Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- The country's mess is our fault (170)
- Obama is not a moderate (130)
- Public health care is a Christian option (79)
- Sarah Palin's book hits the shelves: Locals react (73)
- Lodi City Council plans to cap number of taco trucks at 22 (52)
- The haves should help the have-nots (31)
- Tokay in, traveling to unbeaten No. 3 Grant for football playoffs (25)
- Government-run health care is a bad idea (25)
- Young woman fatally shot at Acampo home (18)
- Sierra Adventure store to close after four years in Downtown Lodi (17)
A conversation with Ken Davis
LUSD board president offers thoughts on race, education and more
After 15 years on the Lodi Unified school board, Ken Davis, 56, has seen the district build 11 new schools and pass a quarter-of-a-billion dollars in bond measures.
Last week, his fellow board members elected him to serve his seventh term as board president, a position he says is a privilege and an honor. However, it's also a position that comes with challenges.
Just one of those challenges is closing the achievement gap between white and minority students.
The district has recently entered into a conversation with its staff members about the role race plays in the classroom.
Davis, who grew up in Arkansas during desegregation, says that when he takes part in that conversation he brings with him his life experiences. He recently sat down with News-Sentinel staff writer Amanda Dyer to discuss his thoughts on the race discussion in Lodi Unified School District.
Q: What are some of the ways that the district is working to close the achievement gap between white and minority students?
A: What we're doing is looking at individualized lesson plans for kids who learn differently than other kids. We're also doing a lot of teacher retraining. We are changing the curriculum to fit the needs of the lowest-achieving kids. ...
And as you know, in the past, we've been having a very courageous conversation about how race affects achievement in the classroom.
Q: Can you tell me a little bit about the equity initiative?
A: Well, the district is looking at — and all districts are looking at the same theme — and that is why kids of color are not achieving at the level that white kids learn and achieve.
We brought in the Pacific Education Group to do some training with our teachers, our administrators and our board. We all went through the same training on that to look at issues of race and how it affects learning.
All the data up and down the state and across the nation shows that there is an inequity between how white kids learn and how kids of color learn and the correlation between what that teacher looks like in the classroom. ...
I don't think anybody in this district has ever called anybody a "racist." But people are drawing the generalization about that. And those are the issues that detract away from what are we doing with kids. Are we doing our best work with kids? ...
I have never, and as board president, I would never condone that kind of language in this district. ...
People draw conclusions from information that's out there based on their experience and their culture.
And, you know what? I don't have any control over that. Because when I come to the table I bring something different. I grew up in a society where I was told that I was less than, that I would never achieve and that I had little or no value.
That is the culture that I grew up in, and that is the culture that I came out of. So, I bring that background with me.
Other people bring different backgrounds with them. We all bring different backgrounds with us. ...
It was 41 years ago where I came up from a system where race was a big issue. Blacks didn't have first-class citizenship. I was born in '51. That was before Brown.
That was when segregation was the law in this country. I didn't go to school with white kids until I hit the ninth grade. I went to all-black schools.
Q: What was that like?
A: Well, it was the only world that I knew. I didn't know that white kids on the white side of town had stadiums and swimming pools and each kid had a book and they had heated rooms ... that's not what we had on our side of town.
If you don't know what you don't have, you don't know. But once the integration piece came, and this was in the early '60s, when I moved from the black schools to the white schools, it was very clear that we weren't wanted there.
And we were told every day we weren't wanted there. We got in fights every day. I still have the scars from some of the beatings that I took from being at that school every day.
It was like going into a war zone every day. I was 13, 14 years old, and I was on my own. And so, I got a beating every day I went to school. And I knew every day I got up and went to school, I was going to get a beating, but it wasn't going to stop me from going to school.
That's what it was like when you go through that. So, that's what I bring to the table. I know what's it's like to feel like you're unwanted. I know what it's like to feel that you're not as good as the next person.
In my lifetime, I've had to use the fountains that (said) "colored only." I've had to go in the back doors of restaurants. I've been denied rooms at hotels and motels. So, I know what that part of life is like.
So, if at any point in my life I have an opportunity to address that piece so that some other child doesn't have to live like that, then I think I have an obligation and a duty to do that.
Because I've been there. I know how much that hurts … You don't have the rights and privileges. You don't deserve the same kind of education.
And so when I talk about what I bring to the table, I bring a history, a historical piece of that, that pretty much speaks for itself.
Q: Can you elaborate on some comments you made on a Sacramento television station's panel discussion in which you talked about a "I-have-you-in-my-class-but-I-don't-have-to-teach-you" attitude?
A: The context of our panel was about education in California and I related an incident that I had when I grew up. And that was when I went to Little Rock Central. I had a teacher who stood in the door and said to me: "The law says you have to be here. I don't have to teach you."
And I said what I see is that attitude. That attitude and that behavior is, "I have you in my classroom, I don't have to teach you." I talked about an attitude and a behavior. ...
I didn't say Lodi. The conversation (was) around the achievement gap in schools. Because there were a number of us from different areas.
But that is an attitude. And I can only give you my opinion, but I can also show you the data that black kids aren't achieving, because I believe there's a different standard for them.
It's something that you see in the data. If you look at the data. If you just disaggregate the data and look at the data and see which kids are not performing, which ones are below basic, which ones are basic and those that are performing at proficient.
Those kids who are below basic and at basic are the kids of color.
This is the data speaking. It's not Ken Davis. This is the data.
So, you have to ask yourself, "Why is that happening?" ...
It's the data. It's the data that's saying something is going on in that classroom where these kids aren't getting what they need.
And it's not just me. They want to blame Ken Davis if they want, and I don't have a problem with that because that comes with the job. ...
But what I can say is that I've been doing this job for 15 years. And for 15 years I've been putting teachers on pedestals, talking about the wonderful work they do.
I have never shied away from that. I have made some outstanding comments about the work that teachers do in this district since the day that I have been here. And if they want to sum up my service in this district in one paragraph, then that's their right. But one thing I won't do is go back and change my words because I've been consistent for 15 years about what I think about the teachers in this district.
Q: I'm guessing that the video (on white privilege) was part of this conversation that's going on between people in the district. By watching the video, how does that help kids in the classroom?
A: The intent, I can only speak to what the intent was, is to make us more self-aware of some of our own biases and some of the things that we hold as privilege. ....
People who want to deny that there's white privilege, they have every right to do that.
I grew up in a country — I'm going to go back to the same thing to my roots. I grew up in country where I didn't have the same privilege that they did. My parents couldn't vote because they were black. That was a white privilege. My parents couldn't move into certain neighborhoods because that was for white people. That was a white privilege. ...
So, I know what white privilege looks like, and I know it exists. If people choose to deny that it exists, that's their right. Maybe they don't see through the lens I see through. ...
The idea is not to force this down anybody's throat by any means. But if you're going to be working with children, all these kids come to you with different needs. You have to be able to recognize what they come to you with, the problems they come to you with and some of the shortcomings they come to you with. And you have to be able to serve the needs of those children who you have in your classroom.
If you have a barrier that prevents you from doing that, maybe it would be a good thing to recognize that so that you can serve kids better.
Q: As board president and a board member you have to deal with people who also really care about kids and feel very passionately about what they want and what they think will help kids. How do you sometimes say, "No" to that person?
A: The federal government is over here with No Child Left Behind, says if you don't do this, this and this, we'll come and take over your system and we'll run it the way we think it needs to be done.
Up in Sacramento the legislature says you need to do this, this and this, and if you don't do what we want you to do, we're going to take money away from you and you won't be able to do any of that. ...
The local boards are caught in the middle. ...
It is difficult, but for the greater good of keeping the district under local control and having a district that really cares about kids as opposed to state control, dissolving your local school board, having an administrator from Washington come in and run your district or having somebody from the state come in and run your district and ruin careers in the process and ruin kids in the process, sometimes you really have to say, "No."
