Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 2nd, 2009
November 8th, 2009
November 7th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
November 4th, 2009
November 3rd, 2009
November 2nd, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
Wal-Mart spokesman Aaron Rios shows council members the amount of reply cards he received from residents stating they support a new Wal-Mart being built in Galt, on Tuesday evening during the Galt City Council meeting. (Angelina Gervasi/News-Sentinel)

Big-box ban approved

Galt council passes retail store ordinance; proposed Wal-Mart not scuttled

By Matt Brown
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 17, 2007 7:47 AM PDT

The Galt City Council passed an ordinance Tuesday banning retail stores of 140,000 square feet or larger that also sell groceries.

The 4-1 vote does not scuttle a proposed 132,000-square-foot Wal-Mart store on Twin Cities Road east of Highway 99.

The council considered a Planning Commission-recommended ban on 120,000-square-foot stores that would have killed Wal-Mart's plans, but decided to pass the ordinance as it was originally written. Councilman Darryl Clare dissented.

"We're disappointed that the council decided to vote against consumer choice," Wal-Mart spokesman Aaron Rios said after the meeting. "But we are pleased that they raised the threshold to allow our proposal to go forward."

About 100 Galt residents packed the Council chambers for a standing-room-only debate that became heated at times. Speakers for and against the ordinance reflected a split in a community that craves shopping options but clings to its small-town image.

Supporters of the ordinance said big box stores like Wal-Mart take customers from small businesses, forcing those businesses to close and leaving communities blighted.


Mayor Tim Raboy gives his opinion on the ordinance banning big-box stores in Galt on Tuesday evening during the Galt City Council meeting. (Angelina Gervasi/News-Sentinel)

Opponents said Galt, with lagging sales tax receipts, is in no position to limit business in the city. They said they loathed having to drive to Lodi or Elk Grove to buy simple things like socks.

Many people saw the debate as a referendum on Wal-Mart in Galt. One group of residents from the Emerald Village neighborhood near the proposed Wal-Mart supported the store but didn't want it in their backyard because of the traffic it would create.

Vice Mayor Andrew Meredith, who spearheaded the ordinance, said the law was about protecting the community not limiting Wal-Mart's plans.

"This is in no way an ordinance to keep one project from happening," he said. "We started this long before we had a proposal from Wal-Mart."

Galt resident Reuven Epstein said Wal-Mart would provide a shopping option in a city where businesses are not booming.

"People keep saying it's going to hurt existing businesses," he said. "I'm not sure what existing businesses. There aren't many. You can't buy much in the way of shoes or other clothing."

David John said government shouldn't meddle in business.

"Don't tell business what to do," he said. "We're in a free market enterprise system."

The Galt City Council voted 4-1 to create a farmer's market.
The market will operate for a six-week trial period in the spring and will continue through the summer if it is successful.
The market will be on Sunday mornings from 8 a.m. to 1 p.m. at the city parking lot near Burger King.
If successful, the council hopes to move it to downtown. Councilwoman Barbara Payne dissented.
— News-Sentinel staff.

Supporters of the ordinance, like Connie Connelly, said allowing big box stores in Galt is a slap in the face to small business owners.

"Small business made Galt what it is," she said. "We need to treat small business with respect."

Speaking before the council, Rios held a stack of postcards he said were from Wal-Mart supporters. Wal-Mart mailed letters to Galt residents in the past week urging them to voice their support for the large retailer.

As Rios explained Wal-Mart's plan for a Galt store, some members in the audience booed and cut him off.

In voting against the ordinance, Clare said the law doesn't solve the issue of traffic near the proposed Wal-Mart.

"We did nothing about Wal-Mart tonight," he said. "We still have to solve the traffic problem."

Meredith said he will work on an amendment to the ordinance that would limit retail store hours from 5 a.m. to 11 p.m.

Contact reporter Matt Brown at mattb@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

to Lodian wrote on Oct 23, 2007 9:44 AM:

" Lodian wouldn't say that about Galt so knock it off. "

DENNY wrote on Oct 23, 2007 1:10 AM:

" Our country better wake up !! During WW ll we sold scrap metal to Japan; they made bombs, planes and ships to come after us. China is going to come after us too. In fact they poision our food and our toys DMM Vacaville "

Dennis wrote on Oct 23, 2007 1:10 AM:

" Have you ever shopped at WINCO ? A breath of fresh air. Several bargain stores attract a tough element the stores are not clean and selection is not good. Winco is always clean and has a great selection. I have been comparing prices with Lucky and Safeway. One example name brand pinto beans at Winco 58 cents at Lucky $ 1.49. Across the board Winco is about half of the Union stores. Everyone beats up Walmart. If they weren't doing it someone else will. Granted China has an unfair advantage; poor labor laws, child labor, no pollution concerns etc. "

Lodian wrote on Oct 22, 2007 11:26 AM:

" Again, nobody cares about Galt. "

CDawg wrote on Oct 18, 2007 12:15 PM:

" Made in China is everywhere! Next time you go into any store look closely at the products you buy most are made in China, Mexico, Indonesia etc. I agree I do not like buying foriegn made goods but reality is that it is cheaper for companies to produce goods in other countries. I am not going to pay top dollar for some socks that will only last for a few months anyway... "

The Wickster wrote on Oct 18, 2007 6:42 AM:

" Why do I not shop at WalMart? China. Everything you buy is made in China, especially when you shop at WalMart. Name brand item you normally think are manufactured in the US is made in China. Folks—get a clue. China is over running the world with their garbage. Besides, with WalMart having financial woes who is to know if they'll be around in the next ten years. Anyone want to buy a huge cement box? "

Tiredofdrivintoshop wrote on Oct 18, 2007 5:30 AM:

" Once again the good ole boys of Galt screw the residents. "

EvenMoreSurprised wrote on Oct 17, 2007 9:27 PM:

" Yes, Galt does have crime but if you think it has "bigger city" crime, you are the ignorant one. Don't worry though, a year or so after Walmart opens its doors you will have a better idea of what bigger city crime really is. "

CDawg wrote on Oct 17, 2007 8:11 PM:

" The east side is already ghetto as a matter of fact all of Galt is ghetto, how will Walmart change that? You show me one part of town that does not have trash, gangs, graffiti or tweekers running around, then I might agree. As for affecting small business, what small businesses are thriving in Galt now? I see them come as fast as they go…besides they don’t have what families need, one stop shop. The flea market is only open during the day, two times a week, how is that convenient for working families? "

walmart supporter wrote on Oct 17, 2007 5:48 PM:

" Glad to see the city council listened to the citizens of galt and voted to leave the ordinance at 140,000 sq ft so Walmart can come to town. It will be nice to have 1.45 million dollars a year in tax revenue. Maybe now the city council won't raise my taxes to pay for city services. Go Walmart!! Let's just make sure they don't make it out of corregated metal like the movie theater! "

Putting the flea market out of business wrote on Oct 17, 2007 4:40 PM:

" Who needs a Walmart in Galt when you have the flea market. What can possibly be sold at Walmart that you cant get at the flea market. "

Lodian wrote on Oct 17, 2007 3:26 PM:

" Again, nobody cares about Galt. "

Weezer wrote on Oct 17, 2007 2:20 PM:

" What unionized grocery lie when there is no un-unionized Walmart truth? Saving a few pennies in return for turning Galt's eastside into a ghetto isn't worth it. It's downright foolish and will the city more in the long run. "

surprisedbyignorance wrote on Oct 17, 2007 1:45 PM:

" Galt is a smaller community, but it is definately not a safer community. Walmart is not going to bring anymore crime than we already have. Galt has bigger city crime, with gang activity, shootings and drugs. "

Morgan Barrington wrote on Oct 17, 2007 11:24 AM:

" You get what you deserve. You bought the unionized grocery lie. Now don't get mad when we drive by Galt, point at it and snicker and laugh. How do you spell "Po'dunk"? Hansen is right, Gallstone is the more appropriate spelling. "

654fgh wrote on Oct 17, 2007 11:19 AM:

" Hey So Much For Free Enterprise, nobody is holding a gun to your head and "forcing" you to pay high prices. If saving money is that important, Lodi and Elk Grove aren't far. A little inconvenience is a small price to pay to live in a smaller, relatively safer community. "

Supporter of CHOICES wrote on Oct 17, 2007 10:18 AM:

" I am not for or against "Wal-mart", but I am definitely for lower prices. Unlike Fischgoth, I DO mind paying the higher prices (AND THEY ARE CERTAINLY HIGHER) at Raley's or Save Mart. I want to be allowed to choose how my hard-earned dollars are spent. That doesn't mean that I will only shop at a big-box, but this is America and I am entitled to the choice. "

654fhg wrote on Oct 17, 2007 9:39 AM:

" Yumm... nothing like some low quality Wal-mart steak. Does saving a few bucks on lower quality food really make up for the increase in crime and traffic that Wal-mart will bring? "

Fischgoth wrote on Oct 17, 2007 9:29 AM:

" I don't mind paying a little higher prices at Raleys. I like the cleanliness and customer service. Especially in an era when customer "service" is becoming extinct. "

Weezer wrote on Oct 17, 2007 8:30 AM:

" Whatever sales tax revenue from the proposed Walmart will be spent to increase the police force as Galt welcomes South Sac thugs. The "G" in Galt will soon stand for ghetto in the eastside. "

654fhg wrote on Oct 17, 2007 8:30 AM:

" Well, there goes the neighborhood. Sorry small businesses and grocery stores, good luck. Goodbye quiet nights. "

So Much For Free Enterprise! wrote on Oct 17, 2007 8:12 AM:

" Why should I be held hostage by HIGH PRICED grocery stores and FORCED to pay HIGH prices for food when I have the right to shop else where? If you GREEDY grocery stores want more customers, lower your greedy prices! I have the right to pay $2.50 a LB for a steak if I can find that price instead of you making me pay $5.00 a LB! Nothing like shutting down competition to keep fleecing customers! "

So Much For Free Enterprise! wrote on Oct 17, 2007 8:09 AM:

" Well, Safeway, Food 4 Less, Raileys and S-Mart Foods can breathe a sigh of relief now that they can continue to charge HIGH prices for their groceries all in the name of GREEDY PROFIT! This country was founded on "Free Enterprise! Sell a good product at a FAIR PRICE, provide good customer service and you MAY be able to make a profit! No business has ever been guaranteed they will bremain in business till next year. Shame on you greedy grocery stores! "

GetUrHeadOut wrote on Oct 17, 2007 7:54 AM:

" If the local “good ole boys” were providing the goods at a reasonable cost, Wally World would not even be interested in Galt! HELLO!!! "

trailer lady wrote on Oct 17, 2007 7:49 AM:

" Glad to see it passed. I am confident that Wal Mart will never get that site to work. By requiring them to get the conditional use permit, the city may have still killed the Wal Mart because I can't see how anyone could support it with the traffic nightmare it would create. "

Comments on this story are now closed.