Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 2nd, 2009
November 7th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
November 4th, 2009
November 3rd, 2009
November 2nd, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
Eric Zhang, 12, watches fellow Elkhorn students play softball after school Friday. Elkhorn has recently been placed on a list that could mean the end to the highly sought-after school. (Brian Feulner/News-Sentinel)

Elkhorn School to close?

LUSD committee eyes possibility of closure

By Amanda Dyer
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Saturday, May 17, 2008 6:32 AM PDT

STOCKTON — Lodi Unified's Budget Advisory Committee will decide Wednesday night whether or not it will recommend closing Elkhorn School to compensate for the $8.2 million the district must make in budget cuts.

The district could save approximately $250,000 by closing the school, said Doug Barge, chief business officer for Lodi Unified School District.

The suggested cut has caused concern among parents, teachers and students at Lodi Unified's only exclusively Gifted and Talented Education school.

"Elkhorn is one of the best things about Lodi Unified, and it would be a shame to close it down," said Stella Webber, whose son is an eighth-grader at the school.

Other recommended cuts include scaling back transportation and doing away with the district's class-size reduction program at the third-grade level.

Elkhorn School was put on the chopping block May 14 at the Superintendent's Budget Advisory Committee meeting, when a committee member suggested closing either Turner Elementary School, Clements School or Elkhorn School, said Trustee Calvin Young, who is one of two board liaisons to the Budget Advisory Committee.

Young said the three schools were chosen because of their low student populations and the ability of the students to go to nearby schools.

The committee did not discuss closing either Turner or Clements schools, but did take a 7-6 vote in favor of adding Elkhorn to tentative list of recommendations that will eventually go to Interim Superintendent Len Casanega.

Young would not say whether or not he would support closing Elkhorn School if the recommendation were to reach the board, saying he's obligated to have that discussion in an open forum.

However, Young did say that due the governor's revised budget released this week, the district's budget woes might not be as dire as originally anticipated.

"I don't think we're going to be seeing that," he said about Elkhorn's closure.

Casanega confirmed Young's statement.


Social studies teacher Judith Gores, left, and PTSA vice president Phyllis Vlavianos talk about the possible closing of Elkhorn School on Friday at the school. (Brian Feulner/News-Sentinel)

"The amount that the district will be required to cut is significantly less than anticipated," Casanega said.

He estimates that the district will have to cut less than half of what was originally planned.

Barge emphasized that although Elkhorn School was added to a list of possible recommendations, the committee and the district must take several more steps before it finalizes cuts.

"The list is nowhere close to being done," Barge said.

First the committee will formulate a list of possible cuts, Barge said. They will then prioritize those cuts based on what they are willing to cut first.

The list of recommendations will then go to the superintendent before going to the school board.

The board is expected to adopt a balanced budget June 17.

Barge echoed Young's remarks that the district is expecting not to have to cut as much from its budget as it originally anticipated. He won't know how much less it will have to cut until Monday.

Scott McGregor, principal at Elkhorn School, said news of the Budget Advisory Committee's suggestion did ruffle some feathers.

"It created some concern with our staff as well as our parent committee," he said.

McGregor went on to say that the suggestion still has to go through more steps before coming to fruition.

"Though it's certainly of concern, it's just a recommendation at this point," McGregor said.

Parents at Elkhorn are taking the suggested recommendation as a more immediate threat.

"I think it's horrible," said Jennifer Conradi, whose son Brendan is a fourth-grader at Elkhorn. "I think they can find (the money) somewhere else."

Phyllis Vlavianos, vice president of the school's Parent, Teacher, Student Association and parent of a sixth-grader at the school, said she's not only against closing the school, she's against closing the school so soon.

"They're talking about next year. We've already made plans," Vlavianos said.

Parents plan to attend Wednesday's budget advisory committee meeting to protest the recommendation to close Elkhorn.

Students aren't crazy about the idea either.

"We don't want the school to close," said Rachael Boyle, 11, a fifth-grader. "It's important to us."

Earlier in the school year, Elkhorn parents protested a districtwide lottery that would that determined which students would attend the school for seventh and eighth-grade.

