Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

August 27th, 2008
August 26th, 2008
August 25th, 2008
August 23rd, 2008
August 22nd, 2008
August 21st, 2008
August 20th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT
"Courageous Conversations About Race" is a book provided by the Pacific Educational Group and is intended as a guide for educators as they confront racial issues in the classroom. (Brian Feulner/News-Sentinel)

Lodi Unified tackles racism issue with training program for its staff

By Amanda Dyer
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Updated: Saturday, January 12, 2008 6:52 AM PST

Black and Hispanic students aren't achieving at the same rates as white students at Lodi Unified schools. The district is now in its third year of program improvement and is facing possible sanctions handed down by the state if its students don't show enough progress.

While Lodi Unified is trying a variety of different methods to close the achievement gap, none of them have received as much attention as the Equity Initiative.

The Equity Initiative, which started approximately four years ago, is the district's attempt to narrow the achievement gap by exploring issues of racism — institutional and otherwise — in the classroom.

Some Lodi Unified employees say that the district's approach puts its staff in a difficult situation by making them discuss race in the workplace, forcing them to subscribe to a particular ideology and accusing them of not caring for all their students equally.

District administrators say that the initiative is not meant to shame or blame anyone, but to nurture and open discussion on how race affects learning, and to help educators cater to each student's individual needs.

The issue recently bubbled over when some teachers spoke out against the video "Mirrors of Privilege: Making Whiteness Visible."

The video follows a group of white people as they discuss their experiences with institutionalized racism and white privilege.

Many teachers felt the video was the district's attempt to take another stab at them by calling them racists.

"That was 45 minutes of making you feel bad," said one Lodi High School teacher who teaches an elective class.

District administrators, though, thought the video could be used as a good learning tool to help spur conversation on the issue.

Here's an in-depth look into the Equity Initiative, who's involved in it and how it originated.

Key players

Bill Huyett

Superintendent of Lodi Unified for more than seven years, Huyett has played a key role in the Equity Initiative since its inception in 2003.

To close the achievement gap between white students and students of color, the district is training its teachers, administrators and other staff on how to recognize racism in classroom and district policies. By doing this and then giving teachers the skills to engage students of color, the district hopes to offer a more well-rounded education for all its students.

This work is done by developing groups of people — called equity teams — at each school, putting them through training and having them share what they learned at that training with their peers.

The district pays Pacific Education Group $50,000 to $60,000 a year for its work.

— News-Sentinel staff
2003-04

• Teams from select schools learn about programs that the district is considering to help close the achievement gap. One of those programs is offered by Pacific Educational Group, a San Francisco-based company that advises school districts on how to fight institutional racism in the classroom.
• The district chooses Pacific Educational Group and forms an equity team, made up of district staff and board members. The district's equity team attends PEG's Beyond Diversity training workshop.

At the workshop, the equity team learns how racism manifests itself in schools and how educators can fight against it.
• The district forms a strategy to begin training.

2005

• Equity teams form at select schools in Stockton and Lodi. The teams are made up of a combination of administrators and teachers. Members of the classified staff, such as paraeducators, secretaries and custodians, are added in 2006.

In Lodi, Lodi High School, Millswood Middle School and Needham Elementary School participate.

In Stockton, Bear Creek High School, Delta Sierra Middle School, Creekside Elementary School, Wagner Holt Elementary School and Oakwood Elementary School participate.

Both the district's equity team and the equity teams at select schools begin and continue training.

2006

• The district's equity team adds teacher representatives.
• The district gives each school a copy of "Courageous Conversations About Race," the Pacific Educational Group's field guide to equity training.

2007
• The district continues its training, now with activities for the schools, including an Oct. 22 staff development day.

For the staff development day, teachers and principals chose from a number of different materials that related to the issue of equity.

— News-Sentinel staff
Lodi Unified isn't the only district that has used the Pacific Educational Group's services. Below is a list of school districts, their ethnic make up and how they're performing by race.

Oak Grove School District

• Location: San Jose
• Population: 11,899 students; 44.8 percent Hispanic; 22.8 percent white; 18 percent Asian; 6 percent African American; 3.4 percent Filipino.
• Schools: 16 elementary schools; three intermediate schools.
• Academic Performance Index scores for 2007
• District: 773 (down five points from 2006)
• African American: 729 (down 11 points from 2006)
• Asian: 884 (down four points from 2006)
• Filipino: 827 (down 10 points from 2006)
• Hispanic: 697 (no change from 2006)
• White: 838 (up one point from 2006)
• Socioeconomically disadvantaged: 697 (down three points from 2006)
• English learners: 729 (no change from 2006)
• Students with disabilities: 549 (down 12 points from 2006)

Lemon Grove School District

• Location: Lemon Grove (near San Diego)
• Population: 4,070 students; 44.7 percent Hispanic; 22.7 percent African American; 17.7 percent white; 3.3 percent Asian; 2.7 percent Filipino; 1.9 percent Pacific Islander.
• Schools: Six elementary schools; two middle schools.
• Academic Performance Index scores for 2007:
• District: 717 (down seven points from 2006)
• African American: 681 (up two points from 2006)
• Asian: 806 (down 49 points from 2006)
• Filipino: N/A
• Hispanic: 698 (down two points from 2006)
• Pacific Islanders: N/A
• White: 765 (down 10 points from 2006)
• Socioeconomically disadvantaged: 691 (down two points from 2006)
• English learners: 664 (up one point from 2006)
• Students with Disabilities: 501 (down 17 points from 2006)

San Leandro Unified School District

• Location: San Leandro (near the Bay Area)
• Population: 8,729 students; 38.6 percent Hispanic; 16.9 percent African American; 15.4 percent Asian; 14.4 percent white; 8.5 percent Filipino.
• Schools: Eight elementary schools; two middle schools; one high school; one continuation high school.
• Academic Performance Index Scores for 2007:
• District: 709 (up 13 points from 2006)
• African American: 648 (up 21 points from 2006)
• Asian: 823 (up six points from 2006)
• Filipino: 776 (up 10 points from 2006)
• Hispanic: 664 (up 16 points from 2006)
• White: 919 (up 17 points from 2006)
• Scocioeconomically disadvantaged: 651 (down two points from 2006)
• English learners: 654 (up 16 points from 2006)
• Students with disabilities: 606 (up 16 points from 2006)

— News-Sentinel staff

Along with the school board, Huyett guides the direction of the initiative and makes sure it's being carried out.

During his tenure, Huyett has helped Lodi Unified increase the number of minority teachers hired from 14 percent to 33 percent.

Odie Douglas

Douglas became Lodi Unified's associate superintendent in the summer of 2005 after a nineyear career at Elk Grove Unified School District.

At Lodi Unified, Douglas is in charge of overseeing the progress of the Equity Initiative and collaborating with the superintendent to guide its direction.

At a 2006 Martin Luther King celebration in Lodi, Douglas explained the difference between equity and equality.

If a sighted and blind person were each given a book, that constitutes "equality," Douglas said, because they both have a book. But the blind person needs help, such as Braille, to read the book. That would be "equity," Douglas said.

Mark Calonico

The district's administrative director of curriculum instruction and assessment, Calonico is responsible for the professional development of Lodi Unified's teaching staff. After viewing "Mirrors of Privilege: Making Whiteness Visible" at a conference last year, Calonico brought the video, which discusses issues of institutionalized racism and white privilege, to Lodi Unified as an option school employees could choose for an Oct. 22 staff development day.

Ken Davis

Recently voted by his fellow board members to serve his seventh term as Lodi Unified's board president, Davis has served as a trustee for 15 years.

He is the only current member of the board who was in office when the initiative started in 2003.

Together with district staff, the school board guides the direction of the initiative.

Davis attended Little Rock Central High School in Arkansas during desegregation. About the Equity Initiative, he said: "I don't think anybody in this district has ever called anybody a 'racist,' but people are drawing the generalization about that. And those are the issues that detract away from what are we doing with kids. Are we doing our best work with kids?"

Katherine Pennington

The assistant superintendent of elementary education, Pennington oversees work done with the initiative at elementary and middle schools.

Barbara Johnston

As the assistant superintendent of secondary education, Johnston oversees high school staffs as they work to provide more equity to their students.

Len Casanega

Casanega, assistant superintendent of personnel, is in charge of hiring a qualified and diverse staff.

Doug Barge

As district's chief business officer, Barge makes sure the district has enough funding to carry out the Equity Initiative.

Art Hand

Along with other members of the district's cabinet, Hand, the assistant superintendent of facility planning, contributes his ideas and thoughts to guide the initiative.

Hand is also responsible for making sure schools meet American Disability Act requirements and supervises maintenance.

Development tools

The following books and video were some of the options that school employees could select for an Oct. 22 staff development day.


The achievement gap is the difference in academic accomplishment — measured by standardized test scores — between white students and students of other ethnic backgrounds, students from poor families and students from financially solvent families, students who speak English as a second language and native English speakers, and students with disabilities and students without disabilities. — "Achieving Success for All Students," the California Department of Education's Web site dedicated to the initiative on closing the achievement gap. (Marc Lutz/News-Sentinel)

• "Mirrors of Privilege: Making Whiteness Visible" — A film directed and produced by Shakti Butler that documents a group of white people from around the country as they share their encounters with institutionalized racism.

Butler, who has worked on helping people understand issues of race, gender, class and sexual orientation for 21 years, is the executive director of the World Trust Educational Services, a nonprofit organization dedicated to extinguishing racism and developing understanding.

• "White Teachers/Diverse Classrooms" — A book edited by Julie Landsman and Chance W. Lewis that explores how white teachers can help students of different ethnic backgrounds succeed by reflecting on their own unconscious biases and adapting their teaching style to serve students of different cultures.

• "Classroom Instruction that Works with English Language Learners" — A book by Jane Hill and Kathleen Flynn that offers a set of instructional strategies for teaching students to learn English.

• "Courageous Conversations About Race" — A book by Pacific Educational Group founder Glenn Singleton and Curtis Linton that uses race to examine the achievement gap, and explains why educators must have candid discussions about race.

The book, which is available at every school in Lodi Unified, also includes activities, discussion prompts and instructions on how to create an equity team.

The facilitator's guide to this book, written by the same authors, offers group activities, discussion, and journaling prompts and suggestions for further reading.

Pacific Educational Group at a glance

• Pacific Educational Group, Inc. is a company that provides guidance to school districts on how to combat inequity — institutional and otherwise — in schools and how to meet the needs of students of color.

The group started working with Lodi Unified in 2003 to help the district close the achievement gap between white students and students of other races.

The district pays the Pacific Educational Group $50,000 to $60,000 a year for its work.

• Its premise: "Systemic racism is the most devastating factor contributing to the diminished capacity of all children, especially African American and Latino children, to achieve at the highest level, and leads to the fracturing of the communities that nurture and support them."

• Some of Pacific Educational Group's other clients include: Lemon Grove School District, located near San Diego; Oak Grove School District, located near San Jose; San Leandro School District; San Diego Juvenile Court and Community Schools, and Seattle Public Schools.

• The group offers a variety of training services, including books, a video and workshops. Beyond Diversity, the group's two-day workshop, helps teachers, parents and administrators understand how racism manifests itself in schools.

• The company was originally founded in 1992 to help families make the change from kindergarten through high school to higher education, but its mission eventually evolved into tackling the issues of systematic racism in schools.

