Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

November 30th, 2008
November 29th, 2008
November 28th, 2008
November 27th, 2008
November 26th, 2008
November 25th, 2008
November 24th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT

Galt OKs study on sales tax increase for police funding

By Matt Brown
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Updated: Thursday, October 25, 2007 6:41 AM PDT

Galt's police department could get a $400,000 per year funding boost if residents pass a potential ballot measure to increase the city's sales tax.

That ballot measure moved closer to reality this week when the City Council voted 5-0 to gauge the community's support for the initiative, which would be on the Nov. 2008 ballot.

"I was very pleased with the outcome," said Councilman Donald Haines, who is pushing the ballot measure. "The council agreed to move forward and do an initial survey to find out if the community is willing to pay for additional police services."

The city will hire consultants Lew Edwards Group for the $40,000 first phase of the public awareness campaign. The Oakland-based consultants will spend three months polling the community to see if they will tolerate a quarteror half-cent, sales tax increase.

If there is public support, the council will spend $120,000 for the second phase of the non-partisan educational campaign in the run-up to the election.

Galt Police Chief Loren Cattolico estimates a quarter-cent sales tax increase would fund three to four new police officers including vehicles and equipment. A recent study of Galt police services found that the department is under-staffed despite adding five positions in the last two years.

The study identified a funding gap between current funds and the funding level needed for a fully staffed department. For a few hours a day, Galt has as many as six police officers on duty and two officers on the graveyard shift, Cattolico said.

Other cities in the state that have passed sales tax increases to fund fire and police departments include:
• Manteca
• Clovis
• Dinuba
• Porterville
• Visalia
• Escondido
• La Mesa
• Los Banos
• Saratoga
• Stockton
Source: Lew Edwards Group.

"It's pretty skinny out there," he said. "(This measure) would allow us to be more visible."

Proposition 218 requires that all new taxes be put to voters. Taxes for dedicated spending, such as for public safety, need to pass by a two-thirds majority.

California law allows sales tax increases in multiples of a quarter-cent. Haines said the initial study would determine the amount of increase to put on the ballot. Galt's sales tax is currently 7.75 percent.

"If the community feels public safety is important, they will support a half-cent increase," Haines said. "It comes down to what the citizens are willing to endure."

Galt tried to pass a sales tax increase in 2004, but voters overwhelmingly turned it down with 79 percent against the measure. The city did not hire consultants to help educate the public about that ballot measure, Haines said.

The Lew Edwards Group has helped cities raise $16 billion in finance measures with a 92 percent success rate, according to the company's proposal.

The company helped the city of Manteca pass a half-cent public safety sales tax measure with 70 percent support. The city now has the highest sales tax rate in San Joaquin County at 8.25 percent when voters approved the measure in 2006 after turning it down in two previous elections.

Lodi officials have talked about raising public safety funds through a sales tax increase. In 2006, voters turned down measure G, a quarter-cent sales tax increase that would have paid for paramedics on fire trucks and funded sports centers.

Contact reporter Matt Brown at mattb@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

what is happening to our town???? wrote on Oct 26, 2007 4:20 PM:

" It bad enough we have to go to the lodi paper to get our news but now we are going to have to shop in lodi too. Someone in Galt need to get it together before we loose all our galt businesses. This problem can be fixed by making some cuts and not by increasing taxes. "

Cogito wrote on Oct 26, 2007 8:21 AM:

" Hey, way to go Einsteins. Now I have another reason not to shop in Galt. Could someone give me 1 good reason why anyone would open a business in this town? We definitely have people in charge that are clueless as how to attract business to the community. A sales tax increase could actually decrease revenue. People will go into business, and shop, elsewhere. "

citizens to protect galt wrote on Oct 25, 2007 5:30 PM:

" In this economy, most businesses have had to lay people off and cut back on their expenses. We have not seen any cut backs and positions eliminated or departments stream-lined in this city. We need to look at this before we tax our citizens for something we can afford if we just look into it. Maybe we can look at reducing the amount of money we pay for benefits for the city employees. That alone should fund the officers we need. My company doesn't pay for health care and that seems to be the norm these days. "

save our town wrote on Oct 25, 2007 5:26 PM:

" I got a flyer in the mail this week that if the city council authorizes the annexation of the land by the sewer plant, and Del Webb moves forward, that project alone will bring over $90 million to our town. I say bring in the 'ol folks. The flyer said they will even pay for our sewer problems and our Interchange infrastructure improvements and they love Walmart! "

tired of being taxed wrote on Oct 25, 2007 5:22 PM:

" It amazes me that the city council voted last week to limit the size of box stores coming to Galt, thereby decreasing our tax revenue and now they are spending $160,000 on a consultant to see if we want to pay more in taxes to cover more police officers. Unbelievable! Find the extra money in your own budget. We are tired of your wasteful spending. Start penny pinching like the rest of us. "

concerned galt citizen wrote on Oct 25, 2007 5:16 PM:

" The City Council should cut the city managers salary in half and eliminate the position of the asst city manager. That should fund 3-4 police officers a year. Also, why don't they save us tax payers $160,000 and just put the measure on the ballot! or use the consulting fee and have the consultants review our city budget and make the necessary cuts to fund the police officers. "

Al Baldwin, Galt wrote on Oct 25, 2007 4:50 PM:

" If Galt splits the 1/4 percent tax with the CSD/Galt fire department there may not be enough money for police. Maybe it should be 1/2 percent or have the Fire Dept. ask for there own 1/4 percent tax. "

kilioo wrote on Oct 25, 2007 12:36 PM:

" jebus h. kristoski, when will the government stop with the confiscation of peoples income. Why can't they survive on the 50% they already take. I know there are a bunch of mush skulls that will be all for this, they are the same ones that put the noose around their own neck thinking its an award. "

Comments on this story are now closed.