Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Why your newspaper, and local Web site, are struggling (120)
- The candidates on evil (112)
- Don't listen to 'Big Oil' (89)
- Reynolds Ranch developer wants hotel, senior housing, more commercial space (49)
- Lodi Police Cadets helping with problem of vacant homes (35)
- High birth rate to boost San Joaquin County population (34)
- Bus service to Elkhorn cut for good (32)
- 'All I saw was a face full of teeth' (28)
- Writer is disappointed in Olympic soccer coach (25)
- Reynolds Ranch developer seeks to add hotel, senior housing (19)
Lodi Unified tackles racism issue with training program for its staff
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Black and Hispanic students aren't achieving at the same rates as white students at Lodi Unified schools. The district is now in its third year of program improvement and is facing possible sanctions handed down by the state if its students don't show enough progress.
While Lodi Unified is trying a variety of different methods to close the achievement gap, none of them have received as much attention as the Equity Initiative.
The Equity Initiative, which started approximately four years ago, is the district's attempt to narrow the achievement gap by exploring issues of racism — institutional and otherwise — in the classroom.
Some Lodi Unified employees say that the district's approach puts its staff in a difficult situation by making them discuss race in the workplace, forcing them to subscribe to a particular ideology and accusing them of not caring for all their students equally.
District administrators say that the initiative is not meant to shame or blame anyone, but to nurture and open discussion on how race affects learning, and to help educators cater to each student's individual needs.
The issue recently bubbled over when some teachers spoke out against the video "Mirrors of Privilege: Making Whiteness Visible."
The video follows a group of white people as they discuss their experiences with institutionalized racism and white privilege.
Many teachers felt the video was the district's attempt to take another stab at them by calling them racists.
"That was 45 minutes of making you feel bad," said one Lodi High School teacher who teaches an elective class.
District administrators, though, thought the video could be used as a good learning tool to help spur conversation on the issue.
Here's an in-depth look into the Equity Initiative, who's involved in it and how it originated.
Key players
Bill Huyett
Superintendent of Lodi Unified for more than seven years, Huyett has played a key role in the Equity Initiative since its inception in 2003.
This work is done by developing groups of people — called equity teams — at each school, putting them through training and having them share what they learned at that training with their peers.
The district pays Pacific Education Group $50,000 to $60,000 a year for its work.
— News-Sentinel staff
• Teams from select schools learn about programs that the district is considering to help close the achievement gap. One of those programs is offered by Pacific Educational Group, a San Francisco-based company that advises school districts on how to fight institutional racism in the classroom.
• The district chooses Pacific Educational Group and forms an equity team, made up of district staff and board members. The district's equity team attends PEG's Beyond Diversity training workshop.
At the workshop, the equity team learns how racism manifests itself in schools and how educators can fight against it.
• The district forms a strategy to begin training.
2005
• Equity teams form at select schools in Stockton and Lodi. The teams are made up of a combination of administrators and teachers. Members of the classified staff, such as paraeducators, secretaries and custodians, are added in 2006.
In Lodi, Lodi High School, Millswood Middle School and Needham Elementary School participate.
In Stockton, Bear Creek High School, Delta Sierra Middle School, Creekside Elementary School, Wagner Holt Elementary School and Oakwood Elementary School participate.
Both the district's equity team and the equity teams at select schools begin and continue training.
2006
• The district's equity team adds teacher representatives.
• The district gives each school a copy of "Courageous Conversations About Race," the Pacific Educational Group's field guide to equity training.
2007
• The district continues its training, now with activities for the schools, including an Oct. 22 staff development day.
For the staff development day, teachers and principals chose from a number of different materials that related to the issue of equity.
— News-Sentinel staff
Oak Grove School District
• Location: San Jose
• Population: 11,899 students; 44.8 percent Hispanic; 22.8 percent white; 18 percent Asian; 6 percent African American; 3.4 percent Filipino.
• Schools: 16 elementary schools; three intermediate schools.
