Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Male-female marriage has survived 5,000 years (151)
- Comments in article concern writer (87)
- Poor economy, debt force Lodi Memorial Hospital to lay off 44 workers (50)
- Palin bashing is disgraceful (38)
- Lodi council spends $500,000 in hopes to separate itself from Stockton (28)
- CHP: Road rage leads to Highway 12 crash (23)
- Two accused of damaging sprinkler at Lodi courthouse (21)
- Times will be a little better if we pull together and 'Shop Lodi' (20)
- Thoughts after the election (20)
Pledge debate
Joe Serna Jr. Charter School discusses Pledge of Allegiance
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
To pledge or not to pledge? That's the question at Joe Serna Jr. Charter School.
School officials have decided to reexamine a policy regarding whether students should be required to say the Pledge of Allegiance after a group of parents took issue with the line "one nation under God," said Catherine Pennington, assistant superintendent of elementary education for Lodi Unified School District.
Around the beginning of the school year, Joe Serna Jr. Charter School staff organized an advisory committee in response to parent concerns about students being required to make the pledge.
Before the debate began, students at Joe Serna Jr. Charter School would say the pledge in English and in Spanish every Wednesday at a schoolwide assembly.
Teachers are not required to lead their students in the Pledge of Allegiance, according to California education code, but they do need to engage their class in some sort of patriotic exercise each day.
"The flag salute, obviously, is the one we're most familiar with," Pennington said, but students can sing a song, have a moment of silence or any number of things.
By California education code, charter schools do not have to have such an observance, according to the California Department of Education.
Michael Gillespie, principal at Joe Serna Jr. Charter School, would not comment on the matter.
Aspire Public Schools, an organization that helps run three charter schools in Lodi Unified, did not return phone calls Monday afternoon to say whether or not its schools participated in the Pledge of Allegiance.
Rod Mara, vice principal and fifth-grade teacher at St. Peter Lutheran School, said classes say the Pledge of Allegiance every morning in their individual classrooms.
Jennifer Nelson-Burgher, a self-described history buff and parent of both a sixth-grader and an eighth-grader at Joe Serna Jr. Charter School, said she believes the phrase "under God" — added to the pledge by act of Congress in 1954 — was added as a result of the McCarthy era of the late 1940s and early 1950s.
"I'm not offended by the pledge itself. I'm offended that it was bastardized," she said.
Nelson-Burgher does not practice an organized religion at home. However she feels that the phrase "under God" is exclusionary.
She said she loves the Sting Ray Pledge, which the school instituted sometime after the debate about the Pledge of Allegiance came forward.
Students now say the Sting Ray Pledge at their Wednesday assemblies, according to Nelson-Burgher.
• Joe Serna Jr. Charter School offers a bilingual education in English and Spanish.
• The school serves nearly 300 students. During the 2006-07 school year, 69.7 percent of those students were Hispanic and 25.4 percent of those students were white, according to the California Department of Education.
• An advisory committee, working under the Lodi Unified School District board, governs Joe Serna Jr. Charter School.
The committee is made up of district officials, site personnel, parents and community members.
— Joe Serna Jr. Charter School's Web site, California Department of Education.
The Sting Ray is Joe Serna Jr. Charter School's mascot.
"It's very inspirational, very powerful," she said.
However, some parents are outraged that the issue is even a discussion topic.
"Don't get me started," said Marianne Henderson, 33, who was picking up her son from the school Monday afternoon. "I'm very upset."
Henderson believes that the pledge is an American tradition that everybody should respect.
Just as she would respect and participate in German traditions if she was to travel to Germany, Henderson said she expects people to respect American traditions while in the United States.
"We live in America," said Henderson, struggling against her anger to get the words out. "You respect each country's traditions."
Lupe Lisojo, 33, had a Bible in her car as she picked up her seventh-grader from school Monday afternoon.
"I don't agree with them taking (the phrase) out," she said. "I believe in a higher power."
In 2004, Michael Newdow made national headlines when he brought a similar complaint about the phrase "under God" before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of his daughter who attended school in Elk Grove Unified School District. However, the court ruled that Newdow did not have the right to bring up the matter under his daughter's name because the girl's mother had sole custody of the child at the time Newdow initially filed the lawsuit.
The Supreme Court's decision overturned a previous ruling in favor of Newdow.
Kim Gillespie, Michael Gillespie's wife and parent of two children at the school, said she doesn't have a problem with the pledge.
She said she comes from a long line of relatives who have served in the armed forces. She said she feels that saying the pledge is a way of recognizing those who risked their lives for their country.
"We can go to sleep at night and know that we're pretty safe compared to other countries," Kim Gillespie said.
Also a teacher at Lodi Middle School, Kim Gillespie said she doesn't require her students to say the pledge.
Joe Serna Jr. Charter School's pledge advisory committee is still discussing whether or not the school will say the Pledge of Allegiance. When it finishes receiving input from the community and makes its decision, the pledge could be reinstituted as it was originally.
Even so, Nelson-Burgher said, her efforts will not have been wasted.
"It was still worth the battle to raise people's awareness."
Contact reporter Amanda Dyer at amandad@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
real facts wrote on Feb 22, 2008 11:53 AM:
"
girard74 wrote on Feb 21, 2008 9:41 PM:
I, too, am curious as to who has been placed in cyber detention. Wow!! This really does remind me of high school!!
Tomorrow I'll meet all you guys at the Malt Shop, ok?!? Like, totally!!! "
real facts wrote on Feb 21, 2008 5:13 PM:
the answer is NO. i do not apologize for anything i ever said or did to you, because i ALWAYS told the truth about you, and will continue to do so "if" you act the same. i keep my promises.
lodian, quit using my name
LNS....i am still not posting multiple posts on purpose. it has to be something with my computer. i apologize "
real_facts wrote on Feb 21, 2008 5:01 PM:
real facts wrote on Feb 21, 2008 1:34 PM:
bummer huh? "
real facts wrote on Feb 21, 2008 12:02 PM:
bummer huh? "
Lodian wrote on Feb 21, 2008 9:20 AM:
~`~`~`~`HALLELUJAH!`~`~`~`~
Thanks, LNS! "
sam wrote on Feb 21, 2008 8:43 AM:
real facts wrote on Feb 21, 2008 12:09 AM:
real facts, please stay on topic and stop the "food fight").
i was addressing comments made to me, and about me, AFTER hanner's warning.
i noticed you didn't bother to address THOSE. whats hypocritical in here, is that i am the ONLY ONE that is the "problem".
anyone else can take their swipes at me all day long in here, but i am supposed to cower into the corner.....nope, that won't happen.
say something to me or about me, and i will respond "
Lucius wrote on Feb 20, 2008 4:16 PM:
Maxwell wrote on Feb 20, 2008 1:13 PM:
" Note from Editor Rich Hanner:
Seems postings on this story have become a food fight of late. We'll culled out the last couple of days and would like to suggest, respectfully, that readers refrain from posts that are insulting or off topic. Thanks! "
"
real facts wrote on Feb 20, 2008 1:03 PM:
where is it?
your probably taking comfort in the FACT that your partners in crime still high five you, even though they know you lie incessantly.
covering up the sins of your crime, makes THEM an accesory to it.
yep, these blogs are loaded with people of integrity.
you all do these things so easily in here, makes one wonder if you have ANY integrity in your personal lives away from here "
Lodian wrote on Feb 20, 2008 11:27 AM:
"
Lodian wrote on Feb 20, 2008 11:26 AM:
Jeff wrote on Feb 12, 2008 6:59 AM:
"Ready, Set, RANT!"
Jef: I guess you were right from the very beginning. LOL
"
real facts wrote on Feb 19, 2008 11:46 PM:
it's not like you need my permission to delete them, but if it was for some reason, you have my permission to delete repeating posts.
i DID NOT do it on purpose
real facts "
real facts wrote on Feb 19, 2008 11:41 PM:
girard, i give you my word as a man, i am not doing this on purpose. my computer is acting weird. i just re-booted it, so we will see.
i may be long in my responses in order to make sure i leave no stone unturned, but repeating posts multiple times is not my style.....that would be lodians modus non operan-did.
i can see why the LNS deleted those posts, but it was a shame...i-"almost"-had-the-real-you......front-and-center...next-time "
real facts wrote on Feb 19, 2008 11:39 PM:
richardh: Does this mean that you will remove all the posts by "real facts" that are threatening personal attacks as well"?).
you would love to turn it into that, but you never will. because thats a lie
the LNS knows the differentiation between "threatening personal attacks"...me making all of you promises in here about how i would respond to you, if you continue to challenge Gods authority.
i am not afraid to repeat it again, because it is within blog rules...i will oppose you to the Nth dgree allowable in here. i promise
"
real facts wrote on Feb 19, 2008 11:29 PM:
richardh: Does this mean that you will remove all the posts by "real facts" that are threatening personal attacks as well"?).
you would love to turn it into that, but you never will. because thats a lie
the LNS knows the differentiation between "threatening personal attacks"....me making all of you promises in here about how i would respond to you, if you continue to challenge Gods authority.
i am not afraid to repeat it again, because it is within blog rules....i will oppose you to the Nth dgree allowable in here. i promise
"
real facts wrote on Feb 19, 2008 11:28 PM:
richardh: Does this mean that you will remove all the posts by "real facts" that are threatening personal attacks as well"?).
you would love to turn it into that, but you never will. because thats a lie
the LNS knows the differentiation between "threatening personal attacks"...me making all of you promises in here about how i would respond to you, if you continue to challenge Gods authority.
i am not afraid to repeat it again, because it is within blog rules....i will oppose you to the Nth dgree allowable in here. i promise
"
girard74 wrote on Feb 19, 2008 11:25 PM:
real facts wrote on Feb 19, 2008 11:10 PM:
richardh: Does this mean that you will remove all the posts by "real facts" that are threatening personal attacks as well"?).
you would love to turn it into that, but you never will. because thats a lie
the LNS knows the differentiation between "threatening personal attacks"...me making all of you promises in here about how i would respond to you, if you continue to challenge Gods authority.
i am not afraid to repeat it again, because it is within blog rules.....i will oppose you to the Nth dgree allowable in here. i promise "
real facts wrote on Feb 19, 2008 10:22 PM:
richardh: Does this mean that you will remove all the posts by "real facts" that are threatening personal attacks as well"?).
you would love to turn it into that, but you never will. because thats a lie
the LNS knows the differentiation between "threatening personal attacks"...me making all of you promises in here about how i would respond to you, if you continue to challenge Gods authority.
i am not afraid to repeat it again, because it is within blog rules.....i will oppose you to the Nth dgree allowable in here. i promise "
real facts wrote on Feb 19, 2008 10:16 PM:
little ol' me.
what you fail (as always) to admit, "you people" start alot of this stuff YOURSELF, i have a right to respond and defend myself.
little ol' me against the busloads of would be silencers.
i am still standing "
OTH wrote on Feb 19, 2008 8:14 PM:
jeff wrote on Feb 19, 2008 5:47 PM:
scout wrote on Feb 19, 2008 4:42 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 19, 2008 4:08 PM:
girard74 wrote on Feb 19, 2008 4:04 PM:
Robb wrote on Feb 19, 2008 4:00 PM:
sam wrote on Feb 19, 2008 3:34 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 19, 2008 3:18 PM:
richardh wrote on Feb 19, 2008 2:39 PM:
Seems postings on this story have become a food fight of late. We'll culled out the last couple of days and would like to suggest, respectfully, that readers refrain from posts that are insulting or off topic. Thanks! "
sam wrote on Feb 19, 2008 2:19 PM:
girard74 wrote on Feb 19, 2008 2:15 PM:
Could you please explain? "
girard74 wrote on Feb 19, 2008 2:08 PM:
nylodian wrote on Feb 18, 2008 8:28 AM:
Lee wrote on Feb 18, 2008 1:08 AM:
girard74 wrote on Feb 18, 2008 12:22 AM:
tosh conn wrote on Feb 17, 2008 5:33 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 4:41 PM:
"
nylodian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 3:36 PM:
Hmmm wrote on Feb 17, 2008 3:33 PM:
He is a fake.
Matt 5:19: Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven. "
jlawrenceendicott wrote on Feb 17, 2008 3:21 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 1:31 PM:
Hey, when's moving day?
"
real facts wrote on Feb 17, 2008 1:26 PM:
let's see if you call lodian out on her nasty lie of me "using" WY, lying that my dealings with WY had to do with some PR move on my part, and that i wasn't dialogging with WY, to encourage WY in Christ.
lets see you take lodian to task for that one. i will bet you won't, because your a hypocrite who only plays HER side of the coin.
pressures on nylodian
you pick people and agenda, OVER truth "
real facts wrote on Feb 17, 2008 1:21 PM:
.... You don't even have a sense of humor, so what good are you? LOL").
ahhh now that hurt bad. you don't think i have a sense of humor, probably because i have to spend countless hours chasing down your lies for you to experience it.
i am funny, trust me.
here's proof....my post to voter at 11:55am
now that WAS funny
in my non-cyber life outside of these blogs where i have to take out peoples trash in here, i am known for being the life of the party. thats bad news for you, huh? "
real facts wrote on Feb 17, 2008 1:14 PM:
it "smells" because it's another lie in your weak game to discredit me. if you had it.....YOU WOULD SHOW IT LIGHTNING QUICK
i guess you love futility, because no matter how many rambling posts you make, no matter how many times you lie without conscience, it's IMPOSSIBLE for you or ANY man to discredit me, so long as i stick to Gods authority as my main goal. your welcome to try, as it only proves my case against....you....wooooohoooooooo "
real facts wrote on Feb 17, 2008 1:09 PM:
you have "banned together". thats a joke. right now "you people" fit that scripture "wide is the path that leads to destruction, and MANY there be on it". you have lied to yourself based on your affliations, that "numbers" tell the truth. NOPE. that just means you have ALOT of "company" in the land of delusion. there is NO comfort in that.
go ahead and still make that accusation about WY....someday you will pay a big price for that, as God does not allow that to fly. you will reap what you sowed on that one "
real facts wrote on Feb 17, 2008 1:02 PM:
poor lodian gets hit with the spot light of who she really is, and starts spitting and sputtering all over herself.
i know your desperate for me to swim in the same river as you do, but anybody that shows brain function on an e.e.g. machine could tell you that brian is 100 times more intelligent than i am. the guy is well versed in many aspects of life, where i am not. i have my "specialty". nope, two different people. too bad you can't squeeeeez out of your bothched-multiple-personality-lie-when-you-tried-to-be...."lee" "
Lodian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 1:00 PM:
Yes, RF, you are unnatural in many ways. This includes the way you cling to WY. Unfortunately for her you have decided that she is the one you choose to "use" in order to make your points toward others and to act as if you were human towards her. Sorry, we all saw right through you. I think you are quite unnatural, maybe even sent from hell to stir things up amongst believers. Sorry again, but that won't happen. We have banned together against your evil. You lose. You can spew your evil all you like, but nothing will change in that you still only zero souls to count in your little bag of tricks. And if I decide to leave any given board/topic it is because I decided that I was done addressing someone that does not care to be human, but only evil. You don't even have a sense of humor, so what good are you? LOL! Well, evil, you will leave empty handed....again. But, I know you will try again. God is on my side. I'll be just fine. "
Lodian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 12:41 PM:
"RF: When posters get tired your rants, you think they are "running away". No RF, they are backing away slowly, careful not to make any sudden moves."
THAT WAS SO FUNNY! I couldn't help but think of Elmer Fudd... "Shhhhhhhh, be vewwwy, vewwwy quiet..."
I'm still laughing! I love your sense of humor! LOL! Thanks!
"
Lodian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 12:35 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 12:31 PM:
Wow! Get a grip fella.
Nope, I will not post your threatening post to me from the other board. It is beneath me to post such evil things. It is, however, gratifying to me to see that you in fact do know the truth about your lies, as evidenced by your outbursts here (again). I was really wondering if you had a clue as to how deep your hatred and evil goes, but alas, I see that you know all too well exactly what you are doing.
You-are-an-evil-little-man.
God help you. "
real facts wrote on Feb 17, 2008 12:03 PM:
whats pathetically sad, is neither of them are any good at hiding it, and they ALL believe thier own "press".
whats even worse, is they delude themselves into thinking they will use the same excuses on God on thier day, that they try and use on us today.
"they" display arrogance, and laugh at the prospect of encountering God in their current state.
they won't be laughing....then.
at least they can never say they weren't forewarned "
real facts wrote on Feb 17, 2008 11:55 AM:
That's an interesting metaphor, Brian. If we're the flies, what does that make you").
......a "fly swatter".
i don't care who you are, thats funny right there" "
voter wrote on Feb 17, 2008 10:35 AM:
Brian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 9:40 AM:
Stanford Man wrote on Feb 17, 2008 9:40 AM:
Brian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 9:36 AM:
Here Here "
real facts wrote on Feb 17, 2008 7:56 AM:
before you answer that with an un-true statement like "no, THEY are defending themselves against you".....let's see you make an excuse for all the people that come after me FIRST. most recently...... OTH, lucius, el bombero, and a host of others that suddenly "appear" out of the shadows. then when i neatly put them in thier place, they run and hide....(OTH-stuck-around-for-a-post-or-three)
i bet you advocate THEM taking-pot-shots-at-me......your biases-are-rediculously-obvious-AND-hypocritical "
real facts wrote on Feb 17, 2008 7:44 AM:
leonard is tired of it all right. tired of being busted for what he "isn't". leonard always talked trash about what he "knew". then when i would pin him to the wall about it, he would run everytime, then lie saying he answered my questions.
so looks like you advocate that behavior as well. at least your consistent in your being hypocritical.
your two for two "
real facts wrote on Feb 17, 2008 7:40 AM:
what kind of a statement is that?
of course they wouldn't. in some regards, you swim in the same river as they do.
thats what i was getting at with you. you never call any of them out on thier nastiness.
so according to you, thier "nastiness" is acceptable to you, which in turn makes you one of them.
your a hypocrite "
nylodian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 7:14 AM:
nylodian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 7:09 AM:
nylodian wrote on Feb 17, 2008 7:04 AM:
real facts wrote on Feb 17, 2008 12:20 AM:
you used to say "religion causes insanity"....i always half agreed with that moniker of yours, as "religion" IS nasty. a relationship with Jesus Christ...a completely different story.
anyhoo, i came up with a new one, and it fits your life profile to a "T"...."perversion eventually rots the soul"
what do you think? do you like it? it fits you, right?
and lodian accused me of not having a sense of humor. actually, it's not really funny, because it's the truth "
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:54 PM:
i thought you held yourself up as the "saviour" of the phonies? you don't want to let them down do you? you were doing your dirty work for them, and i was still building my case against you for being the CHIEF phony.
that last lie was juicy. i want to see that post front and center so you can "finish me off". LAUGHING
not feeling up to it anymore is no excuse either....you can always call on your imaginary "friend"...."lee" "
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:48 PM:
I has always been you, Lying Sack, who has played god and said you walk the walk. OK, fine. When I assumed you fulfilled you obligation of twisting off animal heads, you got huffy. It's a wonderful thing in the bible to sell your daughter into slavery - so why wouldn't you").
the ONLY reason i copy and paste your perversion gone amok, is to demonstrate your blackened heart. people used to think i made it-all-up-about-you...-i-knew-you-would-vomit-your-heart-out-of-your-mouth-given-enough-"rope"....no-wonder-you-can't-father-children...i-guess-you-will-have-to-get-a-cat...LOL "
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:43 PM:
actually, what i did was replicate the biblical story and attitude about slaves. they were hired help. anytime they were treated unfairly (i.e. "sub-human" or akin to "possessions"), the bible condemned that practice.
but of course you have to twist my words, because as usual, you didn't "have me" like you thought you did. it must not be fun for you striking out everytime. your used to -scaring-Christians-with-your-evil-demeanor....so-sorry-to-disappoint-black-hearted-one "
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:37 PM:
I can't believe it took me this long to find the ignore function").
actually leonard, thats been your "function" all along
......you hit the "ignore" button a long time ago (at least since i have known about you for over a year now) "
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:33 PM:
I DARE YOU.
the truth is, your a liar, otherwise you would.
you will never do it, because it both doesn't exist, and your a liar.
DO IT !!!
your refusal to do something that would so easily "have me"....is further proof your nothing more than a liar who can't deal with me any other way. otherwise you would have done it
your excuse for not doing it is a lie. since when did you care about...censorship?
your conscience has become sewage "
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:27 PM:
You were referring to WY and I noticed your unnatural affection towards her").
all i need to do with you, is copy and paste your evil heart, and let your OWN words be your un-doing.
"unnatural affection" huh?
i pray to God that WY reads that and soaks it in.
as for you, someday thier will be a reckoning in your life of what a nasty liar you are, and that while claiming your a "Christian". the truth about it is you know you do, and you don't even temper it. it's now "unchecked"
best-of-luck-when-God-takes-his-recompense-on-your-purposefull-nastiness....your-going-to-need-it "
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 11:21 PM:
I have that post, RF, but I can't re-post it as it was very threatening. Oh, I have it alright").
once again, your lying all over this place.
NO ONE has worked harder than you to discredit me in here, so you could cheapen what i say, and get me kicked to the curb.
if you had that "post", you would have displayed that for all the LNS to see. that would have been your silver bullet.
i laugh at how pathetic a person you have become. your constant lying comes straight from the pit-of-hell.....your-not-even-good-at-it-anymore "
Lucius wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:39 PM:
" To Lodian - Sorry about my illegible posts."
Keep working with that browser. I may not respond and I may not always agree, but I do enjoy reading your posts, girard74. Keep 'em coming. "
Lodian wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:24 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:22 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:16 PM:
Is this the rant of a crazy person or what? LOL!!!!! :>
"
Lodian wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:16 PM:
Is this the rant of a crazy person or what? LOL!!!!! :>
"
Lodian wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:08 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:06 PM:
Lodian wrote on Feb 16, 2008 9:03 PM:
girard74 wrote on Feb 16, 2008 8:40 PM:
I'm a rebel, so I'll keep trying to beat the system, but I'll also try to make sure people can read what I write. "
Leonard wrote on Feb 16, 2008 7:22 PM:
I can't believe it took me this long to find the ignore function.
"
Billy Rubin wrote on Feb 16, 2008 7:05 PM:
And since you claim to live the biblical life, I logically assumed you would give you daughter the best life.
I has always been you, Lying Sack, who has played god and said you walk the walk. OK, fine. When I assumed you fulfilled you obligation of twisting off animal heads, you got huffy. It's a wonderful thing in the bible to sell your daughter into slavery - so why wouldn't you? "
jim fox wrote on Feb 16, 2008 6:45 PM:
Since when are Christians, Buddhists, and Moslems "races." Or even immigrants?
Besides, most people recognize humor when they read it. Chill out. "
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 5:13 PM:
you should run completely away leonard.
you always did anyway
i am not a wuss. billy rubin is the nastiest guy in this blog by far as per his accusation i sold my own daughter into "sexual slavery". if there ever WAS a person i would jettison into blog oblivion, it's that un-humane fellow. not me tho. i don't run and hide from anyone.
leonard does because he can't handle the spotlight anymore "
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 5:07 PM:
" This blog is not displayed because you have added the blogger "Real Facts" to your Ignore list.
Ahh.... bliss! ")
laughing my keyboard off. leonard thinks this is about him, and now that he can't "read it", i will give up on my "friendship" with him. not hardly.
nope leonard, i was using you all along because you were the poster child of phoniness disguised as a "christian". and since you advocated taking regular detours from Gods authority while masquerading as a Christian so you could "sell" the notion that everyone could do that......i-used-you-as-an-example-of-what-not-to-do.....and-i-will-continue-using-you,--whether-you-can-read-it-or-not "
jeff wrote on Feb 16, 2008 4:09 PM:
max stanfield wrote on Feb 16, 2008 3:31 PM:
Leonard wrote on Feb 16, 2008 2:35 PM:
Ahh.... bliss! "
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 2:30 PM:
I, for one, have had enough of his nonsense").
i bet you are. i shine the light on who you REALLY are like no one else ever had the guts to, and thats getting to you. but your stuck with me, because you have more than earned my "affection" for you. i won't allow your nastiness to prevail....and-teach-others-that-they-too-can-circumvent-Gods-authority
you come at me as much as i come at you. the difference is that you feign "integrity" to the readership with your rediculous "i will pray for you RF". what a crock "
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 2:23 PM:
This guy has one goal and it is to drive people from Christ's fellowship by portraying Christians as hate addled bigots").
that is EXACTLY who you are at the start of every blog containing anything revolving around God. you just described exactly who you are, and what you do in-here
i made my goal clear...i wasn't going to stand by and watch as people like you attempt to redefine Gods laws and standards thru your liberal garbage, and then attach "Christianity" on it for validation purposes. nope, not ever gonna happen leonard.
"
real facts wrote on Feb 16, 2008 2:18 PM:
i seperated some muslims from thier words in the blogs about them being would-be potential threats via thier anti-american rhetoric, vs. thier claims about being "peaceful muslims". the LNS must have been scared about being sued or something, and they removed it. what i said in there was the truth (you know me)
but the LNS has NEVER deleted a post of mine in ANY blog other than that one.