the main point he was making. "
lodi boy wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:55 AM:
Mexicans are in Mexico. Illegals are everywhere. "
T & C wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:10 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:08 AM:
" hahaha CALIFORNIA AKA NORTHERN MEXICO, WHY YOU FIGHTING OVER A LAND THAT ISNT EVEN YOURS?DONT BE SURPRISE IF WE START RUNNING EVERYTHING IN CALI WATCH WERE GOING TO BE HIGHLY EDUCATED WE GONNA GO INTO POLITICS WERE GOING TO HAVE THE BEST JOBS BASICALLY GO BACK TO EUROPE BECASUE WERE HERE TO STAY!! " Who the heck are "WE"? lol! "
T & C wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:06 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 12, 2008 11:05 AM:
Che Guevara209 wrote on Aug 12, 2008 9:20 AM:
Mazie wrote on Aug 12, 2008 5:57 AM:
educated reader wrote on Aug 12, 2008 4:27 AM:
And T & C: Yes, the US did pay Mexico 15 Million, but that was not for the land - the US won that in the Mexican-American War. The $$ was to pay for war-related damages to Mexican property. YOU need to learn your history and not just "google" some garbage that agrees with your opinion.
Also, the Treaty included provisions for the protection of Mexican nationals living within the ceded territory. The "wonderful" "white" citizens of California promptly took it upon themselves to begin hunting down and lynching Mexicans and stealing their property under "squatter's rights." Those Mexicans who had received land grants had to fight (and lose) in court to maintain their rightful property.
You need to learn history from a non-biased perspective and stop making up your own version - makes you look truly ignorant. Next you'll be proclaiming that black slaves came here voluntarily for the economic benefits offered by the New World. "
T&C wrote on Aug 11, 2008 8:57 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 11, 2008 8:51 PM:
T & C wrote on Aug 11, 2008 7:10 PM:
File not found
/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp, line 69 "
Giovanina wrote on Aug 11, 2008 5:44 PM:
http://www.hillsdale.edu/news/imprimis/archive/issue.asp?year=2008&month=07 "
T & C wrote on Aug 11, 2008 3:22 PM:
T & C wrote on Aug 11, 2008 12:58 PM:
"The cession that the treaty facilitated included parts of the modern-day U.S. states of Colorado, Arizona, New Mexico, and Wyoming, as well as the whole of California, Nevada, and Utah. The remaining parts of what are today the states of Arizona and New Mexico were later ceded under the 1853 Gadsden Purchase, in which the United States paid an additional $10,000,000." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Guadalupe_Hidalgo "We owe Mexico Nothing!" "
EJ00114 wrote on Aug 11, 2008 12:14 PM:
It's time to replace the managers in charge of the market. It has been on the decline for some time. If you visit the flea market on the weekend in Stockton one is lucky to get a parking place. It's jam packed. Maybe week days aren't the best days for Galt since they close too early for people that would shop after they leave their jobs.
It's so sad to see our market fail "
marzo2008 wrote on Aug 11, 2008 12:09 PM:
Che Guevara209 wrote on Aug 11, 2008 9:34 AM:
Mazie wrote on Aug 11, 2008 8:52 AM:
edumacation wrote on Aug 11, 2008 8:49 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 11, 2008 7:32 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 11, 2008 7:28 AM:
" T & C, those Hispanics are going to be voting for Mayor Mounce and Mr. Khan for city coucil in November, so maybe you and your lily white attitude should learn that maybe accept the fact that their vote can sway an entire election one way or another. Why do you feel so threatened by Hispanics?" Please learn how to spell the word Council! The Gob's are offended you can't spell the word! I am not offended by Hispanics! "
sam wrote on Aug 10, 2008 8:39 PM:
T & C is a guy named Raymond. He decided to try and steal T&C's identity. He whines non stop about T&C's posts and ridicules everything he says. He does not like Mexicans and thinks he pays too much for his bus rides.
Pathetic, I know, but the real T&C has no spaces and the identity-theft impostor is T & C. "
Scrutiny wrote on Aug 10, 2008 8:15 PM:
T&C wrote on Aug 10, 2008 2:53 PM:
T & C wrote on Aug 10, 2008 1:46 PM:
Jess wrote on Aug 10, 2008 7:43 AM:
Jess wrote on Aug 10, 2008 7:41 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 10, 2008 7:36 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 10, 2008 7:31 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 10, 2008 7:26 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 10, 2008 7:23 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 10, 2008 7:19 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 10, 2008 7:15 AM:
educated reader wrote on Aug 10, 2008 3:09 AM:
educated reader wrote on Aug 10, 2008 3:05 AM:
And leave it to Guzzardi to start his bigoted columns again once he has left California. He had toned down his rhetoric for the last few years, but now he feels compelled to put fear into people's heads about illegals "stealing" water resources. I'm sure he could have found some other blatent abuser of our water - like maybe all of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA!!!! "
Jess wrote on Aug 9, 2008 11:39 AM:
Mazie wrote on Aug 9, 2008 10:27 AM:
wtf wrote on Aug 9, 2008 9:58 AM:
Hate to break it to you, Mazie; but McCain is of the same opinion as Obama. He even sponsored a bill that would seek to revise the current immigration system by allowing millions of illegal immigrants in the United States to apply to be temporary guest workers.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/12/AR2005051201559.html
You want to solve the illegal immigration mess? Write in Ron Paul's name for President come November. This is where he stands on this issue:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2008/01/ron_paul_on_immigration.html "
T&C wrote on Aug 9, 2008 9:13 AM:
Mazie wrote on Aug 9, 2008 8:34 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 9, 2008 8:11 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 9, 2008 8:06 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.