• Glenn E. Singleton, who founded the Pacific Educational Group, holds a master's degree in education from Stanford University. Singleton established the Beyond Diversity workshop.

Singleton also wrote a book, titled "Courageous Conversations About Race: A Strategy for Achieving Equity in Schools."

What critics say about Equity Initiative

Teri Lawrence, the education director of the Eagle Forum of Sacramento, called the district's work with the Equity Initiative "systematic thought reform."

"The First Amendment protects the right to freedom of conscience — the right to keep our innermost thoughts free from governmental intrusion," Lawrence said in a letter to the district.

As a spokeswoman for the Eagle Forum, a national organization made up of like-mined conservative people, Lawrence took particular issue with the Oct. 22 training day, when many district personnel watched "Mirrors of Privilege: Making Whiteness Visible."

"The teachers' training day that you had on Oct. 22, which presumes to show teachers the specific ideological assumptions they need in order to be better people, crosses the boundary from education into unconscionably arrogant, invasive and immoral thought reform," Lawrence wrote.

Reader Feedback

Robb wrote on Jan 19, 2008 5:56 PM:

" The races are genetically different, to say anything else is irresponsible, some of the "old" stereotypes are TRUE, why do we as society spend soo much time worrying about being equal & fair, everyone has their own strengths and weaknesses, to call it anything else is just plain stupid... "

ajaho wrote on Jan 19, 2008 1:43 PM:

" Only top news from over 50 best newsmakers - http://usa-tops.com "

cogito wrote on Jan 19, 2008 1:48 AM:

" Check out "www.thedeathofblackamerica.com". I got it from a website pertaining to a speech by Dr. Bill Cosby. I think you'll find some interesting viewpoints here. It backs up what nsn lodian is saying. "

nsn_lodian wrote on Jan 17, 2008 12:38 PM:

" Hey, I have an idea ... instead, let's TRAIN LUSD ADMINISTRATORS on how to correctly identify and diagnose a problem instead of just assuming that lower achievement by african americans is due to discrimination.

How do they explain that Filipino's achieve equally or higher than white's? Is it because Filipino's culturally focus more on education and therefore do better ... or are Filipino's being given an unfair advantage over whites?

By the thought process of LUSD, apparently Filipino's are being secretly given an advantage (which must be why they are achieving better than whites).

Am I right? "

nsn_lodian wrote on Jan 17, 2008 11:50 AM:

" The bar chart in this article is very telling. Only the African American demographic achieved LOWER than the ENGLISH LEARNERS (people who don't speak english as their primary language). They actually achieved less than people who don't speak good english.

If you're african american, you probably look at this and say "something isn't fair". The rest of us look at it and say "something isn't right" with regards to african american culture and its emphasis (or lack of emphasis) on education.

Perhaps more effort needs to be focused on changing the african american culture, rather than changing the system to fit that culture.

But, of course, requiring someone to adhere to a common culture is politically incorrect, isn't it?! "

Metric Time System wrote on Jan 17, 2008 7:34 AM:

" What a smoke screen! The real issue is the failed policies of the LUSD. The Board has once again deflected blame from themselves onto anyone and anything. In their perverted vision, they are never at fault, yet are quick to leach themselves onto any success the District may achieve, despite of their incompetence. "

Oscar wrote on Jan 17, 2008 7:29 AM:

" I did my best at using the graph itself. Let's take the Filipino line for example....In 2002 the the score was 705. In 2007 the score was 760. That's a 7.81% increase. My initial and final numbers may be off a bit due to the inability to read the graph accurately but they will be very close. "

jennifers wrote on Jan 16, 2008 8:09 PM:

" Where did you get those numbers from, Oscar? I don't see them in this article. There is a graph that shows the gap between white and black students that is still about 150 points from 2002 to 2007. "

Percipient wrote on Jan 16, 2008 10:33 AM:

" To Science 8c. Those are my sentiments! Different people have different skills and abilities. Should I complain that I am "descriminated" against because I am not "tall enough" to play basketball, or fast enough to run track? During the housing bubble, many renters thought it "wasn't fair" that they didn't have high enough incomes and savings to qualify for a mortgage. Look at the mess we have now. Today, they whine that it "isn't fair" that they are "1osing there houses" to foreclosures because they can't afford to pay their mortgages? Hello?! With Option ARMS and "LIAR" loans they were not even required to pay interest, have a job, savings or even have a Social Security Number. What did they expect? They bid up the housing prices to artificially high peaks never seen before. Now we are on the precipice of a nasty recession. As the housing prices are on the down side of the roller coaster ride. This is another "do-gooder" caused problem. "

Science8c wrote on Jan 16, 2008 9:19 AM:

" Let's assume for a moment there is an "achievement gap" in academic performance between black students and others. Is this alone cause for alarm? Could there be another explanation, other than racism? If we examine the music industry and the pro-sports world we find an "achievement gap" there too, except in this gap the other groups are less represented than blacks. Could it just be that every group is not equally gifted in all areas of endeavor?
Should we focus on achieving equal results in everything? "

Oscar wrote on Jan 16, 2008 8:36 AM:

" Congratulations to the teachers for improvement in the scores for ALL children. According to the statistics stated in this article over the five year period Asian students improved 14.76%, African Americans - 11.82%, Hispanic - 10.72%, Filipino - 7.81% and White - 5.64%. Keep up the good work! "

jennifers wrote on Jan 15, 2008 6:46 PM:

" Interesting experiment you propose, Percipient. It certainly would be informative to see the test scores of a small cohort of students of another race put into that school.