Even if people think it is unfair. You just have to make the tough decision. Sometimes you have to say, "No."
Contact reporter Amanda Dyer at amandad@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
Science8c wrote on Dec 22, 2007 7:59 AM:
Lets Be Real wrote on Dec 21, 2007 9:18 PM:
Science8c wrote on Dec 21, 2007 6:09 PM:
Lets Be Real wrote on Dec 20, 2007 10:27 PM:
Audi 5000 wrote on Dec 20, 2007 8:20 AM:
Science8c wrote on Dec 19, 2007 9:36 PM:
Lets Be Real wrote on Dec 19, 2007 7:24 PM:
Audi 5000 wrote on Dec 19, 2007 8:55 AM:
bearsfolks wrote on Dec 19, 2007 8:03 AM:
Lets Be Real wrote on Dec 18, 2007 11:02 PM:
Lets Be Real wrote on Dec 18, 2007 10:56 PM:
tosh conn wrote on Dec 18, 2007 12:34 PM:
Lodian wrote on Dec 18, 2007 8:51 AM:
LUSD Mom(Cont) wrote on Dec 18, 2007 7:56 AM:
LUSD Mom wrote on Dec 18, 2007 7:49 AM:
Another Parent wrote on Dec 18, 2007 7:17 AM:
Guardian wrote on Dec 18, 2007 7:06 AM:
Guardian wrote on Dec 18, 2007 7:02 AM:
taxpayer wrote on Dec 18, 2007 6:43 AM:
Comment wrote on Dec 17, 2007 11:28 PM:
lusd teacher wrote on Dec 17, 2007 10:49 PM:
DISGUSTED wrote on Dec 17, 2007 9:53 PM:
comment 30 wrote on Dec 17, 2007 9:46 PM:
Science8c wrote on Dec 17, 2007 7:53 PM:
jumanji wrote on Dec 17, 2007 5:14 PM:
He is out of touch wrote on Dec 17, 2007 4:21 PM:
PatriotPaul wrote on Dec 17, 2007 4:13 PM:
wtf wrote on Dec 17, 2007 4:10 PM:
Guardian wrote on Dec 17, 2007 4:10 PM:
wtf wrote on Dec 17, 2007 4:06 PM:
Guardian wrote on Dec 17, 2007 4:06 PM:
P. L. Smith wrote on Dec 17, 2007 4:03 PM:
wtf wrote on Dec 17, 2007 4:02 PM:
Not Surprised wrote on Dec 17, 2007 3:46 PM:
LUSD Mom wrote on Dec 17, 2007 2:48 PM:
Flight privilege? wrote on Dec 17, 2007 2:25 PM:
wonder why wrote on Dec 17, 2007 1:08 PM:
Jeff wrote on Dec 17, 2007 12:47 PM:
grateful teacher cont'... wrote on Dec 17, 2007 11:53 AM:
Another View continued wrote on Dec 17, 2007 10:40 AM:
Another View continued wrote on Dec 17, 2007 10:38 AM:
Another View continued wrote on Dec 17, 2007 10:21 AM:
Another view wrote on Dec 17, 2007 10:17 AM:
Grateful teacher cont'... wrote on Dec 17, 2007 10:06 AM:
T & C wrote on Dec 17, 2007 9:59 AM:
Grateful teacher wrote on Dec 17, 2007 9:56 AM:
LUSD parent wrote on Dec 17, 2007 9:54 AM:
Starstruck wrote on Dec 17, 2007 8:36 AM:
A Lodi Mom wrote on Dec 17, 2007 8:25 AM:
Parent wrote on Dec 17, 2007 8:13 AM:
jumanji wrote on Dec 17, 2007 7:39 AM:
jumaji wrote on Dec 17, 2007 7:37 AM:
its 2007 wrote on Dec 17, 2007 7:16 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.