Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

November 20th, 2008
November 19th, 2008
November 18th, 2008
November 17th, 2008
November 15th, 2008
November 14th, 2008
November 13th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT
Lt. Chris Piombo looks into a cell that's window was damaged when inmate Jose Delgado ripped the phone off the wall and used it to shatter the windows glass Monday evening. (Brian Feulner/News-Sentinel)

Cost to taxpayers: Roughly $20,000 a year

Broken windows at the Lodi City Jail adding up to hefty price

By Layla Bohm
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Updated: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 7:06 AM PDT

For the third time in the last year-and-a-half, an inmate at the Lodi City Jail has broken a cell window that will cost about $10,000 to replace.

Jose Angel Delgado, 32, is facing felony charges related to the Monday evening incident and a judge set bail Tuesday at $175,000. He could also face more charges due to an outburst in court.

Criminal matters aside, odds of the city getting any actual restitution for the broken window are slim.

In other words taxpayers are paying roughly $20,000 a year to replace jail cell windows — which take months to replace because they're specially ordered.

Police officials are going to see if they can get tougher glass, but that's a challenge because they are not simply made of glass. The thick windows are a material that's not quite plastic and not glass, and it allows electricity to pass through, said Lt. J.P. Badel.

The electricity is linked to a system that allows jailers to push a button and turn the windows opaque. They use it to move women and men without having them see one another, as well as to move juveniles through the jail because they cannot be in the same area as adult inmates.

Of the jail's 10 cells that can hold two people each, two now have broken windows. The jail is used as a holding area for all prisoners going to court in Lodi, and it often fills up, especially after holiday weekends.

An easy alternative would be to put bars in front of the windows, Lt. Chris Piombo said, but he noted that the Bureau of Prison guidelines call for alternatives, because inmates can hang themselves from bars.

Though the windows are supposed to be tough, they weren't strong enough for an inmate to break one with his fist in September 2006, the first time a window was broken.

The 21-year-old inmate, who was in jail for a misdemeanor offense, broke a finger in the process.

About a month or six weeks ago, a county inmate broke another window, Badel said.

And on Monday evening, Delgado allegedly yanked a phone off the wall and slammed it against the window at least twice, as the cracked window indicates.

Delgado was initially arrested around 7 p.m. Monday, a day after he was accused of brandishing a gun at another man. Police stopped him near Lodi Avenue and Washington Street, and would have booked him at the jail and released him on a misdemeanor citation, Piombo said.

But then Delgado allegedly began fighting police, leading an officer to call for rapid back-up. Delgado fought so hard that he bent a patrol car door, Piombo said.

Once at the jail, Delgado was calm and was placed in a normal jail cell. About 10 minutes later, he became agitated, started banging things in his cell and then broke the window, Piombo said.

Delgado was restrained in a chair used for that purpose, then placed in a different cell without a phone.

He appeared in Lodi court Tuesday, where proceedings were halted when he allegedly made a comment in the courtroom. A judge issued a protective order for someone who was possibly threatened.

That matter is still under investigation and a prosecutor declined to say specifically who was threatened, since charges have not yet been filed.

Delgado is now being held in the San Joaquin County Jail in French Camp, where cells still have bars.

Contact reporter Layla Bohm at layla@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

sam wrote on Mar 15, 2008 3:03 PM:

" 4586, Thank you ! "

4586 wrote on Mar 15, 2008 1:56 PM:

" This is so not right, If someone is behind bars & decides to break the glass,thay should have to pay for it. Tack it on to the bill. Why should we have to pay for it. thay are behind bars for a reason. Quite trying to put the burden on the people of lodi. make the person who broke it pay for it. "

WY wrote on Mar 14, 2008 10:03 PM:

" Not Glocks (sp?) "

Cogito wrote on Mar 14, 2008 9:57 PM:

" I think the cops carry 40 calibers now. "

WY wrote on Mar 13, 2008 3:18 PM:

" How about a cage out in the open. Weather the weather. "

Former Lodi Resident wrote on Mar 13, 2008 9:30 AM:

" And Take out all those windows and put bars in their place. How stupid can building designers get? I could of designed a new jail building that would be functional. "

Former Lodi Resident wrote on Mar 13, 2008 9:22 AM:

" These lodi police can be so stupid sometimes. Keep all objects that can be used as weapons away from inmates. "

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 11:55 PM:

" don't they? "

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 11:55 PM:

" The police carry 9mm. "

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 11:55 PM:

" What's that mean? You'd shoot the thug? "

s & W 500 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 11:47 PM:

" Sorry, 44 mag! "

s & W 500 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 11:46 PM:

" One round from a 4 mag costs less than a buck! "

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:58 PM:

" Why do they have phones? Are they gonna call someone who cares? Do the crooks get champain wishes and caviar dreams and another bag of dope. Here let me get a pillow for your feet. "

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:51 PM:

" Do we have to pay for the ambulance ride when stupid is as stupid does???

"

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:50 PM:

" If they put bars in there the thugs could order up a lemon drop! yeah that's it!

Maybe their insurance went up after that dude shot his hand. "

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:47 PM:

" What's water boarding...?

Zzzzeeeet! bahahaha! "

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:45 PM:

" ZzzzeeeeeT! "

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:39 PM:

" Bars will allow the PoPo to hear the whining yelling thugs and they might get spat on or poopoo thrown on the popo.

Caveman... I love the clown face! :o). I'm learning so much blogging! lol "

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:34 PM:

" So ... It's not just me that gets my panties in a knott over the CONSULTANT crud!
Thank goodness! "

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:31 PM:

" at a thug.
oups... i'm baaack! nasty typos an all! "

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:29 PM:

" Yeah mad dog! shock them into tomorrow land. Wouldn't it be funny if a CONSULTANT accidently touched their nose on that HI volt window while trying to peek and a thug.

Zzzeeeeeeet!

(The end to our CONSULTANT problem!)
I don't care who ya are , that was funny!

"

WY wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:24 PM:

" Let us get a CONSULTANT for a new estiment... Can we get one in this mess? bahahaha! "

Cogito wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:17 PM:

" The fact that 2much and I thought of the idea independently shows what a little common sense can do. "

Cogito wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:11 PM:

" My apologies to 2much for stealing your idea, 2MUCH THOUGHT OF IT FIRST! Good job. "

Cogito wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:07 PM:

" How bout this: put in unbreakable windows, and outside curtains that open and close. There I just saved the city 20 K a year. Your welcome. "

T & C wrote on Mar 12, 2008 9:13 PM:

" carlos you are soooo right! Attn: Police Chief! PLEASEEEEEEEEEE don't hire a consultant! Put a thick sheet of plexiglass on the inside of the window. Let him head butt himself till he knocks himself out! There will be less noise in the jail! "

sam wrote on Mar 12, 2008 8:31 PM:

" OTH, LOL. Or quote WY "bahahahaha" "

OTH wrote on Mar 12, 2008 7:14 PM:

" Sam that's alright. They now want a raise so they can make the decision to hire consultants a little easier. They're overworked. Hiring consultants is hard work. "

girard74 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 6:21 PM:

" sam asked, 'Why don't we have people who can think and do research on the city payroll?'

I would think that 'anyone' in any workplace who notices waste or safety issues should take the initiative to at the very least initiate research simply by asking questions. You're right, it doesn't take a $25,000 consultant to realize that there is a big problem with a window that costs $10,000 to replace and as a result has cost $30,000 over the past year and a half.

I would think the Chief of Police would be the first one to raise the question. "

sam wrote on Mar 12, 2008 5:49 PM:

" G74, I was being very sarcastic. I had read in the Record today that the CC voted for the consultant for the bond that needs repaying and are considering hiring another consultant to see if going GREEN will be a good idea.
I could not help myself throwing in the "C" word. I do realize that a little bit of research might do the the city some good regarding this glass. Why don't we have people who can think and do research on the city payroll? "

girard74 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 4:52 PM:

" sam asked, 'AWWKK, does the word "consultant" come to mind??'

Well, contrary to common belief, 'consultants' actually do have a purpose.

In this case, with the assurance that each time one of these windows breaks it's going to cost $10,000; and as G. Wiman suggests that there is a myriad of red tape to overcome, I would think this would be one of those times.

Since this is the third time in a year and a half that one of these windows has been broken, that places even more emphasis on my thought that this IS a time to do a little research. "

sam wrote on Mar 12, 2008 4:33 PM:

" G74 said: "the matter should be researched"

AWWKK, does the word "consultant" come to mind?? "

girard74 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 4:04 PM:

" G. Wiman wrote, 'There are requirements for what you can and can not put in a jail.'

No argument there. I would argue, however, if other police departments are utilizing different technologies that allow for more durable windows, that should be researched and, if necessary, change the 'requirements'.

If all (or a majority of) other departments are experiencing the same types of problems with their windows, then the matter should be researched, better windows should be found and the 'requirements' should be changed.

Ignoring the problem and paying $10,000 each time a window is broken is just plain stupid. "

G. Wiman wrote on Mar 12, 2008 3:58 PM:

" 1. There are requirements for what you can and can not put in a jail.
2. The windows are made up of a laminate of tempered glass and plexiglass (plastic) to meet code rating requirements.
3. You can not use just plastic because it scratches.
4. Electricity is low voltage
5. Codes, rules, laws = $$$ "

Lodian wrote on Mar 12, 2008 3:52 PM:

" girard74 3:41 PM: That's true.

"

girard74 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 3:41 PM:

" sam asked, 'This story is bugging me. Why are WE paying for a criminal's action? Charge the dude.; Make him pay. Charging the taxpayers makes no sense at all.'

It's an exercise in futility. If, as part of a sentence, we charge money for destroying property and the guy/gal doesn't have the means to pay, he/she then sits in jail - costing the taxpayers even more money.

If the crook is given a bill for the damage and then is sued, he/she can ignore the bill or even file bankruptcy. Collection would be near impossible.

Lose, Lose. "

sam wrote on Mar 12, 2008 3:32 PM:

" This story is bugging me. Why are WE paying for a criminal's action? Charge the dude.; Make him pay. Charging the taxpayers makes no sense at all. "

girard74 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 3:22 PM:

" They also might want to check their pockets and other 'areas' on their persons prior to placing them in their cells. Maybe 'detect' for a drug or two as well. "

Mrs. S. wrote on Mar 12, 2008 3:17 PM:

" Ever see the t.v. show, "Jail"? The prisoners bang their heads and fists on the windows all the time, and they never seem to break. The City of Lodi should talk to other law enforcement agencies and see what they use. "

Mad Dog wrote on Mar 12, 2008 2:54 PM:

" Straight jackets? Restraining Chairs? I agree...those do work very well. I use them on my teenagers all the time..along with the taser and waterboarding. "

zz wrote on Mar 12, 2008 12:40 PM:

" Gee, has anyone ever heard of restraining chairs or straight jackets ???? "

zz wrote on Mar 12, 2008 12:38 PM:

" Have the Police ever heard of restraining chairs or stright jackets or is that abuse "

girard74 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 12:37 PM:

" OTH - Dang!!! I forgot that. I'm glad you caught that because I could be sued for merely 'suggesting' the sign while leaving out the languages. What a world!!! "

OTH wrote on Mar 12, 2008 12:32 PM:

" girard74 we have to be politically correct and make sure those signs are printed in 25 different langyage otherwisw we will be sued. LOL "

girard74 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 12:22 PM:

" Mad dog suggested, 'Since these windows are designed to have electricity run thru them, why not up the amperage enough so that if an inmate breaks the glass, he gets the equivalent of a taser shock.'

That's kind of like closing the barn door after the horse is long gone.

Going along with your idea, simply place a sign on the window warning them if they even 'touch' the window they'll get the shock of their lives. Oh, and make the sign indestructible as well.

Oh, the things we do for our criminals!! "

Mad dog wrote on Mar 12, 2008 12:10 PM:

" Since these windows are designed to have electricity run thru them, why not up the amperage enough so that if an inmate breaks the glass, he gets the equivalent of a taser shock. "

Caveman wrote on Mar 12, 2008 11:52 AM:

" Maybe we need to hire a consultant ;o) "

Lodian wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:59 AM:

" **lien** Geez, my spelling/typing is so bad today. I need to slow down. :-) "

Lodian wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:57 AM:

" girard74: It seems they could at least put a lean on whatever property the criminal has in his/her name. At least maybe someday the money may come in. "

Lodian wrote on Mar 12, 2008 10:55 AM:

" 2much: I was thinking the same thing, although I didn't know it was called "polycarbonate". I was thinking plexi-glass. Is it sort of the same thing? Anyway, it seems it would be cost effective to put in a different material as these windows are costing a a small fortune already. Just put in the stuff that will not break! "

Bob Loblaw wrote on Mar 12, 2008 9:49 AM:

" Even Barney Fife's jail in Mayberry had bars... "

OTH wrote on Mar 12, 2008 9:19 AM:

" First bring back the chain gang and let them pick up trash or paint over grafitti.

Second was this man checked for PCP use? This kind of strength often comes with PCP use. Bending a patrol car door? "

girard74 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 9:08 AM:

" s & W 500 asked, 'How can a pane of glass cost $10K?'

This is a very good question. For that price, the window should have been guaranteed never to break. They should be demanding a refund due to breach of warranty. "

carlos wrote on Mar 12, 2008 8:59 AM:

" Keep the electronic opaque windows but put a pane of unbreakable plexiglass on the side facing the prisoners. That way the prisoners can't break it and the PD can keep the electronic opaquing system. "

boonablis wrote on Mar 12, 2008 8:54 AM:

" Again Accountability is absent, if this aggressive individual were to have some buckshot in his head, i think the broken glass situation could have been avoided. but then again i'm old school, and accountable. "

s & W 500 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 8:49 AM:

" Another note: How can a pane of glass cost $10K? It does not look that big! It does not require a crane! It looks as though there are lots of screws, probably specialized ones, but $10K????

Maybe the City needs to contact a local glass company to bid on it! It justs seems kinda like a $5,000 congressional toilet seat! "

s & W 500 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 8:39 AM:

" girard74- you hit it right on the head!

I also believe if they cause damage, and have a car with fancy rims, their car should be sold to pay for repairs.

Sure, it would be a major inconvenience, but then again.....isn't a broken window an inconvenience? "

denisdd wrote on Mar 12, 2008 8:39 AM:

" are you serious, do you mean to tell me that the cheif of police or no one else in the department has the intelegence to figure out a simlpe solution to the small problem. If I were the cheif of police I would be ashamed to have this article go to print without at least offering my opinion about how to resolve your little problem. Shame on you and your lack of inlelegence. "

CLH wrote on Mar 12, 2008 8:37 AM:

" I agree with these comments. PUT BARS UP.... THEY ARE CRIMINALS!!! WHAT`S WITH YOU PEOPLE IN LODI, MAKING THE TAXPAYER PAY FOR THE CRIMINALS WRONG DOING? MAYBE, JUST MAYBE, THE OFFICIALS WILL WAKE UP. I HAVE SAT IN THE COURT ROOM WHEN MR. WARNER GAVE SENTENCES... WHAT A JOKE! "

Bob Loblaw wrote on Mar 12, 2008 8:14 AM:

" Whatever happened to bars? "

2much wrote on Mar 12, 2008 7:58 AM:

" This is one of those items that cost the taxpayers and it seems nobody can see the practical solution, put up polycarbonate and put the shade on the outside. Yes someone would have to close it but an electric shade would be cheaper. Why does everything for PD have to be so hi-tech, they are housing criminals? "

girard74 wrote on Mar 12, 2008 7:24 AM:

" The article included, 'Criminal matters aside, odds of the city getting any actual restitution for the broken window are slim.'

Why can't they recoup the cost of repair from these thugs? They're criminally and civilly responsible for their actions. Regardless of their 'ability to pay,' they should be slapped with additional charges for which restitution should be a requirement. Failure to pay should result in more jail time. Further failure should result in grabbing any tax refunds or reduction in public assistance, if they receive any.

Keeping the citizens on the hook for this is irresponsible. "

Comments on this story are now closed.