Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 2nd, 2009
November 7th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
November 4th, 2009
November 3rd, 2009
November 2nd, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT

U.S. Episcopal leader defends church to world Anglican heads

By Rachel Zoll
Associated Press Religion Writer
Saturday, July 19, 2008 10:32 AM PDT

NEW YORK — Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori was installed as head of the U.S. church less than two years ago, inheriting a mess not of her own making.

The global Anglican Communion was in an uproar over the 2003 consecration of the first openly gay Episcopal bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire. Long-simmering differences over Scripture and the global Anglican fellowship erupted into a threat of full-blown schism.

The differences over Scripture has hit home in Lodi. Delegates from the San Joaquin Diocese, based in Fresno, voted in December to leave the Episcopal Church and affiliate with the conservative Anglican Province of the Southern Cone, based in Argentina.

Lodi's St. John's Episcopal Church chose to not join the Southern Cone and remains with the American Episcopal Church. A new San Joaquin Diocese — this one affiliated with the Episcopal Church — was formed on March 29 in a special conventioned covened by Jefferts Schori in Lodi.

Meanwhile, a new Anglican church affiliated with the Southern Cone, St. Anselm of Canterbury, was formed in May.

Jefferts Schori, a theological liberal who supported Robinson's election, has tried to ease the tensions in meetings with other Anglican leaders.

Starting next Wednesday, she will explain the church's actions in her broadest venue yet: the Lambeth Conference, a once-a-decade meeting of Anglican bishops from around the world. Jefferts Schori said she's looking forward to the "face-to-face conversation" at the event.

"We're far more diverse than we're presented in some quarters," she said in a recent interview with The Associated Press at Episcopal headquarters in New York. "We have people all over the theological spectrum and liturgical spectrum."

It won't be an easy sell.

About 200 conservative Anglican bishops won't even be there. They are boycotting the 18-day event outside London because the U.S. bishops who consecrated Robinson were invited. (For the sake of unity, the Anglican spiritual leader, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, barred Robinson and a handful of other bishops from the assembly.)

But that won't mean a conflict-free Lambeth for Episcopal bishops.

Tradition-minded church leaders who want the Anglican family to stay together despite its rifts will attend. They will undoubtedly ask Jefferts Schori about complaints that the 2.2 million-member U.S. church is mistreating its conservative minority.

Of the tensions within the American church, Jefferts Schori said "we've attempted to deal with it in the Christian community" but haven't always been successful.

Although the exact figure is in dispute, Episcopal officials say that fewer than 100 of the more than 7,000 U.S. Episcopal parishes have voted to split off since Robinson was elected.

The national Episcopal Church is suing to retain control of the breakaway San Joaquin Diocese and its many millions of dollars in property. Another lawsuit is moving through the courts over 11 breakaway churches in Virginia. Critics have called the legal fights "un-Christian" and have asked Episcopal leaders to halt the lawsuits.

But Jefferts Schori said, "We really don't have the authority or the moral right to give away those gifts that have been given by generations past and for the benefit of generations now and the benefit of generations to come."

Last month in Jerusalem, conservatives from around the world held the Global Anglican Future Conference and said they hoped to create a North American province for breakaway conservatives in the Episcopal Church and the liberal-leaning Anglican Church of Canada.

Already, Anglican archbishops, called primates, from Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda and South America, have taken oversight of seceding U.S. parishes. At Lambeth, Jefferts Schori said she will ask Williams "to encourage other parts of the communion to cease their incursions."

"It's totally opposed to a traditional Christian understanding of how bishops relate to each other," she said. "That's the biggest difficulty. They're setting up as something else in the same geographical territory."

Williams has already spoken out against the idea of a North American province, but Anglican conservatives defend the idea as critical for the spiritual well-being of traditionalists.

While Robinson won't attend the Lambeth meeting, he will be just outside the event.

He is preaching at a British church, despite a request from Williams that he refrain from doing so. A group of Episcopal bishops will host two receptions for Robinson outside the Lambeth Conference grounds so other Anglican bishops can meet and speak with him.

Jefferts Schori said she didn't ask Robinson to refrain from preaching and said his presence on the outskirts the conference "doesn't make my life more difficult."

"I think it's an opportunity for others to meet him as a human being, as a member of this church, as an honored member of this church," she said.

Liberal Christians believe that committed same-sex relationships are permitted under the Bible's social justice teachings. Conservatives disagree — and they are a majority in the 77 million-member Anglican fellowship. The communion, a group of churches that trace their roots to the Church of England, has a long tradition of accommodating different views, but it's unclear whether that broad practice will continue.

"Some people think that you can read the Bible without understanding the original context and simply take literally what you read. We will interpret — and it's an important part of faithful living," Jefferts Schori said. "To assume there is only one way of reading is hubris."

To prepare for the meeting, the presiding bishop said she has been speaking and praying with other Episcopal leaders. She is urging them to have realistic expectations for the event.

"Conversations that are challenging can't be solved in one meeting," she said. "These issues aren't going to be finished by the end of the summer."

News-Sentinel reporter Ross Farrow contributed to this story.

Reader Feedback

JD wrote on Jul 25, 2008 6:55 PM:

" Yes, I was, but the LNS cut off the blog so we can't post on the topic anymore. I don't know why the quick cut off.

I also thought that was bizarre. Are comments routinely closed after the accompanying story reaches a certain age?

It appears MTS advocates a strictly textualist approach for the Bible. I'd be interested in seeing him/her flesh out this line of thinking a little more, especially since the Biblical text strikes me as being ambiguous in so many, many instances. "

Lodian wrote on Jul 24, 2008 9:03 PM:

" Metric Time System: Yes, I have my truth, but we will never know all there is to know until that special day comes along. Your truth may be different than mine. "

Lodian wrote on Jul 24, 2008 9:01 PM:

" Billy Rubin: I like voter's blogs too. "

Lodian wrote on Jul 24, 2008 9:01 PM:

" Billy Rubin: Yes, I was, but the LNS cut off the blog so we can't post on the topic anymore. I don't know why the quick cut off. I think it was a good discussion. Maybe someone was offended and complained to the LNS. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 24, 2008 10:50 AM:

" Hey, Lodian- Are you catching the action by Voter on the Mormon thread? Dang, Voter is my hero. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 24, 2008 10:48 AM:

" To what "truth" might you be referring, Metric? "

Metric Time System wrote on Jul 24, 2008 9:09 AM:

" The Truth is out there and is knowable. Don't wait until it's too late. "

Lodian wrote on Jul 24, 2008 12:18 AM:

" Trackback: I guess we'll have to wait till death to know the truth. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 23, 2008 10:27 PM:

" Yeah, Trackback, that is not an inconceivable assumption. But still, it is your completion of your interpretation of Metric's thoughts and not Metric's own.

The problem with trying to get any of these bible quoters (like Metric or the flakey reverend) to say what they think is that they have never actually finished their own thought and have no idea what they think after they puke up Romans and Leviticus. They don't know why, they just know they need to say it. And then a round of shouting Hooray magic Jesus. "

Trackback wrote on Jul 22, 2008 5:06 PM:

" I think what he is trying to say is, there is only one way to interpret the law. Whether it is literal or figurative at times is irrelevant. However, conflicting interpretations of the same text cannot both be correct. . . "

Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 22, 2008 12:31 PM:

" You see, Metric, it either is or it is not the Word of God, as you put it.

There is no middle ground.

You either follow all of the O.T. yourself, or you are a lying hypocrite for condemning others for not believing/following it.

Don't bother to respond, the only response available to you is to lie abiout it. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 22, 2008 12:28 PM:

" Is the bible the inerrant word of God, Metric? I didn't ask if you think it's divinely inspired, you stated it is The Word of God [pasted from your post]. Your position is that HE wrote it?

Thus, you follow all the holiness laws yourself? Do you keep Kosher? You're Jewish, we can presume? Why am I asking? Of COURSE you follow all the laws yourself, otherwise you would NEVER critisize another for not doing so.

Do you wish to see all of God's biblical sacred scripture texts implemented as civil law in the US? "

Metric Time System wrote on Jul 22, 2008 9:29 AM:

" If the Bible is subject to individual interpretation, then how can anyone, including Jefferts Schori, orate from the pulpit about anything. What's true for her may or may not be true for someone else. It's all left to our personal reasoning to omit, filter, or alter The Word of God. The Bible and church is rendered useless. "

Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 21, 2008 6:36 PM:

" Any way to simply make your statement, Metric, without the convolutions?

I read your post about five times and it still makes no sense. "

Metric Time System wrote on Jul 21, 2008 1:07 PM:

" If believing in a transcending truth is "hubris", as according to Jefferts Schori, then nothing is absolute and nothing is really knowable. Therefore why should anyone belong to your church since anything you preach is just your opinion, and it may not be true for me personally. It would be hubris of you to speak to any issue, according to your belief system. "

Comments on this story are now closed.