Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

November 20th, 2008
November 19th, 2008
November 18th, 2008
November 17th, 2008
November 15th, 2008
November 14th, 2008
November 13th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT

Review of Wal-Mart Supercenter plans delayed

By Chris Nichols
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Updated: Friday, March 28, 2008 6:32 AM PDT

A traffic concern raised by the California Department of Transportation will delay any vote on the proposed Wal-Mart Supercenter until the end of May, city of Lodi officials said Thursday.

City Planning Commissioners had been expected to review the project's revised environmental impact report as early as April 9.

Jeff Hood, the city's spokesman, said Caltrans' concerns center on how traffic will enter the Lodi Shopping Center, as the development is also known.

Current plans show just one left-hand turn lane into the center from Kettleman Lane/Highway 12 to Westgate Drive.

"Caltrans wanted two left turn lanes because they don't want traffic backing up on the highway," Hood said.

Adding an extra lane was worrisome for Wal-Mart because the increased traffic off the highway could interfere with a proposed loading area along the north side of the Supercenter, Hood said.

The Central Valley spokesman for Wal-Mart was traveling on Thursday and could not be reached for comment.

A spokeswoman for Caltrans could not confirm the agency's traffic concern Thursday afternoon.

The Lodi City Council has the final say on whether to approve the Supercenter project and its revised environmental report.

While the traffic matter is expected to delay any vote, Lodi Community Development Director Randy Hatch said much of the revised EIR — which addresses the development's effect on traffic, the local economy, water quality, wildlife and other topics — should be available to the public within the next few days.

July 2003: Developers propose Wal-Mart Supercenter on Kettleman Lane and Lower Sacramento Road.
February 2005: Lodi City Council approves the Supercenter.
December 2005: A San Joaquin County Superior Court judge overturns approval, based on insufficient environmental reports.
March 2008: Review of revised reports delayed until May.
— News-Sentinel staff.

Hood estimated it will be about a week before the report is available. He acknowledged it has taken a long time to get the revised document done.

"We hoped it would have been faster than this," he said. "The city wants it to be the best document possible."

An opposition group sued the city and Wal-Mart following the Lodi council's approval of the Supercenter in 2005.

Once it is finally released, the revised document will detail how Wal-Mart will address the loss of agricultural land due to development.

It will also specify Wal-Mart's "Downtown investment," Hood said. The city has required Wal-Mart to pay a fee — sometimes known as a "big box fee" — to make up for the Supercenter's expected drain on business in Downtown.

Contact reporter Chris Nichols at chrisn@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

Lodian wrote on Apr 1, 2008 9:44 AM:

" Robb: That's a good point. And I agree. I think these companies should be paying more though. I still think they are taking advantage of these poor people in other countries, just because they can. "

Robb wrote on Apr 1, 2008 6:57 AM:

" Either way, quite a a few of these companies that have move out of the USA are improving life elsewhere.

It does not matter that they are not paying s much as US workers... they are paying sooo much more than local companies in the same region... "

Observer wrote on Mar 31, 2008 8:38 AM:

" I will acknowledge your observation of the need for profitablity. ("Profit" is not a bad word by the way.) However, we need companies to be profitable in the USA. Why do we make it so difficult for them? Why don't we demand that products made in a foreign countries meet the same specifications we require in this country? The economic benefits of a profitable business on the local economies are remarkable. Everybody needs to be compete on a level playing field. Why does government make it so tough? "

Lodian wrote on Mar 30, 2008 11:40 PM:

" Observer 7:01 PM: Have you considered that it is not the demand from the consumer for lower prices but the greed these companies have for more money that has driven these companies to produce their products outside the US? Companies have learned that they can get something made/produced/assembled etc outside the US for pennies as opposed to paying someone is the US a living wage to do the same work.
"

Observer wrote on Mar 29, 2008 7:01 PM:

" We, as consumers, are responsible for corporations moving to foreign soil. We have demanded lower prices at any cost. I'm afraid that if you were limit your purchasing power to those stores with American grown/produced products you may not be able to ever shop again. Even your Safeway's, Raley's, etc. have produce from South America. American automobiles contain foreign parts. This list is never ending. "Buy American" has been replaced with "Buy as cheap as possible". "

verity wrote on Mar 29, 2008 6:48 AM:

" Off the subject of WalMart a bit, and back on the subject of products made in America - chocolate specifically. I refuse to buy Hershey products at this time, and that includes Reeses PB Cups, which is a Hershey product. As a former Oakdale resident of over 20 years it's sad to see how Hershey Corp. could so callously give Oakdale the finger (so to speak) putting 100's of locals out of work and giving the jobs to Mexican nationals instead. With Hershey's the "bottom line" is the most important thing. So much for "Buy American!" "

caliwings wrote on Mar 29, 2008 1:04 AM:

" Okay, this is the dumbest week ever for Lodi. You had a podium speech dedicating a traffic light at Kettleman and Davis. People have speeches about dedicating buildings or opening parks, or confessing to sex scandals or bribery (take note on that last one). We have been festering on Wal Mart for nearly a decade; I don't care what the population is, I think that is grounds for being demoted back from City to Town. And when Elk Grove Promenade goes up (www.elkgrovepromenade.com), kiss Lodi goodbye. A city grows... a town dies, DIE! "

Mrs. S. wrote on Mar 29, 2008 12:38 AM:

" And yes, I've been treated in a rude manner by another local business, and I never returned. One was a jewelry store, I think they're out of business now. The clerk was standing around, talking with her friends as a line waited. I took my watch to be repaired at the jewelry store across the street and got much better service.

Bad service can happen anywhere. "

Mrs. S. wrote on Mar 29, 2008 12:36 AM:

" David, excellent point. There's a woman who's hard of hearing and she works at Wal-Mart. I don't know her name, but she's very courteous. At the time I was there to purchase the wading pool, I noticed that this woman had "deaf" on the back of her vest. She doesn't have this anymore, which is good, imo, because it's not respectful to advertise a person's disability that way.

However, this particular employee had no such wording on his vest. I repeated, "excuse me" several times, most within earshot. "

Lodian wrote on Mar 28, 2008 10:03 PM:

" sam: Regarding chocolate...
Have you tried Ghirardelli chocolate? Yum! http://www.ghirardelli.com/

Also, try Trader Joe's Organic 73% Super Dark Chocolate Bar. It's fabulous!
"

DavidD wrote on Mar 28, 2008 9:43 PM:

" Mrs S, is it impossible to believe that perhaps the employee could not hear you? Maybe he has a hearing impairment. Wal*Mart is always good about hiring those with disabilities.

And even if he was being rude, do you mean to say that you cannot name a single time that you've felt slighted by a local business's employee? "

Mrs. S. wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:52 PM:

" And don't get me started about how many times I've seen employees standing around, blocking aisles while they gripe about their break schedule or gossip with each other.

Of course, I haven't been in the store much in the past year and a half or so, so maybe things have changed. "

Mrs. S. wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:45 PM:

" Verity, here's what I experienced of Wal-Mart's "customer service":

My teenage son and I were shopping for a wading pool for my youngest child. We saw a perfect boxed pool, but it was on the top shelf. I saw a Wal-Mart employee a few feet away. I tried to get his attention, saying, "excuse me". He turned his back and walked away. I repeated, "excuse me", louder this time, but it didn't do any good. I told my son to climb up and get it. "I'll sue them if you fall," I half joked. "

verity wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:25 PM:

" Sam, I'm not trying to be an apologist for WalMart, Home Depot et al., & I don't relish the idea of these stores coming to Lodi. I just don't think we should bash WalMart & similar stores just because they're big, efficient operations, and they might take some business away from the mom-and-pop stores downtown.

There's more ways to compete than on price alone. For example, WalMart does not exactly shine when it comes to customer service. A business with great customer service can often hold its own & even thrive against the WalMarts of the world. "

sam wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:16 PM:

" Mrs S, I do agree with buying from local grocery stores. Pay a bit more and eat what was grown in our back yard, rather than Chili. "

sam wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:14 PM:

" Mrs S.. I am against a Big Box fee too.

I personally would rather drive to Stockton for a Bigger Box, pay more lodi taxes and let Lodi stay small. But I get the feeling that is not going to happen. "

sam wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:12 PM:

" AWKKK.. did I just say that??? OK ok... yes I can accept made in the USA over chocolate... AWKKK

HEY does anyone know a good "made in the USA" chocolate?? "

Mrs. S. wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:12 PM:

" I don't think I would change my present shopping habits much if the SuperCenter were (finally) built, unless the new store were cleaner and better laid out than the one in Stockton or the present Lodi store. Local grocers are still best for quality and price as far as fresh produce and meat are concerned, because their supply chain is shorter. Even Safeway has ridiculously high prices for asparagus, which is a local product, probably because Raleys and S-Mart can source it more directly from local growers.

As far as a "Big Box" fee, I'm against it. "

sam wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:11 PM:

" Verity, I am a HUGE Hershey fan, but no longer buy their product. I love MADE in the USA more than I love chocolate. "

sam wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:09 PM:

" well verity, we doubled posted. I think we agree. "

sam wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:08 PM:

" verity, we already have a WalMart... shop away.

Why do we need BIGGER. I am assuming you do not like Lodi's small town feel.

You cannot have a Super WalMart AND a small town. You are entitled to your opinion. But voting for a Super Walmart means you want Lodi to look more like Elk Grove or Stockton. "

verity wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:08 PM:

" Lodian, I agree with you, I would rather see WalMart remain as it is, rather than see a Super Center here. However, I feel it's within the right of WalMart to expand operations if it wants to. In a "free market economy" WalMart or any other business should be able to expand as long as all laws are obeyed. The test of whether or not a business will make it or fail ultimately lies with the consumer. We can choose to shop there or not shop there. We can vote with our pocketbooks. "

sam wrote on Mar 28, 2008 5:04 PM:

" verity, do you know that Home Depot, Kohls, and Costco are coming to Harney and frontage road???


"

Lodian wrote on Mar 28, 2008 4:47 PM:

" verity: Why not just keep the current Wal-Mart? "

verity wrote on Mar 28, 2008 9:20 AM:

" Regarding U.S. companies outsourcing production to foreign countries:

A recent example is Hershey Corp. which recently closed the Oakdale plant and several others in North America and built a big new plant in Monterrey Mexico, employing Mexican workers for a fraction of what American workers make. Oakdale alone lost 600 jobs, with total lay-offs numbering 1,500.

Instead of bashing WalMart, maybe we should boycott companies like Hersheys who seem to have no concern for the plight of American workers. The "All American Candy Bar" should be re-named the "All Mexican Candy Bar." "

verity wrote on Mar 28, 2008 9:03 AM:

" Giovanina wrote

"...it does not need the crime that it will pull in."

My response: WalMart will bring in more crime? Do you have verifiable facts/statistics to support that claim?

Giovanina wrote:

"Walmart carries Chinese products, and Food4Less is carrying more and more Mexican products due to all their illegal alien customers. "

My response: So what! Show me a store (including downtown merchants) that don't carry Chinese or Mexican-made products. Maybe we should be talking about the U.S. companies that are outsourcing all of their production to foreign countries. "

verity wrote on Mar 28, 2008 8:52 AM:

" Can't believe I'm defending WalMart...but seriously folks, who's to say that "Lodi does not need a Super Walmart?" I'm sure those who barely eke by on a week-to-week paycheck and try to stretch out their dollars just a little farther will argue with that.

Hey, even I shop at WalMart occasionally, and not because I can't afford to shop elsewhere. Sometimes WalMart has just what I want, a particular product that I can't find from other local merchants, so off to WalMart I go... "

Giovanina wrote on Mar 28, 2008 8:23 AM:

" Walmart has been busted, before, for price fixing on their vitamins, etc, by the Feds. They are using old tactics that Teddy Roosevelt dispised. Lodi does not need a Super Walmart, and it does not need the crime that it will pull in. People that want this Super Walmart should go stand in one during the day and night to see what they are gonna get. Walmart carries Chinese products, and Food4Less is carrying more and more Mexican products due to all their illegal alien customers. "

boonablis wrote on Mar 28, 2008 8:05 AM:

" Fantastic, now we can a nice cross section of white trash, and people who don't speak english. I love IT!!!! Face it, walmart is big business f'ing the local business' I will continue to support the locals in downtown, and around the area. "

T & C wrote on Mar 28, 2008 8:00 AM:

" America was and is built on COMPETITION! Quality, Service and PRICE is what drives most smart shoppers! Getting the MOST value in this TIGHT economy is what we are grasping for with the NEVER ENDING price of Gas per gallon! If I can buy 2 or 3 cans for $1.00 or save $1.75 per can off a local grocer competitor, why shouldn't I want to save money? I have no spare money to toss away. Those who live on plastic may, but Quality, Service and Value is why I shop at Wal-Mart! "

T & C wrote on Mar 28, 2008 7:56 AM:

" Now that is a win-win situation! Those who hate wal-mart and have the extra money to pay more for groceries can continue down the highway to what ever store they hand over all their money too and those who want to save money can turn into wal-mart and leave with what they needed and cash in their pocket. Let's put the turn lane in and get on with The New Wal-Mart! We the people VOTED for it years ago! "

verity wrote on Mar 28, 2008 7:54 AM:

" A definition of "Free Market."

A free market is a market in which prices of goods and services are arranged completely by the mutual consent of sellers and buyers. By definition, in a free market environment buyers and sellers do not coerce or mislead each other nor are they coerced by a third party.

[...]In the marketplace the price of a good or service helps to quantify its value to consumers and thus balance it against other goods and services. Through competition between vendors for the provision of products and services, prices tend to decrease, and quality tends to increase.
Source:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_market "

verity wrote on Mar 28, 2008 7:45 AM:

" I'm not especially excited about the Super Center coming to Lodi, because I'm concerned about the continued sprawl into agricultural land. But why impose a "big box fee" just because WalMart is an especially efficient competitor that may take business away from downtown merchants - or any other local merchants for that matter? People can shop where they want to shop, and if it's WalMart because it's more convenient or inexpensive, then that's their choice. Why penalize WalMart for being a business that attracts customers at the expense of other businesses? It's a free market after all. "

Comments on this story are now closed.