That said, no one should reject the possibility that racism might cause or contribute to the low performance of black kids. Anything is possible, right? Just doesn't fit the data very well. The gap between black and white students is amazingly uniform across the county and over time. Check out the NAEP results, for example. Sure seems that there is less racism in the schools and in general now compared to 20-30 years ago. Why no significant change in the gap on NAEP scores? Then you have the problem that even in districts that are mostly or entirely black run, the gap is the same as for school systems that are mostly white. So, black run schools are as racist as white run schools. Hmm. Next, if whites were using racism to maintain an advantage in school, why do filipinos and asians do better than whites? Not very effective racism. Maybe the Klan has been infiltrated by Asians.

OK, let's say you can't overcome your cognitive dissonance and decide to maintain your delusion that racism is the cause of the gap. Yeah, I know it's institutional racism that is the alleged culprit but let's just refer to it as racism for simplicity, if not shock value. Besides, it makes the race challengers happy. So, racism is the cause and now all we have to do is stomp out racism in schools. Yeah. How is that working for you? Anyone having success with that? Anyone? Anyone? Buehller? Be honest now. You'll need to produce some data to support success. No feel good interview type of data will be accepted, we'll be needing standardized test scores. Why doesn't Mr. Singleton show the "success" he's produced in all the districts he's worked with? "

Percipient wrote on Jan 15, 2008 11:36 AM:

" To: Jennifers You may have a point. I found a Sacramento school that was taken over by the state and turned into a charter school. Instead of the emphasis on "college for all", they have several small "academies" with a goal toward skilled trades. Virtually all teachers are African-American, all Administrators are African-American, and each parent must sign a contract that they will read to their child every day. No drugs are allowed in school (really!). 100% of the students are enrolled in math and language arts programs. The latest state test statistics show that the only relevant demographic group in the school is African-American, (there are only 2 white students and 3 hispanics). The "Lower Socio-economic" status is 32%. There are no identified Special Ed students, and No English Language Learners. 100% of the teachers are fully qualified. There is a ratio of 1 teacher for 16 students. There are new classrooms and books for every student. After 4 years of the program, less than 34% of the students are proficient. Their mean scaled score on the CAT/6 is 610. Now the question is: How is racism holding this group back? I speculate that if we start adding students from other ethnic groups you will see the start of another GAP in test scores. I think that would be a great experiment! Randomly add about 50 students from other "cultures" (Filipino?) and I predict you will see a score gap emerge. If this turns out true, how can you blame it on racism? Maybe we should admit only the lowest scoring Filipino students from another local school and watch what happens? (many are also Bilingual AND lower SES). You can't blame the miserable results on "not enough money", "not enough books, "dilapidated classrooms","unqualified teachers","too many students per teacher", "institutionalized racism", "white men", "white privilege from the invisible knapsack", "English Language Learners", "Special Ed students", "poor attendance", "drugs", "gangs", "lack of parental involvement" (each parent MUST volunteer 40 hours per year at the school). Who is to blame? or is that a relevant question? Maybe the "race issue" should be subtracted from the argument? Perhaps OTHER causes produce this effect? Like "Think_Outside_The_Box mentions. There are many other uncontrolled variables that will effect the outcome. The "racism" excuse for failure is tired and worn out and serves no purpose but to cause racial disharmony and support racial bigotry. I don't believe "race" sholuld be an "excuse" or a "reason". Why is it that it seems that "Liberals" are always the ones to start categorizing and judging people by "race"? There is no biological basis for using "racial" definitions. Most of us have different ancestors from different cultures. What liberal will tell Eldrick "Tiger" Woods, what "race" he is? "

audi 5000 wrote on Jan 15, 2008 8:24 AM:

" Private school has been the best money I ever spent on my children. Too bad I am forced to fund - through punitive taxation - a bloated, self-serving, egotistic, money wasting bureaucracy that is the public school system. "

jennifers wrote on Jan 15, 2008 4:43 AM:

" Only 4 years? You've got to be kidding. Four years is a third of a child's education in public schools. No change after four years and you're telling me to be patient? Talk about low expectations. There are districts where stamping out whiteness has been the goal for 15 years. I hear they have the same problem still.

For another illustrative example, consider a school district like Washington DC (or any other majority black district). One of the better funded districts in the country. Black mayor, majority black council, black superintendent, mostly black administrators, mostly black teachers. Why do they have the same gap as LUSD? Must be those few white teachers!




"

bry wrote on Jan 15, 2008 4:23 AM:

" The truly disadvantaged students are what racists call, "white students". They are the only race not given special priviledges, Affirmative Action freebies, concessions and adjusted grade points etc., because they are not considered a minority. Yet, they still obtain strong GPA's due to hard work. Those claiming 'disadvantaged students' equals minorities is a crock racist lies! All the Affirmative Action, special concessions, funding and speical treatment in the world won't make a student study if he doesn't want to regardless of his race or skin color.

Life is about accountability and we reap what we sow. You can whine, complain, make excuses and so on but legitimate hard work and determination always pays off. This constant pandering to lack a of effort and negligence is destroying our youth and our country. "

ttian wrote on Jan 14, 2008 10:36 PM:

" There was an article last year showing the gap closing and making great improvements among minorities printed in the Lodi News Sentinel last year, with blog comments critizing the improvements. Such attitudes ARE barriers in education today and in the future of children. "

ttian wrote on Jan 14, 2008 9:51 PM:

" Become educated and aware of reality (if you can)outside of the news sentinel:

http://www.collegescholarships.org/blog/2007/10/18/keeping-low-income-students-out-of-college/

http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/~mcisaac/emc598ge/Unpacking.html
http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/15_02/Int152.shtml

"

Lets Be Real wrote on Jan 14, 2008 8:15 PM:

" The equity initiative has been around for 4 years in the district, and some are criticizing it as being ineffective based on the data. There is not enough data to label it as a failure because it is only been 4 years. The greater the social change, the deeper the entrenchment and the longer it takes to uproot some of those old ideas. Just think, if the value of school desegragation was based on the number of schools desegregated after 4 years, it would have been labeled an ineffective initative as well. Fortunately, our leaders were in it for the long haul because they knew it was worth fighting for - and still is worth fighting for! "