• Academic Performance Index scores for 2007
• District: 773 (down five points from 2006)
• African American: 729 (down 11 points from 2006)
• Asian: 884 (down four points from 2006)
• Filipino: 827 (down 10 points from 2006)
• Hispanic: 697 (no change from 2006)
• White: 838 (up one point from 2006)
• Socioeconomically disadvantaged: 697 (down three points from 2006)
• English learners: 729 (no change from 2006)
• Students with disabilities: 549 (down 12 points from 2006)
Lemon Grove School District
• Location: Lemon Grove (near San Diego)
• Population: 4,070 students; 44.7 percent Hispanic; 22.7 percent African American; 17.7 percent white; 3.3 percent Asian; 2.7 percent Filipino; 1.9 percent Pacific Islander.
• Schools: Six elementary schools; two middle schools.
• Academic Performance Index scores for 2007:
• District: 717 (down seven points from 2006)
• African American: 681 (up two points from 2006)
• Asian: 806 (down 49 points from 2006)
• Filipino: N/A
• Hispanic: 698 (down two points from 2006)
• Pacific Islanders: N/A
• White: 765 (down 10 points from 2006)
• Socioeconomically disadvantaged: 691 (down two points from 2006)
• English learners: 664 (up one point from 2006)
• Students with Disabilities: 501 (down 17 points from 2006)
San Leandro Unified School District
• Location: San Leandro (near the Bay Area)
• Population: 8,729 students; 38.6 percent Hispanic; 16.9 percent African American; 15.4 percent Asian; 14.4 percent white; 8.5 percent Filipino.
• Schools: Eight elementary schools; two middle schools; one high school; one continuation high school.
• Academic Performance Index Scores for 2007:
• District: 709 (up 13 points from 2006)
• African American: 648 (up 21 points from 2006)
• Asian: 823 (up six points from 2006)
• Filipino: 776 (up 10 points from 2006)
• Hispanic: 664 (up 16 points from 2006)
• White: 919 (up 17 points from 2006)
• Scocioeconomically disadvantaged: 651 (down two points from 2006)
• English learners: 654 (up 16 points from 2006)
• Students with disabilities: 606 (up 16 points from 2006)
— News-Sentinel staff
Along with the school board, Huyett guides the direction of the initiative and makes sure it's being carried out.
During his tenure, Huyett has helped Lodi Unified increase the number of minority teachers hired from 14 percent to 33 percent.
Odie Douglas
Douglas became Lodi Unified's associate superintendent in the summer of 2005 after a nineyear career at Elk Grove Unified School District.
At Lodi Unified, Douglas is in charge of overseeing the progress of the Equity Initiative and collaborating with the superintendent to guide its direction.
At a 2006 Martin Luther King celebration in Lodi, Douglas explained the difference between equity and equality.
If a sighted and blind person were each given a book, that constitutes "equality," Douglas said, because they both have a book. But the blind person needs help, such as Braille, to read the book. That would be "equity," Douglas said.
Mark Calonico
The district's administrative director of curriculum instruction and assessment, Calonico is responsible for the professional development of Lodi Unified's teaching staff. After viewing "Mirrors of Privilege: Making Whiteness Visible" at a conference last year, Calonico brought the video, which discusses issues of institutionalized racism and white privilege, to Lodi Unified as an option school employees could choose for an Oct. 22 staff development day.
Ken Davis
Recently voted by his fellow board members to serve his seventh term as Lodi Unified's board president, Davis has served as a trustee for 15 years.
He is the only current member of the board who was in office when the initiative started in 2003.
Together with district staff, the school board guides the direction of the initiative.
Davis attended Little Rock Central High School in Arkansas during desegregation. About the Equity Initiative, he said: "I don't think anybody in this district has ever called anybody a 'racist,' but people are drawing the generalization about that. And those are the issues that detract away from what are we doing with kids. Are we doing our best work with kids?"
Katherine Pennington
The assistant superintendent of elementary education, Pennington oversees work done with the initiative at elementary and middle schools.
Barbara Johnston
As the assistant superintendent of secondary education, Johnston oversees high school staffs as they work to provide more equity to their students.
Len Casanega
Casanega, assistant superintendent of personnel, is in charge of hiring a qualified and diverse staff.
Doug Barge
As district's chief business officer, Barge makes sure the district has enough funding to carry out the Equity Initiative.
Art Hand
Along with other members of the district's cabinet, Hand, the assistant superintendent of facility planning, contributes his ideas and thoughts to guide the initiative.
Hand is also responsible for making sure schools meet American Disability Act requirements and supervises maintenance.
Development tools
The following books and video were some of the options that school employees could select for an Oct. 22 staff development day.

• "Mirrors of Privilege: Making Whiteness Visible" — A film directed and produced by Shakti Butler that documents a group of white people from around the country as they share their encounters with institutionalized racism.
Butler, who has worked on helping people understand issues of race, gender, class and sexual orientation for 21 years, is the executive director of the World Trust Educational Services, a nonprofit organization dedicated to extinguishing racism and developing understanding.
• "White Teachers/Diverse Classrooms" — A book edited by Julie Landsman and Chance W. Lewis that explores how white teachers can help students of different ethnic backgrounds succeed by reflecting on their own unconscious biases and adapting their teaching style to serve students of different cultures.
• "Classroom Instruction that Works with English Language Learners" — A book by Jane Hill and Kathleen Flynn that offers a set of instructional strategies for teaching students to learn English.
• "Courageous Conversations About Race" — A book by Pacific Educational Group founder Glenn Singleton and Curtis Linton that uses race to examine the achievement gap, and explains why educators must have candid discussions about race.
The book, which is available at every school in Lodi Unified, also includes activities, discussion prompts and instructions on how to create an equity team.
The facilitator's guide to this book, written by the same authors, offers group activities, discussion, and journaling prompts and suggestions for further reading.
Pacific Educational Group at a glance
• Pacific Educational Group, Inc. is a company that provides guidance to school districts on how to combat inequity — institutional and otherwise — in schools and how to meet the needs of students of color.
The group started working with Lodi Unified in 2003 to help the district close the achievement gap between white students and students of other races.
The district pays the Pacific Educational Group $50,000 to $60,000 a year for its work.
• Its premise: "Systemic racism is the most devastating factor contributing to the diminished capacity of all children, especially African American and Latino children, to achieve at the highest level, and leads to the fracturing of the communities that nurture and support them."
• Some of Pacific Educational Group's other clients include: Lemon Grove School District, located near San Diego; Oak Grove School District, located near San Jose; San Leandro School District; San Diego Juvenile Court and Community Schools, and Seattle Public Schools.
• The group offers a variety of training services, including books, a video and workshops. Beyond Diversity, the group's two-day workshop, helps teachers, parents and administrators understand how racism manifests itself in schools.
• The company was originally founded in 1992 to help families make the change from kindergarten through high school to higher education, but its mission eventually evolved into tackling the issues of systematic racism in schools.
• Glenn E. Singleton, who founded the Pacific Educational Group, holds a master's degree in education from Stanford University. Singleton established the Beyond Diversity workshop.
Singleton also wrote a book, titled "Courageous Conversations About Race: A Strategy for Achieving Equity in Schools."
What critics say about Equity Initiative
Teri Lawrence, the education director of the Eagle Forum of Sacramento, called the district's work with the Equity Initiative "systematic thought reform."
"The First Amendment protects the right to freedom of conscience — the right to keep our innermost thoughts free from governmental intrusion," Lawrence said in a letter to the district.
As a spokeswoman for the Eagle Forum, a national organization made up of like-mined conservative people, Lawrence took particular issue with the Oct. 22 training day, when many district personnel watched "Mirrors of Privilege: Making Whiteness Visible."
"The teachers' training day that you had on Oct. 22, which presumes to show teachers the specific ideological assumptions they need in order to be better people, crosses the boundary from education into unconscionably arrogant, invasive and immoral thought reform," Lawrence wrote.


Reader Feedback
Robb wrote on Jan 19, 2008 5:56 PM:
ajaho wrote on Jan 19, 2008 1:43 PM:
cogito wrote on Jan 19, 2008 1:48 AM:
nsn_lodian wrote on Jan 17, 2008 12:38 PM:
How do they explain that Filipino's achieve equally or higher than white's? Is it because Filipino's culturally focus more on education and therefore do better ... or are Filipino's being given an unfair advantage over whites?
By the thought process of LUSD, apparently Filipino's are being secretly given an advantage (which must be why they are achieving better than whites).
Am I right? "
nsn_lodian wrote on Jan 17, 2008 11:50 AM:
If you're african american, you probably look at this and say "something isn't fair". The rest of us look at it and say "something isn't right" with regards to african american culture and its emphasis (or lack of emphasis) on education.
Perhaps more effort needs to be focused on changing the african american culture, rather than changing the system to fit that culture.
But, of course, requiring someone to adhere to a common culture is politically incorrect, isn't it?! "
Metric Time System wrote on Jan 17, 2008 7:34 AM:
Oscar wrote on Jan 17, 2008 7:29 AM:
jennifers wrote on Jan 16, 2008 8:09 PM:
Percipient wrote on Jan 16, 2008 10:33 AM:
Science8c wrote on Jan 16, 2008 9:19 AM:
Should we focus on achieving equal results in everything? "
Oscar wrote on Jan 16, 2008 8:36 AM:
jennifers wrote on Jan 15, 2008 6:46 PM:
That said, no one should reject the possibility that racism might cause or contribute to the low performance of black kids. Anything is possible, right? Just doesn't fit the data very well. The gap between black and white students is amazingly uniform across the county and over time. Check out the NAEP results, for example. Sure seems that there is less racism in the schools and in general now compared to 20-30 years ago. Why no significant change in the gap on NAEP scores? Then you have the problem that even in districts that are mostly or entirely black run, the gap is the same as for school systems that are mostly white. So, black run schools are as racist as white run schools. Hmm. Next, if whites were using racism to maintain an advantage in school, why do filipinos and asians do better than whites? Not very effective racism. Maybe the Klan has been infiltrated by Asians.
OK, let's say you can't overcome your cognitive dissonance and decide to maintain your delusion that racism is the cause of the gap. Yeah, I know it's institutional racism that is the alleged culprit but let's just refer to it as racism for simplicity, if not shock value. Besides, it makes the race challengers happy. So, racism is the cause and now all we have to do is stomp out racism in schools. Yeah. How is that working for you? Anyone having success with that? Anyone? Anyone? Buehller? Be honest now. You'll need to produce some data to support success. No feel good interview type of data will be accepted, we'll be needing standardized test scores. Why doesn't Mr. Singleton show the "success" he's produced in all the districts he's worked with? "
Percipient wrote on Jan 15, 2008 11:36 AM:
audi 5000 wrote on Jan 15, 2008 8:24 AM:
jennifers wrote on Jan 15, 2008 4:43 AM:
For another illustrative example, consider a school district like Washington DC (or any other majority black district). One of the better funded districts in the country. Black mayor, majority black council, black superintendent, mostly black administrators, mostly black teachers. Why do they have the same gap as LUSD? Must be those few white teachers!
"
bry wrote on Jan 15, 2008 4:23 AM:
Life is about accountability and we reap what we sow. You can whine, complain, make excuses and so on but legitimate hard work and determination always pays off. This constant pandering to lack a of effort and negligence is destroying our youth and our country. "
ttian wrote on Jan 14, 2008 10:36 PM:
ttian wrote on Jan 14, 2008 9:51 PM:
http://www.collegescholarships.org/blog/2007/10/18/keeping-low-income-students-out-of-college/
http://seamonkey.ed.asu.edu/~mcisaac/emc598ge/Unpacking.html
http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/15_02/Int152.shtml
"
Lets Be Real wrote on Jan 14, 2008 8:15 PM:
Percipient wrote on Jan 14, 2008 4:30 PM:
t produce work, and Aas long as you say "yes" to the wishes of the Educrats, you can not reach your goal of teaching your students. These educrats are only political functionaries with no useful purpose in the public schools. They are one more layer of bureaucrats hiding from meaningful work. Why did they bother to hire you? The district should fire all whites and start over- but will the kids improve? We both know the answer. You selected a career that calls itself "teaching" but is run by political hacks who only serve as barriers to your calling. I think most of us know that educrats are in education because no one else wants them. I agree with "think_outside_the_box". They don't know how to think! The LUSD administrators may have degrees but they don't seem to have "common sense". You don't start out with a premise "all white teachers are bad" and "all minority students are good", and then try to collect "evidence" to prove your point. Do they really believe that if ALL white teachers were fired, the little darlings who are offended by white teachers would start doing their homework and start earning high grades? Do they REALLY believe that? All you have to do is look at the districts where most teachers and administartors are not white. You will see the same low achievement. Dr. Cosby tried to tell the truth and they didn't like to hear it. Is he "racist"? LOL I guess the educrats can always blame the lack of achievement on "not enough money" or not enough "role models" or some other lame excuse. They hate accountability. The administrators need to look in the mirror and point their fingers at who they see. An old English proverb from 1674 states "A fish rots from the head down". That is something to think about. "
teach247365 wrote on Jan 14, 2008 3:23 PM:
Again I ask you (and you have yet to even respond to me after multiple posts on various articles), how on earth do I do this with 32+ students in my class, 57 minutes with them and very little in the way of supplies? Why is the money being spent on consultants coming in and telling me that I'm racist? Why is it that we're NOT being trained on how to touch these kids's lives at all (not that I think we need that, as most teachers KNOW how, we just aren't able to due to the circumstances).
EVERY "racial equity" training day I have been put through has been about telling me that I'm not doing my part, that I'm privleged because I'm white, that I'm racist because I'm white. Not ONE TIME has the conversation turned to "here's how to do it." So its a bunch of B.S. that teaching us to reach kids in a meaningful way is the goal. There certainly is not any of that going on. Odie Douglas coming to my school and telling our staff that we only punish black kids does not tell me how to reach them. Him telling our staff that only white kids achieve on the tests does not tell me how to reach them. Watching some stupid video about wrongs done long ago does not tell me how to reach them. Standing in a line so I can see that I'm white does not tell me how to reach them. This is B.S. and you know it. Those that agree with the district admin are those that have the dream of one day escaping the classroom (yes, every one of those people that I have talked to who have this goal use that word "escape") and join them. "
nylodian wrote on Jan 14, 2008 7:38 AM:
jeff wrote on Jan 14, 2008 7:11 AM:
Stanford Man wrote on Jan 13, 2008 8:54 PM:
bry wrote on Jan 13, 2008 7:34 PM:
jennifers wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:52 PM:
Of course the number of parents in a home is not deterministic, which is what you imply when you say consistently do worse. What do the averages show?
voter: "I haven't seen direct evidence (via scientific research) that race plays a role [in IQ]".
Of course you haven't. Because stating that as a hypothesis not only doesn't get your research funded, it gets you fired. Is there any modern genetic research that has been done to answer the question? "
Scrutiny wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:34 PM:
jennifers wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:32 PM:
voter wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:29 PM:
Scrutiny wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:13 PM:
voter wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:12 PM:
jennifers wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:12 PM:
My favorite Eric Turkheimer quote: "Results demonstrate that the proportions of IQ variance attributable to genes and environment vary nonlinearly with SES. The models suggest that in impoverished families, 60% of the variance in IQ is accounted for by the shared environment, and the contribution of genes is close to zero; in affluent families, the result is almost exactly the reverse."
In other words, unless you're dirt poor, genes do matter. Thank you Dr. Turkheimer.
From Joseph Fagan: "results support and extend earlier studies indicating the continuity of intelligence from infancy to adolescence and illustrate the validity of early measures of recognition memory based on selective attention to novelty for the long-term prediction of achievement."
Hmm. Seems like Dr. Fagan thinks intelligence measures in infants (!) predicts to some extent intelligence later in life. Couldn't that be because part of IQ is genetic?
The Flynn effect is interesting but not sure it answers my question.
Does anyone doubt genetics influences IQ among whites? or among blacks or among asians? Isn't it conceivable there are differences between these based, in part, on genetics? Not even possible? Maybe? "
Scrutiny wrote on Jan 13, 2008 5:01 PM:
voter wrote on Jan 13, 2008 3:20 PM:
jennifers wrote on Jan 13, 2008 2:34 PM:
For an interesting discussion of the topic, check out an article titled Race, Genes, and Intelligence by William Saletan in Slate from November. It's in the Human Nature series but you'll have to google for it.
"
Lodian wrote on Jan 13, 2008 2:14 PM:
LodiBorn wrote on Jan 13, 2008 2:05 PM:
voter wrote on Jan 13, 2008 1:45 PM:
awobs wrote on Jan 13, 2008 1:02 PM:
Taxpayer & Citizen wrote on Jan 13, 2008 12:11 PM:
Robb wrote on Jan 13, 2008 10:57 AM:
think_outside_the_box wrote on Jan 13, 2008 10:33 AM:
think_outside_the_box wrote on Jan 13, 2008 10:23 AM:
There is no standard for teaching rational thought to our children in grades K-6. What a pity! Perhaps we should require this standard for the LUSD Administrators. A required course for administrators in rational thought may save us lots of money and lots of grief chasing invisible ghosts that DO NOT exist. Logical fallacies of thinking are usually taught in introductory math courses. My question is this: How can an administrator with a degree in engineering miss the obvious? "
tired wrote on Jan 13, 2008 9:54 AM:
commonsense wrote on Jan 13, 2008 7:27 AM:
bry wrote on Jan 12, 2008 11:52 PM:
bry wrote on Jan 12, 2008 11:37 PM:
jennifers wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:24 PM:
savant wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:13 PM:
Any educational leader worth her salt knows the things that improve achievement. High expectations, well defined curriculum, smaller class size, effective preschool, etc. Is there any district anywhere that has used the institutional racism mantra and eliminated or even substantially closed their gap? I certainly haven't heard of any. Glenn Singleton hasn't heard of any either and he gets paid to sell this method.
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. -Albert Einstein. "
teach247365 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 7:54 PM:
Lets Be Real wrote on Jan 12, 2008 6:56 PM:
I also appreciate the Lodi News Sentinel for running this story because I was not aware that the initiative has been around for 4 years. Based on some of the past blogs, I was lead to believe otherwise. Thanks again. "
Hmmm wrote on Jan 12, 2008 6:31 PM:
Mad Dog wrote on Jan 12, 2008 5:33 PM:
T & C wrote on Jan 12, 2008 5:13 PM:
Ernie wrote on Jan 12, 2008 3:44 PM:
Taxpayer & Citizen wrote on Jan 12, 2008 3:28 PM:
They just keep instituting these government programs for the money and nothing more. More money goes for administration than goes to both the schools and students. Why is that? "
Bry wrote on Jan 12, 2008 12:05 PM:
Giovanina wrote on Jan 12, 2008 11:00 AM:
citizen wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:44 AM:
voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:30 AM:
voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:26 AM:
Giovanina wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:13 AM:
jeff wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:05 AM:
voter: please let us know who you are, so during the next election we can vote for YOU, because apparently you're more competent.
tired: which children are you refering to that "refuse to even try?" And is the students fault if their parents are not as effective as others? "
steve wrote on Jan 12, 2008 10:04 AM:
takealook wrote on Jan 12, 2008 9:58 AM:
tired wrote on Jan 12, 2008 9:40 AM:
Ernie wrote on Jan 12, 2008 9:06 AM:
voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:47 AM:
commonsense wrote on Jan 12, 2008 8:22 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.