Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

November 21st, 2008
November 20th, 2008
November 19th, 2008
November 18th, 2008
November 17th, 2008
November 15th, 2008
November 14th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT

Nakanishi introduces bill to promote private school, homeschooling

By Ross Farrow
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Updated: Tuesday, February 26, 2008 6:38 AM PST

Assemblyman Alan Nakanishi, R-Lodi, has introduced a bill that would give parents a $500 tax credit if they educate their children at home or send them to private school.

But the assemblyman is pretty frank when it comes to discussing the bill's slim prospects.

"A lot of the bills we're bringing out may not pass committee, but we're making a statement," Nakanishi said Monday.

Assembly Bill 2605 would save taxpayers about $150,000 for each child's K-12 education, Nakanishi said.

He said he wants to broach the tax credit idea and get people to talk about it.

The idea comes in response to the state's projected $16 billion budget deficit, and Nakanishi said he was looking for a way to reduce the deficit. The tax credit is one way, he said.

Lodi Education Association President Sue Kenmotsu said the bill is bad for public schools, even though she is not opposed to home schooling or private schooling.

"The word 'abysmal' comes to mind," Kenmotsu said, referring to the tax credit. "Just thinking it through, wouldn't it take money away from public schools?"

If a student is no longer enrolled in public school, the school will no longer receive state "average daily attendance" funds for that student. With California ranked 49th out of 50 states in per-capita state funding, Kenmotsu said she opposes any legislation that removes funding for public schools.

Introduced: Friday by Assemblyman Alan Nakanishi, R-Lodi.
Tax credit: $500 per year per child enrolled in either private school or home school.
Limit: Families with income less than four times the federal poverty level. The poverty level is $20,650 for a family of four, so multiplied by four, it's $82,600. Make any more than that, you don't get a tax credit.
What happens now? Bill goes to Assembly Education Committee.
Source: Jeff Hale, chief of staff.

"We're not going back to an era when only the rich knew how to read and write," she said.

Len Casanega, interim superintendent of the Lodi Unified School District, said he hasn't read enough about the bill to comment.

Hale said the fate of the tax credit bill doesn't have a major chance of being signed into law, not with 48 Democrats and 32 Republicans in the Assembly.

"There are three reasons you introduce a bill," Nakanishi said. "One is you know it's going to pass. Another is that a constituent asked you to carry a bill. And the third one is you're trying to make a statement."

Because Friday was the last day that legislators could introduce a bill this year, Nakanishi's bill leaves out some vital details as it heads to the Assembly Education Committee, of which Nakanishi is a member.

One detail is to clear up language to make the tax credit annual. The current bill doesn't specify whether the credit is onetime or annual, Hale said. Secondly, Hale plans to limit the tax credit to families with income less than four times the federal poverty level. For a family of four, that is $82,600 per year.

"This is a longshot," Hale said. "It's an attempt to have creative solutions and look at the budget."

Contact reporter Ross Farrow at rossf@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

Lodian wrote on Mar 6, 2008 11:45 PM:

"

Well, there has been some interesting recent developments in home schooling.

"Parents who lack teaching credentials cannot educate their children at home, according to a state appellate court ruling that is sending waves of fear through California's home schooling families." (Los Angeles Times)

LA TIMES
"Ruling seen as a threat to many home-schooling families"
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-homeschool6mar06,0,7343621.story

"

Lodian wrote on Mar 5, 2008 10:51 AM:

" nylodian: That's scary. This kid could go on to get worse and end up hurting someone. Does this student have a disability? Just wondering. The parents need to be the key here and help their son. The parents will make the difference here, BUT they need to be told of what is going on and how severe his writings and thoughts have been at school. The counselors/school are idiots for not addressing this as an emergency situation. They need to listen to you, as you are the frontline in these things as a teacher. We've seen what can happen to some kids if let to advance into destructive actions. I hope this kid will get the help he needs and someone intervenes before something really bad happens. "

nylodian wrote on Mar 4, 2008 3:40 PM:

" Lodian: he COULD keep up if he wanted to, in fact he tested at the AP level. He chose to do no work, his parents did not make him, the counselors were content to let him sit and fail. They said I was not qualified to determine whether the darling's art work and writings were threatening to himself or others, and it was "beyond my professional scope" to call the parents with my concerns. THANK GOD the kid didn't hurt anyone. "

Lodian wrote on Mar 4, 2008 9:50 AM:

" Robb: Do you really believe that home-schooled kids have a hard time in the real world? I don't know anyone that home-schools their children, so I don't have any experiences to go on. "

Robb wrote on Mar 4, 2008 9:31 AM:

" iT's too bad that MOST home schooled children are not prepared for life in the "real" world... "

Lodian wrote on Mar 4, 2008 9:29 AM:

" nylodian: Wow! Why were the counselors basically dismissing your concerns? What was the point of this "self-esteem" excuse for the troubled student? It seems that an AP class would make things worse for him (his self-esteem) as he obviously could not keep up in the class. Sometimes, I just don't get the reasoning behind these decisions. They make no sense at all. "

nylodian wrote on Mar 4, 2008 6:42 AM:

" It isn't just curriculum and assessment that teachers are losing their voices on. Behavioral problems as well. I had a disturbed kid in my AP English class. He NEVER did any work, but the school counselors thought it would boost his "esteem". I found his very violent drawings and writings, and contacted the counselors. They dismissed it, and told me I couldn't contact his parents about it (their job, not mine). The kid later brought hunting knives to school and tried to stab another student. "

nylodian wrote on Mar 4, 2008 6:28 AM:

" There are many good comments here reinforcing my opinions that the education spending is top-heavy, teaching to standardized tests is a waste and they do not reflect the students' overall education, the ADA money, and teachers, even though they now required to get Masters degrees, as Lodian stated, teachers have less input even though they are the ones in the system having most contact with the kids. "

Lodian wrote on Mar 3, 2008 11:26 AM:

" voter: Well said. You makes good points. I have to agree. I guess my frustration comes from some of the areas where public schools are lacking. It seems to be getting worse as teachers are allowed less and less input on how they teach their class. Too many admins are handing down the "law" without really knowing what is best, or doing what is best, for the children. Sometimes, regarding the money, I feel like it's my ball (money and child) and they are not playing fair so I just might take my ball and go home (elsewhere). It's frustrating! "

voter wrote on Mar 2, 2008 5:30 PM:

" Lodian, your argument sounds logical on the surface, but--- You say the money should follow the child. So, does that mean that if I buy my own books the public library should give me a rebate? NO! Public services are not pay as you go. Childless taxpayers still contribute to schools. They are provided for all. If you take money away from them, then society suffers from the lack of investment. We need to stop thinking "me" and start thinking "we". You want special services, you pay for them yourself. "

Lodian wrote on Feb 29, 2008 10:04 AM:

" The spending is top heavy. Instead of worrying about making sure the schools receive the state "average daily attendance" funds for each student, maybe they could focus on skimming off the top. The top being the administration. They're trying to save a penny when thousands go out unchecked into the pockets of administration....and no questions asked! "

Lodian wrote on Feb 29, 2008 9:49 AM:

" Okay, I am a bit confused. We all pay for the public schools through our taxes. And the idea here is to credit the families that choose to homeschool or send their kids to a private school. Isn't it just a wash? If the student isn't going to the public school then the public school isn't putting out any money for that kid, right? The money should follow the kid. Do I have that right? "

commonsense wrote on Feb 27, 2008 6:17 AM:

" Sorry, I do not want my tax payer $$$ going to parents that decide to home school or send their child to a private school. That is their right and choice, but my choice is to use my dollars that has some accountability. I will not agree with using my private tax money to support private industry. I would like to see site administration of schools, not the FEDS, STATE or the over paid District Office overseeing the education of our child. Yes this would take away local dollars for our schools. Ms.Kenmotsu is correct on the funding!!!!!!!! "

dawn in NS wrote on Feb 27, 2008 3:24 AM:

" I should point out that as a homeschooler I'm not in favour of tax credits. Tax credits may lead to more inference from the gov't and I'm quite happy with the freedom we have in our homeschooling. "

dawn in NS wrote on Feb 27, 2008 3:22 AM:

" Weezer - Test results reflect how well a student prepared for the test. They generally reflect little about a child's general education these days. This is an extremely poor means of measuring the progress of homeschooling kids who often progress at different rates then school children or pursue different interests. Home schooled kids often read much later than schooled kids although when they do learn to read it's very fast and they usually pass their schooled peers quickly. How would a test based on educational expections built from schools deal with this? "

dawn in NS wrote on Feb 27, 2008 3:16 AM:

" brokenl - That's a common misconception. When we started homeschooling the decision for me to stay home with the kids meant we were hovering above the poverty line. 5 years later we're just leaving low-income family territory. We aren't that unusual either as I've met and talked with other families that made homeschooling work on very small incomes.

Homeschoolers generally homeschool because of deeply held convictions about religion, family or education. Being poor doesn't mean you don't have those convictions, it just means you have to become an excellent manager of a budget.
"

brokenl wrote on Feb 26, 2008 10:15 PM:

" Let me get this staight, people who could afford to have one parent stay home or send lil jonnie to private school would get a tax break? Gosh, that sounds fair. We'll just tell all those poor people to use the declining (now more rapidly) public schools. "

sam wrote on Feb 26, 2008 9:14 PM:

" Dawn, my kids are grown, but if they were currently in school I would home school them or go the private school route. "

weezer wrote on Feb 26, 2008 2:59 PM:

" concerned citizen, there's nothing wrong with "testing." Test results in a way reflect the effort kids give and the kind of education they receive. There's no way that a well-schooled child will fail in any testing that they're prepared for. "

concerned citizen wrote on Feb 26, 2008 2:26 PM:

" It is time to realize that "no child left behind" was a bad idea! All that is going on in class is testing to prove that the teachers are "teaching" in reality so much time is wasted in "testing" that students now are obtaining the worst education yet! At least this is an "idea" although I think that parents looking for more money will not educate well either! "

Think before Speak wrote on Feb 26, 2008 2:11 PM:

" The comments by Sue Kenmotsu are very telling. She cannot run to the defense of the "Average daily attendance" dollars fast enough. This is why schools are more concerned that students attending school than they are about how effective the educators are at actually teaching them skills that will serve them and their employers in the future. Union controlled schools have been declining in their effectiveness and will continue to damage the US's ability to compete in the ever more technical world that we live in. "

dawn in NS wrote on Feb 26, 2008 11:09 AM:

" Sue Kenmotsu has two comments that display some lazy thinking.

"Just thinking it through, wouldn't it take money away from public schools?"

She needs to exercise some critical thinking here. Her issue is not the tax credit, it's how schools are funded.

"We're not going back to an era when only the rich knew how to read and write

She's referencing an unsubstantiated fantasy (when was this era?) and the assumption is a complete non-sequitur.

Seriously, do a lot of folks in education display such fuzzy and unfocused thinking? Yikes. Glad I homeschool my kids. "

Observer wrote on Feb 26, 2008 10:58 AM:

" DavidD, don't you know that we can't reward students for performing well. (See Millswood Catalina trip blog) "

DavidD wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:58 AM:

" I commend Alan (or Ron Paul?) for thinking out of the box, and this idea will definitely get more people thinking about solutions.

I'm not entirely for this particular idea, but at least people are thinking.

It would be nice to see a minimum grade level tied to this tax credit, based on some sort of standarized test. (Yes, I know how much we hate those.) I would like to see home-schooling parents more accountable if they are going to receive funding like this. "

Scrutiny wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:50 AM:

" Attaboy Alan!! Don`t be afraid of the infamous Cal. Teacher`s Ass.! Tell it like it is brother!! "

lodiparent wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:46 AM:

" Also, with that being said, I know that EACH school in LUSD teaches at a different rate. One school requires children to do reports, research and other things, go on field trips and so forth. Where another school has the kids doing none of that. They clame there is no $... Yet the PTA has thousands of $$. Same school requires the parents to supply all school supplies. So where is the money going to? LUSD top paying employees should take a pay cut so ALL schools can have equal chances with their children. "

lodiparent wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:43 AM:

" If the school district would acutally educate the children that are in school more parents would stop pulling their children out. I had a child that scored on their testing the next grade up and they refused to put my child in the grade that she belongs in. The LUSD does not care about educating a child, they care only about the $ coming in. I think that if we want our children to have a better education then we should be allowed to pick where our children can go and where their funding goes. "

wtf wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:17 AM:

" Again, not true; we are IN the era of children not learning to read and write while paying exorbitant sums to over-priced "administration" to do do. When budget crises appear, what seems to *always* be the "administration's" solution?

Cut back on spending for the children and get rid of teachers. Somehow this seems *ssbackwards to me. "

wtf wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:14 AM:

" Looks like Assemblyman Nakanishi has been reading Ron Paul. LOL! Good for him (and us).

http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/education/

As for the comment by Ms. Kenmotsu that this would take funding away from the schools, the answer is NO! It would possibly force the schools to cut back on some of the inflated administration that seems to abound.

Regarding her comment, "We're not going back to an era when only the rich knew how to read and write."

"

Comments on this story are now closed.