Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Bible is entwined with American civic life (135)
- I predict: A conservative tide will rise in 2010 (71)
- David Diskin is first to give an invocation under new city of Lodi policy (70)
- The Treaty of Tripoli hoax (58)
- Universal health care solves big problems (58)
- Here's what my father knew about the assassination of JFK (35)
- Stuck in neutral? Hardly! (32)
- Words from our forefathers (27)
- City of Lodi staff looking into possibility of limiting number of taco trucks (20)
- Majority cannot deprive the minority (20)
Redevelopment approved
2,000 acres are designated in eastern Lodi by City Council; group of concerned citizens vows to put issue on the ballot
Despite the mayor's objections and the vow of a small group of citizens to oppose the process, Lodi's City Council voted Wednesday to begin redeveloping the eastern half of the city.
Beginning in January, more than 2,000 city acres will be designated a redevelopment area, meaning that the city will keep a larger share of the property tax in that section. In turn, the tax money will be used for various revitalizing projects, such as improved sidewalks, roads and parks.
A group of Lodi citizens, citing concern that the idea is costly and could ultimately take private property through eminent domain, has vowed to gather enough signatures so the issue will be put to the voters. Mayor JoAnne Mounce agreed that the citizens should decide the matter, and she gave that as her reason for casting the dissenting vote at Wednesday's council meeting.
"We owe it to our citizens to put this to a vote so that they have a say, one way or another, in redevelopment," Mounce said.
If the council had put the matter to a vote, it would have gone on the November ballot; now opponents will likely have to hold a special — and potentially costly — special election if they gather enough signatures.
Council members voted 3-1, with Councilwoman Susan Hitchcock absent, to move forward on the long-discussed redevelopment idea.
Councilman Bob Johnson, before voting for the process, noted that the council has heard from about 20 citizens who oppose it. He said that's not enough public interest to warrant a citywide vote.
Also on the agenda
In other action Wednesday night, the council:— News-Sentinel staff
Six years ago, a City Council made up of different members also tried to pass a redevelopment project. It ultimately died when citizens protested the inclusion of eminent domain, which allows the government to take private property for public use.
This time around, eminent domain is not included in redevelopment. City spokesman Jeff Hood noted that not once in California has redevelopment used eminent domain, and that if the city planned such a move, it would have to be laid out publicly.
But opponents worry that future councils could ultimately use eminent domain. They also worry that the plan could be costly.
"I'm concerned that they've failed to inform the public of the extent of their plans," 45-year Lodi resident Marianne Rivera said after the council meeting.
She also addressed the council before their vote, asking members to lay out more precise plans before approving the multi-million-dollar idea. Rivera was part of the group that successfully fought redevelopment six years ago, and she said she is once again talking to her neighbors in Lodi's Eastside.
"This redevelopment process has been something that is frightening the Eastside," Rivera said in her emotional speech to the council. "I promise you that if you persist, you will have a fight."
Eunice Frederich, another Eastside resident who attended Wednesday's meeting, also worries about tax usage. Through redevelopment, Lodi will keep more of the property taxes that would normally go to San Joaquin County, and she noted that the county's hospital desperately needs more funding.
Hood countered that other cities in the county, including Stockton, Tracy and Manteca, already have redevelopment, so they are also keeping more of their own property taxes.
Ultimately, Lodi will get less than 2 percent of the county's overall tax, and the redeveloped area will actually increase the tax base and make that number even smaller, said City Manager Blair King.
The matter will likely be argued and debated plenty in the near future, if opponents hold to their vow of getting enough signatures to put the issue on a ballot.
"We're going to cover the whole town, every precinct," Frederich said.
Contact reporter Layla Bohm at layla@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
Observer wrote on Jul 8, 2008 3:24 PM:
papercut wrote on Jul 8, 2008 11:21 AM:
DanielH wrote on Jul 7, 2008 11:51 PM:
I have also lost contact with the people who were organizing to oppose this redevelopment project. "
DanielH wrote on Jul 7, 2008 11:49 PM:
It is an understatement to say that I have no respect for T&C.
His post below is weird, because I agree with what he typed, while it appeared that he was disagreeing with me. I went down the board to see if I had typed something wrong.
I just decided he wasn't worth my time to bother. "
DanielH wrote on Jul 7, 2008 11:41 PM:
If you think T&C ripped me on the board, it wasn't enough for me to remember. "
edumacation wrote on Jul 7, 2008 4:55 PM:
papercut wrote on Jul 7, 2008 1:43 PM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 7, 2008 8:13 AM:
Observer wrote on Jul 7, 2008 6:27 AM:
Observer wrote on Jul 7, 2008 6:22 AM:
Observer wrote on Jul 7, 2008 6:19 AM:
DanielH wrote on Jul 6, 2008 10:30 PM:
I'm beginning to think that you only appear in the newspaper comments during working hours, and I don't think you're qualified as a public servant. "
DanielH wrote on Jul 6, 2008 10:28 PM:
If they utter a word of having made a decision, they just disrespected all of the public process, and I think they just disqualified their own vote. "
papercut wrote on Jul 6, 2008 9:53 PM:
Observer wrote on Jul 6, 2008 7:46 AM:
I didn't stop by HOC on 7/4.....was headed out to the Lake that morning with family in town. Everybody leaves today.....hate to see them go. "
edumacation wrote on Jul 5, 2008 9:48 PM:
On your post to papercut. The lady doth protest to much me thinks. I don't believe there is an "our" or a a "success".
I need your opinion: What if California required that all political appointees and elected representatives, post their IQ scores after their names. Would you support that regulation? "
commonsense1 wrote on Jul 5, 2008 5:34 PM:
commonsense1 wrote on Jul 5, 2008 5:31 PM:
papercut wrote on Jul 5, 2008 11:56 AM:
papercut wrote on Jul 5, 2008 11:54 AM:
Observer wrote on Jul 5, 2008 10:27 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 4, 2008 9:41 PM:
T&c wrote on Jul 4, 2008 7:27 PM:
T&c wrote on Jul 4, 2008 7:12 PM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 4, 2008 6:58 PM:
click on the PDF link to the left.
Nothing is new in small town politics. only the names have changed. "
edumacation wrote on Jul 4, 2008 6:47 PM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 4, 2008 6:39 PM:
re: T&C 6:05 Its no big deal. Its in the records at the ESC. I think it was also quoted in the LNS. Like I say am not a developer so I don't care. I knew Huyett, and I doubt that he was get involved with anything involving kickbacks. I saw no quid pro quo, so no problem. I will research it for you to put your mind at ease. I do remember it was one of the recent developments that was planned in the past 3-4 years. I think I know who it was but want to be sure first. "
T & C wrote on Jul 4, 2008 6:09 PM:
T & C wrote on Jul 4, 2008 6:05 PM:
T&c wrote on Jul 4, 2008 1:17 PM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 4, 2008 11:43 AM:
T&c wrote on Jul 4, 2008 11:34 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 4, 2008 10:53 AM:
DanielH wrote on Jul 4, 2008 9:49 AM:
Let me remind people that the campaign donations from developers makes up a large percentage of a typical politician's campaign funds. "
DanielH wrote on Jul 4, 2008 9:45 AM:
DanielH wrote on Jul 4, 2008 9:44 AM:
Your request for a local citizen to substantiate a statement is out of line, that is, if you or your employer has an oath of office. "
DanielH wrote on Jul 4, 2008 9:41 AM:
Additionally, the plan to pay for the project is based upon speculation on an increase in tax revenue that is required in order to pay for the project. "
edumacation wrote on Jul 4, 2008 12:34 AM:
Observer wrote on Jul 3, 2008 8:05 PM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 7:11 PM:
Will this happen here? Thats an intersting question. Can we get an answer or policy now before we go into millions of dollars of debt? Do we wait unitl we have a fiscal problem and make up the rules as the conditions merit? This is a litigious state, does anyone want to bet that we walk into another lawsuit? Paranoia? I think not. Ask the new Superintendent what happened last March? "
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 7:01 PM:
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4176/is_20080308/ai_n24912068
http://sunpost.net/content/view/1294/174/
Here is a recent newapaper editorial for you:
http://sunpost.net/content/view/1644/172/
I guess I am not so "paranoid" after all. Add the two newspapers to the paranoid list ROFL. LOL "
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 6:55 PM:
patton1 wrote on Jul 3, 2008 6:18 PM:
T & C wrote on Jul 3, 2008 6:08 PM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 3:52 PM:
T & C wrote on Jul 3, 2008 2:44 PM:
"The GOB are not rich in real times but it exists only in their own minds. A poll by the LNS found that over 60% of respondents believed that there is undue influence by a few self-appointed "Good ol Boyz" in this area." Guess what edumacation: People begin to "Believe" things that are 100% false because of the rumors people spread to fuel anxiety and frustration! Think about it, lol! "
T & C wrote on Jul 3, 2008 2:41 PM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 2:06 PM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 2:03 PM:
commonsense1 wrote on Jul 3, 2008 1:52 PM:
commonsense wrote on Jul 3, 2008 1:37 PM:
wtf wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:52 PM:
Thank you for your response, Ms. Bohm. You've given me info on how many opposed were there - three; with one making a public comment. Given that this was the only public comment, do you know, aside from the council members, the number of those in favor who were there? "
T & C wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:34 PM:
T & C wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:32 PM:
T & C wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:30 PM:
T & C wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:27 PM:
" The meeting was at 7PM last night and the three cockroaches crawled out from under their firewood pile at rosewood long enough to vote yes against te citizens' wishes and also that of Madam Mayor Mounce"! It appears to me that "concerned citizens are being personally attacked and insulted by papercut, AKA T&c, and edumaction calling Lodi citizens cockroaches! Who said they were even spanish! Moderator help us out and ban papercuts, three person log-in ISP for 3 months! "
T & C wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:25 PM:
T & C wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:20 PM:
T & C wrote on Jul 3, 2008 12:17 PM:
noun, a lump or mass, as of something soft. Informal a large quantity or amount waste material produced in coal mining, consisting of clay, shale, etc." What in the heck does a GOB have to do with Lodi? papercut or any other GOB name you post under cannot answer that question! If the "GOBS) wanted to do something for you edumacation, you'd have a different outlook, lol! "
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 11:57 AM:
http://www.sjgov.org/commdev/cgi-bin/cdyn.exe
and
http://sjmap.org/website/DistrictViewer/Viewer.asp
Have fun boyz n grlz. "
patton1 wrote on Jul 3, 2008 11:54 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 11:35 AM:
patton wrote on Jul 3, 2008 10:49 AM:
papercut wrote on Jul 3, 2008 10:26 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 10:18 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 10:14 AM:
GetUrHeadOut wrote on Jul 3, 2008 10:13 AM:
"Lodi will keep more of the property taxes that would normally go to San Joaquin County" NOT A NEW TAX! "
patton1 wrote on Jul 3, 2008 10:13 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 10:06 AM:
Try this one but it only has a few fields. The document number, book and page will help when you visit the Recorders office. "
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 10:04 AM:
patton1 wrote on Jul 3, 2008 10:01 AM:
Edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:56 AM:
Answer that one. Using only the onlne database will give you the answer to that story. Also look back a few years. Its amazing how many transfers there have been---and the SAME NAMES keep popping up. We have streets named after them. "
patton1 wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:55 AM:
patton1 wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:53 AM:
Edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:50 AM:
patton1 wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:47 AM:
Edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:44 AM:
Edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:36 AM:
Observer wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:32 AM:
Observer wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:27 AM:
gray cloud wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:19 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:15 AM:
Layla Bohm, reporter wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:10 AM:
Edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:05 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:02 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 9:01 AM:
Is that close enough? Now in the spirit if good and honest civic responsibilty, I have another question for you. If you learn about any agreements or meetings that are not public concerning RDA money or contracts and subcontracts will you report it? If not WHY? "
Observer wrote on Jul 3, 2008 8:51 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 8:49 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 8:47 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 8:44 AM:
T&c wrote on Jul 3, 2008 8:43 AM:
Observer wrote on Jul 3, 2008 8:36 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 8:27 AM:
Observer wrote on Jul 3, 2008 8:13 AM:
papercut wrote on Jul 3, 2008 8:08 AM:
papercut wrote on Jul 3, 2008 7:59 AM:
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 7:51 AM:
wtf wrote on Jul 3, 2008 7:48 AM:
From the Agenda, it looks like this was passed at the regular 7:00 p.m. meeting.
http://publicdocs.lodi.gov/Docs/AGENDAS/2008/07-02-08agn.pdf
Councilman Bob Johnson, before voting for the process, noted that the council has heard from about 20 citizens who oppose it. And says this is not enough for a city-wide vote. What the LNS does not mention is how many citizens showed up and spoke in **favor** of redevelopment - or are we, the citizens of Lodi, just supposed to accept that the THREE (not 20) city council members represent all of us?
How many spoke in favor of this? LNS please find out and update this story. "
edumacation wrote on Jul 3, 2008 7:47 AM:
Mad Dog wrote on Jul 3, 2008 7:10 AM:
KenH wrote on Jul 3, 2008 5:44 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.