Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- The country's mess is our fault (165)
- Obama is not a moderate (130)
- Sarah Palin's book hits the shelves: Locals react (70)
- Lodi City Council plans to cap number of taco trucks at 22 (48)
- The haves should help the have-nots (30)
- Public health care is a Christian option (29)
- Tokay in, traveling to unbeaten No. 3 Grant for football playoffs (25)
- Government-run health care is a bad idea (17)
- Young woman fatally shot at Acampo home (17)
- Sierra Adventure store to close after four years in Downtown Lodi (16)
The lighter side
Who needs ethanol? Let's just reveal the long-held secrets of 200 mile-per-gallon carburetor!
You've all heard the stories about the inventor who developed the 200-mile-per-gallon carburetor, only to have his patent bought or stolen by the big oil companies.
Some say the story goes back to 1918, some say 1932, while others claim a date as recently as 1947. The tale has enjoyed wide circulation, but few can pinpoint the details as to who this alleged ingenious inventor was or the happenstance of his fate.
This story no longer needs to remain a mystery. Since my days in army intelligence and after years of harboring a scandalous secret, my silence has ended. The true facts will now be revealed.
In order to invent a device such as a 200-mpg carburetor, the laws of physics must be completely violated. These would include the laws of motion, weight, acceleration, resistance and displacement, all which are indicators for the amount of energy needed to move an object from one point to another. This would require technology from beyond Earth or beyond our time continuum.
This is exactly what happened when this famous air and fuel mixture device was discovered. It actually was 1947, when a so-called "flying saucer" crashed near Roswell, New Mexico. Although most of the aliens perished in the accident, one did survive and lived until 1951. He showed the American military many of the pathways that have led to our modern technology today, such as fiber optics, microchips and automotive armrest beer coolers, found in some luxury cars today.
One of his gifts to the people of the Earth was the 200-mpg carburetor, which remains buried in the archives of Area 51. This amazing device works on principles still vaguely understood, but as we can best surmise, has a mixing factor known as Element 221. This slippery substance is something unknown on this planet, but widely available on the planet Dufuseus, 38 light years from our solar system.
While this invention would have meant a wonderful boon for mankind, the device was immediately squelched by the big oil barons, primarily by a man with the code name of "Slick Bearings," leader of a giant, worldwide oil cartel. Others with more noble values, such as state department officials, were afraid the device would severely hurt oil-producing nations — thus leaving millions of Middle Eastern people in unmitigated poverty.
Today, another dilemma continues. Many congressional leaders know about the secret, but are trapped within a web of lies. To say that the carburetor exists means that our elected representatives would have to admit that aliens have visited Earth and that the clever device was hidden for many decades. So instead, the politicians have created a diversion called "ethanol," which appears to save oil but actually, only dramatically raises food and other commodity prices.
The time has come for our elected leaders to "fess up" and give the people the carburetor they so desperately deserve! The entire economy, security and general welfare of the American people may totally depend upon it.
Steve Hansen is a Lodi writer and satirist. If his remains are found in the desert, you'll know why.

Reader Feedback
girard74 wrote on Apr 14, 2008 1:13 PM:
Also, I fully 'got' the sarcasm in that response. These blogs are here for us to 'discuss' what has been written by the author of the piece as well as those of us offering our opinions.
How it 'should' or should not be done is a matter of opinion. You, and others, seem to think that we should not offer our opinions if they are counter to yours. Perhaps you don't see that? Re-read what you've written. "
girard74 wrote on Apr 14, 2008 12:52 PM:
I don't like to 'out' myself on any blog; so you’ll need to figure it out, and it shouldn’t be that difficult. "
dyan wrote on Apr 14, 2008 12:13 PM:
girard74 wrote on Apr 14, 2008 11:46 AM:
Oh, the definition of 'hypocrisy?' That was a 'rhetorical' question fella. Please don't require that I post the definition for that! You didn't get that? Wow! You took the wind completely out of my sails!
Dyan = hypocrisy; as it pertains to your earlier statement about you not 'pretending' to be a critic.
Hopefully this clears that up for you.
Maybe this is now the 'end of story' for you? "
dyan wrote on Apr 14, 2008 11:38 AM:
girard74 wrote on Apr 14, 2008 11:28 AM:
Really? Your statement that, '[You] would like to read [our] works so [you] can understand what true genius is,' belies this contention.
How does one define hypocrisy? "
dyan wrote on Apr 14, 2008 11:19 AM:
girard74 wrote on Apr 14, 2008 11:07 AM:
girard74 wrote on Apr 14, 2008 10:56 AM:
Lodian wrote on Apr 14, 2008 9:56 AM:
Cogito wrote on Apr 14, 2008 9:26 AM:
Cogito wrote on Apr 14, 2008 9:17 AM:
dyan wrote on Apr 14, 2008 7:40 AM:
dyan wrote on Apr 14, 2008 7:37 AM:
girard74 wrote on Apr 13, 2008 11:34 PM:
Cogito wrote on Apr 13, 2008 7:29 PM:
Cogito wrote on Apr 13, 2008 7:25 PM:
Cogito wrote on Apr 13, 2008 7:17 PM:
Scrutiny wrote on Apr 12, 2008 9:30 PM:
girard74 wrote on Apr 11, 2008 1:41 PM:
Oooooh, talk about evading the questions!!
I think you need a nap. "
dyan wrote on Apr 11, 2008 1:38 PM:
Have you always been this nice of a guy? "
girard74 wrote on Apr 11, 2008 1:23 PM:
Like you, he posted here and to the previous column by Hansen. And like you he was ‘personally’ critical of me. And of course he reads these blogs; why else would he post his comments?!?
I didn't say 'all' Germans; I said 'most.' I lived amongst them for three years.
I also don't give a crap whether or not Europeans 'like' us or not. That's their problem. Just how ‘old’ are you? I suspect you’re around 16 or 17, perhaps younger? That would certainly explain the intellectual level of your postings. (IMO) "
dyan wrote on Apr 11, 2008 1:16 PM:
No wonder Europeans don't like us. I Hope he doesn't read these blogs. "
girard74 wrote on Apr 11, 2008 12:40 PM:
girard74 wrote on Apr 11, 2008 12:34 PM:
I wasn't clear or accurate. I was referring to both of his columns that I have read. But I'll attempt to correct and clarify myself. I find his writings as something that do not present a well-researched or thought-out proposal of ideas. 'Rant' denotes 'anger' or 'harshness' in an argument; clearly he wasn't angry and for that I apologize for the use of the word.
Regardless dyan, this IS a forum for 'opinion' whether or not you agree with those opinions. As a result, I can legitimately define your collective comments as a 'ranting' as well as incorporate therein how I view Hansen’s writings in my first paragraph here.
You don’t want to know my definition of ‘arrogance.’
I don't know this guy; never met him. What's your point? "
dyan wrote on Apr 11, 2008 12:23 PM:
Come on really -Why don't you like this guy? Let's put it all on the table. "
dyan wrote on Apr 11, 2008 12:21 PM:
girard74 wrote on Apr 11, 2008 11:57 AM:
First, your response is as unclear as Hansen's rant. Second, I don't understand your use of '(sic)' in your response; and third, I suppose you do 'pretty well' the way that you are able to communicate being 'legally blind.' Now, I have never had a conversation with a 'blind' person. Being 'legally blind,' just what is your limitation in this regard? Do you have software that 'speaks' what is written? I am curious. "
dyan wrote on Apr 11, 2008 11:52 AM:
girard74 wrote on Apr 11, 2008 11:39 AM:
It never ceases to amaze me how some people glean such nonsense out of my and other's thoughts. I offer 'opinion,' ask 'questions' and insert my own 'humor/satire' as I go along. I decide for myself what I believe to be funny - if you want to laugh, let it rip! I don't suggest that you do anything at all; you are in control of YOU. I don't want control even if you give it to me. I also don’t care if you have an opinion or not; just as you shouldn’t care about anything about me. Do you not understand the purpose of these blogs yet? "
dyan wrote on Apr 11, 2008 10:24 AM:
dyan wrote on Apr 11, 2008 10:09 AM:
girard74 wrote on Apr 11, 2008 6:48 AM:
My three years in Germany during the early 1980s however, remind me that the majority of its citizens there are devoid of funny bones altogether. So, I'm left at a loss (again) to understand just where Hansen is heading with his words AND with regard to the dude from Ober-Ramstadt I am equally as puzzled. Could it be that once again, in the words of drrobertsantry himself that '[t]he intent of the author is to provoke laughter not to promote a dialogue?’ I wait to be enlightened. "
drrobertsantry wrote on Apr 10, 2008 11:49 PM:
Herr Doktor,
Thank you for the words that elicited a smile on my face and a subdued giggle at my desk.
Great story. Your humor and satire are entertaining and memorable.
Prof. Dr. med. R.M. Santry
Ober-Ramstadt, Germany "
Cogito wrote on Apr 10, 2008 8:26 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.