Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Male-female marriage has survived 5,000 years (147)
- Comments in article concern writer (87)
- Poor economy, debt force Lodi Memorial Hospital to lay off 44 workers (50)
- Palin bashing is disgraceful (38)
- Lodi council spends $500,000 in hopes to separate itself from Stockton (28)
- CHP: Road rage leads to Highway 12 crash (23)
- Two accused of damaging sprinkler at Lodi courthouse (21)
- Times will be a little better if we pull together and 'Shop Lodi' (20)
- Thoughts after the election (20)
Nakanishi introduces bill to promote private school, homeschooling
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Assemblyman Alan Nakanishi, R-Lodi, has introduced a bill that would give parents a $500 tax credit if they educate their children at home or send them to private school.
But the assemblyman is pretty frank when it comes to discussing the bill's slim prospects.
"A lot of the bills we're bringing out may not pass committee, but we're making a statement," Nakanishi said Monday.
Assembly Bill 2605 would save taxpayers about $150,000 for each child's K-12 education, Nakanishi said.
He said he wants to broach the tax credit idea and get people to talk about it.
The idea comes in response to the state's projected $16 billion budget deficit, and Nakanishi said he was looking for a way to reduce the deficit. The tax credit is one way, he said.
Lodi Education Association President Sue Kenmotsu said the bill is bad for public schools, even though she is not opposed to home schooling or private schooling.
"The word 'abysmal' comes to mind," Kenmotsu said, referring to the tax credit. "Just thinking it through, wouldn't it take money away from public schools?"
If a student is no longer enrolled in public school, the school will no longer receive state "average daily attendance" funds for that student. With California ranked 49th out of 50 states in per-capita state funding, Kenmotsu said she opposes any legislation that removes funding for public schools.
Tax credit: $500 per year per child enrolled in either private school or home school.
Limit: Families with income less than four times the federal poverty level. The poverty level is $20,650 for a family of four, so multiplied by four, it's $82,600. Make any more than that, you don't get a tax credit.
What happens now? Bill goes to Assembly Education Committee.
Source: Jeff Hale, chief of staff.
"We're not going back to an era when only the rich knew how to read and write," she said.
Len Casanega, interim superintendent of the Lodi Unified School District, said he hasn't read enough about the bill to comment.
Hale said the fate of the tax credit bill doesn't have a major chance of being signed into law, not with 48 Democrats and 32 Republicans in the Assembly.
"There are three reasons you introduce a bill," Nakanishi said. "One is you know it's going to pass. Another is that a constituent asked you to carry a bill. And the third one is you're trying to make a statement."
Because Friday was the last day that legislators could introduce a bill this year, Nakanishi's bill leaves out some vital details as it heads to the Assembly Education Committee, of which Nakanishi is a member.
One detail is to clear up language to make the tax credit annual. The current bill doesn't specify whether the credit is onetime or annual, Hale said. Secondly, Hale plans to limit the tax credit to families with income less than four times the federal poverty level. For a family of four, that is $82,600 per year.
"This is a longshot," Hale said. "It's an attempt to have creative solutions and look at the budget."
Contact reporter Ross Farrow at rossf@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
Lodian wrote on Mar 6, 2008 11:45 PM:
Well, there has been some interesting recent developments in home schooling.
"Parents who lack teaching credentials cannot educate their children at home, according to a state appellate court ruling that is sending waves of fear through California's home schooling families." (Los Angeles Times)
LA TIMES
"Ruling seen as a threat to many home-schooling families"
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-homeschool6mar06,0,7343621.story
"
Lodian wrote on Mar 5, 2008 10:51 AM:
nylodian wrote on Mar 4, 2008 3:40 PM:
Lodian wrote on Mar 4, 2008 9:50 AM:
Robb wrote on Mar 4, 2008 9:31 AM:
Lodian wrote on Mar 4, 2008 9:29 AM:
nylodian wrote on Mar 4, 2008 6:42 AM:
nylodian wrote on Mar 4, 2008 6:28 AM:
Lodian wrote on Mar 3, 2008 11:26 AM:
voter wrote on Mar 2, 2008 5:30 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 29, 2008 10:04 AM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 29, 2008 9:49 AM:
commonsense wrote on Feb 27, 2008 6:17 AM:
dawn in NS wrote on Feb 27, 2008 3:24 AM:
dawn in NS wrote on Feb 27, 2008 3:22 AM:
dawn in NS wrote on Feb 27, 2008 3:16 AM:
Homeschoolers generally homeschool because of deeply held convictions about religion, family or education. Being poor doesn't mean you don't have those convictions, it just means you have to become an excellent manager of a budget.
"
brokenl wrote on Feb 26, 2008 10:15 PM:
sam wrote on Feb 26, 2008 9:14 PM:
weezer wrote on Feb 26, 2008 2:59 PM:
concerned citizen wrote on Feb 26, 2008 2:26 PM:
Think before Speak wrote on Feb 26, 2008 2:11 PM:
dawn in NS wrote on Feb 26, 2008 11:09 AM:
"Just thinking it through, wouldn't it take money away from public schools?"
She needs to exercise some critical thinking here. Her issue is not the tax credit, it's how schools are funded.
"We're not going back to an era when only the rich knew how to read and write
She's referencing an unsubstantiated fantasy (when was this era?) and the assumption is a complete non-sequitur.
Seriously, do a lot of folks in education display such fuzzy and unfocused thinking? Yikes. Glad I homeschool my kids. "
Observer wrote on Feb 26, 2008 10:58 AM:
DavidD wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:58 AM:
I'm not entirely for this particular idea, but at least people are thinking.
It would be nice to see a minimum grade level tied to this tax credit, based on some sort of standarized test. (Yes, I know how much we hate those.) I would like to see home-schooling parents more accountable if they are going to receive funding like this. "
Scrutiny wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:50 AM:
lodiparent wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:46 AM:
lodiparent wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:43 AM:
wtf wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:17 AM:
Cut back on spending for the children and get rid of teachers. Somehow this seems *ssbackwards to me. "
wtf wrote on Feb 26, 2008 8:14 AM:
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/education/
As for the comment by Ms. Kenmotsu that this would take funding away from the schools, the answer is NO! It would possibly force the schools to cut back on some of the inflated administration that seems to abound.
Regarding her comment, "We're not going back to an era when only the rich knew how to read and write."
"
Comments on this story are now closed.