Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Bible is entwined with American civic life (135)
- I predict: A conservative tide will rise in 2010 (71)
- David Diskin is first to give an invocation under new city of Lodi policy (70)
- The Treaty of Tripoli hoax (58)
- Universal health care solves big problems (56)
- Here's what my father knew about the assassination of JFK (35)
- Words from our forefathers (27)
- Stuck in neutral? Hardly! (22)
- City of Lodi staff looking into possibility of limiting number of taco trucks (20)
- Majority cannot deprive the minority (20)
Second place candidates received better coverage
I couldn't believe the coverage of the New Hampshire primary election in the News-Sentinel!
The second place candidates have huge pictures on Page 10 (sometimes the first page people look at it because it is at the back), then on the front page there are the dinky pictures of the first place candidates. Then if that wasn't enough, on Page 8, there is another huge picture of Obama. Very interesting. I guess there isn't much doubt who the News-Sentinel supports.
Fortunately for the country, the smart, independent women of New Hampshire voted for someone who is also smart, independent, articulate, caring and experienced. In voting for someone who has had very little experience, even though we "like" him, we risk "throwing the baby out with the bath water."
Gerry Jurgensen
Lodi

Reader Feedback
nsn_lodian wrote on Jan 17, 2008 1:46 PM:
Leonard wrote on Jan 14, 2008 7:17 AM:
" Sorry guys - you're not even close. Either our definition of "liar" is in dispute, or your absolute hatred for the president blurs whatever little intelligence you have.
Chuckle... your definition of the word "liar" is most certainly in dispute but the dispute is between you and the dictionary.
Personally, I will go with Merriam Webster on this one.
Main Entry:
li·ar
Pronunciation:
\ˈlī(-ə)r\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English, from Old English lēogere, from lēogan to lie — more at lie
Date:
before 12th century
: a person who tells lie "
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 7:40 PM:
voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 3:04 PM:
Leonard wrote on Jan 12, 2008 2:41 PM:
Heck, Richard Nixon was a better President than Bush, he was evil but at least he was relatively competent.
Nixon, laid the foundation for bringing China in on our side in the Cold War. Bush, on the other hand, has laid the foundation for turning a nuclear armed Pakistan over to the Taliban.
George W. Bush truly is THE WORST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY. "
Leonard wrote on Jan 12, 2008 2:37 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 2:30 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 2:24 PM:
voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 2:16 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 2:13 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 2:12 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 2:07 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 1:54 PM:
voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 1:43 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 1:15 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 1:14 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 1:10 PM:
voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 1:09 PM:
voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 1:06 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 12:53 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 12:52 PM:
Leonard wrote on Jan 12, 2008 12:51 PM:
THE
WORST
PRESIDENT
IN
HISTORY!!!! "
Leonard wrote on Jan 12, 2008 12:49 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 12:42 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 12:34 PM:
voter wrote on Jan 12, 2008 12:18 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 12, 2008 11:25 AM:
Regarding the WMDs, if in fact the president had deceived not only the American people, but Congress itself regarding this matter, where are the Articles of Impeachment? I would agree that if such proof and facts existed pointing to his guilt, there would be little opposition to move forward. Since there is no evidence, Leonard, you will need to let it go. "
Leonard wrote on Jan 12, 2008 1:52 AM:
The fact that Hillary and other Democrats believed the doctored evidence and falsified documents that the Bush Administration presented is certainly to their everlasting shame but it hardly makes those documents more legitimate.
"
Leonard wrote on Jan 12, 2008 1:48 AM:
Now, where are those WMDs? "
girard74 wrote on Jan 11, 2008 8:31 PM:
Of equal importance is the reputation of the Office of the President was literally destroyed. Bill will not be remembered fondly by the historians. "
girard74 wrote on Jan 11, 2008 8:24 PM:
girard74 wrote on Jan 11, 2008 8:20 PM:
That war was waged upon intelligence that convinced not only Bush, but Hillary and many other Democrats as well. Frankly, I'm growing tired of pointing out the truth to those who refuse to seek it. "
myownwmn wrote on Jan 10, 2008 6:58 PM:
Boomer wrote on Jan 10, 2008 6:34 PM:
voter wrote on Jan 10, 2008 4:33 PM:
nylodian wrote on Jan 10, 2008 2:32 PM:
Leonard wrote on Jan 10, 2008 1:40 PM:
George W. Bush is truly the worst President this country has ever known. "
Leonard wrote on Jan 10, 2008 1:39 PM:
As the bumper sticker says, No One Died When Clinton Lied.
"
girard74 wrote on Jan 10, 2008 1:02 PM:
With all of the blustering about how "bad" Bush is, he has kept us safe since 9/11 and has remained incredibly focused on the war against terror. He is doing his job, whether you agree or not. "
Leonard wrote on Jan 10, 2008 11:17 AM:
Leonard wrote on Jan 10, 2008 11:16 AM:
Hello???
The Worst President In History??? "
girard74 wrote on Jan 10, 2008 10:51 AM:
Leonard wrote on Jan 10, 2008 10:17 AM:
Ricdeb wrote on Jan 10, 2008 10:03 AM:
Leonard wrote on Jan 10, 2008 9:08 AM:
Ricdeb wrote on Jan 10, 2008 9:03 AM:
Leonard wrote on Jan 10, 2008 7:55 AM:
"
Leonard wrote on Jan 10, 2008 7:54 AM:
Ricdeb wrote on Jan 10, 2008 7:07 AM:
Leonard wrote on Jan 10, 2008 6:48 AM:
Leonard wrote on Jan 10, 2008 6:48 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.