Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
February 1st, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT
Neighbors, from left, John Welsser, Rod Rodriguez and Ralph Bilbrey discuss their complaints related to a vacant house on Tejon Street in Lodi. (Whitney Ramirez/News-Sentinel)

What to do about vacant home's looks?

Lodi neighbor takes matter into his own hands — he mows lawn

By Ross Farrow
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Thursday, September 27, 2007 6:57 AM PDT

Ralph Bilbrey had finally had enough.

Grass on his neighbor's lawn had grown several inches high, but there isn't a homeowner to mow it. Yet there is a "for sale" sign with the name of Prudential California Realty on the lawn.

The neighbor's Park West home is in foreclosure. Residents estimate that no one has lived at the Tejon Street residence for a year or more. And nobody is mowing the lawn.

Until Wednesday, that is.

Despite reportedly being told by a Prudential representatives to stay off the property, Bilbrey took his lawn mower, saw and pruning shears and did about three hours of work Wednesday morning.

Bilbrey and a neighbor, Rob Rodriguez, have brought the matter to the attention of Lodi City Hall and Prudential during the past two weeks. They feel they haven't received a satisfactory answer.

"Why do you let this home go so bad when you're trying to sell the property?" asked Rodriguez. "The lawn was so high you could deer hunt on the property."

The situation in Park West is just another example of how the downturn in the real estate market and the mortgage crisis have left homes unoccupied in Lodi, San Joaquin County and throughout the nation.

Many of the homes sit vacant as yards, pools and their overall appearances deteriorate. Neighbors have little recourse to fix the problems as code enforcement staffs are overwhelmed, and it's often a struggle to figure out who owns the properties.

Prudential broker Donna Cartwright, whose name is on the "for sale" sign on Tejon Street near Lower Sacramento Road, declined to comment.

"It would be best to call the owner direct," Cartwright said Wednesday. "I'm not at liberty to discuss the owner."

City records show that the house is owned by U.S. Bank, so the city sent a "courtesy letter" to the bank's San Diego headquarters on Aug. 16, said Lodi city spokesman Jeff Hood.

U.S. Bank spokeswoman Jennifer Wendt said Wednesday afternoon she is looking into the bank's records on the Tejon Street property, and had no other information.

Mayor Bob Johnson said he has discussed with city staff the possibility of adopting an ordinance to require absentee owners to maintain their property.

"I don't know how far down the line (discussion) has gone," Johnson said. "I'm not trying to side with anybody, but the owner is supposed to maintain the property, not the agent."

Another problem the city faces in foreclosure cases is determining just who the owner is, said Randy Hatch, Lodi's community development director.

"One of the problems is following the trail of owners," he said. "Documents at the (county) recorder's office may not be current."

But Hatch said the city, through its present ordinances, has enough teeth to enforce sanctions against unsightly vacant properties.

"We updated our code enforcement process so we can go after homeowners," Hatch said.

The Manteca City Council will soon consider adopting an ordinance that would result in civil penalties of up to $1,000 per day with a maximum of $100,000 for unsightly structures. If the fine isn't paid, the city may place a lien on the property.
Under the proposed ordinance, the exterior of the house, including landscaping, must be maintained to not create the appearance of an unsecured, unoccupied structure or another hazard to public safety, according to a report by Manteca Police Chief Charles Halford.
If landscaping isn't maintained, the city may hire a contractor to perform the work and charge the property owner.
Source: City of Manteca.

The city of Manteca is developing an ordinance to allow that city to strictly punish owners of abandoned homes that aren't secure and lack landscape maintenance, said Manteca City Clerk Joann Tilton.

Lodi has its eyes on a dozen abandoned homes that are vacant, Hood said. They are located all over town, including the neighborhood near Mills Avenue and Yosemite Drive, the area near the intersection of Hutchins Street and Kettleman Lane, and the neighborhood east of the Grape Bowl.

"Some communities are totally overwhelmed," Hatch said. "So far, it doesn't seem like a crisis situation here like in some communities."

