Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- The country's mess is our fault (170)
- Obama is not a moderate (130)
- Sarah Palin's book hits the shelves: Locals react (73)
- Public health care is a Christian option (71)
- Lodi City Council plans to cap number of taco trucks at 22 (50)
- The haves should help the have-nots (30)
- Tokay in, traveling to unbeaten No. 3 Grant for football playoffs (25)
- Government-run health care is a bad idea (25)
- Young woman fatally shot at Acampo home (18)
- Sierra Adventure store to close after four years in Downtown Lodi (16)
Top city earners pulling down big bucks
Lodi, Galt city managers make around $200,000 a year
A News-Sentinel review of Lodi and Galt salaries shows that the city manager position is the highest paid with Lodi's Blair King and Galt's Ted Anderson earning the most in their respective cities. King makes $218,643 in salary and benefits while Anderson makes $193,044.
The review shows that fire and police are generally the highest paid category of workers making up half of the top 20 earners in each city. Police and firefighters earn the most in overtime and have large state retirement packages.
For example, a police sergeant in Galt made $71,000 in base salary plus $53,000 in overtime and benefits.
That reflects another finding of the review: Base pay can sometimes be deceptive in terms of overall compensation, as overtime and benefits now account for increasing pieces of the pie.
Lodi Mayor Bob Johnson, as an overseer of the city's coffers, said Lodi's salaries are in the mid-range compared with other cities in the area.
"I do think they are reasonable," he said. "Everyone wants salaries to be less, but on a competitive basis, they aren't going to be less. Compared to other communities, our salaries certainly aren't on the high end."
Galt Mayor Tim Raboy said he is happy with the salaries of rank-and-file employees, but has a problem with the salaries of department heads, who have been on a controversial pay-for-performance system for more than a year. The department heads will be given a raise based on periodic performance reviews.
"Right now, the salaries are at the median, which I think is appropriate," Raboy said. "I don't think pay-for-performance works in government."
The salary review looked at total compensation, which included overtime and benefits. The total benefit package differed depending on the job title and bargaining unit, but in most cases included the city's share of medical, dental, vision and life insurance, state retirement benefits and social security.
The cities were generally responsive to the News-Sentinel requests and produced the information in a timely manner. Both cities provided the News-Sentinel with lists of base salaries. Lodi provided the News-Sentinel with overtime and benefits for Sept. 1, 2006, to Aug. 31, 2007. Because of a difference in bookkeeping, Galt was only able to provide overtime and benefits from Jan. 1 to Sept. 24.
The News-Sentinel has decided to list the top 20 employees in each city with their name, position and total compensation value.
The News-Sentinel has also included a sample of other employees by position and salary only.
The city of Galt has developed a compensation system that allows it to stay competitive with other cities in the region. This enables the city to recruit and retain educated, experienced and highly-qualified employees who are necessary to carry out the many important programs and services provided to the community.
In establishing competitive salaries, the city utilizes an independent consultant to conduct a salary survey of 11 neighboring cities to compare salary and benefits. Those cities are: Lodi, Marysville, Ceres, Dixon, Lathrop, Manteca, Oakdale, Placerville, West Sacramento and Woodland. These cities were chosen based on their similarity to Galt in various areas including organizational structure, population, scope of services and similar labor market.
Galt employee salaries are set by the City Council at the median of the agencies used in the survey. The city realizes that it cannot pay at the high end of the market, but believes it is important to pay in the middle of the range in order to provide a competitive salary and maintain a skilled workforce.
The most recent salary survey was conducted by Bryce Consulting and was implemented in 2006. Since that time, employees received a cost of living adjustment effective Jan. 1, 2007.
The Galt compensation plan is structured by step and grade. Each position is assigned to a specific grade. Each grade has five steps, with each step approximately five percent apart. Typically, employees begin working at the first step and move to the next step after each year of successful performance. Beginning in 2007, department directors no longer participate in the step grade system but are compensated through merit-based pay for performance system.
â€" News-Sentinel staff
Editor's note: We are reviewing numbers for the top 20 Lodi earners. We'll repost the list when possible discrepancies are resolved.
| A sample of Lodi positions by base salary only | |
|---|---|
Position | Salary |
| Administrative Clerk | $36,348 |
| Administrative Clerk | $36,348 |
| Assistant Streets and Drainage Manager | $70,416 |
| Budget Manager | $85,264 |
| Building Inspector II | $58,350 |
| City Clerk | $86,520 |
| City Council Member | $6,000 |
| City Planner | $97,821 |
| Community Improvement Manager | $95,673 |
| Construction Project Manager | $73,611 |
| Customer Service Rep II | $40,139 |
| Deputy Water Conservation Officer | $17,567 |
| Dispatcher | $51,189 |
| Docent Coordinator | $25,987 |
| Electric Foreman | $82,399 |
| Electrician | $74,430 |
| Environmental Compliance Inspector | $58,743 |
| Facilities Supervisor | $51,698 |
| Facility Supervisor | $24,960 |
| Facility Supervisor | $32,656 |
| Fire Captain | $68,919 |
| Fire Captain | $75,983 |
| Fire Engineer | $61,847 |
| Information Services Manager | $94,103 |
| Laborer A | $16,390 |
| Laborer B | $21,060 |
| Lead Equipment Mechanic | $56,821 |
| Librarian's Associate | $43,062 |
| Library Services Director | $90,036 |
| Maintenance Worker II | $45,059 |
| Management Analyst II | $66,351 |
| Manager of Customer Services and Programs | $93,693 |
| Office Supervisor | $48,350 |
| Park Maintenance Worker II | $33,708 |
| Police Corporal | $68,430 |
| Police Sergeant | $81,825 |
| Program Coordinator | $36,655 |
| Senior Accountant | $73,317 |
| Senior Civil Engineer | $91,105 |
| Senior Civil Engineer | $91,105 |
| Senior Electric Rate Analyst | $93,701 |
| Senior Library Assistant | $41,983 |
| Senior Services Coordinator | $61,847 |
| Senior Traffic Engineer | $91,113 |
| Street Supervisor | $62,832 |
| Transportation Manager | $80,978 |
| Utility Equipment Specialist | $65,422 |
| Wastewater Plant Operator II | $46,223 |
| Wastewater Supervisor | $67,562 |
| Water Services Manager | $98,958 |
| Source: City of Lodi | |
| Top 20 Galt employees in total compensation* | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rank | Name | Position | Salary |
| 1. | Ted Anderson | City Manager | $193,044.85 |
| 2. | Loren Cattolico | Police Chief | $188,915.14 |
| 3. | Curt Campion | Community Development Director | $166,949.31 |
| 4. | Gregg Halladay | Public Works Director | $164,879.18 |
| 5. | Inez Kiriu | Finance Director | $164,122.46 |
| 6. | Boyce Jeffries | Parks and Recreation Director | $162,023.25 |
| 7. | Jason Behrmann | Assistant City Manager | $157,834.59 |
| 8. | Jim Uptegrove | Police Lieutenant | $144,232.97 |
| 9. | Ken Erickson | Police Lieutenant | $139,851.01 |
| 10. | Robert Goss | Building Official | $129,800.03 |
| 11. | William Forrest | Senior Civil Engineer | $127,604.90 |
| 12. | Paula Islas | Human Resources Director | $125,280.12 |
| 13. | Charles Dedriksen | Police Sergeant | $125,078.74 |
| 14. | Sandra Kiriu | Principal Planner | $124,267.10 |
| 15. | Gary DeJesus | Utility Superintendent | $122,428.33 |
| 16. | Ed Arlt | Police Sergeant | $117,226.70 |
| 17. | Trung Trinh | Associate Civil Engineer | $114,036.07 |
| 18. | Elizabeth Aguire | City Clerk | $113,307.12 |
| 19. | Christopher Smith | Police Sergeant | $112,740.56 |
| 20. | Craig Walton | Police Sergeant | $111,275.94 |
| * Total compensation is annual base salary plus the value of nine months of benefits and overtime. | |||
| Source: City of Galt | |||
| A sample of Galt positions by base salary only | |
|---|---|
Position | Salary |
| Accounting Assistant II | $38,004 |
| Accounting Assistant II | $39,900 |
| Accounting Manager | $81,648 |
| Administrative Assistant | $48,612 |
| Assistant Market Operations Supervisor | $41,988 |
| Associate Planner | $67,020 |
| Building Permit Specialist | $32,040 |
| Code Compliance Officer | $57,840 |
| Construction Inspector | $57,864 |
| Crime Prevention Coordinator | $37,692 |
| Deputy City Clerk | $53,664 |
| Dispatcher | $37,692 |
| Dispatcher | $39,576 |
| Dispatcher | $45,792 |
| Engineering Assistant | $56,412 |
| Equipment Mechanic | $48,612 |
| Executive Assistant to City Manager | $56,376 |
| Human Resource Specialist | $42,012 |
| Market Operations Supervisor | $53,664 |
| Office Assistant III | $38,004 |
| Parking Enforcement Assistant | $36,120 |
| Parks Maintenance Supervisor | $53,664 |
| Parks Maintenance Worker I | $30,492 |
| Parks Superintendent | $79,668 |
| Police Officer | $48,384 |
| Police Officer | $50,796 |
| Police Officer | $53,328 |
| Police Officer | $58,788 |
| Police Sergeant | $64,884 |
| Public Works Maintenance Worker I | $31,272 |
| Public Works Maintenance Worker I | $34,464 |
| Public Works Maintenance Worker I | $37,980 |
| Public Works Maintenance Worker II | $36,240 |
| Public Works Maintenance Worker II | $38,040 |
| Public Works Maintenance Worker II | $41,928 |
| Recreation Coordinator | $39,900 |
| Recreation Supervisor | $59,232 |
| Senior Building Inspector | $63,840 |
| Senior Equipment Mechanic | $53,664 |
| Senior Public Works Maintenance Worker | $44,076 |
| Senior Public Works Maintenance Worker | $46,272 |
| Special Programs Administrator | $79,668 |
| Streets Field Supervisor | $51,180 |
| Supervising Engineer Technician | $75,828 |
| Wastewater Plant Supervisor | $68,688 |
| Wastewater System Operator I | $44,052 |
| Wastewater System Operator II | $48,612 |
| Water System Supervisor | $68,688 |
| Water Systems Operator I | $39,972 |
| Water Systems Operator II | $48,612 |
| Source: City of Galt | |
Contact reporter Matt Brown at mattb@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
Lodian wrote on Dec 8, 2007 11:28 AM:
OMG! wrote on Dec 8, 2007 10:51 AM:
oh wrote on Dec 7, 2007 8:14 PM:
oh wrote on Dec 7, 2007 7:52 PM:
to oh wrote on Dec 7, 2007 1:14 PM:
T & C wrote on Dec 7, 2007 1:04 PM:
hey oh wrote on Dec 7, 2007 12:14 PM:
hey oh wrote on Dec 7, 2007 12:08 PM:
oh wrote on Dec 7, 2007 10:53 AM:
I heard wrote on Dec 6, 2007 8:55 PM:
Puhleaze! wrote on Dec 6, 2007 8:54 PM:
ticked wrote on Dec 6, 2007 7:56 PM:
oh wrote on Dec 6, 2007 7:11 PM:
hey oh wrote on Dec 6, 2007 4:43 PM:
Thats Funny wrote on Dec 6, 2007 3:28 PM:
Thats Funny wrote on Dec 6, 2007 3:24 PM:
Thats Funny wrote on Dec 6, 2007 3:21 PM:
to oh wrote on Dec 6, 2007 1:38 PM:
thank u lodi wrote on Dec 6, 2007 1:36 PM:
hey oh wrote on Dec 6, 2007 1:35 PM:
oh wrote on Dec 6, 2007 11:58 AM:
oh wrote on Dec 6, 2007 11:40 AM:
oh wrote on Dec 6, 2007 11:31 AM:
WoW wrote on Dec 6, 2007 11:16 AM:
hey oh wrote on Dec 6, 2007 11:03 AM:
To to john brown wrote on Dec 6, 2007 11:01 AM:
Piewhacket wrote on Dec 6, 2007 6:19 AM:
to John Brown... wrote on Dec 5, 2007 9:04 PM:
To: hey oh wrote on Dec 5, 2007 8:15 PM:
oh wrote on Dec 5, 2007 8:10 PM:
hey oh wrote on Dec 5, 2007 3:42 PM:
oh wrote on Dec 5, 2007 11:17 AM:
John Brown wrote on Dec 5, 2007 7:57 AM:
Blue Sky wrote on Dec 4, 2007 9:30 PM:
For Shame! wrote on Dec 4, 2007 7:24 PM:
No Justification wrote on Dec 4, 2007 1:22 PM:
No Justification wrote on Dec 4, 2007 1:21 PM:
No Justification wrote on Dec 4, 2007 1:18 PM:
No justification wrote on Dec 4, 2007 1:16 PM:
mcg wrote on Dec 4, 2007 11:51 AM:
FFer wrote on Dec 4, 2007 11:39 AM:
mcg wrote on Dec 4, 2007 10:42 AM:
thank u lodi wrote on Dec 4, 2007 9:26 AM:
thank u lodi wrote on Dec 4, 2007 9:23 AM:
George of the Jungle wrote on Dec 4, 2007 8:41 AM:
Blah Blah Blah wrote on Dec 3, 2007 9:50 PM:
PD Employee wrote on Dec 3, 2007 8:48 PM:
to oh wrote on Dec 3, 2007 7:19 PM:
point of clarification wrote on Dec 3, 2007 7:13 PM:
HHMMM... wrote on Dec 3, 2007 6:26 PM:
To Searching wrote on Dec 3, 2007 6:02 PM:
Max Stanfield wrote on Dec 3, 2007 5:39 PM:
To All wrote on Dec 3, 2007 5:26 PM:
Searching wrote on Dec 3, 2007 2:56 PM:
Ticked wrote on Dec 3, 2007 12:21 PM:
mcg wrote on Dec 3, 2007 12:09 PM:
T & C wrote on Dec 3, 2007 11:25 AM:
think about it wrote on Dec 3, 2007 11:16 AM:
oh wrote on Dec 3, 2007 11:02 AM:
to mcg wrote on Dec 3, 2007 10:58 AM:
oh wrote on Dec 3, 2007 10:47 AM:
mcg wrote on Dec 3, 2007 10:34 AM:
To Lodian wrote on Dec 3, 2007 8:08 AM:
2¢ wrote on Dec 3, 2007 7:53 AM:
Lodian wrote on Dec 3, 2007 7:49 AM:
galt citizen wrote on Dec 3, 2007 6:46 AM:
Makes you go Hmmmm wrote on Dec 3, 2007 2:07 AM:
The numbers dont lie like the LNS wrote on Dec 3, 2007 1:03 AM:
to Cogito wrote on Dec 2, 2007 10:37 PM:
extranthifer wrote on Dec 2, 2007 8:27 PM:
Hey Lodian wrote on Dec 2, 2007 8:15 PM:
jumptoconclusions wrote on Dec 2, 2007 8:04 PM:
skewed numbers wrote on Dec 2, 2007 8:00 PM:
Lodian wrote on Dec 2, 2007 6:50 PM:
To: To Allen wrote on Dec 2, 2007 6:44 PM:
LODIAN29 wrote on Dec 2, 2007 5:25 PM:
Salvador Ibanez wrote on Dec 2, 2007 5:11 PM:
Major Ben Johnson wrote on Dec 2, 2007 5:09 PM:
JustTheFacts wrote on Dec 2, 2007 4:49 PM:
JustTheFacts wrote on Dec 2, 2007 4:44 PM:
observation wrote on Dec 2, 2007 2:38 PM:
To: Allen wrote on Dec 2, 2007 1:12 PM:
money, money wrote on Dec 2, 2007 12:40 PM:
lotsa jobs wrote on Dec 2, 2007 12:05 PM:
To just the facts wrote on Dec 2, 2007 11:55 AM:
to oh uh wrote on Dec 2, 2007 11:47 AM:
to oh wrote on Dec 2, 2007 11:46 AM:
Observation wrote on Dec 2, 2007 11:31 AM:
To Fairly Compensated wrote on Dec 2, 2007 10:42 AM:
To The Critics wrote on Dec 2, 2007 9:58 AM:
Joke wrote on Dec 2, 2007 8:56 AM:
JustTheFacts wrote on Dec 2, 2007 8:55 AM:
Joke wrote on Dec 2, 2007 8:53 AM:
JustTheFacts wrote on Dec 2, 2007 8:52 AM:
I wonder wrote on Dec 1, 2007 11:53 PM:
Lets all just take a chill pill wrote on Dec 1, 2007 11:49 PM:
unbelievable wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:49 PM:
Aunt Bernice wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:09 PM:
Allen wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:09 PM:
Aunt Bernice wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:07 PM:
Aunt Bernice wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:05 PM:
Aunt Bernice wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:04 PM:
Aunt Bernice wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:02 PM:
oh wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:39 PM:
oh wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:31 PM:
T & C wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:18 PM:
oh wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:18 PM:
Cogito wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:06 PM:
oh wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:03 PM:
Cogito wrote on Dec 1, 2007 7:49 PM:
oh wrote on Dec 1, 2007 7:12 PM:
fools gold wrote on Dec 1, 2007 6:49 PM:
Fairly compensated City Employee wrote on Dec 1, 2007 6:39 PM:
OTH wrote on Dec 1, 2007 6:36 PM:
Good Ole' Boys Cont... wrote on Dec 1, 2007 6:35 PM:
OTH wrote on Dec 1, 2007 6:35 PM:
God Ole Boys Indeed wrote on Dec 1, 2007 6:31 PM:
Typical wrote on Dec 1, 2007 6:21 PM:
Wow! wrote on Dec 1, 2007 6:16 PM:
Balance wrote on Dec 1, 2007 6:14 PM:
To LNS wrote on Dec 1, 2007 6:00 PM:
Dixon Headson wrote on Dec 1, 2007 5:18 PM:
Whoa Nellie! wrote on Dec 1, 2007 5:07 PM:
Lodi citizen wrote on Dec 1, 2007 4:21 PM:
Way Out wrote on Dec 1, 2007 3:22 PM:
killio wrote on Dec 1, 2007 2:41 PM:
Geweke wrote on Dec 1, 2007 2:03 PM:
No.1 wrote on Dec 1, 2007 1:58 PM:
Maintenance Worker wrote on Dec 1, 2007 1:50 PM:
killio wrote on Dec 1, 2007 12:33 PM:
CS wrote on Dec 1, 2007 12:25 PM:
fyi wrote on Dec 1, 2007 11:56 AM:
must remove wool from over head... wrote on Dec 1, 2007 11:45 AM:
T & C wrote on Dec 1, 2007 11:39 AM:
Go Flames wrote on Dec 1, 2007 11:34 AM:
to lodunews.com wrote on Dec 1, 2007 11:33 AM:
to dave wrote on Dec 1, 2007 11:26 AM:
To Oh wrote on Dec 1, 2007 11:24 AM:
oh wrote on Dec 1, 2007 11:08 AM:
pluto wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:55 AM:
To: LNS wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:51 AM:
Also To: Dave wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:39 AM:
oh wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:29 AM:
Fair wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:24 AM:
Machiavelli wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:21 AM:
OTH wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:13 AM:
oh wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:08 AM:
T & C wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:53 AM:
To Dave wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:41 AM:
T & C wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:39 AM:
pay gap? wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:35 AM:
T&CII wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:33 AM:
T & C wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:32 AM:
to blair wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:25 AM:
killio wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:21 AM:
T & C wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:20 AM:
Typical wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:57 AM:
Fair wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:43 AM:
more money wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:43 AM:
to dave wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:42 AM:
WY wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:38 AM:
To DAVE wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:31 AM:
dave wrote on Dec 1, 2007 7:08 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.