Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Male-female marriage has survived 5,000 years (148)
- Comments in article concern writer (87)
- Poor economy, debt force Lodi Memorial Hospital to lay off 44 workers (50)
- Palin bashing is disgraceful (38)
- Lodi council spends $500,000 in hopes to separate itself from Stockton (28)
- CHP: Road rage leads to Highway 12 crash (23)
- Two accused of damaging sprinkler at Lodi courthouse (21)
- Times will be a little better if we pull together and 'Shop Lodi' (20)
- Thoughts after the election (20)
Big raise could mean $1 million more in retirement for Lodi unified superintendent
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
A pay raise granted this week to Lodi Unified's interim superintendent means an extra $40,000 in retirement benefits each year for the rest of his life — perhaps adding up to $1 million if he lives another 25 years.
Lodi Unified board members voted 5-1 Tuesday night to approve a $45,000 increase for Len Casanega, who will serve as superintendent through July 3.
That pay raise for a relatively brief time will mean a dramatic jump in Casanega's lifetime retirement benefits.
For instance, Casanega stands to make approximately $169,248 a year in retirement, according to the California State Teachers' Retirement System's Retirement Benefit Calculator.
Sherry Reser, spokeswoman for CalSTRS, said the calculator is an "unofficial estimate."
That's $39,780 more than he would have made without this week's pay boost.
So if Casenaga lives 25 years after retiring, his stint as interim supe would be worth an extra $1 million in retirement pay.
In fact, his retirement, enhanced by the recent boost, will be $28,000 more a year than Casanega ever made working as assistant superintendent of personnel at Lodi Unified.
Last year, Casanega made $141,019, according to information provided by Lodi Unified.
"This is the type of situation that angers taxpayers, because taxpayers are the ones that ultimately pay the bill," said David Kline, spokesman for the California Taxpayers' Association.
Trustee Jeff Thompson said the board considered Casanega's leadership qualities and not his retirement before giving him a raise.
"Did the board consider that? No," Thompson said.
However, Trustee Peter Johnson said the board did consider how Casanega's raise would affect his retirement package.
"Yeah, the board did consider that," Johnson said.
Casanega said he hasn't checked how much his current raise will affect his retirement benefits.
A few board members, including Richard Jones, have questioned whether or not the board followed the best course of action by hiring Casanega before finalizing his salary.
Casanega took over for former superintendent Bill Huyett on Feb. 4. The board voted to approve his salary Tuesday night.
"If it's a mistake, we made it," Trustee Richard Jones said. "That won't happen again. I guarantee it."
While Jones said he does stand behind the decision he made Tuesday night, he also has some reservations.
"I wasn't 100 percent like most times when I make a decision," Jones said.
Harvey Bills, the only board member to vote against Casanega's compensation package, said he was surprised that Casanega would request such a high salary in a time when the district will have to make major cuts.
"I think it's a shock to a lot of people," Bills said.
The district is estimating that it will need to trim approximately $8 million from next school year's budget.
Casanega maintains that he asked the board for a fair salary based on what other superintendents of similarly sized districts made.
Until he leaves, he will draw a salary that would equal $220,000 annually, or about $1,000 per day.
A comparison provided by Lodi Unified of similarly sized districts showed that on average the superintendents of those districts made more than $237,000.
"It was a request, not a demand," Casanega said.
Most of the retirement money would come from money made from investments managed by the state.
However 15 percent of that would come from the district and the state's general fund.
Casanega, himself, paid for 10 percent of it with contributions he's made over the course of his career.
When Lodi Police Captain David Main became the department's interim police chief recently he received a 5 percent pay raise. That raise would bring him to $129,905 in base salary, based on calculations made using information provided by the city of Lodi.
Casanega's pay increase amounted to a 32 percent increase.
Despite his large raise, some community members are saying that Casanega is the "ray of light" the district needs to see through these dark times of budget cuts.
Michelle Madrid, operations supervisor for Lodi Unified's transportation department and former president of Lodi's chapter of the California School Employee's Association, said she's looking forward to the next 103 days of Casanega's superintendency.
Although she doesn't know him personally, Madrid said, professionally, Casanega has never let her down.
"I believe he's worth every cent," Madrid said. "I believe he's worth more than he's getting."
Board members say that part of the reason they gave Casanega the job was his reputation for being an exceptional administrator.
The other part of that reason is that Casanega, unlike other internal interim candidates, like Associate Superintendent Odie Douglas, has no intention of applying for the superintendency permanently.
With nearly 30 superintendent positions open statewide, board members believe they'll receive more qualified applicants by appointing an interim who has no interest in applying for the job.
In addition, most board members agree that with budget cuts and the task of filling three administrative positions (superintendent, assistant superintendent of personnel and curriculum director) the board needs to be looking ahead rather than wondering who's taking care of the district.
"He has the monumental task of making sure the wheels don't fall off," Jones said.
Casanega said he was still at work at 10:40 p.m. on a recent week night when he had a conversation with his wife.
She asked, "Is this going to be what it's like?"
"And I said, 'Yeah,'" Casanega said.
"If they wanted to pay me less I would've done it," Casanega later said. "(But) I wouldn't have thought it was fair."
Contact reporter Amanda Dyer at amandad@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
SportsGuru wrote on Feb 26, 2008 3:16 PM:
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=local&id=4792870
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0EIN/is_2005_Jan_12/ai_n8689786
"
SportsGuru wrote on Feb 26, 2008 3:10 PM:
Think before Speak wrote on Feb 26, 2008 2:24 PM:
oldguy wrote on Feb 26, 2008 11:13 AM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 25, 2008 9:42 PM:
sam wrote on Feb 25, 2008 8:29 PM:
RDHwildcard wrote on Feb 25, 2008 4:54 PM:
Is a permanent (due to retirement) 32% pay raise for four months of work really fair? I suppose he has friends in high places. Hell, the Lodi PD interim chief only got 5%.
15% of his retirement comes directly from the school district and the state general fund. In this day and age with deficits and budget cuts how can any governmental operation actually and ethically afford large pay raises.
Suggestion: relieve him of his duties as interim superintendent two days prior to his retirement – now that’s fair Mr. Casanega!
"
Lodian wrote on Feb 25, 2008 9:45 AM:
"
Lodian wrote on Feb 25, 2008 9:45 AM:
"...lay off those who are simply collecting the paycheck"
PLEASE MAKE THIS HAPPEN! "
Lodian wrote on Feb 25, 2008 9:43 AM:
"...how would you suggest the cuts are made?"
Skim it right off the top and we'll be in the black. "
nylodian wrote on Feb 25, 2008 8:21 AM:
vested wrote on Feb 24, 2008 9:48 PM:
Cogito wrote on Feb 24, 2008 9:00 PM:
brokenl wrote on Feb 24, 2008 8:31 PM:
Elbert Hubbard
"
brokenl wrote on Feb 24, 2008 8:25 PM:
SportsGuru wrote on Feb 24, 2008 7:33 PM:
That makes no sense (but then, when has anything the CTA negotiated for its members make sense?). "
Bob Loblaw wrote on Feb 24, 2008 5:19 PM:
awobs wrote on Feb 24, 2008 2:46 PM:
awobs wrote on Feb 24, 2008 2:45 PM:
brokenl wrote on Feb 24, 2008 1:43 PM:
— Mark Twain
"
brokenl wrote on Feb 24, 2008 1:38 PM:
brokenl wrote on Feb 24, 2008 1:35 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 24, 2008 1:33 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 24, 2008 1:32 PM:
brokenl wrote on Feb 24, 2008 1:31 PM:
awobs wrote on Feb 24, 2008 1:20 PM:
awobs wrote on Feb 24, 2008 1:19 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 24, 2008 12:37 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 24, 2008 12:37 PM:
citizen wrote on Feb 24, 2008 12:25 PM:
brokenl wrote on Feb 24, 2008 11:41 AM:
awobs wrote on Feb 24, 2008 11:25 AM:
stkngal wrote on Feb 24, 2008 11:16 AM:
stkngal wrote on Feb 24, 2008 11:11 AM:
Fruitful47 wrote on Feb 24, 2008 7:56 AM:
Former Lodi Resident wrote on Feb 23, 2008 10:21 PM:
Cogito wrote on Feb 23, 2008 8:12 PM:
brokenl wrote on Feb 23, 2008 8:01 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 23, 2008 7:53 PM:
So, you are basically saying they are doing a great job by paying out the nose for this guy and the kids get zip....again. Does that really deserve a pat on the back?
"
Lodian wrote on Feb 23, 2008 7:52 PM:
I know! Don't hire the guy, period. Like Cogito said, "They could have left the position vacant for a few months and nobody would have noticed."
"
vested wrote on Feb 23, 2008 7:50 PM:
vested wrote on Feb 23, 2008 7:44 PM:
Robb wrote on Feb 23, 2008 7:30 PM:
It would appear that the school system has plenty, yet chooses poorly on how to spend it.... "
Cogito wrote on Feb 23, 2008 7:05 PM:
WY wrote on Feb 23, 2008 6:45 PM:
WY wrote on Feb 23, 2008 6:44 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 23, 2008 6:08 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 23, 2008 6:05 PM:
oldguy wrote on Feb 23, 2008 5:08 PM:
DavidD wrote on Feb 23, 2008 4:39 PM:
nylodian wrote on Feb 23, 2008 3:43 PM:
Whoa Nellie! wrote on Feb 23, 2008 3:42 PM:
Those of us in the "real world" would LOVE to retire with 90-100% of our final salary. We get a fraction from Social Security & have to invest a portion of our salaries into 401k's & other investments.
I am currently encouraging my kids to become school teachers for the retirement alone.
"
OTH wrote on Feb 23, 2008 1:32 PM:
BlueEyes wrote on Feb 23, 2008 1:30 PM:
sam wrote on Feb 23, 2008 11:49 AM:
sam wrote on Feb 23, 2008 11:48 AM:
GetUrHeadOut wrote on Feb 23, 2008 11:26 AM:
wtf wrote on Feb 23, 2008 10:46 AM:
http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-me-schools21feb21,1,2906887.story
"
citizen wrote on Feb 23, 2008 10:28 AM:
Fruitful47 wrote on Feb 23, 2008 10:10 AM:
wtf wrote on Feb 23, 2008 10:09 AM:
citizen wrote on Feb 23, 2008 9:56 AM:
citizen wrote on Feb 23, 2008 9:50 AM:
sam wrote on Feb 23, 2008 8:51 AM:
OTH wrote on Feb 23, 2008 8:40 AM:
commonsense wrote on Feb 23, 2008 7:32 AM:
Fruitful47 wrote on Feb 23, 2008 7:15 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.