The city is low on personnel to enforce its ordinance regarding vacant buildings. The city has one full-time code enforcement officer and retained two consultants to help on nuisance abatement, Hatch said.

Due to manpower restrictions, the city must prioritize where that enforcement will be, Hood said.

"If (the houses are) secure and vacant, we're not going to be taking any special steps," Hood said. "If it has a broken window or something like that, It would move up the priority ladder. It has to be a safety or public health issue."

Dead vegetation is considered a nuisance, Hood said. If a swimming pool turns green, then it would get the city's attention because standing water breeds mosquitoes and the potential for someone contracting West Nile virus.

The San Joaquin County Mosquito and Vector control District has been busy this summer treating swimming pools, ponds and other standing water to prevent outbreaks of mosquitoes.

Contact reporter Ross Farrow at rossf@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

neighborly wrote on Oct 3, 2007 5:04 AM:

" I hope that people who try to maintain the yards of their neighbors would not be prosecuted for trespassing, nor should they face liabilty for this act. If neighbors are allowed to do this, it would help the neighborhood appearance and protect it from vagrants. Neighbors who care for one another should be respected and applauded and not have to worry about repurcussions. They are helping their present neighbors as well as themselves and are trying to protect the health and safety of their neighborhood. Isn't it nice to know that such people exist in Lodi? "

Lend A Helping Hand wrote on Sep 30, 2007 8:18 AM:

" When a French "pharmacist" couple in one neighborhood were arrested due to their illegal pharmaceuticals, that neighborhood simply got together and maintained their yard and pool. It takes a long time before government-confiscated homes can be sold! Another neighbor took the American-born children into her home but the French-born child was sent back to France. A very sad situation, for sure! So, neighbors, pitch in and one day the problems will all be resolved. "

ExcuseMe wrote on Sep 29, 2007 8:18 PM:

" The sale on her house fell apart and now it becomes someone elses responsiblity to maintain the property. I guarantee you, neither her Realtor or lender suggested she move before her buyer was approved or escrow closed. She made that decision all on her own. Now the neighbors, city, lender or Realtor should maintain her property. How ridiculous is that? "

To Researcher wrote on Sep 29, 2007 8:10 PM:

" You're big on making accusations, but come up short on facts. You make outrageous statements concerning the integrity of Realtors, appraisers and lenders. Put names on these people you're attacking. I would venture to say you don't own real estate and never will. You're a weasel and you need to crawl back into your hole. "

Holier than thou wrote on Sep 29, 2007 3:16 PM:

" 1)NOW is NOT the time to buy a house. 2) In 5 years when prices start normalizing and salesman start pitching "get rich quick" schemes again, RUN the other way. 3) If your neighbor's house starts looking terrible, ask them if they need help. If they don't care, sneak over at night and water the lawn. If you see gangbangers, dopers or drunk kids "hanging out", call the LPD. If all fails, call a Lodi Realtor and ask to try to get a new listing. Maybe they will "fix and flip" like the other flipper/realtors? "

Observer wrote on Sep 29, 2007 10:44 AM:

" Well how do all of you "holier than thou" people feel after reading todays article? "

To Researcher wrote on Sep 29, 2007 1:25 AM:

" Your "Parkwest" home that sold for $135K at 648 Rutledge is NOT in Parkwest, you don't know anything it seems. What is going to happen in this market is prices will fall a little bit more, but all the seller's will soon take their homes off the market rather than get nothing for it and it WILL become a seller's market again by 2009/10, thus the cycle continues. I do agree prices have gone out of control, but get real. This article was about the vacant property - IT IS THE OWNER's RESPONSIBILITY - but banks don't care. "

Lodi Resident wrote on Sep 28, 2007 5:00 PM:

" There are 2-3 yards like this in almost all Lodi neighborhoods. Watch out! you havent seen anything yet. So take your medication, drink your booze and calm down. "

Researcher cont wrote on Sep 28, 2007 1:02 PM:

" Many Realtors support a complete upgrade in educational requirements to a BA in Real Estate for Associates and an MS for Brokers. This would be in addition to course work in finance, ethics, economics, law, and one year of statistics and or calculus. These needed changes will improve the image of the profession and screen out - in your words "uneducated morons" that embrace your profession. "

Researcher wrote on Sep 28, 2007 1:01 PM:

" No, I am NOT an uneducated moron. Presently, there are 427,389 Real estate licensees in California. Thats almost one half million! WHY? Thats almost the total population of San Joaquin county. There are extremely low educational requirements to be licensed by the California DRE. New proposed laws if enacted, including AB 2429, will increase the minimum single college course requirement that exists today. "

to To Lodian wrote on Sep 28, 2007 12:45 PM:

" Try buying a house in the Vinewood school district. IMPOSSIBLE! "

Researcher wrote on Sep 28, 2007 12:37 PM:

" Their goals tend to promote high house sales, higher prices (promoting SFR as investments rather than just shelter), and to tout single family residences as an investment. These three factors keep the "churn" going. This is where the profits are. If there is NO "churn", there is no need for Realtors. Historically, Real estate commissions have been usually based via a commission fee schedule developed years ago. New fairer methods of compensation are being developed as technology improves. I recommend going to the NAR website for more information. "

Researcher wrote on Sep 28, 2007 12:36 PM:

" The Realtor does NOT dictate selling price. Theoretically they must bring qualified willing buyer and seller together for an agreement to settlement. However, many pay a large fee to local Realtor associations, California and National Realtor organizations. These fees are for advertising and political lobbying. "

Lodian wrote on Sep 28, 2007 12:23 PM:

" I can see the homes in the Rutledge area selling for less than the Park West area homes. "

Researcher 4 wrote on Sep 28, 2007 12:21 PM:

" Always be careful about builder-financed mortgages. Many builders prefer you finance ONLY through "their mortgage company". You might get clipped for more cash. Any promised "upgrades" as inducements to comply may not be upgrades at all. I suggest if have any questions, post them on the Mortgage Broker Blog located at: http://www.brokeroutpost.com/ The main point that keeps LO's honest about qaulifying their buyers is the loan "buyback" provision of 6-12 months. "

Lodian wrote on Sep 28, 2007 12:21 PM:

" To Lodian: The poster 'Research is key' posted that the house was in Park West and sold for $135k. I was trying to locate that information on zillow.com, as suggested, but it does not seem to exist. "

Researcher 3 wrote on Sep 28, 2007 12:16 PM:

" Many times, when business is brisk, it helps if all the players know each other. That is not illegal. But any non-disclosures of "other" money transactions (or consideration or agency) related to the mortgage are required to be stated according to HUD and RESPA. There are exceptions. For example, home builders do not need to disclose the exact loan costs as long they are acting as the loan oribinator for their new homes only. They are not legally loan brokers. "

Researcher 2 wrote on Sep 28, 2007 12:13 PM:

" This decision is supposedly up to the buyer (if there are more than one Mortgage companies). But in the confusion, with lots of information, a verbal recommendation or nod of the head is all that it takes for a decision. As you know, on existing houses, the appraiser can be selected by the loan officer or the mortgage lender depending on the facts. Usually its the lender, but not always. "

Researcher wrote on Sep 28, 2007 12:11 PM:

" I don't want to hurt any ongoing investigation, but I will tell you that when I or any of my friends call a Real estate salesman. They always "recommend" the preferred broker they like. Literature or business cards are usually offered. The broker (who is supposed to be independent), selects the type of loans that are to the best interests of two people - the prospective buyer (theoretically) and/or themselves). "

For lodian wrote on Sep 28, 2007 11:55 AM:

" For example, look at the property owned by a CC member on Ham lane. Notice what side of the street her property is located. If you want to look up other addresses its on the City Council website under "conflict of interest filings", or campaign contribution filings. All are online. They think no one checks LOL. There are no secrets here. State law (FPPC and Secretary of state) requires all politicians info is to be in public records. Look up any of these addresses on Zillow and other databases and you will understand. "

To Lodian wrote on Sep 28, 2007 11:53 AM:

" You will see big differences based on zip codes, and school boundaries. You have to print the maps and put in the LUSD single school boundaries yourself. You will see a huge difference in price by looking at the exact same type of house across the street. Go to the LUSD web page and look at the indvidual school maps. Houses wihin the Reese school boundaries cost more than within the Washington boundaries for the same sq ft house. "

To Lodian wrote on Sep 28, 2007 11:45 AM:

" hint: try the 600 block of Rutledge, its a 4/2 and has lot size of 5227 and was built in 1970. Check the box that says "recently sold". In this case 7/18/07. When you use Zillow, you have to remember that it only has data from county records. Any information is only one piece of the puzzle. The best data consist of the sales history, legal house info (structures with building permits), and neighborhood information. "

To lodi realtor wrote on Sep 28, 2007 11:31 AM:

" Thank you, We appreciate someone who cares about the neighborhood. Now, all you have to do is get the "head cheese" of the Lodi Association, to put on his gloves, get out the mower and start trimming. Thanks for caring. "

Lodian wrote on Sep 28, 2007 10:52 AM:

" Research is key: I can't find the recent sale, of $135K on zillow.com, that you speak of... where is it? "

To Reasearch is KEY wrote on Sep 27, 2007 9:36 PM:

" I looked at Zillow.com for this imiginary $135,000 house in Park West. I found nothing in the recently sold section that was even close to that low. Delta Instructor "

Chuck wrote on Sep 27, 2007 9:00 PM:

" Park West was a nice place a few years ago, but now the whole place is a dump anyway, no one cares... "

ra wrote on Sep 27, 2007 8:39 PM:

" Good going! When government and common courtesy fails, take matters into your own hands. BRAVO!!! You should place a lien on the house for your landscaping services. "

To good job Kiolo wrote on Sep 27, 2007 7:47 PM:

" Boy, you are a real rocket scientist. You needed Cramer to figure out this is not the best time to buy a house? I would think that little pea-brain of yours could reach that conclusion all on its own. Go back to watching cartoons, goofy. "

To Researcher wrote on Sep 27, 2007 7:41 PM:

" Name one Realtor in this town or any other town that has influence over an appraiser or lender. Do you think Realtors pick who will appraise a property? Do you think a Realtor dictates prices to a seller? Do you think a Realtor can dictate how a lender will conduct their business? The seller & buyer set the market. You're an uneducated moron! "

JFP wrote on Sep 27, 2007 6:29 PM:

" We had two foreclosed homes on our block and a stay-at-home mom neighbor who took care of them. Even going as far as running a hose from her house, across the street, to water the lawn. She deserves a reward! On the other hand...For those of you who say it's ok for government to come in and mow your lawn when it gets too high should not complain when government wants to take your house because they need a park. "

Lodi Realtor (part 3) wrote on Sep 27, 2007 6:03 PM:

" I am not however being reimbursed for this at a later date, I do it because it is to my advantage to have the home and neighborhood look attractive. Not all agents are able to do this and it's certainly NOT because we don't care about these problems. Whose income do you think is greatly affected by this slow market anyway? "

to Stockton wrote on Sep 27, 2007 6:00 PM:

" Look who's talking, someone from Stockton! LOL! "

Lodi Realtor (part 2) wrote on Sep 27, 2007 5:55 PM:

" As a Realtor myself, I have found (as well as several of my fellow agents), that the lender will NOT authorize ANY allowances for upkeep or repairs. They simply want their money. To that end, in MY business (this is my own personal choice not something that is required or even expected of me), I will perform (on my own) yard work and clean up just to keep a property looking clean from the street. "

Lodi Realtor wrote on Sep 27, 2007 5:54 PM:

" The current owner of (most) foreclosed homes is generally the originator (or secondary) lender. When the borrower defaults on the loan, after a pile of red tape and paperwork, the home becomes the property of the lending institution. The Lender, now the current Owner is the entity resposible for the home, HOWEVER! "

Go Ralph wrote on Sep 27, 2007 4:31 PM:

" We need more people like you. Maybe you should be out next Mayor? None of this "shilly shally" mayor talk. Idf you see a neigborhood mess, try to talk, then take action. Th excuses from the banks and Realtors are just that. EXCUSES. "

Good Job Kiolo wrote on Sep 27, 2007 3:38 PM:

" "Cramerica" has the OWNERS and CEO's of the nations TOP builders including "KB Homes, Hovnanian, Centex, Beazer, Standard Pacific and Toll Brothers." agreeing with him. The NBC Hosts who interviewed Dr. Cramer ended up agreeing with him as well that "NOW is a TERRIBLE time to buy". Watch the video link for details. "

Good Job Kiolo II wrote on Sep 27, 2007 3:36 PM:

" Dr. Cramer said "DO NOT BUY A HOUSE NOW -- YOU WILL LOSE YOUR MONEY". He said he recently tried to buy foreclosed houses in a tri state area, but none of the banks were reasonable about prices. If Dr. Jim Cramer of can't get a deal, why do you think the average buyer will? (Dr. Jim Cramer made hundreds of millions of dollars through investing.) Here's the link to his speech and the NAR point of view calling him "misleading". This internet video explains it ALL and is excellent. http://www.cnbc.com/id/21015928 "

Good Job Kiolo wrote on Sep 27, 2007 3:30 PM:

" My sentiments exactly. Realtors want to squeeze money out of anyone who will let them. Last night, CNBC Mad Moneys Dr. Jim Cramer spoke about this on the TODAY show and was subsequently attacked by the National Association of Realtors (NAR). Dr. Jim Cramer came back fighting with facts! Dr. Cramer conceded that US housing was ONLY a deal in TWO areas: Seattle and a 40 block area of New York City! Thats it! "

Oh Stockton wrote on Sep 27, 2007 2:58 PM:

" You have no problems! Like the auto theft rate in the country, and the highest housing foreclosure rate in the nation for the past 3 months. Stockton sounds great. We saw a TV program that told about "Weston Ranch" development of thousands of houses less than ten eyars old, and hundreds of the foreclosures can't be sold because no one wants to live next door to a gangbanger. Great town! "

Weezer wrote on Sep 27, 2007 2:36 PM:

" The homeowners aren't actually "owners." They are just borrowers. Once they have already abandoned their homes, who end up as owner? The bank which repossess the property. So, the banks should be responsible for the upkeep. It makes sense for them since who wants to buy a crappy property? "

To T&C wrote on Sep 27, 2007 2:30 PM:

" For your information, the street and Lower Sac and Turner is being widened and upgraded. It's nice to see someone improving the looks of things around that area!! "

Canadian continued wrote on Sep 27, 2007 2:10 PM:

" We get flippers here as well, but they must pay the price before selling the house. Some neighborhoods are finicky about how many flower pots must be in bloom, that how beautiful our city is. Any graffiti must be removed within 24 hours. "

Canadian wrote on Sep 27, 2007 2:10 PM:

" Victoria planning dev will send a bill for the required services to the owner. The owner has no more than 60 days to pay for the repairs, at which time the City places a lien on the property. Once the liens get to a certain value the house can be seized for failure to meet the requirements of the neighborhood association. Visit our lovely city anytime, and notice the absence of blight! "

Canadian wrote on Sep 27, 2007 2:08 PM:

" In Victoria, we have neighborhood associations. If a resident allows their house to look bad, such as not painting it, poor upkeep, ugly lawn or plantings, they will send the owner a nice letter, to find out what the problem is. After 30 days and no or unacceptable response, the nighbiorhood association will file papers with the city for remediation. A contractor from the city will cleanup the mess, painting if required, or whatever the problem. "

Stockton wrote on Sep 27, 2007 1:33 PM:

" Do people in Lodi just sit around and complain all day.. You should all get off your bums and get a job or at least a life... Or better yet do something about the problem other than point fingers... "

More Dry Bean Counter wrote on Sep 27, 2007 1:25 PM:

" Sacramento County, Manteca and other towns want to "clean house" on the foreclosed housing mess and "you dont want to take sides". There are no "sides" in this debate. Houses in disrepair because of the housing bubble, crash, and foreclosures. We need solutions not excuses. If the blame goes to your friends and the GOB (developers, builders, appraisers, and realtors) then let them take the blame. No one is perfect. Lets get this mess cleaned up! We know who is responsible, so take the "side" of the citizens of Lodi and fix it. "

Bean counter wrote on Sep 27, 2007 1:22 PM:

" Looks like Mayor Bob has his priorities? Real estate appraisers (Mayor Bob) must work closely with Loan officers and Realtors so that may explain why he said "I'm not trying to side with anybody, but the owner is supposed to maintain the property, not the agent." Mayor Bob, when will you be the mayor for ALL of Lodi not just for a few business associates? I thought this GOB stuff was "over the top" until I read your quote. "

help wrote on Sep 27, 2007 1:12 PM:

" The City of Lodi has had a watering Ordinance and they enforce that! why not yards/cars/lawns? "

Research is key wrote on Sep 27, 2007 12:27 PM:

" It will take years before we find ALL of the real estate crooks. When prices go back to 1998 prices, things will get better. One recent Park West house 3/2/2 sold for $135,000 last month and it wasn't a fixer! Prices are steadily dropping. Locate this house on Zillow.com maps of closed sales. "

Research is key 5 wrote on Sep 27, 2007 12:26 PM:

" Potential Real estate buyers: Ask questions to your "buyers agent" how many foreclosures involved sales from YOUR BROKER in the past 3 years ?? FBI and Sheriff detectives are discovering that many recent foreclosures are involving the SAME ORIGINAL Real estate salesmen? Why is that? If it walks like a duck, looks like a duck then maybe its a duck? Due diligence is required. There are lots of Real estate thieves out there (109 pages of them in a recent government report) who want YOUR MONEY. "

Research is key 4 wrote on Sep 27, 2007 12:23 PM:

" They are paid on a commission. hey are supposed to be at "arms length from each other", not "buddies". The higher the price/appraised value/loan amount of the house, the more they extract from the transaction. They get penalized if they tell the truth that a 1950's house (read Inman report found on Realtor websites about the potential DANGER of buying these old houses) is almost ready to "die", and isn't really worth the $525,000 that the owner/flipper wants. "

Research is key 3 wrote on Sep 27, 2007 12:22 PM:

" A real estate "professional" should step in to say, "save your money for a down payment with the money you "would have" paid for mortgage payments and call me next year". No! The "I want it now" and "get rich quick", mentality of many of our "RE professionals" gets in the way of morality. When a Realtor, RE appraiser, and a loan officer get together - WATCH OUT! "

Research is Key 2 wrote on Sep 27, 2007 12:20 PM:

" As a professional, Realtors know the "code of ethics" and know that if a person is working at Walmart part time, and are new on the job, they are NOT going to handle $2650/mo house payments. Also, if the buyer has no Social Security number or drivers license it "might" raise a red flag or two. Add to these "red flags", NO money down and cash back at closing with 1% teaser rates, and it makes you wonder what type of Realtor would allow this buyer to get into so much debt? "

Research is Key wrote on Sep 27, 2007 12:13 PM:

" We often want to blame the result of a problem, on the "last fool". The "last fool" is real estate jargon used by Real estate salesmen that refers to the very last owner of a house in a bubble market. Google the words "last fool" and "house" and you will see what I mean. The last Realtor who sold the house before the foreclosure problems is a SOURCE of the problem. "

know what? wrote on Sep 27, 2007 12:11 PM:

" make that, T&C = tortured and confused. Sorry about the results of my public education. "

know what? wrote on Sep 27, 2007 11:48 AM:

" T&C = torchered & confused! "

To T&C wrote on Sep 27, 2007 11:18 AM:

" You're a piece of work. Where are these Doucette owned homes, with overgrown, dying lawns? Any half-wit would know the work at Lower Sac and Turner has nothing to do with Lodi's proposed water treatment plant. Your posts are dishonest and have no value. "