Contact reporter Amanda Dyer at amandad@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

Lodian wrote on May 31, 2008 12:17 AM:

" The fact that Elkhorn shows the highest scores in the district is further proof that very studious children attend this school as identified GATE students. A real gifted program would probably not show the high scores Elkhorn does at this point. There are many highly, even profoundly, gifted children that are failing. These are the students I believe should have GATE services, but still not a GATE school. When we can provide a "special needs" school for the other end of the spectrum then we can provide an entire school facility for GATE students. I don't see that happening any time soon. "

Lodian wrote on May 31, 2008 12:06 AM:

" rw_gresham: Certainly you are not addressing me. LOL

Oh my goodness, gresham, the ignorance in your post is plentiful. I can't decide where I should start with you. I will use restraint. First, you should at least read the posts before personally attacking with your flip little jabs. You obviously missed quite a few facts already stated. Come back and try again later. Geez, I hope you are not a representative or product of an Elkhorn education (what a disgrace!). I suspect that many from Elkhorn would kindly like you to shut your trap as you are not furthering their cause. FYI, my opinions are based on years of experience in the GATE program and as an advocate for the highly gifted. "

rw_gresham wrote on May 30, 2008 11:24 PM:

" You have no clue as to what this school does. If you did you would be unable to write such negative comments about it. You can argue till you are blue in the face that you could save money but in the long haul you will lose a lot more. First with an API (Academic Performance Index) because you must be a complete idiot. Is off the chart a 971 out of 1000 is a very very great number acts a buoy to help lift LUSD API up. If you did not know and I believe you dont the higher the API the more money you get. You also have no clue what it feels like to be a GATE student because when you are in a regular class you are putting along not being challenged enough which leads to drop outs drugs and violence. Through the gate program you move the high students together to push them more and also free up the other classes from the nascence of the slower people. It is also good for them to be pulled out because it also allows the regular education to be more to the level of the students. Elkhorn is also a very old school. It celebrated its 150 anniversary just a few years ago. I pity you and if you have any god forbid your children because they must be stoners and dumb people because you are a first class idiot. So that is why you are misinformed and are having delusions about the fact the people actually care that you think yourself smart when you cannot even COPY AND PAST RIGHT. HaHaha.

Yours truly

RWG "

Lodian wrote on May 26, 2008 11:43 AM:

" I sure wish all punctuation would copy and paste over to this board when using word to type a response. Oh well.. I guess you can get the point anyway. Sorry the punctuation was omitted from my post. :-) "

Lodian wrote on May 26, 2008 11:40 AM:

" Hcblade95/ Harvey Ching: I appreciate your letter and would like to address you on a couple of things. Id like you to know that there are many gifted children throughout the district that do not attend Elkhorn and that do very well, actuallyexceptionally well. My personal opinion is that the district does not need to offer a gifted school as an option for the gifted students in order for them to get the most out of their "Gifted-ness", as you put it. Besides, in my view, Elkhorn (the GATE program) is not set up well for the truly gifted students among us anyway. It is rather a school for bright studious children that can handle tons of projects and homework, but thats another subject for another day.

Im sorry to hear that your previous school in Stockton had bad kids in it. However, it should not be the Lodi Unified School Districts responsibility to create an all GATE school so students can get away from bad students. FYI, there are bad kids at Elkhorn too. With that said, I believe that every child should have the opportunity to go to school and not be burdened with bad kids around, but thats not real life. As parents, teachers, administrators and students we should all work together in making all the schools a safe learning environment so all the children can thrive, not just the identified GATE children.

You need to know that Elkhorn is very expensive for the district. That is the main reason they are now looking to put it on the chopping block. We, as a district, can no longer afford such luxuries as an entire school dedicated to identified GATE students. The bussing alone costs the district a quarter of a million dollars alone.

In closing I would like to share with you that there is an entire world outside of Elkhorn where you can/will do very well. There are many GATE students that are at their neighborhood schools doing very well. If your family is interested in a private school then that is their option, but the district can no longer afford such a school and should think of ALL the students in the district.

I look forward to your response.
Have a great day!
Lodian



"

hcblade95 wrote on May 26, 2008 9:03 AM:

" Hi, my name is Harvey Ching, and I am a 7th grader in Elkhorn Middle School.

I have been in Elkhorn since 4th grade and I strongly believe that I have learned a lot more than if I was at other schools. I have the ability in Elkhorn to work with my peers and set challenges and goals for myself. It allowed me to use the most out of my "Gifted-ness",as they call it, to enhance my learning experience. The teachers are MUCH better at here, too. I was actually challenged by the work, which I believe helped me learn, unlike some schools. In my opinion, I don't know WHAT would happen if we didn't have at least ONE school like this.

To the people who doesn't want Elkhorn to continue: I want you to look at the people in your child's school. How are they behaving? When I was at school for the first time in Stockton (I moved) in 3rd grade, I can realize FOR MYSELF that I was not going to learn anything. The kids there were bad, fight went on, teachers didn't even give the children any challenge whatsoever. I got straight A's all the time in that school, so did many other kids that went there that later went to Elkhorn. I believe that every school should be like Elkhorn that gives kids challenges and makes them really THINK.

Basically, Elkhorn enhanced my learning experience. I don't know what I would have done without going to the school. I can feel my life being better after going to the school. Working with my peers allowed me to express my giftedness to others.

I don't want this school to close down. Besides I have one year left. :D I want to at least finish. Don't ruin the experience of the other students.

Harvey Ching
Elkhorn 7th Grader "

Lodian wrote on May 23, 2008 11:44 AM:

" Observer: My previous post was in response to a post by Rhodie regarding gangs etc. Elkhorn not is immune from problem students. That was my point. Sorry if I was not clear. A GATE/smart kid can be a problem too...sometimes even worse (IMO). We saw everything from the usual clicks and bullies to extreme violent behavior. This is not conjecture on my part as my children went to Elkhorn. I was involved there for many years. "

Lodian wrote on May 23, 2008 11:26 AM:

" Observer: I'm adding my two cents which comes from years of experience at Elkhorn. Yes, my children went to Elkhorn. I wouldn't choose Elkhorn again. "

dyan wrote on May 23, 2008 10:07 AM:

" I say "close it." We spend too much money on the smart kids and not enough on the dummies. "

Observer wrote on May 23, 2008 9:46 AM:

" Lodian, why are you so critical of Elkhorn? I don't see anyone claiming that they have "perfect little learners". Of course these students are subject to all of the other issues facing our children today. I'm not looking for an argument but just curious about your very strong feelings about this subject. Did you have a child attend Elkhorn? Was it not a good experience? All of my friends who had or currently have children attending the school love the program and the teachers. "

Lodian wrote on May 23, 2008 8:56 AM:

" Elkhorn has a high percentage of AD/HD kids along with many other comorbid disorders. I don't like to call them disorders, but that's still how it's stated. These "conditions" often go hand in hand with bright "GATE" kids. Not all of the kids, of course, but many have these others issues. I'm just saying that Elkhorn is not a haven where only perfect little learners will attend. There are plenty of issues at Elkhorn from the students to the teachers and curriculum. Can you say project overload??? "

Lodian wrote on May 23, 2008 8:49 AM:

" Robb: You're right. There isn't really an acceptable alternative. "

Robb wrote on May 22, 2008 7:36 PM:

" It is just too bad that there is Not an acceptable private alternative in the Lodi area..... "

Lodian wrote on May 22, 2008 6:51 PM:

" Elkhorn may be there for one more year, if that. "

jess wrote on May 22, 2008 4:33 PM:

" Rhodie, I have my kids in private school. Public schools here are ok but the gang problem is real. Good luck with Elkhorn. "

Rhodie wrote on May 22, 2008 1:03 PM:

" We're new to the area so we don't know much about the enviroments at the different schools but we were excited about one of our kids being asked to go to Elkhorn. Not only for the educational opertunities but also because for the first three months we lived here everyone warned us about the gangs at Lodi Middle and in the high schools. At my kids age I was fairly confident in myself and gangs were no real issue for me, even in a large southern cal town (the main high school had a cage in the boys locker room so one group or kids could change without fearing being jumped by a gang). But as a parent I am concerned that more is not done at local schools to crush gang and gang-like behavior.

That said, all I see closing Elkhorn doing is encouraging more parents to send their kids to private schools. "

Aimee wrote on May 20, 2008 9:32 AM:

" Edit: Instead of "what rights" it should be "what services". "

Aimee wrote on May 20, 2008 9:27 AM:

" Lodian/gadzooks: Excellent points. I completely agree with you both. The informational paperwork they are required to give you by law does not outline exactly WHAT rights you are entitled to. After all, "a free and appropriate education" is very subjective and open to interpretation. Valley Mountain Regional Center (VMRC) and Protection and Advocacy in Sacramento (PAI) were both excellent resources for us. "

Lodian wrote on May 19, 2008 4:04 PM:

" WY: It sounds like you were given false information. "

Lodian wrote on May 19, 2008 4:03 PM:

" The services for special needs children are not even shared with parents up front. One has to dig and threaten before the keeper of the information is willing to share the information and allow services. These services are the right of a special needs child yet the school will keep as much information on these services a secret as long as they can. It's ridiculous when, as parents of a special needs child, we have to learn from other parents of special needs children to what we are entitled. Finally, instead of being Ms. Nice and trying to work "with" the school I decided to have a lawyer by my side. Then things started coming our way and the information flowed. GATE parents do not have to deal with such issues. "

gadzooks wrote on May 19, 2008 3:46 PM:

" I feel uniquely positioned to respond to some of the questions raised on this thread. I'm employed by LUSD, have taught GATE classes, and have mainstreamed seriously disabled children into the regular classroom. One of my own children was GATE identified (stayed at our neighborhood school), another son is so disabled that he will never live on his own--both were students in Lodi Unified. Let's make no mistake, the disabled require and deserve far more resources--resources which are often denied. Asserting that the gifted need extra attention is ignorant and selfish--they may need different attention or resources at times, but certainly not more. "

WY wrote on May 19, 2008 2:39 PM:

" OTH... I'm sorry, I have been so busy.
They brought some woman in from Sacramento to explain the issues of a gifted child. Special needs class simulations. She had graphs of how the State spends the money. Call LUSD office and ask how to get that info. I got a google girl, I'm not one. :) If you want a good education for your child, You have to be involved. "

Aimee wrote on May 19, 2008 2:11 PM:

" Zinfandel: Thank you for the head's up-I will make every effort to attend as I have a special needs child in my life as well.

Sam: the elementary school has a good curriculum and teachers that really care about their children...I went there myself once upon a time. But watch out for the music teacher.. "

zinfandel wrote on May 19, 2008 1:46 PM:

" Lodian, OTH, Hrtz and Aimee, thank you for you kind comments. The issue of "Special Needs Children" is one very close to my heart. Like OTH, I have a "speical needs child" in my family. We have had to fight LUSD for services that they are required by law to provide. And like OTH's sister, the district office is not happy to see or hear from us. If any of you are interested in voicing your support for children with special needs, there will be a meeting on May 28th at 7:00 p.m. at the James Areida Education Support Center, 3rd floor conference Room D, 1305 E. Vine Street. These children need our support........so please attend and voice your concerns. And if you are unable to attend, please contact Catherine Conrado, Ed.D, she is the Administrative Director of Student Services/SELPA or Dill Celis at 331-7051 or 953-8061. Please voice your concerns regarding the impact cuts to the special ed program will have on our "special needs chldren". I hope to see you all there! "

sam wrote on May 19, 2008 12:34 PM:

" Aimee, I will let you know in about 10 years. I have a little nephew starting at the beginning. So far he LOVES it and looks forward to school everyday.

When I say "at the beginning" I mean the SDA elementary school. "

Aimee wrote on May 19, 2008 9:09 AM:

" Sam:

Lodi Academy isn't what it used to be, unfortunately. "

Aimee wrote on May 19, 2008 9:06 AM:

" Zinfandel: BRAVO, BRAVO for your comments that could not have been more right on, correct and stated very succinctly. "

Jenn H wrote on May 18, 2008 10:28 PM:

" Busy work. That's the difference between Elkhorn School and regular classrooms. I never saw so much pointless work & so many useless projects. Moreover, the teachers did not follow the prescribed curriculum est. by the District. I cannot say that eliminating this school would sadden me, based upon our experience. "

papercut wrote on May 18, 2008 9:34 PM:

" Lodian, there are always exceptions for the wealthy, well connected and the same snivelers year after year. LUSD is so far out of the norm and top-heavy with administration and their high salaries and perks along with that. "

Lodian wrote on May 18, 2008 5:43 PM:

" sam: Things seem to be going down hill in most of the LUSD. There are, of course, exceptions. "

sam wrote on May 18, 2008 4:46 PM:

" OTH, I was pleased with my kids' education. However that was a long while ago.

If I had kids in school now I would go private. I love Lodi Academy.

LUSD is too top heavy to support the teachers and meet the needs of the students. Look at Len Casanega's salary fiasco. What an embarrassment. "

OTH wrote on May 18, 2008 4:41 PM:

" Observer....I took no offense from your comment, other that maybe they should go back to putting the handicapped studets in closets so their not out in planin view.

We pay the einsteins that run the school system a lot of money to do their job. An yet no I know parent who is happy with the shcools, "

Lodian wrote on May 18, 2008 1:10 PM:

" Gadzooks 7:32 AM: I agree. Well said. I have to say though... there are plenty of "riffraff" at Elkhorn too. :-)

"

sam wrote on May 18, 2008 10:41 AM:

" At Live Oak school, their teachers allowed them to go over to Dorothy Mahin School to work with the kids there. Now as adults, they still consider that experience to have been priceless.

School is not just about learning the curriculum, it is also a place where kids grow socially and learn to exist and work with kids of all levels. "

sam wrote on May 18, 2008 10:40 AM:

" Gadzooks, that is an interesting comment..."The Elkhorn parents are expecting the public to pay for a private school experience..."

I have to agree with you.

My kids are GATE kids and I refused to send them to the GATE school. They received a great education and took advantage of all the honors classes and other opportunities available. "

Observer wrote on May 18, 2008 10:38 AM:

" My intent was never to offend anyone with my comments. That's not my style and I apologize for that. I don't want to see ANY money taken away from the students. I think there are other areas that should be considered until you consider funding that directly effects students. I'm just disappointed that LUSD would consider dumping one of the most successful programs they have in the district. "

OTH wrote on May 18, 2008 10:25 AM:

" cont'd Thank God she has a head for numbers and was able to tell what was going where and what wasn't supposed to be going where.

Like I said she found their little slush fund of profit from the lunches. They are not supposed to make a profit on those. "

OTH wrote on May 18, 2008 10:21 AM:

" WY
I would love to see the numbers. There is supposedly a certain amount budgeted for the GATE students, regular students and handicapped students.

My sister found with my nephew they were not getting things they were supposed get to because nobody knew about them. The money went somewhere else. cont'd "

Gadzooks wrote on May 18, 2008 7:32 AM:

" The Elkhorn parents are expecting the public to pay for a private school experience at the GATE campus. And, I would suspect, more than a few of them view their child's attendance there as a point of status. We all know that these kids could be served just as well in a GATE class or GATE cluster in their neighborhood school. So why the whining from the parents? It would lead you to believe that some don't want their precious gem rubbing elbows with the riffraff in the lunch room. "

Lodian wrote on May 17, 2008 11:13 PM:

" Robb 5:00 PM: Same here. Not impressed. Actually, I was quite disappointed in Elkhorn.

"

Lodian wrote on May 17, 2008 11:10 PM:

" WY wrote on May 17, 2008 10:25 PM:
"They tell us in the beginning of your experence with GATE that the State spends the least amount of money on GATE."

This district spends a lot of money on GATE. There are all day GATE classes at LUSD sites schools, GATE resource teachers, a pull out GATE program, GATE cluster classes and don't forget an entire school dedicated to GATE students (Elkhorn). And remember these GATE kids attending Elkhorn are bussed in, adding another expense. Yes, theres a pretty penny spent on GATE students/programs. "

WY wrote on May 17, 2008 10:25 PM:

" They tell us in the beginning of your experence with GATE that the State spends the least amount of money on GATE. Smart kids are left to idle in this district While it's fact that the handicapped students get more money. We were told that by some Stae worker that had all the numbers.
And NO... the cluster classes are a waste of time. Just more work not qualtiy. 4th grade cluster classes were a JOKE at Reese school so were the teachers. They put a level system into progess and called it GATE. The kids rotate classes. Levels low med and high.You are placed acording. Nothing special there. To many kids and The teachers couldn't separate the GATE. There is no GATE at Reese. But they tell themselves what ever they need to so they can be all "Distinguished"
"

OTH wrote on May 17, 2008 9:10 PM:

" Observer

I didn't mean that comment to sound as harsh as it it did. Would still be interested in your reply. "

Robb wrote on May 17, 2008 5:00 PM:

" I had 2 children @ Elkhorn, Not that impressed, I pulled them both out.... cut the program... no loss.. "

papercut wrote on May 17, 2008 2:06 PM:

" Observor, you are a very terrible and hateful person. Aren't you one of those responsible city high society folks at city hall, too? No wonder Lodi is in such a turmoil. "

Lodian wrote on May 17, 2008 1:49 PM:

" I don't think the kids at Elkhorn are getting anything more out of their education than they would if they were clustered at their regular district school. Having an entire school dedicated to the kids that pass whatever test they deem appropriate that year is just overkill. These kids can be educated very well at their own local schools. This is definitely a program that should be cut. "

Hrtz wrote on May 17, 2008 1:28 PM:

" Well said Zinfandel!.. It sure is sad when the teachers and students have to pay the price. I think special needs children should have their own school. What a great way for families to bond and provide support for one another. Excellent Idea! "

Lodian wrote on May 17, 2008 1:27 PM:

" Elkhorn should be cut. Keep the GATE programs at the local schools if they must, but the GATE school is no longer what it should be and should be eliminated or at the very least completely revamped. "

Lodian wrote on May 17, 2008 1:25 PM:

" Observer: That was a nasty comment. Are you seriously begrudging "handicapped" children the services they deserve? OMG! "

Lodian wrote on May 17, 2008 1:23 PM:

" zinfandel 1:09 PM: I agree.

"

OTH wrote on May 17, 2008 1:16 PM:

" cont'd

Needless to say when they saw they had a tiger by the tail they shaped up their act and she became a advocate for the handicapped. What the state law said they were to have they got.

Needless to say her name is Mudd but if she shows up at a meeting there's some long faces. "

OTH wrote on May 17, 2008 1:11 PM:

" Observer

What is your problem with them finding money for handicapped kids education?

I have a handicapped nephew (not in this district) and my sister has had to fight for everything he got. She did find out in that district they were making a $50,000 a year profit on the lunch program. cont'd "

zinfandel wrote on May 17, 2008 1:09 PM:

" Observer, I have to disagree with you. You stated that there is always money for the "handicapped"....not true....the special education program is always short changed. Regular ed teachers who don't want to deal with children with discipline problems just transfer them into special ed programs that are already overcrowed. These children are always the ones being short-changed! Services that these children need to achieve their full potential are always being cut. These children are the ones who need their own school.....not GATE!! "

zinfandel wrote on May 17, 2008 11:12 AM:

" Observer, I have to disagree with you. You stated that "we can always find money for handicapped". The handicapped are the ones that are always "SHORT CHANGED" by LUSD. Their classes are always to large, children with "discipline problems" are put in with children with "special needs" because regular ed teachers do not want to be BOTHERED with them, so special ed teachers, who are already over loaded, end up with children who should not even be in their class. So once again, "special needs children" are not receiving the time or attention they should be getting. LUSD is also well known for short changing these "FORGOTTEN CHILDREN" with the services they need to achieve their full potential are cut off. The law requires that they provide services for these children. LUSD cut off the after school reading program more than a month early stating lack of funds. And what really gets me hot under the collar is that "Gate children" are allowed to have their own school while "SPECIAL NEEDS CHILDREN" are schuffled from one school to another...they are never allowed have stability or develop life-long friends. These children are the ones that need a school for themselves or at least make the classes smaller and at more schools where these children could attend school from K-6 without changing schools every few years. Why are "Gate kids" treated so much better than "Special Needs kids"??? Our children who need the most from LUSD are being discriminated against!!! "

nocoen wrote on May 17, 2008 8:10 AM:

" To A Lodi Mom - Elkhorn is at capacity. It is small in size.

Closing Elkhorn would be a slap in the face of the site staff, students and parents who work well together.

The common theme amongst the schools that are succeeding is parent involvement. If parents demonstrate that education is important, the chances of their child succeeding goes up. Go to BTS Night, Join PTA, take one vacation day and volunteer to help in the class room. Ask you kids teacher(s) how they are doing and is there anything you can do to help...you would be surprised at the results....

It is during these difficult times, we need to help our schools the most. "

Observer wrote on May 17, 2008 7:43 AM:

" What a tragedy this would be. (And no, I do not have any children/grandchildren at Elkhorn). We can always find money for under performing, non-English speaking, handicapped or discipline problems but here's a real chance to save some money buy cutting out the most successful program in the district. What can you be possibly thinking? "

A Lodi Mom wrote on May 17, 2008 7:31 AM:

" What an unbelievable mess! Low population at Elkhorn? As compared to what? Is the school not at capacity? One could understand this absurd recommendation if the school were not full. How many times do we parents have to scream out "Cut from the top" before we are finally heard? Why are the students (and teachers) the first to be put on the budget chopping block? Such a shame that education, the building block of the future, is less important than hiring consultants, stuffing the bureaucratic pockets, etc... "

Comments on this story are now closed.