Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

December 1st, 2008
November 30th, 2008
November 29th, 2008
November 28th, 2008
November 27th, 2008
November 26th, 2008
November 25th, 2008
November 24th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT

$3 million: Nothing to show for it

Collapsed Victor Road deal has Delta officials looking at other options

By Andrew Adams
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Updated: Saturday, July 26, 2008 6:08 AM PDT

Delta College spent more than $3 million on the ill-fated Victor Road site — without buying a single acre.

All the money went for options, fees and studies. No land.

Now, what had been envisioned as a new Lodi campus is likely to remain a bucolic spread of vineyards and stately homes.

With cost overruns at other Delta sites — especially Mountain House near Tracy — and inflation, the school's $250 million in Measure L bond money has quickly diminished.

Now there's only about $64.5 million to pay for regional centers at Lodi and Manteca and a campus at Mountain House.

That has left the school looking at other options in Lodi, such as an existing building or another piece of land.

Much of the money the school spent on the Victor Road site was for site analysis and planning. The firm Carter & Burgess received a little more than $1 million for reviewing the property as well as developing two master plans.

The city of Lodi received $32,780 for work on the environmental impact report.

The firm Private Public Ventures Inc., based in Pasadena, received about $760,000 to help Delta pick the site off Victor Road in Lodi as well as establish the development agreement with private companies to add housing and retail.

Lodi campus costs

The following is a breakdown of San Joaquin Delta College's spending on the Victor Road site. Consultant costs are current as of March 31 and dealt mainly with site analysis and planning work.

Property option payments: $450,000.

Private Public Ventures: $758,083.20, planning and site search.

Dennis E. Barnhart Program Services: $165,547.14, planning.

Lozano Smith: $116,440.93, legal review.

Carter & Burgess: $1,009,487.21, land use and master plans.

CCS: $111,038.51, curriculum planning.

City of Lodi: $32,780.02, environmental impact review.

Palmero Reporting: $608.75, notation services for a public meeting.

Design, Community & Environment Inc.: $44,948.35, land use report.

EDAW, Inc.: $260,698.38, land use and environmental impact review.

Unallocated: $148,521.

Total: $3,098,153.49.

Source: San Joaquin Delta College

Delta has also spent $450,000 on option payments to retain the right to buy the property.

However, the college's board of trustees voted 5-2 on July 15 to forgo paying another $150,000 to hang onto those options.

Some are relieved

Landowners near the Victor Road site say they are relieved to hear that Delta is looking elsewhere, especially because they found the development agreement troubling.

Initial plans called for homes, retail outlets and possibly even a hotel.

Mary Hoff, who led a group of residents opposed to the school's plans, said Delta should be looking at opportunities to establish a campus within the city limits of Lodi.

"We're happy that they're hopefully not going to build a campus here," she said. "We never thought it was a good idea from the beginning."

She said a college campus could be an "in-fill" development, and locating it in the city would preserve farmland.

Another property owner, Terry Fena, said he has always supported a Delta campus in the Lodi area, even perhaps in the rural area near his home. He just balked at the idea of a large commercial development.

"I've never been against Delta College," he said, "just the developers that came with it."

Those developers were Capitol Avenue Development and Investments, or CADI, and Granite Land Co.

Granite Land Co. is the real estate development arm of construction giant Granite Construction Inc., best known for building highways, bridges, tunnels and other infrastructure. In 2004, the company employed 6,000 and had revenues of $2.1 billion, according to the firm's Web site.

CADI and Granite formed a partnership company, Victor Ventures, LLC., which assumed CADI's side in a development agreement with Delta College in August 2007. CADI and Delta formed their original partnership in March 2007.

The college had initially been looking to develop 114 acres off Victor Road itself.

When that appeared to be too costly, it opted to use only 40 acres for an "academic village" and leave the remainder for Victor Ventures.

CADI staff have rarely discussed their plans for the area in public. The company did not return a call for comment or respond to an e-mail.

David Rodriguez, the consultant with PPV, helped lead the search for a location in Lodi.

His company also helped negotiate the development agreement, according to its Web site www.publicprivateventures.net.

PPV lists the Delta project as one of its successes, saying it "arranged a complex, five-party agreement" between Delta, the city of Lodi, CADI and property owners to create a "master-planned, mixed use" development.

The company also notes the land was being purchased "well below market value," although Delta College still has not purchased the land.

Contacted at his office Friday, Rodriguez declined to comment on the Victor Road project.

Public and private partnerships

Trustee Ted Simas said he wasn't sure how Delta became linked to CADI. He said he remembered that in 2006, when the college voted to buy the property, the trustees did not know which company would help develop the Lodi site.

Simas said the college's consultant, Rodriguez, would only say "it was a reputable developer from the Sacramento area."

Trustee Marie Elena Serna also said she could not recall how CADI and Delta came together ,but thought it was "some type of bid process."

Delta spokesman Greg Greenwood said he did not know how the college and CADI came to form a partnership.

He also said the board's decision not to proceed with an option on the Victor Road property does not necessarily preclude the college's agreement with CADI.

"The college is analyzing all of the aspects surrounding the proposed Lodi site, as well as exploring the likelihood of alternatives. That said, the agreement is currently in effect," Greenwood said.

Even if the agreement is in effect, it's hard to tell if anything will happen at the Victor site. Delta doesn't appear to have enough money, and San Joaquin County planning staff could not find any development applications submitted by CADI or Victor Ventures.

Part of Delta's agreement with CADI established an escrow account into which funds would be deposited for work on the project site.

Delta has spent millions on planning work, but it's unclear if CADI or Victor Ventures has deposited anything.

Greenwood said the account is processed by a neutral third party and could not say if CADI had made any deposits.

"We recommend you contact representatives of CADI for information as to what they have, or have not, deposited," he said.

CADI did not respond to inquiries from the News-Sentinel.

Trustee Simas said he did not believe CADI had contributed anything for Delta's Lodi project, and characterized the endeavor as "gambling with taxpayer money."

Serna, however, said she still views public and private partnerships as a method to building a Lodi campus.

"There are those that are just negative on public/private partnerships, and I'm not," she said.

She said she still thinks the Victor Road site may work out, but would be willing to consider other options that Delta staff may discover. The trustee is dead set against a "storefront" location, however, because such an arrangement would not allow Delta to expand.

"We'll probably have to get very creative, but that's OK," she said. "These things don't come cheap."

Contact City Editor Andrew Adams at andrewa@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

commonsense1 wrote on Aug 3, 2008 10:38 PM:

" t&c...I have to commend you. You have outdone yourself with your Aug. 1 & 2 posts. Your massive display of ignorance has no bounds and it would seem, no ending. "

T&C wrote on Aug 2, 2008 8:34 AM:

" Has this developer of Reynolds Ranch provided the promised 200 acres or so that was to be put aside as preserved agricultural land within 15 miles of Lodi that was agreed upon when council sped his approval and annexation through? And will he set aside more agricultural land for his part in the venture with Delta College? Just hwere are those preserved acres and have they even been purchased yet or are they going to let the good ol' boys slide by the council once again? "

T&C wrote on Aug 1, 2008 7:39 PM:

" ccinlodi, there were rumors from the beginning and this whole thing was kept very secret until shortly before being approved by Hansen, Johnson and Beckman. One of those involved in the deal had questionable land owned by either family or relatives and this was a low key deal once again swept under the carpet by your local newspaper, maybe as a settlement favor to get themselves off the hook for their part in the ground pollution settlement. All three of those developments were approved in front of other smaller projects that were pushed to the back to pander to RR and the 2 Gateway projects. "

ccinlodi wrote on Aug 1, 2008 3:10 PM:

" Okay - am I wrong - but didn't someone have to contact planning or community development at City Hall and get approval to go ahead and plan a large development? If so,what was the proposal and why didn't this article address the formal plan presented to the city? "

T&C wrote on Jul 31, 2008 5:34 PM:

" Those BC/BS buildings in the industrial area will be vacant soon and offer plenty of parking. Or is city council saving them for RDA funds to doze down or sell for a profit to our lovely developers? "

Lodian2 wrote on Jul 31, 2008 1:30 PM:

" Delta College won't have to pay that much (waste another 3 million) on a Lodi project if they choose one that's in their budget and will suit the students/educational needs and not the
trustees real estate needs. "

T&C wrote on Jul 31, 2008 1:23 PM:

" The grand jury recommended no private or commercial partners or ventures and I'd assume that the board would heed their warning. But then, this board and its leader are a different kind of animal. "

Lodian2 wrote on Jul 31, 2008 10:32 AM:

" I noted the word "hopefully" in Ms. Hoff's comments --- she didn't sound so sure that the deal is off either. "

JF wrote on Jul 30, 2008 8:00 PM:

" Until the college announces the option contracts and all agreements have been cancelled and will not be re negotiated I aint buyin' it! Pun intended. "

JF wrote on Jul 30, 2008 7:59 PM:

" Do you really think these people who just lost millions would be so quiet? Hell no, they would be in the paper, on tv, holding picket signs, washing the trustees feet trying to get back in the game. But no, its quiet, not a word from them. To the other side, you'd expect the college to be boasting about their tough decision to CANCEL the victor rd deal, nope. Nothing there either. See my point? "

JF wrote on Jul 30, 2008 7:52 PM:

" the original options expire in December of this year, my bet is the college made a deal with the sellers to shut up and keep what they have been paid so far and hang in until december for the big payoff, new boundaries different land arrangements and phony per acre purchase prices to try and fool us all into thinking they got a deal. "

JF wrote on Jul 30, 2008 7:48 PM:

" Dont fall for this. Too much money spent, too many other money players laying in wait that cant do a thing until Delta commits, this is just a PR resusitation attempt for the trustees. I dont see any hullabaloo from the city, nothing from the sellers, nothing from the developers. Come on people. This is a joke, this plan is still moving forward but even farther below radar. It is embarrasing these people got a bond let alone elected. "

commonsense1 wrote on Jul 30, 2008 5:12 PM:

" Lodian2....You hit the nail on the head!They voted not to pay another $150K "NOW" to retain there option to purchase the property. Delta has invested more than $3 Mil to date in due diligence and infrastructure costs. How smart would it be to walk away from money you will have to spend again on another site? "

Lodian2 wrote on Jul 29, 2008 8:03 PM:

" "However, the college's board of trustees voted 5-2 on July 15 to forgo paying another $150,000 to hang onto those options."
Delta has voted not to pay another 150K (to sellers, I assume), does that mean that the Victor site is not going to happen, period. Or are they just not paying them NOW, at this point in time, because of all the bond management problems that are on their platter. "

t&c wrote on Jul 29, 2008 5:10 PM:

" common, if the sellers got $450K for selling property on option to Rodriguez and Parises and the College, then apparently they got $450K for just promising to sell their land and when Delta voted not to follow through, they got that $450K anyway, didn't they. C,mon genius, please tell me. Or what was that $450K paid out for? "

commonsense1 wrote on Jul 29, 2008 10:38 AM:

" t&c...OK, I give up. Obviously, thinking isn't your strong suit. "

T&C wrote on Jul 28, 2008 9:51 PM:

" common1, you may consider me stupid but still didn't answer my question about where the money went and to whom and who got cash or commissions. The box above lists $450,000 as property option payments. What does that mean? Am I missing something? "

commonsense1 wrote on Jul 28, 2008 4:21 PM:

" t&c...I'm trying to decide if you're joking or just plain stupid. You ask, "Who got that money ($450K) and the COMMISSION on the sale?" Are you ready? Here we go.....Option money is paid (all of it) to the seller(s) of property. Now read this very carefully..THERE HAS BEEN NO SALE OF PROPERTY, THEREFORE, THERE IS NO COMMISSION PAID! If you can manage to read just the headline of this article, you might be shocked to find out that is what this is all about. You are an absolute nut-job. "

T&C wrote on Jul 28, 2008 2:10 PM:

" Common, rattled again? There's $450,000 and some was used to pay option money on the property for Delta College. Who got that money and the COMMISSION on the sale? Quit cheerleading for a while and read, and, most importantly, use your computer. Chill, lady, chill. "

commonsense1 wrote on Jul 28, 2008 11:35 AM:

" t&c...As usual, you're the only one suggesting/insinuating a developer was paid any "upfront or commission" money. What missing $3 mil. Read the article, it tells you where it went. What ongoing GJ investigation? They are waiting for answer's to their recommendation sited in the report. The foam dripping from your mouth is messing up your shirt. Take a pill and lie down. "

DeltaEnglish wrote on Jul 28, 2008 11:03 AM:

" RV,

You may already have seen Andrew Adams' article, "3 Million and Nothing to Show for It (7/26)," but if you haven't, it's worth a few minutes of your time if you want more specifics. You're correct in surmising I'm Sam Hatch. "

JF wrote on Jul 27, 2008 10:43 PM:

" Common,
I have talked with CADI, both men.
They are a perfect fit for Dale and his local partners. They talk alot without saying anything "

T&C wrote on Jul 27, 2008 6:29 PM:

" common, did we rattle your cage again? Why are you so defensive when someone else voices their opinion? You're always upset and scolding others and leading the cheers for the questionable good ol' boys constantly. Are you one of their lapdogs or what? This article does happen to be about the missing $3,000,000 and nothing to show for it, including those slimey land deals. And, you're damn right we're angry about our local developer if he's taken any upfront money or earned commission money from Delta's bond on a land deal gone sour. The grand jury is far from being done with this investigation until this board can account for every penny. And yes, common, it's about the whole Delta College system and the board, not just Mountain House. Just stay tuned to the info, including the grand jury report and the soon to come answers by Rodriguez and his puppets. Problem is, there are 5 other board members besides he and Serna that will be telling the truth, if only to save their own reputations. Keep your eye onhttp://sjdcwatch.blogspot.com/. A copy of the accreditation report will be on this site possibly this week, too. Read it,common,you'll learn something. "

Cogito wrote on Jul 27, 2008 4:12 PM:

" Back to the big picture. Everyone who votes needs to remember how your money is being spent whenever a bond issue gets on the ballot. This colossal waste is criminal, yet no heads will roll. Oh well, no wonder education has so-called funding issues. "

commonsense1 wrote on Jul 27, 2008 2:42 PM:

" t&c....there are no other citizens and certainly not the GJ, asking the same questions you and your alter egos are. You don't ask questions, you make outrageous accusations/allegations without a single fact to back them up. You need to start wearing your helmet more. "

commonsense1 wrote on Jul 27, 2008 2:32 PM:

" t&c, why don't you let us know what "aka's" the folks are using to confuse you. You're off on your moronic Grand Jury joke again. Nobody is investigating anything. GJ is waiting for answer to their recommendations, period! Delta Campus in Lodi was never mentioned. If you have questions, I'm certain CADI would answer your call. Bet you won't call. JF, same thing, he won't call either. Not as much fun as making stuff up and calling people names. How do you think this stuff up? "

T&C wrote on Jul 27, 2008 2:02 PM:

" Check this out from the Sentinel: http://lodinews.com/articles/2007/05/12/opinion/editorials/edt_mcnerney_070512.txt "

t&c wrote on Jul 27, 2008 1:03 PM:

" Jeff Hood would dig to the bottom of this as a Record reporter, but Blair King hired him away to be his personal mouthpiece and to shut him up. He knows plenty and now he's obligated to the good ol' boys network and won't speak up. And, Lodian, there are many missing keys to the backroom doors in Delta and Lodi city council meeting quarters that need to be turned in, especially at Delta where Brown Act violations are part of this investigation, also. "

Lodian wrote on Jul 27, 2008 12:57 PM:

" Andrew Adams: Keep digging. I think there is more to this story yet to be uncovered. Go get'em! "

Lodian2 wrote on Jul 27, 2008 10:41 AM:

" I can hardly believe that Serna, Simas, and
Greenwood don't know how or when CADI got involved in the deal, or if they've paid them anything.
(Why don't they just ask their trusty consultants that they have paid over 750 thousand to already). It makes me wonder (like JF) if there's still behind the scenes dealing going on, that of course the public isn't privy to. Good job, though, Andrew, for researching and getting all the details that you can out of these folks. "

JF wrote on Jul 26, 2008 7:19 PM:

" t&c the two sellers got the money. The title of this story is grossly misleading! IT IS NOT "Collapsed"!

Dont fall for this people, this political spider web is still being spun and the plan is not dead by a longshot "

tc wrote on Jul 26, 2008 6:53 PM:

" essayjay, you'd think that the city would've had someone clean up that mess that just burned down on Lockeford street with all those hazardous materials that it was built from just blowing in the wind. The hazmat needs to be called to clean those materials up and dispose of them properly. That'd make a nice site for a college satellite campus, with plenty of parking across the street at the Grape Festival grounds and right near the new affordable housing on Railroad Avenue. That would give that area a great boost both visibly and economically. A campus there would spur new businesses for the poor eastside and maybe a bank and grocery store for the low income at the new housing project. There's also plenty of room at the festival ground and buildings that're not in use most of the time, and then only in the evenings. It's at least a start to utilize our own neglected buildings and let Delta bring them up to code for use rather than watch the city let them slip into worse deteroriation. Then when Delta is ready for a long-term, permanent commitment, some faculty, facilities and infrastructure will already be in place. "

t&c wrote on Jul 26, 2008 6:26 PM:

" T & C, T & C, T & C, The grand jury is asking basically the same questions as we citizens, including myself, are asking. With your expertise as a junior police officer, maybe you should do some investigating on your own, or even better yet, team up with realty and common1 and check out some of these characters with many different business names and addresses rather than accuse others of making statements that're allegedly accusatory. These are merely some of the same allegations the grand jury is asking for a written explanation of from the Delta College board and implicating those like a certain developer whom Delta says one minute they know nothing and then this article, indeed, acknowledges this same developer and another outside interest collaborating with the board for commercial and residential development rather than the college campus itself. Just what is it about the grand jury investigation and outside interests taking our taxpayer money in an elaborate scam? "

essayjay wrote on Jul 26, 2008 6:12 PM:

" Okay, one more time Lodi City Council, REDEVELOPMENT AND DELTA COLLEGE PROJECT, COMBINE THE TWO!!!!! "

essayjay wrote on Jul 26, 2008 6:11 PM:

" Why not combine this project with the redevelopment plans that our city is so hot on? You could start with the shed that burned down on Lockeford and the building that burned down earlier a year or so back on Lockeford closer to Sacramento St. In Fact you could start with all of Sacramento Street, or Main Street alonside the railroad tracks. Oh wait this makes too much sense. Someone on the Delta board probably isn't connected to the property and stands to gain in the profits. "

T & C wrote on Jul 26, 2008 5:50 PM:

" T&C, t&c, tc, papercut, edumacation..."All the same poster", loves to "TALK THE TALK"! BUT where I ask you, WHEREEEEEE is all the documented evidence of any wrongdoing from ANYTHING you have EVER posted? You have NO EVIDENCE! Only vague accusations hiding behind different e-mail addresses so you can post under many names..."Always looking for the "GOB's"! Run for city council if you have all these "GOB" facts! Make a change in Lodi instead of trying to get everyone stirred up. You are like a car in neutral! You are going no where fast! "

t&c wrote on Jul 26, 2008 4:13 PM:

" JF, do you know how much upfront option money was given to the greedy ones who wanted to sell their swampland to Delta? Or was it the developer that fronted the funds and where did they get the funds? And how many split that $450,000 or so and did any members of the board profit personally from this scheme? "

t&c wrote on Jul 26, 2008 4:08 PM:

" And, common, what makes you think these are accusations? They're all in your mind. They're merely allegations without facts that I'm asking for answers to. If someone here accuses me or alleges I did something unethical or even criminal, I'd have the courage to stand up for myself and challenge their blog. Why don't they answer for themselves instead of you? Are you their attorney or just their cheerleader? Take a couple of hours today and start googling those names involved in this issue and their business affiliations and many of them are intertwined in some of the same schemes in other cities and projects. Or are you too afraid? Or too lazy? What you can't find you can buy online for $59.95 from several different search websites. "

t&c wrote on Jul 26, 2008 3:54 PM:

" JF, the answers provided by the Delta board requested by the grand jury will provide yet another round of investigations involving those who are involved in the exchange of any monies meted out by the board. We haven't seen anything yet until that information is made public in 90 days. Since the perpetrators aren't answering calls nor making themselves or one of their many aka's available, I think it'd be correct to assume they need to consult their attorneys first and then have that big meeting to get their stories straight. If there is any wrongdoing, which board member will take the immunity and spill the beans? I'd like to hear more about the developer agreement with CADI-Granite that Serna says never was. If these are such upstanding companies, why do they refuse to acknowledge any questions or calls? "

JF wrote on Jul 26, 2008 2:18 PM:

" Delta previously stated they had "no partnership in place with a developer" Now they do? BS, they always have.
Dont fall for this PAUSE in the action, Until it is announced that they will NOT be purchasing or moving forward on Victor Rd, NOTHING has changed. "

JF wrote on Jul 26, 2008 2:13 PM:

" It just keeps getting better! serna, "We'll probably have to get very creative, but that's OK," she said. "These things don't come cheap."

This is a smoke screen, they are not going anywhere. It is still going to be planted at Victor Road, This is a CYA move to let the scrutiny calm down "

JF wrote on Jul 26, 2008 2:10 PM:

" More of Delta's transparency:
1.CADI staff have rarely discussed their plans for the area in public. The company did not return a call for comment or respond to an e-mail.
2.Contacted at his office Friday, Rodriguez declined to comment on the Victor Road project. 3.Trustee Ted Simas said he wasn't sure how Delta became linked to CADI.4.Trustee Marie Elena Serna also said she could not recall how CADI and Delta came together. 5. Delta spokesman Greg Greenwood said he did not know how the college and CADI came to form a partnership. "

Lodian wrote on Jul 26, 2008 12:30 PM:

" Three million? Someone needs to pay for this, one way or another. "

dogs4you wrote on Jul 26, 2008 12:10 PM:

" If this deal goes through, Stockton just got a mile or so closer. Sam, your right on, all the crap you have to go through to build a second house on your land, and then up jumps the devil making an offer that can`t be refused. Strings pulled? make that cable`s. "

Observer wrote on Jul 26, 2008 11:40 AM:

" A property owners dream come true. Big up front option payment and the Buyer walks. Seller pockets the money and still owns the property. Next Buyer please! "

commonsense1 wrote on Jul 26, 2008 11:29 AM:

" T&C...Do you have anymore idiotic accusations to throw around? Why not get factual information before you start attacking others? Sorry, that was a stupid question. You never let the truth or facts play a part in your posts. "

commonsense1 wrote on Jul 26, 2008 11:14 AM:

" T&C, etc....No sale, no commissions. Why would CADI be paid money by Delta??? The developer puts up money to benefit Delta. Think CADI is very happy? Armstrong folks need to remember State mandated requirement of 10+ mile minimum from existing campus. Never happen on Armstrong, Harney, Lower Sac or W. Kettleman Lane. Just a wild-ass guess would suggest the land owners got the option money. T & C is absolutely correct in noting, Delta would have been better off purchasing the land and reselling at a later date if necessary. At least there is something to show for the money. "

T&C wrote on Jul 26, 2008 11:09 AM:

" http://www.publicprivateventures.net/fly.aspx?layout=content&parentid=77&taxid=121 "

T&C wrote on Jul 26, 2008 10:30 AM:

" patton1, this ought to be right up your alley? Any comments or cheers? "

T&C wrote on Jul 26, 2008 10:29 AM:

" Were CADI and Granite, or one of their aka's, given funds? I wouldn't think a developer would work for nothing. Or are they embedded with one of the individuals or corporations highlighted above, or all, with just one web and many companies like our local developer uses? "

T&C wrote on Jul 26, 2008 10:09 AM:

" Wonder if he's leasing that old building to granite? ROFLMAO "

T&C wrote on Jul 26, 2008 10:07 AM:

" sam, how do you think that little non-union contractor has gotten almost all of Lodi's work through the years? Try cheap labor and family ties? "

T&C wrote on Jul 26, 2008 10:06 AM:

" sam, google this: http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2004/11/29/tidbits1.html. Very interesting how the names remain the same and all tie into the same good old boys. "

sam wrote on Jul 26, 2008 9:47 AM:

" Madman, I agree. If Diede is changing Armstrong to commercial, Delta College would be a perfect fit. "

sam wrote on Jul 26, 2008 9:45 AM:

" I am starting to be believe you, T&C about the GOB pay offs. Why do AG40 rules
on Armstrong pertain to us farmers and not to Diede. "

sam wrote on Jul 26, 2008 9:45 AM:

" T&C, the Diede rumor is NOT a rumor.

One has to wonder how he can pull his strings to get AG40 land rezoned for commercial.

We have farmers here on Armstrong sitting on 40 acres who cannot even build a second home on their land for family members.

And in walks Diede and puts the commercial garbage spack dab where he wants it. "

Lodian2 wrote on Jul 26, 2008 9:36 AM:

" How can Ms. Serna think that public/private ventures
are the way to go after the Mountain House debacle? "

T&C wrote on Jul 26, 2008 9:32 AM:

" And, by the way, just who got all that land option money and who got the commissions? How about your local gob developer who was rumored trying to buy up all the land in and around that area on options? Now the truth comes out about those property owners that were actually unhappy about the college lo-
cating there, yet let their greed allow them to agree to sell their property on some kind of option to a greedy player in this scheme? Looks like someone needs to stand up and be accounted for. I'm sure the grand jury will be asking where all these funds went, and to whom, after reviewing Delta's board written answer to their investigation. "

T&C wrote on Jul 26, 2008 9:25 AM:

" Granite Construction is merely setting itself up with Granite Land Co. to assure it gets the lucrative freeway and county road contracts that will be in the hundreds of million of dollars for the new overpass and on and off ramps to accomodate that development. The little dogs here, like Diede Construction, won't make a move without someone backing them financially and without Mr. Spanos' approval. Why is it this supposed piece of valuable "greenbelt" all of a sudden is going to be developed by some little local construction company that's never done a big project and has depended on his gob in city hall to give him work all these years when other contractors were rejected time after time? This deal and rumor stinks to high heaven. "

T & C wrote on Jul 26, 2008 9:17 AM:

" Madman, California produces too much wine anyway! Look at the dui rate! Business means jobs! "

T & C wrote on Jul 26, 2008 9:16 AM:

" Moral of the story is...Buy the land first and you are NOT out of $3 million dollars! If the deal falls thru you still have the land to sell! "

Madman wrote on Jul 26, 2008 8:37 AM:

" Delta should look again at Armstrong Road.

Diede has plans for a 100 room hotel and a strip mall with stores and restaraunts on Armstrong and Frontage road.

There goes the vineyards and the neighborhood. "

Comments on this story are now closed.