Percipient wrote on Jan 14, 2008 4:30 PM:

" To: Teach247365 It must be very frustrating to try to motivate and encourage students who are not held accountable for conduct or lack of academic productivity. Over the years I have heard similar statements. As long as you "give" grades to kids who don't care or don'
t produce work, and Aas long as you say "yes" to the wishes of the Educrats, you can not reach your goal of teaching your students. These educrats are only political functionaries with no useful purpose in the public schools. They are one more layer of bureaucrats hiding from meaningful work. Why did they bother to hire you? The district should fire all whites and start over- but will the kids improve? We both know the answer. You selected a career that calls itself "teaching" but is run by political hacks who only serve as barriers to your calling. I think most of us know that educrats are in education because no one else wants them. I agree with "think_outside_the_box". They don't know how to think! The LUSD administrators may have degrees but they don't seem to have "common sense". You don't start out with a premise "all white teachers are bad" and "all minority students are good", and then try to collect "evidence" to prove your point. Do they really believe that if ALL white teachers were fired, the little darlings who are offended by white teachers would start doing their homework and start earning high grades? Do they REALLY believe that? All you have to do is look at the districts where most teachers and administartors are not white. You will see the same low achievement. Dr. Cosby tried to tell the truth and they didn't like to hear it. Is he "racist"? LOL I guess the educrats can always blame the lack of achievement on "not enough money" or not enough "role models" or some other lame excuse. They hate accountability. The administrators need to look in the mirror and point their fingers at who they see. An old English proverb from 1674 states "A fish rots from the head down". That is something to think about. "

teach247365 wrote on Jan 14, 2008 3:23 PM:

" Jeff, it certainly would be wonderful if we could touch their lives in a meaningful way; but then, they'd have to be in school for us to do that, right? (In my classroom, the only ones not succeeding are those who are not in school and don't do any work). And when they are in school, we teachers would have to be in school, right? (How many days do teachers get pulled out of the classroom to go to some indoctrination or another?) And if by some chance we are in school on the same day, we'd have to have some TIME to do that, right?

Again I ask you (and you have yet to even respond to me after multiple posts on various articles), how on earth do I do this with 32+ students in my class, 57 minutes with them and very little in the way of supplies? Why is the money being spent on consultants coming in and telling me that I'm racist? Why is it that we're NOT being trained on how to touch these kids's lives at all (not that I think we need that, as most teachers KNOW how, we just aren't able to due to the circumstances).

EVERY "racial equity" training day I have been put through has been about telling me that I'm not doing my part, that I'm privleged because I'm white, that I'm racist because I'm white. Not ONE TIME has the conversation turned to "here's how to do it." So its a bunch of B.S. that teaching us to reach kids in a meaningful way is the goal. There certainly is not any of that going on. Odie Douglas coming to my school and telling our staff that we only punish black kids does not tell me how to reach them. Him telling our staff that only white kids achieve on the tests does not tell me how to reach them. Watching some stupid video about wrongs done long ago does not tell me how to reach them. Standing in a line so I can see that I'm white does not tell me how to reach them. This is B.S. and you know it. Those that agree with the district admin are those that have the dream of one day escaping the classroom (yes, every one of those people that I have talked to who have this goal use that word "escape") and join them. "

nylodian wrote on Jan 14, 2008 7:38 AM:

" Whatever you think of Obama as a candidate, I watched an interview with him on BET and I will give him props for saying PARENTS, of all races, are the biggest factor for their children's success in education. It's time to get real and address the parents. "

jeff wrote on Jan 14, 2008 7:11 AM:

" Bry, if it's true that 'many black students refuse to study because they are labeled sell outs by their peers,' then wouldn't it be helpful if teachers were able to reach those students in a meaningful way? Perhaps that is one of the intents of this program. "

Stanford Man wrote on Jan 13, 2008 8:54 PM:

" Why is it man can't see the obvious but continues to chase the illusive? "

bry wrote on Jan 13, 2008 7:34 PM:

" You can argue all day long why one student's test score is lower than another regardless of skin color. Besides environment, there are obviously many factors that enter into the cause of variable GPA's amongst students. But then if you're a racist and looking for an out to justify the student's low GPA, you bring race into it and vilify the "evil white man". All students have the same teachers, the same books and the same opportunity to study. The problem is that there are so many illegal Hispanics in Lodi's school district who are just learning to speak English, so how can you expect an equal GPA. And many black students refuse to study because they are labeled sell outs by their peers. Regardless of skin color, race or culture, teachers can not force students to make and effort or study. So we need to get off the race card excuse crap! "

jennifers wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:52 PM:

" voter says: "I don't think many teachers would agree that children with one parent consistently do worse than children with two"

Of course the number of parents in a home is not deterministic, which is what you imply when you say consistently do worse. What do the averages show?

voter: "I haven't seen direct evidence (via scientific research) that race plays a role [in IQ]".

Of course you haven't. Because stating that as a hypothesis not only doesn't get your research funded, it gets you fired. Is there any modern genetic research that has been done to answer the question? "

Scrutiny wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:34 PM:

" About the only good that will come from this exercise in futility is that the `large` bloc of Filipino students in Lodi should have their self-esteem raised quite nicely. Let`s all pat ourselves on the back now. "

jennifers wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:32 PM:

" By the way, the Slate article from November 2007 by William Saletan has lots of references to studies on this topic. Whether you're a psychologist or a journalist or a lowly starving student, there has to be convincing data backing one's opinion. Just say no to an appeal to authority. "

voter wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:29 PM:

" jennifers--I don't think many teachers would agree that children with one parent consistently do worse than children with two--again, the economic situation would factor larger. Of course genes play some role in IQ, but I haven't seen direct evidence (via scientific research) that race plays a role, just the opposite. Human intelligence is complicated and multifaceted. Incidentally, the world is slowly moving towards a mixed race populace, so I guess in several generations the whole question will be moot. Final Question: Using the graph in this article, I'm guessing that you would consider Filipinos to be the most intelligent race? "

Scrutiny wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:13 PM:

" If the goal is "equal" results on standardized tests, the quickest way to achieve that would be to raise Black and Hispanic test scores while seeking to lower those same scores for whites and Filipinos. The school system`s ONLY objective should be to raise the test scores of ALL students regardless of skin color. Life is not fair and it never will be. The whole premise of this "program" is incompatible with sound teaching practices and is inherently flawed. "

voter wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:12 PM:

" Scrutiny, I'm with ya on that one. "

jennifers wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:12 PM:

" voter: no one is saying environment (aka nurture) doesn't contribute to intelligence. Don't children with only one parent do worse in school than those with two parents? Same with children who watch a lot of TV. That doesn't exclude genetic influences.

My favorite Eric Turkheimer quote: "Results demonstrate that the proportions of IQ variance attributable to genes and environment vary nonlinearly with SES. The models suggest that in impoverished families, 60% of the variance in IQ is accounted for by the shared environment, and the contribution of genes is close to zero; in affluent families, the result is almost exactly the reverse."

In other words, unless you're dirt poor, genes do matter. Thank you Dr. Turkheimer.

From Joseph Fagan: "results support and extend earlier studies indicating the continuity of intelligence from infancy to adolescence and illustrate the validity of early measures of recognition memory based on selective attention to novelty for the long-term prediction of achievement."

Hmm. Seems like Dr. Fagan thinks intelligence measures in infants (!) predicts to some extent intelligence later in life. Couldn't that be because part of IQ is genetic?

The Flynn effect is interesting but not sure it answers my question.

Does anyone doubt genetics influences IQ among whites? or among blacks or among asians? Isn't it conceivable there are differences between these based, in part, on genetics? Not even possible? Maybe? "

Scrutiny wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:01 PM:

" Who wants to bet that these Lodi area racial achievement statistics mirror the national average pretty darn closely? "

voter wrote on Jan 13, 2008 3:20 PM:

" jennifers, the only elephant in the room is how people could have that view in this day and age. William Saleten is a journalist, not a genetics researcher. There is a mountain of research that points to environment as causation of IQ differences between various social groups. Children of poverty (all races) tend to score much lower. When these kids are moved to middle class homes at an early age, scores improve dramatically. Check the work of Eric Turkheimer, Elsie Moore, Joseph Fagan, James Flynn and others. Generational poverty is the issue with low achievement, rather than race. The culture of poverty is crippling from an educational standpoint. "

jennifers wrote on Jan 13, 2008 2:34 PM:

" No voter, I don't think awobs was implying that all blacks and hispanics are intellectually inferior due to genetics. But are you sure the difference in the lower average achievement of blacks is not due at least in part to genetics? That seems to be the elephant in the room. Mention the possibility and you get fired overnight by Cold Spring Harbor even if you're a Nobel Laureate.

For an interesting discussion of the topic, check out an article titled Race, Genes, and Intelligence by William Saletan in Slate from November. It's in the Human Nature series but you'll have to google for it.
"

Lodian wrote on Jan 13, 2008 2:14 PM:

" think_outside_the_box: I'm guessing your Latin word spelled with a "c" is on the list of offensive words not to be printed. And it's not because it is Latin. "

LodiBorn wrote on Jan 13, 2008 2:05 PM:

" what about the meth freak parents, how are their kids doing? "

voter wrote on Jan 13, 2008 1:45 PM:

" awobs, I hope I misunderstood you. It sounds like you are claiming that Hispanics and African Americans are intellectually inferior due to genetics. Wow. Possibly you are trolling? Scary either way. Possibly you are the one person in town who could benefit from this training. The rest of us have evolved. "

awobs wrote on Jan 13, 2008 1:02 PM:

" Don't be fooled...there are A LOT of white kids being left behind! Unfortunately for them, there is no extra support because they are not English language learners. By the way, if a student moves here in let's say March from Mexico never having been in an American school, they are REQUIRED to take the state tests in April. This happens all the time! Think that might have something to do with the test scores?? Here's another thought...part of diversity is accepting all of our differences, right? So, maybe this is just a genetic difference and not the fault of racist teachers. Are P.E. teachers not racist because a lot of non-whites are successful in athletics?? Maybe the NBA should start having "courageous conversations" because they surely are racists as they don't have an equal number of whites on their teams! "

Taxpayer & Citizen wrote on Jan 13, 2008 12:11 PM:

" Thank you Mr. Huyett and the city management and council who helped you create this problem for yourself and then run off to leave for others to solve. Get rid of this all white leadership fetish Lodi has and these problems will be solved. "

Robb wrote on Jan 13, 2008 10:57 AM:

" What a load of garbage,and a waste of time and dollars, come on people, who is in charge here?? "

think_outside_the_box wrote on Jan 13, 2008 10:33 AM:

" I had to intentionally misspell the first latin word for "with" of my comment because the News Sentinel software does not allow this latin word to be printed (a very weird type of censorship). This explains why I spelled it with the letter "K" (sic). "

think_outside_the_box wrote on Jan 13, 2008 10:23 AM:

" Kum(sic) hoc ergo propter hoc is Latin for "with this, therefore because of this". It is also described as "Correlation does not imply causation". This is a logical fallacy that may accompany another logical fallacy, Post hoc ergo propter hoc, "after this, therefore because of this". Many times our government officials get stuck in a miasma of fuzzy thinking. The root of much of this circular or irrational thinking comes from not understanding rational thought. In all of the studies about this issue I have seen in the News-Sentinel, not one demonstrated that "alleged racism"(if it exists) in the school district CAUSED some students to have poor achievement. A cause is not determined by testing and retesting without changing variables. This only reinforces the illogical conclusion. Correlation can "imply" causation (in the casual use of the word imply), but it does NOT PROVE causation. Stated simply, "if event or condition A occurs in correlation with event or condition B, THEREFORE A causes B". This is NOT logical, and this is the logic used by the listed LUSD administrators. They are making a premature conclusion about causality after observing only a correlation betweeen factors. The problem with this thinking is that there are FOUR other possibilities: 1) B may be the cause of A or 2) some unknown third factor (usually not defined in the study) is actually the cause of the relationship between A and B or 3) The relationship is so complex that it can be labelled "coincidental" or 4) B may be the cause of A at the same time A is the cause of B - this describes a self re-inforcing system. There can be NO conclusion made regarding the existence OR the direction of a cause and effect relationship only from the fact that A and B are correlated. Determining whether there is an actual cause and effect relationship requires further investigation even when a large effect size is observed OR a large part of the variance is explained.

There is no standard for teaching rational thought to our children in grades K-6. What a pity! Perhaps we should require this standard for the LUSD Administrators. A required course for administrators in rational thought may save us lots of money and lots of grief chasing invisible ghosts that DO NOT exist. Logical fallacies of thinking are usually taught in introductory math courses. My question is this: How can an administrator with a degree in engineering miss the obvious? "

tired wrote on Jan 13, 2008 9:54 AM:

" Jeff: I'm talking about the kids, who sleep in class, the kids who make zero effort with their school work, the kids who habitually cut school, the kids who insist on always being in trouble. As always, it doesn't matter what color their skin. They are from all walks of life, and their parent(s) should be the only one's accountable for their failure. It's about time this country stop letting people hide behind the R word. "

commonsense wrote on Jan 13, 2008 7:27 AM:

" This is our town, our schools. It is time to ask for accountability of the individuals that our looking into curriculum that is not changing the achievement of the "clients". Put money into the classroom so students can have the tools to learn and to keep up with the changing of society. Racism has been across all lines, not just blacks and hispanics! Lets not forget the Jews, Irish, Italians,Japanese, disabled, women etc. The problem is that these groups do not use the card for entitlement and have worked hard to be successful. Quit allowing excuses, give our school teachers what they need to teach in the classroom, quit wasting taxpayer money! "

bry wrote on Jan 12, 2008 11:52 PM:

" Oh yes, I forgot to mention. If one mentions the statistics and facts about the black race in America i.e., fatherless children, crime and prison stats, GPA stats, welfare stats etc. they are labeled a racist. However, if one is donating money for the cause there is no problem mentioning the facts. Whatever happened to accountability in America! "

bry wrote on Jan 12, 2008 11:37 PM:

" Jennifer, yes blacks students tend to have lower GPAs than other groups regardless of the area and many have moved to Lodi over the past few years. Furthermore, now that there are so many illegal alien Hispanic students her in Lodi who are just trying to learn the English language, of course they will have a lower GPA. But as usual we can't address those facts or you're racist against Mexicans. So let's blame it on the evil racist white man. "

jennifers wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:24 PM:

" Are we sure that James Watson isn't correct? It seems like no matter what anyone does, the average for black students is lower than other groups. "

savant wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:13 PM:

" Whether you agree with this approach or not, everyone should be interested in one question. Does it work? Well, it started in Lodi in 2003. The graph of achievement doesn't show any narrowing of the achievement gap from 2002 through 2007. Four years of this approach has done exactly nothing for Lodi students.

Any educational leader worth her salt knows the things that improve achievement. High expectations, well defined curriculum, smaller class size, effective preschool, etc. Is there any district anywhere that has used the institutional racism mantra and eliminated or even substantially closed their gap? I certainly haven't heard of any. Glenn Singleton hasn't heard of any either and he gets paid to sell this method.

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. -Albert Einstein. "

teach247365 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 7:54 PM:

" Jeff, its not the students fault that their parents are ineffective...but its the teachers? Again, I ask you how I am supposed to be effective with these students who are behind (white, black, Asian, purple with yellow polka dots...doesn't matter the color of their skin) when the district is spending all of this money on telling me that I'm racist, and shoving 32+ children in my classes and giving me NO supplies to run a science curriculum. Many of the labs we run can only be run because students bring in things from home. Unfortunately, not everyone can. I donate what I can, but there's only so much my small salary can do. No, I'm not saying I need a bigger salary. It pays my rent and the basic bills. I'm saying the district needs to start ponying up and putting the money where the KIDS are. IN THE CLASSROOM and not in some consultant's pockets. "

Lets Be Real wrote on Jan 12, 2008 6:56 PM:

" Given the history of racial inequity in our society, I am in total agreement with the district's courage to examine this issue. I appreciate the fact that those leading the equity initiative are not using equity issues as the sole reason that some students are outperforming others, but are not blind to the possibility that, in some situations, it is a factor.

I also appreciate the Lodi News Sentinel for running this story because I was not aware that the initiative has been around for 4 years. Based on some of the past blogs, I was lead to believe otherwise. Thanks again. "

Hmmm wrote on Jan 12, 2008 6:31 PM:

" T&C 5:13 wanna be, have you ever been to school? I am sure you cheated your way through if, in fact, you ever graduated. You have no voice. Go bury your head in shame for trying to steal some else's identity. "

Mad Dog wrote on Jan 12, 2008 5:33 PM:

" Forget about racial issues and teach! Some kids will do well, others won't. Stop looking for excuses and fix the poor state of the schools and quit wasting money on the district administration. "

T & C wrote on Jan 12, 2008 5:13 PM:

" What a wonderful way for some students to get back at adults by doing poorly so the school district can be punished! It's always been about EFFORT students! You get OUT what you PUT into anything. If the Students put the same effort into tests as they do their cell phone time all would get an A! "

Ernie wrote on Jan 12, 2008 3:44 PM:

" T & C (original) I agree with you. More money for administrators + less money spent in the classrooms = a bad educational system. LUSD used to be the best around. Now it is slipping rapidly. "

Taxpayer & Citizen wrote on Jan 12, 2008 3:28 PM:

" Again, those who have the responsibility and make the big dollars just leave without no accountability whatsoever. T & C (that's me, the real original T & C) said that long ago about Huyett stirring up the hornet's nest and no one listened.Lodi's educational system has gotten worse each year of the last 21 I've been here and Huyett is responsible for much of it.

They just keep instituting these government programs for the money and nothing more. More money goes for administration than goes to both the schools and students. Why is that? "

Bry wrote on Jan 12, 2008 12:05 PM:

" It is not the child or parent's fault that their son is getting low grades. It is because the child has ADD, ADHD, Autism or maybe he is Bipolar. No, that's not it. Drugs are the culprit. It is because of a drug or alcohol dependancy problem. Wait that's not good enough! It is because the teachers were racist and incompetant. Yes, the son and his parents are the poor innocent victims of the evil white man and anyone else who expects them to be accountable for themselves. "

Giovanina wrote on Jan 12, 2008 11:00 AM:

" Jeff does seem to come up with excuses for the irresponsibility of student, parents, etc. No accoutability. But teachers! AHA! They must not be acting responsible in the classroom...They must not be teaching in the class. Let's face it, every teacher has Black and Latino students that do very well, and some Whites and Filipinos that don't do well. It all has to do with the family dynamics; culture, language, economics, and responsibility. "

citizen wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:44 AM:

" For gods sake I hope Jeff isnt a teacher, but knowing the mentality of Hyuett he probably works for him. Please dont respond to this you already made clear you horrid liberal attitude towards teaching our children. Wow what a major waste of money that could have been spent on real teaching. "

voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:30 AM:

" Methinks that jeff works at the district office. District administrators would currently not fare favorably in a survey of all the district's employees. Just the opposite would have been the case ten years ago. "

voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:26 AM:

" Jeff, thanks for the endorsement! I'll let you know. "

Giovanina wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:13 AM:

" The chart looks like the gap is between the top group, Filipinos, and the rest. So how is it between the Black/Latino groups and the Whites? Why don't they look at the ideology behind that? Well I guess they couldn't jump up and down on their "race wagon" if the word "white" was not involved. More ethnocentric politics being pushed into Lodi. "

jeff wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:05 AM:

" commonsense: perhaps this training is intended to be a "tool to teach".

voter: please let us know who you are, so during the next election we can vote for YOU, because apparently you're more competent.

tired: which children are you refering to that "refuse to even try?" And is the students fault if their parents are not as effective as others? "

steve wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:04 AM:

" That's the ticket, our teachers need more training. If anyone needs training, how about the children's parents or guardians? Before the childs household gets its IV drip of AFDC, let them go to class and learn what their kids need in the way of "racial re-education." It's easy to attack the teachers and forget about the parents, teachers have to maintain the "multicultural daycare centers" while some parents sit and complain about their children being left behind. "

takealook wrote on Jan 12, 2008 9:58 AM:

" So the pass 5 years we have had little change maybe we should try another area. Why not make parents take part. It would be good for parents to view their student in the classroom. I do know some parents would participate, but I also realize some parents would refuse. I also know there would be some who would come with the same attitude as their student. Parents are going to be the main answer to this problem. The teachers I know want all students to learn and would never let color get in the way. "

tired wrote on Jan 12, 2008 9:40 AM:

" What a Joke!! The school districts already WASTE an enormous amount of money on this. These children are in the same classes together and have the same opportunity to succeed. However, some of the children refuse to even try. It is time the politicians and school administrators grow a spine and stand up for the truth. The problem is the and their parents who don't parent. "

Ernie wrote on Jan 12, 2008 9:06 AM:

" What a waste of our money. It is simple. Those who want to learn, listen, do the work, are respectful of others in the class, and attend class regularly, learn. Those who choose to to act up, cut class, and refuse to even try will not succeed. It is imperative, however, that kids are placed in the appropriate classes, the teachers have the tools they need, and the administrators support the teachers with both lower class sizes and discipline matters. If parent's and students viewed education as a privilege, instead of the school's duty, there would be more successful students. "

voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:47 AM:

" I would like the LNS to investigate how much money that LUSD has paid to outside consultants in the past five years--it is an utterly enormous amount and would be a shock to the citizenry. This particular program is just a drop in the bucket compared to funds flowing to some of the other consultants. Might this money have been better spent by giving struggling students extra help and attention? It would have been far less costly. The people making decisions in this district are incompetent. "

commonsense wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:22 AM:

" There you have it! WHAT A WASTE OF MONEY! I figure the district has spent just for the Pacific Education group between 200K to 240K. That does not even take into the training all those those teams have attended. COULD OUR TAX PAYER MONEY BE SPENT ON TOOLS IN THE CLASSROOM FOR STUDENTS TO CLOSE THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP, NOT THIS MUMBOJUMBO? The board of LUSD needs to take a hard look and decide if this process is cost effective and beneficial to students, or is just another way of wasting taxpayer money. With the new budget reductions to education, I hope the board will do the right thing and focus on education of students in the classroom, not this idealogy. Too much idealogy, not enough tools to teach. "

Comments on this story are now closed.

Weather

WXPort
Weather sponsored by: