Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

August 19th, 2008
August 18th, 2008
August 16th, 2008
August 15th, 2008
August 14th, 2008
August 13th, 2008
August 12th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT

Lawsuit against Fahy is tossed

Stockton Diocese: Nothing indicated the late priest was abusive to children

By Ross Farrow
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Updated: Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:54 AM PST

A lawsuit alleging the sexual abuse of a child by the late Father Murty Fahy has been dismissed, according to the Stockton Diocese.

Fahy allegedly abused a girl about 30 times while she was in the second through fifth grades at St. Anne's School in Lodi during the 1990s, according to the $3 million lawsuit filed in December 2006.


Murty Fahy

"The (diocese) investigation did not reveal any facts which suggested that Father Fahy had ever acted improperly toward children," Bishop Stephen Blaire said in a prepared statement released on Wednesday afternoon.

"I think it's great (news)," St. Anne's Deacon Don Bo said. "I think it'll make everybody who knew Father Fahy feel good, because it is in the past now and I hope whoever brought it forward can find some peace."

Ryan DiMaria, one of two attorneys representing the woman who filed the lawsuit, said her client still maintains that Fahy abused her sexually, but she wants to get on with her life.

"She's 21 years old, and she's just starting to deal with the mental and emotional repercussions of her sexual abuse," DiMaria said. "She found it best to focus on her own healing, and we're on board with that."

The diocese's investigation was more difficult to conduct because Fahy had died and was unable to defend himself, Blaire said.

"We know that the many people who knew and admired Father Fahy will find comfort in this news," Blaire said.

The Lodi Police Department investigated the allegations, but closed the case earlier this year because investigators said they couldn't prove that he committed any sexual misconduct.

The lawsuit was filed against St. Anne's Catholic Church, St. Anne's School, Stockton Diocese and the Oblates of Saint Francis De Sales — Toledo/Detroit Province. The Oblates train and supervise priests, nuns and lay people throughout the United States, according to the suit.

"I am most grateful to Father Fahy and the Oblates of St. Francis de Sales for their dedicated service to the people of our diocese," Blaire said.

Contact reporter Ross Farrow at rossf@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

Tammy Glor wrote on Dec 9, 2007 9:06 PM:

" I am a catholic and I am appalled about the words I have read regarding the victim. I believe the victim, I know the victim and she is speaking the truth. You have no idea how this has affected her life. If you have never walked in these shoes, who are you to judge. And for those who he taught and never touched - you were lucky. Yes, he is dead and but the victim is not! "

to NSN lodian wrote on Dec 6, 2007 6:27 PM:

" He was a teacher of hers too.....unfortunately she also knows more about this man than any of the bloggers will ever know. And you are making him innocent by association so you are as biased as anyone! just because you knew him means nothing! I think you should publicly thank him like the bishop did! That should make you look great! But wait! you would have to use your real name!!!! can't do it can you! "

to NSN lodian wrote on Dec 6, 2007 6:21 PM:

" there is a case. you cannot put nothing on hold....the case is put on hold....hence there is a case. "

NSN Lodian wrote on Dec 6, 2007 4:19 PM:

" I'm done posting on this article. There are so many of you that blather on about the guilt of someone who is INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. I knew the man personally. He was a teacher of mine. So I know 1,000 TIMES MORE about this man than you will ever know. This is simply guilt-by-association (e.g. in your minds, all priests are pedophiles), or anti-religous-hate speech. "

NSN Lodian wrote on Dec 6, 2007 4:15 PM:

" To LCK: There IS NO CASE (dropped, not dropped, with or without prejudice). The LPD found no basis for the complaint. "

Elizabeth Leonard wrote on Dec 6, 2007 1:51 PM:

" Yhe suit against Fr. Fahy was not filed to receive money. The investigation did reveal solid facts about his improprieties. It is sad for a cradle-Catholic to see another priest's problems revealed, but it is horrendous to see our own Bishop deny the facts he knows are true. "

to nsn lodian wrote on Dec 6, 2007 8:12 AM:

" The difference between a CIVIL lawsuit and a CRIMINAL lawsuit is simple. There is never a possiblity of a CRIMINAL lawsuit when the accused is dead. Its a shame she can never have the satisfaction of a conviction. At least the CIVIL suit brings the allegation out there for his other victims. "

Casual Observer wrote on Dec 6, 2007 7:12 AM:

" After his first victim was destroyed, and OGrady supported and moved around by the church, more than 20 other of his victims came forward. This will happen in this case too because no pedophile does this just to one child. The church could be proactive instead of protecting their gold chalices because they do know the truth of this matter just as they knew the truth of Ogrady. And to Sorry Folks! I agree she wasn't molested by Fahy - it was SATAN because thats what he was. "

Casual Observer wrote on Dec 6, 2007 7:09 AM:

" Probably most people flying off the handle here are not those close to the case, but many Catholics sick to death of this abuse being perpetuated on our children while the Church hides and protects these abusers for the sake of money. The church needs to step up and get rid of these sickos and support their young. The Church is still paying O'Grady his retirement for God's sake!!!! and he was convicted. His first victim was run through the mud much like this current young girl. "

Needing education wrote on Dec 6, 2007 7:05 AM:

" Go to the Church's own website which lists the accused priests in the area. You will find what a problem this is. The Church posts this. It also lists how many of these accused have been found guilty. Don't keep your head in the sand. Go to the CPS and see how many children are molested each year, not only priests, but christian pastors, coaches, educators, etc. etc. If you see the numbers you will understand the probability of the truth here. "

to Whoa wrote on Dec 6, 2007 7:01 AM:

" Agreed! Innocent until proven guilty....however that day - the day in which Fahy is proven guilty by his many victims will come when this victims are strong enough to stand up to the hardball tactics of the church and the Oblates. And when the victims are strong enough to handle the incorrect reporting of this by the local papers. I wonder what the articles were saying when O'Grady first came forward. Was Farrow reporting that as well?? "

to Sorry Folks wrote on Dec 6, 2007 6:59 AM:

" Only a casual reader would say such a vague, destructive and off the handle comment. The reactions to that type of comment come from many - not just those close to the case. "

to NSN lodian wrote on Dec 6, 2007 6:57 AM:

" and finally! "to impose a civil penalty against the accused if found guilty" hahahahahahaha Im sure she'll be able to fine the dead guy! May he ROT IN HELL! God will impose that fine!!!! I think you should also speak with the Bishop who does know the truth! Oops! he won't be able to talk to you unless his attorney allow it! "

to NSN lodian wrote on Dec 6, 2007 6:54 AM:

" The purpose of a suit is to establish culpability - Bingo! Reason number one....reason number two...to ensure that those who perpetuate the environment in which these tragedies happen cease! Penalties do not have to be monetary. They can be stricter guidelines such as DO NOT ALLOW CHILDREN to go clean rectories during class time! And again BINGO!!! Didn't your reading comprehension skills tell you that there was 3 million asked for??? Again false! Again - check that out for yourself. "

to NSN lodian wrote on Dec 6, 2007 6:50 AM:

" We agree that the article says the case was thrown out and that the article insinuated that it was thrown out because Fahy was innocent, however all of that is totally incorrect. The case has not been "tossed" nor has the allegations against Fahy been dropped. Again! check that out yourself instead of using your great reading comprehension to understand false reporting....that will do a lot for your understanding! "

to NSN lodian wrote on Dec 6, 2007 6:48 AM:

" You are correct. The police investigated the report and were not able to "prove" it. Isn't that a surprise??? The Church didn't turn over the information they have about Fahy's past!! Now isn't that typical. the investigator NEVER spoke with the victim. The case was not closed. Check it out yourself. It is not being actively investigated at this time but it is not closed nor was any determination made about the veracity of the victim. Only that they couldn't find "proof." "

How wrote on Dec 5, 2007 11:18 PM:

" How does one prove molestation when they were only a child at the time? Remember, when you see one rat/molester there are 100 you don't see or ever hear about. Molestation by a priest in the church has got to be the worst thing that can happen to a child, besides death... and some decide that death is even better than living with the pain. I hope this victim can find peace in her life, some how some way. And if Fahy did this horrible crime to a child...may he burn forever. "

L C K wrote on Dec 5, 2007 8:47 PM:

" To Pippylongstocking and NSN Lodi, Pippy, you ask why she is nameless and faceless ? Are you serious ? Were you ever that age ? Is your name Pippylongstocking ? NSN Lodi... Get off your soap box. This case has not even been investigated. This was Dismissed "WITHOUT" Prejudice. This case has not been dropped. "

L C K wrote on Dec 5, 2007 8:08 PM:

" If anything, this girl gave us all a gift...A wake up call. St. Anne's should never allow children to be called out of class alone. If people would educate themselves on what victims in a case like this have to endure, they would understand why this young girl filed Dismissed "WITHOUT" Prejudice. Which means the case is put on "HOLD" not "TOSSED". "

NSN Lodian wrote on Dec 5, 2007 3:40 PM:

" The article stated the facts clear as a bell (for those of you who don't have much reading comprehension)... "he Lodi Police Department investigated the allegations, but closed the case earlier this year because investigators said they couldn't prove that he committed any sexual misconduct." "

NSN Lodian wrote on Dec 5, 2007 2:58 PM:

" ... further, the standard for burden of proof in a CRIMINAL case (reasonable doubt) is much different than that of a CIVIL case. CIVIL cases don't have to be proven like criminal cases do in order to win (they are easier). Lastly, the article clearly states this case was THROWN OUT which means the plaintiff couldn't even prove their claims at the EASIER level of a CIVIL case. "

NSN Lodian wrote on Dec 5, 2007 2:53 PM:

" Some of you are fools. Do you know what the difference is between a CIVIL LAWSUIT and a CRIMINAL PROSECUTION? The purpose of a CIVIL LAWSUIT is to establish culpability and impose a civil penalty against the accused if found guilty. You don't have to ASK FOR AN AMOUNT to be AWARDED AN AMOUNT. Even when an amount is ASKED, the judge or jury have to decide the actual amount of damages and punitive damages. Some of you are confusing this case with a CRIMINAL ONE (which is much different). "

Woah wrote on Dec 5, 2007 11:42 AM:

" What ever happened to innocent till proven guilty? It seems like most people here are pretty quick to condemn. "

Sorry Folks wrote on Dec 5, 2007 10:40 AM:

" A casual reader wouldn't fly off the handle over such a vague comment... but you are not a casual reader. You are closely connected to this mess and clearly very defensive. I suspect you know what actually happened and I believe the full story will surface one day. "

To "Sorry Folks" wrote on Dec 5, 2007 8:33 AM:

" Where do you get off saying she was molested but not by Fahy! If not Fahy who?? Did you molest her?!?!? "

to No Sense Numbskull lodian wrote on Dec 4, 2007 8:25 PM:

" Your ignorance regarding the particulars of this case are apparent! She has asked for nothing so your justifications for disbelief have no credibility. You'll need to come up with another reason for a false accusation of Fahy because a million or 3 million as quoted by the paper is false!!! Remember the insensitive reporting that the law suit was tossed??? There is no lawsuit at this point as it has been put on hold, yet the victim continues to expose the story to aide his other victims---plural in case you didn't catch that!!!! "

sad catholic wrote on Dec 4, 2007 2:03 PM:

" to nsn lodian.. Before you explain to people the standing of this case you need to get your facts straight. Your statements are totally incorrect. They should be presented as ignorant opinion rather that knowledge you dont have. "

to No Sense Numbskull lodian wrote on Dec 4, 2007 1:58 PM:

" Your ignorance regarding the particulars of this case are apparent! She has asked for nothing so your justifications for disbelief have no credibility. You'll need to come up with another reason for a false accusation of Fahy because a million or 3 million as quoted by the paper is false!!! Remember the insensitive reporting that the law suit was tossed??? There is no lawsuit at this point as it has been put on hold, yet the victim continues to expose the story to aide his other victims---plural in case you didn't catch that!!!! "

NSN Lodian wrote on Dec 4, 2007 12:21 PM:

" To Lodian: "... why in the world would anyone go through this he11 and expose themself to this horrible ordeal if there wasn't a shred of truth to it?" Unfortunately in today's society, people see MILLIONS of reasons (each with George Washington's head printed on them) to bring claims like this. Realize that a civil lawsuit does not require even "reasonable doubt" to move forward. Only a "likelyhood" of wrongdoing. In this case, even that simple standard was not found to be upheld. "

to sorry wrote on Dec 4, 2007 11:20 AM:

" what do you know You are sorry!! "

Sorry Folks wrote on Dec 3, 2007 9:31 PM:

" She was molested, but not by Fahy. "

another mom wrote on Dec 3, 2007 6:13 PM:

" Victim - I believe you too!! Your strength and courage amaze me. You have done the unselfish and right thing by coming forward, for the benefit of others. I could not have done it at such a young age. This whole ordeal will and has made you stronger. Thank you on behalf of so many other moms for doing this. Parents -you must be so proud!! Father Blaire - you dissapoint me. "

L C K wrote on Dec 3, 2007 5:40 PM:

" Dear Editor, I would like you to post the first comment I made. It makes this story very clear. Thank you "

L C K wrote on Dec 3, 2007 5:05 PM:

" I think the reason she was able to come forward at such a young age is because she has such a supportive family. If you knew the family, you would know why she trusted them enough to confide in them. "

Disgusted cont. wrote on Dec 3, 2007 4:47 PM:

" I believe everyone standing up for this man has not placed themselves in this young woman or her families shoes! For female supporters, what if that was you, would have the courage to come forward and for male supporters, how would you feel if this young woman was your daughter, girlfriend, sister or wife? "

Disgusted wrote on Dec 3, 2007 4:47 PM:

" I am a firm believer that everyone is entitled to their opinions but I am disgusted at some people on here!! NSN Lodian, can you imagine being a victim of something remotely close to this? It is quite appalling to hear you call this young woman an "alleged victim!" "

to another parishioner wrote on Dec 3, 2007 4:27 PM:

" Lucky for you that you weren't his type after all those contacts with him! And what's the difference when she came forward?? He would have denied it when he was alive! Do you think if he were alive he would come forward and say, "Yes, my parishioners, I have sinned. It has been 30 days since my last confession!" and "forgive me for I have raped a child?" "

to another parishioner wrote on Dec 3, 2007 4:23 PM:

" Just because you find this hard to believe doesn't make it untrue. She waited until she was old enough to even dare step forward. She came forward at 19 how much younger could she have been when he did this to her through the age of 12?? that is coming forward quickly in terms of this trauma. She was told by this supposed representative of Jesus to never talk!!! Most of us don't have our heads in the sand! "

to NSN Lodian wrote on Dec 3, 2007 4:19 PM:

" a) he obviously couldn't molest all who came in contact with him. That some people he knew only saw his good side is the hallmark of a true pedophile. b)the victim was very young at 19 to even come forward - most wait till 30s or 40's. She would have been all of about 14 when he died and probably didn't even know he was dead and c) she hasn't asked for money! Only those igorant of the impact of sexual abuse would find this dubious "

Lodian wrote on Dec 3, 2007 3:25 PM:

" Think about it... why in the world would anyone go through this he11 and expose themself to this horrible ordeal if there wasn't a shred of truth to it? "

Another parishioner wrote on Dec 3, 2007 3:20 PM:

" I met Father Fahy more than 20 years ago, when I was a teenager. When he was accused of this, I was a parishioner of St. Anne's. After many contacts with him, I find it hard to believe he would do something like that. Sounds like most of you already have him convicted. Unfortunately this victim waited for him to be long gone, before making the accusation. "

NSN Lodian wrote on Dec 3, 2007 3:15 PM:

" The problems with this particular case are (a) many people in the community who knew Murty Fahy believe he was not a child molester and have spoken out against the charges, (b) the alleged victim brought these charges after Father Fahy died (meaning he can't defend himself). Given the propensity for victims to "sue for money", can't reasonable people see why this case could be construed as dubious? "

BIGGER PICTURE wrote on Dec 3, 2007 12:23 PM:

" THIS IS THE WAY ALL VICTIMS ARE TREATED BY OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM. THE CRIMINALS HAVE MORE rights than the victims do. I applaud this woman for having the courage. Good luck in your fight and stay strong. you speak for all victims. tHANK YOU for having the strength and lending your voice. You are helping people all levels. peace! "

Lodian wrote on Dec 3, 2007 10:04 AM:

" parishioner: Will you feel the same if your child comes to you one day and tells you a horrific story of his/her abuse? "

to Lodi news wrote on Dec 3, 2007 6:36 AM:

" I agree with Digger! Your reporting of this story through the past year has been despicable! You have never tried to uncover the truth in this matter. Put your investigative reporters on the track and the path that Fahy has taken since being a young man. You will uncover the truth! Start in Philly and follow the trail! Spend your time looking for the real story instead of a drama you can create with your biased pen! "

to Lodi News wrote on Dec 3, 2007 6:33 AM:

" You should correct your erroneous information regarding the lawsuit filed. There was NEVER a 3 million dollar tag on this. As a matter of fact, no amount of money was asked for. This was filed only to document formally the sad story and try to help other victims come forward. Remember the FIRST accusation towards OGrady??? She too at one time was the only accuser! "

to parishioner wrote on Dec 3, 2007 6:29 AM:

" Your comment is truly ignorant! "

sad catholic wrote on Dec 3, 2007 6:26 AM:

" I understand that a pedophiles exist in every dark corner of mankind. They are in families, youth sports and anywhere else young children are available. However what makes the catholic situation so horrible is that the church continues to cover up and protect abusers at the expense of young children. The creeps are moved to other parishes, backed with attorneys, and financially supported instead of being thrown in jail. If the catholic church ever decides to treat this problem as a criminal matter and apologize to the victims I will consider returning to the church. "

To Harmony wrote on Dec 2, 2007 9:13 PM:

" I know her. They don't come more beautiful. They don't come more talented. They don't come smarter or more caring. Her family is loving and supportive. She is strong and will heal. Like the lotus flower, she'll pick herself up and grow stronger during this healing process. She will find harmony because she is who she is. Her fight is for the others who have been molested within the walls of the church and have no voice. She speaks for all of them. She stands for all of them. I admire her courage. "

Ernie wrote on Dec 2, 2007 11:31 AM:

" To the victim: I believe you. Stay strong. You are in my thoughts and in my prayers. "

Family Friend wrote on Dec 2, 2007 9:07 AM:

" I truly admire the courage and strength of this young women whom I have known for years. She is a beautiful, intelligent and extremely talented person who has had to put her life on hold to deal with this horrific act. Not only has she been traumatized but her entire family has suffered as well. It is time for her to take a break from this lawsuit and concentrate on healing. With strong family support and loving friends she will get through this difficult ordeal and come back stronger than ever. "

Listen wrote on Dec 2, 2007 2:01 AM:

" The Catholic church does not care about the victims, period. "

Caring wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:21 PM:

" How can parishioners find comfort in the news of the case being dismissed. Don't they realize that a brave young girl is dealing with this and she is the one who needs the comfort of others. "

Question wrote on Dec 1, 2007 7:01 PM:

" If you or a close loved one has not been molested can you understand the turmoil it causes? The pain and frustration for the family is beyond your understanding. It is a heinous crime that unfortunately is all to common in our society. When a victim comes forward and is immediately dismissed as a liar. What is the church telling them? The victim has never been believed by the church leaders. For this victim the courage it takes to stand unbelieved by the organization that she put her trust in is staggering. "

For the victim wrote on Dec 1, 2007 6:34 PM:

" I don't know if the victim is reading this entry, but if so please know that you are loved, BELIEVED in and applauded for how you have courageously endured this tradegy. There are many people cheering you on!! "

missy wrote on Dec 1, 2007 5:29 PM:

" Don Bo, who is a St.Annes deacon is quoted saying in the article: "I think its great news. I think it will make everyone who knows father fahy feel good." How thoughtless and uncaring toward the victim and her family who did know Fahy. The only thing that can make the family and victim feel good is that he is dead and he and his sins are in God's hands now. He can no longer harm children. "

digger wrote on Dec 1, 2007 2:48 PM:

" I had to do a little digging and I found some interesting information. Every article in the Sentinel about Fahey has been written by Ross Farrow. Is he giving an unbiased article each and every time? No he isn't or hasn't. He tends to quote Bo, Blair and Welsbacher many more times in favor of the catholic church rather than asking detailed questions to the survivors lawyers. I smell a plot,but I can dig this one out too,,,,,,,,, "

Lodian wrote on Dec 1, 2007 12:54 PM:

" TO: "TO PIPPY": WELL SAID! A young victim is not required to give their name to the public. And shame on you "Pippy" in asking for a molested woman's name and you post as anonymous. You're a coward. "

Sorry Folks wrote on Dec 1, 2007 12:15 PM:

" You have only heard a small part of this story... It is more tragic than you know. "

local catholic wrote on Dec 1, 2007 11:20 AM:

" I am shocked and disheartened at the words from the bishop. A victim should be protected, supported and loved by her church. There is something seriously wrong here. I hope this courageous young woman finds healing and can continue to seek justice when she is physically and emotionally able. "

the questioning catholic wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:48 AM:

" the postponement of judgement for fahy has given false hope to the smug abusers that do exist in the catholic church. this young heroine has suffered since the third grade with the actual abuse, an aftermath of guilt and loneliness, and the torture of bringing this case to light. the costs paid by her and her family can never be repaid. after all of this,she needs a break, but she will be back! "

another loving grandfather wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:15 AM:

" This young lady would never lie. We suspected she might have been abused when she was only nine but at that time her horrors were so great that she couldn't tell anyone. We are sick at heart we didn't get to the bottom of this at that time -- but so proud of her and her strength to go on with life. We love her so much -- as we know Jesus does. "

caring Christian wrote on Dec 1, 2007 10:12 AM:

" Hurrah for the young lady -- coming forward to live through the horrors of childhood tragedy at only 21. I know victims of childhood sexual abuse who didn't get their lives together until 50 or 60. She should be admired because the case was ONLY dismissed; Fahey was not exonerated. It's about time the Roman Catholic church admits mistakes and loves their own -- doesn't persecute them. "

to bishop blair wrote on Dec 1, 2007 9:31 AM:

" Please support this victim. Please aide instead of hinder the investigation and healing. Please do the right thing rather that what attorneys and the church hierarchy tell you to do. Please reach out to offer spiritual guidance as I am sure her religion has been taken from her by this pedophile. What do you have to lose? Just your title! the church will continue to financially support you just as they have done with OGrady. What do you have to gain? The right to enter Heaven for doing the right thing! "

to the victim wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:32 AM:

" I have true respect for you! I think you are very very brave. I wish I had your courage because what you have done for other victims that you know are out there is heroic! Thank you for putting this out there! I know this must be difficult for you, but I want you to know it is very much appreciated. "

sad catholic wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:28 AM:

" When the case was filed the Oblates and the Stockton diocese began to point fingers at each other. Bishop Blair's "praise" of the Oblates and Fahy is nothing but a political statement aimed at mending fences with the Oblates. In addition! it was interesting to see the only other Oblate in the area, Father Morse of St. Anthony's, suddenly shipped away. According to his letter to parishoners, his orders to move were not what he wanted nor expected!!!! Shame on the Church!!! Turn your records over and support the meekest of your flock!! "

to Digger wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:21 AM:

" Bravo!!! Not once has anyone from St. Annes or the stockton diocese ever contacted the victim or the family to offer spirtual or emotional support. Never once have they even contacted the family to ask how they have been getting along.....sad, sad, sad "

Lodi Dad wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:19 AM:

" Sadly, you are truly wrong about what you say. Father Fahy was not cleared. At that time no other victims had come forward so there was no proof other than what the victim reported. Unfortunately there is always a first. This case has not been closed. This was investigated by him at the very beginning of this victim's journey. She never spoke with him so he has not heard the truth. When the truth is spoken people know it. The bishop knows this is the truth. "

sallylou wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:11 AM:

" Exactly...where is the support and compassion for the victim from the church????? I did not see that in the article. I hope the church is addressing that . It is quite commendable for a 21 yr old to even step forward with this. Praise to her!!! "

To Pippy wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:11 AM:

" You don't even use your real name in a Blog! But you expect a traumatized person who has been abused and humiliated to publically announce very private matters??? ha ha "

to Parent wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:07 AM:

" The investigator never spoke with the victim. But he may have been thoughtful in not putting the victim through such difficult questions as this was first being revealed. The investigation was never closed....it was discontinued. The church's investigators were investigating the victim rather than the perpertrator sadly! "

to cmd wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:03 AM:

" your questions are good. You are right this was before first communion. Pulled right out of class. No one ever questioned him about that. Very similiar to O'Grady's M.O. She didn't need to be an alter server, nor at first communion age.....all she had to be was a student at St. Anne's and he had full reign....If you knew the facts you would understand. Unfortunately the facts are very painful and embarrassing for a victim to reveal publically. "

Rise Above wrote on Dec 1, 2007 8:02 AM:

" The hero is the victim....she will proceed when she is ready. She has planted a seed for others. "

to concerned wrote on Dec 1, 2007 7:59 AM:

" Isn't that interesting? Can you tell us more about kids being pulled out to clean the rectory during school hours???? This victim was often pulled out of class - not for the cleaning thing - but for other reasons that had nothing to do with school work. The teachers just allowed her to keep being pulled out of the class. Never even asked why she was being pulled so often. "

Debra wrote on Nov 30, 2007 11:27 PM:

" Iam proud of this young woman who had the courage to come forward to report this life altering crime. A crime so shamful that I am sure Christ Himself shed tears. Look into your heart and then ask WWJD. He would not be celebrating. He would be on his knees praying for the innocent souls that were harmed in His name at His house and for the lost souls that know no better than to celebrate at a time of such pain and sorry for so many. "

MCB wrote on Nov 30, 2007 9:52 PM:

" Admire Fahy? A child molester? This girl is telling the truth. And being bullied by the Diocese. I'm proud of her for having the courage to come forward. The case against Fahy was not tossed as the headlines would have you believe. It was the victim's choice to dismiss the case without prejudice. I find it disgusting that the bishop could actually praise a man who has victimized a young child over and over again. My love and support go out to the victim and her family in this time of healing. "

Parent wrote on Nov 30, 2007 7:39 PM:

" The private investigator for the case was Craig Williams of Stockton. His careful and thoughtful approach to this sensitive case helped to reach this decision. "

Recovering Catholic wrote on Nov 30, 2007 6:54 PM:

" Three cheers for this young woman in her efforts to heal and move on with her life. The support is clearly not coming from Blair or the Catholic Church who are more bent on exonerating a dead man. I hope her brave efforts bring forth more victims of this sick man to coroborate her story and to press on with her lawsuit. "

sad catholic wrote on Nov 30, 2007 6:43 PM:

" to NSN Lodian and parishoner - "this" did not get "settled". He was not "cleared"! The victim is still dealing with the aftermath of "murty". There will be a time when the legal system will be utilized because this case has not been tossed. Only set aside until the victim has the strength to fight an entire system designed to protect their black-clothed sinners and their blood money......I wouldn't admire someone who did this! kinda sick if you ask me! "

Her Grandfather wrote on Nov 30, 2007 6:31 PM:

" We know the molestation happened. No sweet young girl at that age can suffer what she did and not show the effects ever so clearly to her whole family. Only those that have experienced youthful sexual abuse can know the terrible toll it takes. We are so proud of her efforts to get her life back on track. "

also concerned wrote on Nov 30, 2007 3:25 PM:

" The compassion for this young girl does not appear anywhere in the statements from the church... "great news" doesn't come across as any type of support for the victim....this young girl has a lifetime of dealing with this...she will not "find comfort in this news" "

digger wrote on Nov 30, 2007 3:11 PM:

" Wasn't or isn't the survivor a member of St Annes Parish? Are the bishops, priests and deacons watching over this individual? Seems like their main concern is their own and the cover up continues. Over and Over it happens. It will occur again because the catholic church does nothing but stand behind the perp. Thank goodness there are strong individuals to stand up to the hypocracy. More like her and the pattern may someday end!!!!! "

CJA wrote on Nov 30, 2007 2:47 PM:

" I wish I good give this woman a BIG HUG and let her know that she did what was RIGHT by coming forward. Hopefully she has paved the way for others to find hope and healing. "

bystander wrote on Nov 30, 2007 2:25 PM:

" My heart goes out to this courageous young woman. She has shown an incredible amount of strength throughout this tragic ordeal. The case was not "tossed out" but rather a difficult decision was made by the victim to put things on hold and concentrate on healing. Fahy has not in any way been cleared of wrong doing!! "

CRH wrote on Nov 30, 2007 2:08 PM:

" Can a victim of Fahy heal when Bishop Stephen Blaire, states "Many people who knew and admired Fahy will find comfort in this news" when these many people and Bishop have not been sexually abused by a perverted priest when they were children? Bishop Blair offers comfort to these people but what spiritual comfort has he and the Church offered to the victim? Hopefully, the lawsuit is not "tossed" but only delayed while the victim finds the courage to proceed while the church sweeps the dirt under the rug. May Fahy burn in hell! "

Lodi Dad wrote on Nov 30, 2007 1:39 PM:

" The PI investigating the case was Craig Williams of Stockton. His thorough investigation cleared Father Fahy. His sensitive and careful approach to the case made everyone feel comfortable with discussing this sensitive matter. "

sad2 wrote on Nov 30, 2007 1:10 PM:

" sad catholic: And they still want those Catholics to have more babies. Why? They are not valued in the Catholic church. "

nylodian wrote on Nov 30, 2007 12:44 PM:

" Parishioner: I agree with you. I personally know two teachers who had accusations against them PROVEN false. One accuser had tried it before. Last year in Upstate NY another student's accusations were proven false. As angry and betrayed as I am about Fr. Ollie (as I knew him) I am still able to retain some reason and determine that NOT every accused priest is guilty. "

Believer wrote on Nov 30, 2007 12:40 PM:

" She has not given her name because like it is stated above, she is not ready for this to publicized. Plus look at all the scrutiny she is getting remaining nameless! She needs to get her life on track and when she is emotionally ready she will deal with this issue. "

Believer wrote on Nov 30, 2007 12:40 PM:

" Whether you think this allegation is true or not it is not very "Catholic" of you to call this young woman a liar. I know this happened as I know this young women and I know she would not make this up. If you were around this man and he didn't do anything to you it doesn't mean he was incapable of these acts. This is a terrible thing that has happened and I feel for this young woman and her family. "

concerned too wrote on Nov 30, 2007 12:30 PM:

" The victory here is not that the church and Fahy have been cleared because they have not been. The case has just been placed on hold. The victory here is that there is a young girl out there who is a true hero. She was willing to step out with her story and let the truth be heard. My praise solely goes to her! "

KB wrote on Nov 30, 2007 12:09 PM:

" I cannot praise this young girl enough for her amazing strength and courage in coming forward with what this priest did to her. She has not only opened the door for others to come forward but has allowed herself to begin the healing process. Putting the lawsuit on hold for now, demonstrates her determination to look after herself and truly do what she needs to heal. I admire her greatly! "

sad soul wrote on Nov 30, 2007 11:30 AM:

" The victim states IT DID HAPPEN....did we miss that??? I bet it is a grueling experience to get to that point. It is said that is why more do not come forward...the same with rape cases........it is a very painful and exploiting for the victim. "

Lodi Girl wrote on Nov 30, 2007 11:25 AM:

" We must remember that just because it is in the paper does not mean it is how the story went! "

thinker wrote on Nov 30, 2007 11:24 AM:

" Intersesting comments in the article . The victim continues to state she was abused. The deacon states it will make all who knew him "feel good", it should make them "question". I also wonder if Blaire would leave his little girl alone with Fahy since he is so "GRATEFUL for his dedicated service". I am glad the victim came forward at such a young age. It will help her with her own healing and help pave the way for the other victims out there. "

P & C wrote on Nov 30, 2007 10:04 AM:

" IN THE PAST NOW? "She's 21 years old, and she's just starting to deal with the mental and emotional repercussions of her sexual abuse," DiMaria said. "She found it best to focus on her own healing, and we're on board with that." It is not in the past for the accuser or her family. A young child, taken advantage by an authority figure, was again subjected to emotional abuse when she came forward. This time by the overwhelming resources available to the Stockton Diocese. They powered through this one. Alleluia??? "

a concerned mother wrote on Nov 30, 2007 8:39 AM:

" I don't know why a Church led investigation offers comfort to the people who knew Fahy. It sounds absurd to be reassured by this "impartial" process. I admire the young woman for bringing the discomfort and wariness about such abusers to the surface and then returning her energies to her own healing. We have been fairly warned. Surviving through and healing from this type of abuse is exhausting and demanding work. Her decision to set the case aside for now is not a vindication of Fahy. I'm perplexed that the church thinks this is "great news"! "

sad catholic wrote on Nov 30, 2007 7:45 AM:

" I really wish that the church would look out for the emotional, spiritual, and physical well being of their children. Instead the church continues to want to protect all of their gold and silver at the expense of victims of their pathetic priests. Is it so hard for the male hierarchy to understand that all they have to do is to get rid of the pedophiles just like any other business would do? "

sad catholic wrote on Nov 30, 2007 7:42 AM:

" I am saddend to hear Bishop Blair praise Fahy and report that the case was tossed. The case was only put on hold. The exact terms is "dismissed without predjuice" which means that this victim can put this on hold until she is better able to emotionally handle the vicious attacks that the oblates and church have begun. She is proud that she has put this on record so that other victims can feel free to come forward. She has till she is 27 to carry on with this case. Hopefully she will heal before then. "

wake up wrote on Nov 30, 2007 12:16 AM:

" just because the law suit was dropped does not clear up his name, this girl was obviously not ready to proceed for reasons that we will never be able to imagine unless this has happened to you.. "

missy wrote on Nov 29, 2007 8:54 PM:

" I think the victim is the winner here. What people don't realize is that she was able to get the accusation out there so if there are any other victims the path is layed for them. There is always a first to come forward!!!! She is a courageous young lady. "

Not Catholic wrote on Nov 29, 2007 6:16 PM:

" How can some of you Fr Fahy supporters simply 'look the other way.' I guess that way you will only have to do 10 Hail Mary's instead of 20? I'm sure these perverts used more Catholic guilt into brainwashing these poor young victims. Shameless! "

Lodian wrote on Nov 29, 2007 4:34 PM:

" Pippy: We're talking about "child" molestation. "

Lodian wrote on Nov 29, 2007 4:32 PM:

" When priests (or anyone) molest a child they do not do so in front of other people. "

Pippy cont'd wrote on Nov 29, 2007 2:03 PM:

" I think they should publicly post via all media the accusers identity if the charges are ever dropped or if the accusation that was publicized before charges are filed. Nothing regarding misconduct should ever be publicized at LEAST until CHARGES are filed. "

Pippy Longstocking wrote on Nov 29, 2007 2:00 PM:

" So who is the Victim? The nameless facelees accuser? Or the Catholic Church etal? Pretty obvious, Annonymity is a pretty big cloak and is constantly abused for extorsion. Look at the woman who just claimed the Kings player abused her too. That was FRONT PAGE, that player was completely TRASHED and she just disappears when the charges are dropped. "

T & C wrote on Nov 29, 2007 11:49 AM:

" It's time Lodi moved on and cleaned up some of their own sixty-some christian churches. You hypocritical christians and protestants think it's only the Catholic Church? Who's watching your children today? "

NSN Lodian wrote on Nov 29, 2007 11:17 AM:

" Oh, yeah. I think Murty was against recruiting too. "

cmd wrote on Nov 29, 2007 11:00 AM:

" I was an alter girl for many masses Father Fahy ran. I don't rememer a single instance in which he was inappropriate with any of us. I also wonder how a 2nd grader was around him as much as she says she was. 2nd graders have not had their first communion, cannot be alter kids and I do not think have that much contact with the priests while attending school . . . makes me question, but then again, I do not know all the facts. "

concerned wrote on Nov 29, 2007 10:24 AM:

" Then why were students sent to the rectory to clean during school hours? "

To NSN Lodian wrote on Nov 29, 2007 8:49 AM:

" Father Murty was not "cleared" as you put it. This does not change the fact that she claims he molested her. She just feels right now that her mental health is more important and she needs to deal with that before a lawsuit. So for those of you saying he was "innocent" you don't know that. "

NSN Lodian wrote on Nov 29, 2007 7:41 AM:

" I am glad this got settled, and glad that Father Fahy (whom we all called "Murty" when he was at St Marys) has been cleared. He was a very animated character in the classrooms at SM and I'm sure many alumni have fond memories of his antics. "

parishioner wrote on Nov 29, 2007 7:23 AM:

" I admired Fahy and take it as good news too, hopefully the skeptics can realize that not every accused priest is guilty. That is why we have the legal system for everyone, innocent till proven guilty. "

Comments on this story are now closed.

Weather

WXPort
Weather sponsored by: