Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 21st, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
November 17th, 2009
November 16th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT

Bullet Buster

Lodi police have eyes set on a new heavy-duty armored truck; they may get it if federal funding is approved

By Layla Bohm
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Friday, March 14, 2008 7:12 AM PDT

If the wishes of Lodi police officials come true, the department could get an armored, blast-proof vehicle to share with other county agencies, paid for with federal money.

That wish is a long way from coming to fruition, though, because funding for the $250,000 vehicle must go through both Congressional houses and then be signed by the president.

The BearCat Rescue Vehicle, made by Massachusetts-based Lenco Industries Inc., weighs about 15,000 pounds, can maintain speeds of 85 mph and comes with heavy-duty armor plating. It includes a rotating roof hatch, gun ports and can withstand large-caliber gunfire as well as blasts and chemical releases.

In the city's annual request for federal funding, Lodi officials asked Rep. Jerry McNerney, the area's Congressman, to include the BearCat on his wish list.

McNerney will submit the request, along with others from cities and counties in his jurisdiction, to an appropriations committee, said his spokesman, Andy Stone.

"Money is tight, there's no question about that, but the congressman thinks it's an important issue and he will push for funding for it," Stone said.

The request was the brainchild of Lt. Chris Piombo, who commands Lodi's SWAT team and recently organized a large-scale training for active shooter situations. While Lodi does have an armored car already, the department is looking for an upgrade.

In his request to McNerney, Piombo cited half a dozen recent mass shootings, including those at Virginia Tech and Northern Illinois University, as well as shopping mall shootings.

The purpose of such a vehicle, Piombo wrote, is twofold — to transport officers directly into a situation without putting them in jeopardy, and to be able to rescue victims.

"Suspects are arming themselves at an alarming rate and the variety of high-powered weapons they have access to is disturbing," he wrote.

Nearly all police vehicles do not stop high-powered ammunition, but the BearCat is so heavy-duty that it's used in Iraq. BearCat is short for "Ballistic Engineered Armored Response Counter Attack Truck" and the vehicle is built on the chassis and drive train of a Ford truck, meaning that it can be serviced at local dealers.

Lenco Industries, Inc. was established in 1981 and is based in Massachusetts. The privately owned company has made more than 4,000 armored vehicles that are used in more than 30 countries, according to the company's Web site.

Lenco makes vehicles that the U.S. government uses in Iraq and Afghanistan. It also supplies the U.S. Department of Defense, Department of State, Department of Energy and FBI.

Lenco's site, armoredtrucks.com, says the BearCat vehicles are made of hardened steel armor plate and multi-hit ballistic glass. The vehicles include blast fragmentation resistant floors, specially designed gun ports, roof hatches with rotating turrets, gun mount platforms and gear storage.

— Source: Lenco

A number of police agencies are buying BearCats, ranging from Western Australia to Modesto.

It was Modesto's BearCat that was put into use in January 2005, after a man opened fire on Ceres police with an AK-47 assault rifle, according to Piombo. The suspect fled after killing one officer and critically injuring a second. Officers in the armored BearCat were able to get close to the suspect without drawing risk to themselves, and the man was ultimately shot and killed by police.

If Lodi gets a BearCat, it will be available to other agencies in the county, interim Police Chief David Main said. He acknowledged that people with heavy-duty weapons are not known for walking down Lodi streets, and said that if the funding does not come through, Lodi will still be OK.

"(Piombo is) just trying to look in the future," Main said. "There are more and more of these types of incidents occurring in the United States; we should be looking ahead."

As for the probability of getting the funding, that's unknown. McNerney's entire request package will go to the appropriations committee within a couple months, and from there it will go to the House of Representatives, Stone said.

Funding requests must clear the House as well as the Senate, and then they are sent as a bill to the president for signature. The funding request is for the fiscal year beginning in October 2009, so officials should know by then whether a BearCat is coming to Lodi.

Contact reporter Layla Bohm at layla@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

the truth wrote on Mar 21, 2008 3:25 AM:

" BACK IN BUSINESS!!!!!!!!!!!! "

madman wrote on Mar 16, 2008 6:44 PM:

" Instead of spending a 1/4 of a million dollars on a bullet buster "Gee Look At Me" toy maybe we should invest in training our Lodi officers how NOT to shoot themselves.
Maybe a course in "ASSUME EVERY GUN IS LOADED" would be more beneficial and a better investment of our tax dollars. "

sam wrote on Mar 16, 2008 6:39 PM:

" well ihatebloggers, I have to respectfully disagree with you. I am a victim of gang violence. I do not dwell on the east side, nor am I a gang member. Your comment that gang bangers on the east side are no threat to us regular people is false.

I also think, IMHO, a better defense against school shooters would be to enclose campuses and have each entrance have reliable metal detectors. I would pay for that.

As for a Mall shooting, we do not have one yet, unless you consider Lakewood mall. "

WY wrote on Mar 16, 2008 9:50 AM:

" That's three "

ihatebloggers wrote on Mar 16, 2008 9:30 AM:

" Maybe my name should have been i hate bloggers who babble on about things just to get a reaction out of people. No real thought goes into these posts. It would be a good forum for logical debate if people were real thinkers instaed of mush heads "

WY wrote on Mar 15, 2008 10:04 PM:

" Blogger hater,name caller guy... no one said anything about stealing it from our Troops in Iraq. Seems you have turned into what it is that you hate. You've made two post now. :o)


"

ihatebloggers wrote on Mar 15, 2008 5:39 PM:

" It has nothing to do with terrorists you bozos. It's the school shooters, mall shooters and other wack jobs that are the real threat. Not the gangsters on the east side. they only kill themselves no harm done there. And if you had any sense in your head at all you would know that there is no way little lodi is going to steal a piece of equipment that should be headed for iraq. These things are made for law enforcement applications, not military use. "

WY wrote on Mar 15, 2008 12:32 PM:

" I'm in agreement with you on the 'when and where' not "IF".
"

Paladin wrote on Mar 15, 2008 11:49 AM:

" You're stating to get the picture, WY. Most LE authorities discuss the potential scenarios that may play out in the next terrorist attack. It's really not a question of IF--it's a matter of WHEN & WHERE. If the population at large knew the extent of the possibilities, there could be wide-spread panic and severe repercussions. To more fully understand the horrors that may befall us; learn more about the Beslan School Massacre in Russia. You'll be glad you have a well-equipped police force if that happens. "

WY wrote on Mar 15, 2008 8:53 AM:

" When it gets here... I want a ride. "

WY wrote on Mar 15, 2008 8:48 AM:

" And yeah... we're gonna laugh. Did you see that photo? Now picture that cop that shot his hand holding on with guns blazing. yee haw! The next thing we'll have to swallow is a MBZ for the CC members. I never see the Hummer in use around town. And as for the BIG Schit hitting the fan... I would NEVER count on anyone. Thank God we have the right to bare arms. yep the cops have to justify it, till then we can giggle. :o) "

WY wrote on Mar 15, 2008 8:40 AM:

" What are YOU talking about?! Athorities talk us down on the threat issue, terrist cells, then you say,"if the poo hits the fan WE NEED THIS". Then go Blah blah. So,what is it? 'WE have a cell but don't tell the good people of Lodi. Let us stock pile amo and armor for something we told them is BS but is really true.
How bout you explain what you mean. instead of go "blah blah". Is this for OUR streets or you just need to spend the bond money? cuz it looks like something for Iraq not here. "

ihatebloggers wrote on Mar 14, 2008 11:50 PM:

" BLAH..BLAH...BLAH. Someday someone will post a blog and actually know what they are talking about. If the Feds are going to part with some money and the city will benefit, then where is the problem? The truck isnt for the crime on the street right now. It's for when the *&%$ hits the fan. You can't pick that day but it will come at some point and I want our boys in blue to be ready when it does. For everyones sake "

Paladin wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:57 PM:

" Your police chief is looking to fund this purchase with Federal grants available from the Department of Homeland Security. Yes, it is US taxpayer money, but if federal dollars can find their way back to your community, to procure a life saving piece of equipment, it would be spiteful to reject it. Considering the current state of affairs and the potential for gun violence, your police chief would be derelict if he didn't try to get this vehicle. It's really a Win-Win and you should embrace the idea. Please think about this logically. "

WY wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:52 PM:

" T&C... I just don't know about that gun thing....
Bam Zzeet! Now he's up on the roof and falls off. No flying monkey can catch that Faux Pa. "

WY wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:50 PM:

" That Armor truck the swat has now came around our neighborhood on that Night Out thingy. That was a biggie for the kids. "

WY wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:49 PM:

" I personally think an Attack Helicopter would be more than one million. :) "

Paladin wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:44 PM:

" It's really sad to hear the apparent disconnect that exists amongst may of these respondents for their local PD. These dedicated, brave men & women are from YOUR community, they have kids in school with your kids, they and their families are your neighbors. To decry their wish to protect their lives--as well as the rest of the community is dangerously myopic. The Us vs. Them mentality is meant to be: Us = law abiding citizens and police vs. Them = the criminals. Rethink this people. You are showing a distasteful disregard for law enforcement. "

T & C wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:11 PM:

" A Sharpshooter on a roof or behind something is a better investment! Aren't all swat teams supposed to have sharpshooters on their team? "

T & C wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:09 PM:

" I agree with you WY, it is very likely already ordered and this is the way of letting us know it is on its way! I truely do not see a NEED for this fuel guzzling vehicle! It's a show off vehicle meant to intimidate the bad guy and make us innocent folks go wow!!!!! "

s & W 500 wrote on Mar 14, 2008 7:56 PM:

" Sorry LPD, until you start getting rid of illegal immigrants, treating thieves the way they should be treated, and dealing with the homeless: NO WAY!

Deal with meth, lock em up! I personally have given LPD intelligence, they have NEVER FOLLOWED UP! I OFFERED TO GIVE THEM A KEY TO MY HOME TO WATCH DEALERS< NO FOLLOW UP! nice PROMOTION PRICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Mar 14, 2008 7:29 PM:

" There is NO NEED for a vehicle like this in Lodi. The SWAT team has an armored truck already. I'd love to know how often it is used. This is just a classic waste of taxpayer dollars. I'm all for giving the police bigger better guns since the gangs, crack heads all have assault rifles, but really... this vehicle is way over the top. If they need something like this maybe they can borrow a tank from the National Guard. "

girard74 wrote on Mar 14, 2008 4:45 PM:

" The article also stated, '...the vehicle is built on the chassis and drive train of a Ford truck, meaning that it can be serviced at local dealers.'

Oh, that changes things - I missed this part my first time through.

Yeah, this'll save a lot of money. Oil changes and tires will cost about the same as it would for an Explorer. Yeah, right!

Surely they're not suggesting that a 'stock' chassis would be adequate to support a multi-thousand pound body? I'm no mechanic, but I really don't think this thing will be driven into Geweke Ford for tune-ups!

Thankfully, this won't ever happen. "

wtf wrote on Mar 14, 2008 4:13 PM:

" girard74 said, "No, it's not a toy - it's a boondoggle!"

In more ways than one. Not only would the vehicle itself cost a small fortune; but what about fuel costs? "Heavily armed" vehicles suck up a lot of fuel. "

girard74 wrote on Mar 14, 2008 3:54 PM:

" Paladin wrote, 'If this vehicle saves just one life--would you still say it's a toy?'

No, it's not a toy - it's a boondoggle!

Okay, using your logic, let's suggest that we purchase an attack helicopter for say, $1 million. Would that purchase, having saved one life, been worth the investment? All lives are 'invaluable.' Once could justify spending $1 billion on something to save one life.

I would counter by stating that perhaps New York or L.A. would benefit from such a weapon. Lodi's 101-year history doesn't come close to showing a need for this thing. "

wtf wrote on Mar 14, 2008 3:45 PM:

" Paladin a well armed citizenry also helps combat this. Rather than disarm law-abiding citizens and making them vulnerable to future attacks, let them carry a weapon and watch how fast these types of attacks drop.

Then there's the question of if it would be used in a case like this:

SWAT teams disperse crowd of hundreds awaiting housing applications

"We're all working people and we're all bitter right now," said Deborah Davis, 37. "To be turned away like this hurts. They should have anticipated having a large crowd."

http://www.examiner.com/a-1274730~SWAT_teams_disperse_crowd_of_hundreds_awaiting_housing_applications.html
"

Paladin wrote on Mar 14, 2008 3:09 PM:

" While some in your community may not see the immediate need for this life saving piece of equipment, please realize that gun violence is on an increase nationally. Police are expected to respond to all manner of threats, and it is unfair and unethical to expect them to face high power gunfire without adequate protection. They have families, too.

If this vehicle saves just one life--would you still say it's a toy? If it saves one of your kids in an evacuation from a school shooting, wouldn't you be greateful your PD had the foresight to procure one?
"

sam wrote on Mar 14, 2008 1:53 PM:

" OTH, I agree. I would rather hire more policemen than purchase this vehicle. "

sam wrote on Mar 14, 2008 1:52 PM:

" G74, let's hire a consultant first. "

girard74 wrote on Mar 14, 2008 12:56 PM:

" I want to know how in the world we have gotten away with not having this incredibly important and necessary crime-fighting tool?!?

I say don't wait for Congress or Presidential approval. We NEED it now!!! Write the check. The City Council will just have to forego their raises. "

OTH wrote on Mar 14, 2008 11:46 AM:

" Number one, we can't even get blast proof vehicles for our men in Iraq.

Number two. If these other cities our going to use it why don't they help pay for it?

jnnym perharps if we had a few more policeman on the streets it would make a difference. "

sam wrote on Mar 14, 2008 11:31 AM:

" jnnym, I agree that Lodi is changing. But please (seriously) inform me as to how this vehicle is going to stop the gangs?

The cops are going to have a shoot out with the gangs while they are inside this vehicle?
"

jnnym wrote on Mar 14, 2008 10:44 AM:

" This town is crazy! Read the Police logs in the paper! Look at what is happening here. This is not liveable, loveable Lodi anymore. We have a real problem here that is not being resolved. We have drive by shootings, drugs and whatever else is out there. "

Lodian wrote on Mar 14, 2008 10:31 AM:

" Go Flames 8:10 AM: You do have a point. There are a lot of things that happen in Lodi that citizens are unaware.

"

wtf wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:50 AM:

" concerned citizen said, "Another boy toy!"

My thoughts exactly. Though you have to admit, the pic in the article looks pretty cool. Still.....driving down the street in Lodi?

I don't think so. "

sam wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:39 AM:

" seriously?? do we need this?? "

concerned citizen wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:35 AM:

" Maybe if the cops in Lodi spent less time SURFING THE NET in their cars, talking on their cell phones while driving ---------- they would have more time to fight the gangs on the eastside. There is absolutely no reason to buy such an OUTLANDISH toy for the "BOYS in BLUE"! what an absolute waste of tax dollars to appease the boys need for a new toy "

wtf wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:31 AM:

" Sorry, but the Mother Ship is hovering and my paranoia feelers went up. What does the Lodi PD know that we don't?

Seriously, though, one of the best ways to prevent crime is a well-armed citizenry. I've seen several studies that have shown that, as the guns of law-abiding citizens were grabbed, the crime rate went up.

After all, the crooks know you're an easy target; especially in "gun free" zones that advertise this fact such as some of the more recent atrocities.

MSM doesn't report when armed citizens have reduced the number of deaths in similar situations. "

boonablis wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:18 AM:

" I cannot wait til' this vehicle shows up at a local traffic stop, a high school house party, or at a bar fight in downtown. AKM is right, what a waste of tax dollars. The focus should be on the clean up of eastside lodi. But hey we do need this like counsil members need a raise. What is that B.S. example of mass shootings? That is going to happen whether or not we have this SWAT vehicle-this is not a "preventitive" measure, but whatever, i'm probably wrong "

WY wrote on Mar 14, 2008 8:38 AM:

" Come on Jack 007... It's not that we don't respect the police officers. I know many officers that work up town . I would never want them to get hurt. But have you been reading most the articles in the paper lately? It's all about how the elected waste our money. The frick'n thing is probably already ordered, so we want to vent! And we can here. I'd really like to get my kids off to college one day but I can save in this town. "

WY wrote on Mar 14, 2008 8:34 AM:

" Here comes the fuzz, here comes the fuzz,

Was that on LAUGH IN?

If it's for surrounding areas too , then let them buy it and lets ask if we can barrorow it on Thursdays and Saturdays.

It looks very cool though. Woo hooo "

WY wrote on Mar 14, 2008 8:28 AM:

" Goes to show you how scared of the gangs they are. What a waste/joke.

You know what the girls say about guys and there fancy cars right???? They trying to make up for their lack there of. (gigglling about the inky dink to the point of needeing depends)Bahahahaha! NO I'm busting up.

What... are we in Iraq? "

GetUrHeadOut wrote on Mar 14, 2008 8:28 AM:

" No crack/meth; no problems! Get to the root of the problem first! "

007Jack wrote on Mar 14, 2008 8:20 AM:

" It would probably suprise both of you to really know what goes on in this town. The article also mentions that surrounding agencies will have access to the vehicle also. I think both of ya are just a bit "anti-police" and couldn't say anything good about them if you wanted too! "

Go Flames wrote on Mar 14, 2008 8:10 AM:

" It's a rescue vehicle available to agencies from Galt to Tracy. And for those "nothing ever happens in Lodi crowd", think about how many times CNN has been in town the past few years. "

concerned citizen wrote on Mar 14, 2008 7:53 AM:

" Please tell me the cops in Lodi are kidding! Another boy toy! Come on, get real this little town with its gang problems on the east side as their biggest problem does not even come close to requiring this "toy vehicle" PLEASE!!! "

AKM wrote on Mar 14, 2008 7:20 AM:

" What a joke....How often does Lodi's Swat team get used...sounds like another fleecing of America...my tax dollars at work! "

Comments on this story are now closed.



Leaf Pickup