Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

December 1st, 2008
November 30th, 2008
November 29th, 2008
November 28th, 2008
November 27th, 2008
November 26th, 2008
November 25th, 2008
November 24th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT

Hearing begins for Lodi man accused in fatal beating

By Layla Bohm
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Updated: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 12:29 AM PDT

A man who was killed in a Downtown Lodi parking lot this spring suffered 56 injuries, San Joaquin County's chief medical examiner testified Monday at a hearing for the murder suspect.

Part of the March 21 beating death of Neal Singer, 35, was witnessed by several nearby residents, two of whom testified that they saw the victim being kicked. One said she saw the suspect lift a large object over his head and use it to strike the victim.

That suspect, Juan Velazquez, 37, is now facing a murder charge, as well as special circumstances of lying in wait and robbery. He could face execution if convicted of all charges, though prosecutors have not yet said if they will seek the death penalty.

Velazquez sat silently in the courtroom Monday, listening to testimony with the assistance of a Spanish language interpreter.

The beating happened around 2 a.m. that March day, and Lodi resident Esteban Lopez Gutierrez testified that he awoke to the sound of someone crying, "Help. Someone help me."

Gutierrez, who lives in a five-residence apartment building in the 100 block of North Sacramento Street, went to the building's door that overlooks a parking lot and alley. He looked outside and saw a man kicking someone who was lying on the ground.

Gutierrez, who also testified through a Spanish language interpreter, said he yelled "Leave him alone" in English, then said, "I'm going to call the police."

The assailant replied, "Go ahead, call the police," Gutierrez said, later testifying that the suspect's English was perfect and did not have an accent.

Gutierrez looked straight ahead during his entire half hour of testimony, never once looking at the defendant. He testified that the alley was too dark for him to see the suspect, and that after he woke up a neighbor and the property manager, he went back to his residence.

The commotion woke Deborah Lerma, who also lives in the building and had been asleep for six hours. She heard Gutierrez telling someone to "Stop, leave him alone," and went to her window, which overlooks the alley.

Though Gutierrez said he couldn't see much, Lerma said she saw a man throw a rock. Then he picked up a large object, lifted it over his head with both hands and brought it down on the man lying on the ground, Lerma said.

She later identified Velazquez when police took her to Hale Park, where he had been detained. Lerma also identified him in court Monday, pointing at Velazquez when Deputy District Attorney Ted McGarvey asked if she saw the suspect in court.

At times Lerma grew frustrated Monday when Deputy Public Defender Chris Steiner asked more detailed questions. She had said she saw Velazquez through an object at the victim's head, but when Steiner pressed and asked if she actually saw it hit the man's head, she did not.

When Steiner asked about suspect's exact description, Lerma retorted that she wasn't paying a lot of attention because she didn't know if the man had a gun.

"I don't know, I'm not standing next to him taking measurements," she said when Steiner asked the man's height.

The injuries were detailed by Dr. Bennet Omalu, the county's chief medical examiner who has done extensive research on brains. Earlier this year he published a book about injuries sustained by football players and wrestlers who suffer repeated concussions.

In Singer's case, the man had a total of 56 wounds and had been beaten or kicked about 20 times, Omalu testified. The wounds included eight blows to the back of the head, a shoe print on his face and a blow to the forehead, likely caused by a shoe, that fractured his skull.

Blows to the head cause the brain to shake back and forth, also known as a concussion. Though he had some wounds on other parts of his body, they were not serious, and Singer died of "severe blunt force trauma" to the head, Omalu said.

Singer had no defensive or offensive wounds, Omalu said, which means that there was no sign of a fight. Singer's blood-alcohol content level was 0.28 percent, more than three times the legal driving limit, but that did not cause his death, Omalu testified.

The preliminary hearing continues today, after which Judge Charlotte Orcutt will rule if there is enough evidence to send the case to trial.

Also Monday, Orcutt issued a $50,000 warrant for a defense witness who did not appear in court.

Robert Collins, who pleaded guilty to using Singer's credit card within hours of his death, was convicted June 17 and sentenced to 65 days in jail. He has since been released from custody, but did not appear to testify Monday.

Collins' co-defendant, Tammi Delong, also pleaded guilty in June. She is serving two years in state prison, a longer sentence because she had a previous strike for the attempted arson of her parents' home.

Contact reporter Layla Bohm at layla@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

Leonard wrote on Jul 30, 2008 8:43 AM:

" sam wrote on Jul 29, 2008 5:00 PM:

" Dogs4you said "So you see Leonard money and power talk and the guilty go free.


Despicable as this individual may be, I sincerely doubt that his wealth will get him out of this one. "

Giovanina wrote on Jul 29, 2008 10:05 PM:

" Leonard wrote on Jul 29, 2008 1:23 PM:

" Yes, that is the way our legal system works.

A defendant is entitled to the best defense their lawyer can give them.

If you don't like it, change the Constitution. "

The prosecutor is supposed to use the facts to make thir case, and the defense is supposed to protect the rights of the defendant, and use to show innocence. But defense attorneys will fabricate and lie to win. That is NOT justice. That is covering truth. If a civilain does it, it is called obstruction of justice, and they are arrested. If a defense attorney obstructs justice, they get a bonus check. The Constitution says nothing about defense lawyers lying.

Criminals play by their own rules, and so do liberals. For them, it's only justice if they get their way.

When he says, best defense, he means best way to evade a conviction, even if it means lying. That isn't justice. "

dogs4you wrote on Jul 29, 2008 7:04 PM:

" CHL you say the system has it all wrong, what system would you put in it`s place and get rid off all those idiots, what idiots would you replace them with? Your talking about changing the world. I don`t think that can be done as long as money talks and B S walks. I haven`t seen anybody that can walk the walk, lots of talk the talk though. "

CLH wrote on Jul 29, 2008 6:47 PM:

" I BELIEVE THE SYSTEM HAS IT ALL WRONG. GET RID OF THOSE IDIOTS...... "

sam wrote on Jul 29, 2008 5:00 PM:

" Dogs4you said "So you see Leonard money and power talk and the guilty go free."

Dogs... I agree. Money talks and money lets the guilty people slide. It is sad.

OOps.. my friend just said for me to add "Money talks and BS walks."

Guess that says it all. "

sam wrote on Jul 29, 2008 4:54 PM:

" Ok T & C, you tell T&C to run for City Council. You should. This is not a rant nor a rude comment. You have so much passion for inforcing the ilegal alien laws, you would be wonderful for Lodi. Seriously.

Think about it. I will donate my time to you as a graphic designer for posters, brochures, etc. I cannot run. I do not live in the city limits. You can.

JUST DO IT. "

dogs4you wrote on Jul 29, 2008 4:19 PM:

" Yes Leonard, a defendent is entitled to the best defence his lawyers can dream up, and he can afford, as in the "Dream Team". If you don`t believe that ask O J, almost every day he`s on a golf course looking for the real killer of his wife and Ron Goldman, like Johnnie Cockren said, if the glove don`t fit, you must equit and that stupid jury bought it. And then there`s Slick Willie, he never had a sexual encounter with that woman, that lie lasted 6 months. So you see Leonard money and power talk and the guilty go free, and the little people serve time like they should. I don`t like it but changing the Constitution? better to have something, this could be Russia where you guilty before proven innocent. "

Leonard wrote on Jul 29, 2008 1:29 PM:

" Would you prefer a system in which your lawyer stands up in court and says: "My client, Mr. Dogbark, says that he did not have sexual relations with those bulls but I don't believe him, I think he is guilty and I suggest he do hard time for his crimes"? "

Leonard wrote on Jul 29, 2008 1:23 PM:

" Did you, perhaps, mean "where as"? "

Leonard wrote on Jul 29, 2008 1:23 PM:

" Yes, that is the way our legal system works.

A defendant is entitled to the best defense their lawyer can give them.

If you don't like it, change the Constitution. "

dogs4you wrote on Jul 29, 2008 1:05 PM:

" Leonard. You don`t seem able to grasp the situation. All the defence lawyer has to do is B S a jury into believing his guilty client is innocent, if nothing else works the lawyer can always bring up his clients childhood,where as his mother was a crack whore and he didn`t have a father, or plead diminished capacity. Were as the prosecutor has to present facts about the crime, a much tougher job. You say the system is so simple that even the most dull witted individual ought to be able to understand it, DO YOU ? "

Leonard wrote on Jul 29, 2008 12:22 PM:

" T & C wrote on Jul 29, 2008 9:51 AM:

I hate it when Public defenders do their utmost to help the GUILTY WALK FREE!


What should a defense attorney do other than provide their client with the best defense they can?

The prosecutors job is to convict the accused. The defense attorney's job is to defend them. The system is so simple that even the most dull witted individual ought to be able to understand it. "

dogs4you wrote on Jul 29, 2008 10:05 AM:

" Concerning Juan Velazquez, I often wondered what kind of B S public defenders dream up to get their guilty clients out of jail. If nothing else, a one way ticket back to the land of drugs and murder, ahhhh Mexico that is. "

T & C wrote on Jul 29, 2008 9:51 AM:

" How ironic that this article leaves out the FACT that Juan Velazquez was illegally in the United States and had other previous crimes in Lodi, but had NOT been turned over to ICE agents for Deportation! The victim may still have been alive if Velazquez had been deported back to Mexico before this attack took place! I hate it when Public defenders do their utmost to help the GUILTY WALK FREE! The article didn't even state if there is a deportation hold on him! If he bye luck he "Gets off", he will walk the streets of Lodi again! "

Comments on this story are now closed.