Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Students 'protest' the eating of turkeys on Thanksgiving (82)
- Does citing the facts on immigration mean I am a hate-monger? (75)
- Minister takes to the streets to recruit new members (70)
- Huber upsets Sieglock in 10th Assembly race (34)
- Former gang member hopes to make a difference in Lodi (34)
- Is the U.S. Constitution obsolete? (30)
- Automakers need a simple car (30)
- Lodi fills position of deputy city manager (17)
- Update: Huber appears to have made comeback victory (16)
- Galt Boys and Girls Club in danger of closing (14)
U.S. Episcopal leader defends church to world Anglican heads
Associated Press Religion Writer
NEW YORK — Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori was installed as head of the U.S. church less than two years ago, inheriting a mess not of her own making.
The global Anglican Communion was in an uproar over the 2003 consecration of the first openly gay Episcopal bishop, V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire. Long-simmering differences over Scripture and the global Anglican fellowship erupted into a threat of full-blown schism.
The differences over Scripture has hit home in Lodi. Delegates from the San Joaquin Diocese, based in Fresno, voted in December to leave the Episcopal Church and affiliate with the conservative Anglican Province of the Southern Cone, based in Argentina.
Lodi's St. John's Episcopal Church chose to not join the Southern Cone and remains with the American Episcopal Church. A new San Joaquin Diocese — this one affiliated with the Episcopal Church — was formed on March 29 in a special conventioned covened by Jefferts Schori in Lodi.
Meanwhile, a new Anglican church affiliated with the Southern Cone, St. Anselm of Canterbury, was formed in May.
Jefferts Schori, a theological liberal who supported Robinson's election, has tried to ease the tensions in meetings with other Anglican leaders.
Starting next Wednesday, she will explain the church's actions in her broadest venue yet: the Lambeth Conference, a once-a-decade meeting of Anglican bishops from around the world. Jefferts Schori said she's looking forward to the "face-to-face conversation" at the event.
"We're far more diverse than we're presented in some quarters," she said in a recent interview with The Associated Press at Episcopal headquarters in New York. "We have people all over the theological spectrum and liturgical spectrum."
It won't be an easy sell.
About 200 conservative Anglican bishops won't even be there. They are boycotting the 18-day event outside London because the U.S. bishops who consecrated Robinson were invited. (For the sake of unity, the Anglican spiritual leader, Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams, barred Robinson and a handful of other bishops from the assembly.)
But that won't mean a conflict-free Lambeth for Episcopal bishops.
Tradition-minded church leaders who want the Anglican family to stay together despite its rifts will attend. They will undoubtedly ask Jefferts Schori about complaints that the 2.2 million-member U.S. church is mistreating its conservative minority.
Of the tensions within the American church, Jefferts Schori said "we've attempted to deal with it in the Christian community" but haven't always been successful.
Although the exact figure is in dispute, Episcopal officials say that fewer than 100 of the more than 7,000 U.S. Episcopal parishes have voted to split off since Robinson was elected.
The national Episcopal Church is suing to retain control of the breakaway San Joaquin Diocese and its many millions of dollars in property. Another lawsuit is moving through the courts over 11 breakaway churches in Virginia. Critics have called the legal fights "un-Christian" and have asked Episcopal leaders to halt the lawsuits.
But Jefferts Schori said, "We really don't have the authority or the moral right to give away those gifts that have been given by generations past and for the benefit of generations now and the benefit of generations to come."
Last month in Jerusalem, conservatives from around the world held the Global Anglican Future Conference and said they hoped to create a North American province for breakaway conservatives in the Episcopal Church and the liberal-leaning Anglican Church of Canada.
Already, Anglican archbishops, called primates, from Nigeria, Rwanda, Uganda and South America, have taken oversight of seceding U.S. parishes. At Lambeth, Jefferts Schori said she will ask Williams "to encourage other parts of the communion to cease their incursions."
"It's totally opposed to a traditional Christian understanding of how bishops relate to each other," she said. "That's the biggest difficulty. They're setting up as something else in the same geographical territory."
Williams has already spoken out against the idea of a North American province, but Anglican conservatives defend the idea as critical for the spiritual well-being of traditionalists.
While Robinson won't attend the Lambeth meeting, he will be just outside the event.
He is preaching at a British church, despite a request from Williams that he refrain from doing so. A group of Episcopal bishops will host two receptions for Robinson outside the Lambeth Conference grounds so other Anglican bishops can meet and speak with him.
Jefferts Schori said she didn't ask Robinson to refrain from preaching and said his presence on the outskirts the conference "doesn't make my life more difficult."
"I think it's an opportunity for others to meet him as a human being, as a member of this church, as an honored member of this church," she said.
Liberal Christians believe that committed same-sex relationships are permitted under the Bible's social justice teachings. Conservatives disagree — and they are a majority in the 77 million-member Anglican fellowship. The communion, a group of churches that trace their roots to the Church of England, has a long tradition of accommodating different views, but it's unclear whether that broad practice will continue.
"Some people think that you can read the Bible without understanding the original context and simply take literally what you read. We will interpret — and it's an important part of faithful living," Jefferts Schori said. "To assume there is only one way of reading is hubris."
To prepare for the meeting, the presiding bishop said she has been speaking and praying with other Episcopal leaders. She is urging them to have realistic expectations for the event.
"Conversations that are challenging can't be solved in one meeting," she said. "These issues aren't going to be finished by the end of the summer."
News-Sentinel reporter Ross Farrow contributed to this story.

Reader Feedback
JD wrote on Jul 25, 2008 6:55 PM:
I also thought that was bizarre. Are comments routinely closed after the accompanying story reaches a certain age?
It appears MTS advocates a strictly textualist approach for the Bible. I'd be interested in seeing him/her flesh out this line of thinking a little more, especially since the Biblical text strikes me as being ambiguous in so many, many instances. "
Lodian wrote on Jul 24, 2008 9:03 PM:
Lodian wrote on Jul 24, 2008 9:01 PM:
Lodian wrote on Jul 24, 2008 9:01 PM:
Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 24, 2008 10:50 AM:
Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 24, 2008 10:48 AM:
Metric Time System wrote on Jul 24, 2008 9:09 AM:
Lodian wrote on Jul 24, 2008 12:18 AM:
Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 23, 2008 10:27 PM:
The problem with trying to get any of these bible quoters (like Metric or the flakey reverend) to say what they think is that they have never actually finished their own thought and have no idea what they think after they puke up Romans and Leviticus. They don't know why, they just know they need to say it. And then a round of shouting Hooray magic Jesus. "
Trackback wrote on Jul 22, 2008 5:06 PM:
Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 22, 2008 12:31 PM:
There is no middle ground.
You either follow all of the O.T. yourself, or you are a lying hypocrite for condemning others for not believing/following it.
Don't bother to respond, the only response available to you is to lie abiout it. "
Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 22, 2008 12:28 PM:
Thus, you follow all the holiness laws yourself? Do you keep Kosher? You're Jewish, we can presume? Why am I asking? Of COURSE you follow all the laws yourself, otherwise you would NEVER critisize another for not doing so.
Do you wish to see all of God's biblical sacred scripture texts implemented as civil law in the US? "
Metric Time System wrote on Jul 22, 2008 9:29 AM:
Billy Rubin wrote on Jul 21, 2008 6:36 PM:
I read your post about five times and it still makes no sense. "
Metric Time System wrote on Jul 21, 2008 1:07 PM:
Comments on this story are now closed.