Lodian wrote on Sep 27, 2007 11:03 AM:

" The banks (owners) of these foreclosed properties need to be held accountable for the up-keep of these vacant properties. "

Lodian wrote on Sep 27, 2007 11:01 AM:

" Foreclosures: I don't see the lawn/yard care as the responsibility of the "former" owner of a home, even if they gave the house to the bank (foreclosed). It is the responsibility of the current owner of said property. A "former" owner may have made bad financial decisions, or maybe fell on hard times for other reasons, so for you to condemn those "former" owners for the neglected lawn/yard is ridiculous. Put the blame where it belongs, the "current" owner, which is often the bank if your neighbor has foreclosed. "

John Brown wrote on Sep 27, 2007 10:53 AM:

" The real Estate company should take care of any of their properties as it's to their benefit..The city could clean it and place a lien on said property.One more way is to place a post on the web site Squeeky wheel with the Real estate company's name and e-mail and for 5.00 they will post your complaint and every time some one reads your post they will send the company in question an e-mail some times 25-30 a day.It will get their attention...5.00 for a year.. "

nylodian wrote on Sep 27, 2007 10:30 AM:

" I hope such an ordinance is adopted. My parents live in a nice older neighborhood with all the houses and yards kept up nicely on their street except two - one with an absentee owner who nobody can seem to contact and the other occupied by lazy slobs who never mow or weed their yard. The garbage and overgrowth has attracted mice. "

wtf wrote on Sep 27, 2007 10:24 AM:

" We have taken it a little further in my neighborhood. The sprnikler timers set and ran with battery packs, maintain the yards NOT JUST MOW and have numbers for the bank's maintenance persons for other issues. What you don't do is contact the City, a realtor or LNS. The first two will waste your time. LNS will draw UNNECESSARY attention to what you have done. "

Eileen wrote on Sep 27, 2007 10:06 AM:

" The City of Lodi has had a Property Maintenance Ordinance on the books since 1991. They just need to enforce it. "

Midtowner wrote on Sep 27, 2007 9:21 AM:

" We have a home on the southeast corner of Hutchins and Locust which needs attention. I will call the "owner" soon. It has not been cared for in the last year. "

kiolo wrote on Sep 27, 2007 9:07 AM:

" Wow, this is in Park west. Guess things aren't going the way Underhill and the rest of the realtors would like. Keep your heads in the sand, it will be safe to bring them out in a couple of years when things get back to normal. "

PJ wrote on Sep 27, 2007 9:03 AM:

" Wow - this sounds kind of like an eminent domain issue. After reading the potential ordinance that Manteca is going to adopt, the city stands to gain quite a bit of money on these vacant unkept homes. "

Whatever wrote on Sep 27, 2007 8:40 AM:

" Hey! Good Job. Finally someone uses some common sense. "

T & C wrote on Sep 27, 2007 8:20 AM:

" The city didn't waste anytime demolishing those little canneries on Lockeford street for the old folks home, which hasn't even been approved yet and now they're almost done tearing the sidewalks and easement up at the corner of LowerSac and Turner for that new water treatment plant, and I don't believe it has even been decided on yet, except by the council and gob's. "

T & C wrote on Sep 27, 2007 7:38 AM:

" Sue the town of Lodi and their irresponsible employees that won't enforce the code laws here. It's easy for them to sit on their duffs and talk the talk, but are afraid they'll punish one of the gob's that own many of them homes, like Douchette and even some CC members, especially on the east side. I guess patching potholes is Lodi's greatest challenge. "

Foreclosures wrote on Sep 27, 2007 7:36 AM:

" I have run into a similar situation. We went ahead and took care of the yard ourselves. Pretty darn frustrating that my property values can be reduced because of the poor financial decisions of others and the banks poor judgement of handing out such foolish and risky loans to these individuals that should never have been issued a mortgage. "

disgusted wrote on Sep 27, 2007 7:22 AM:

" You complain about vacant homes, we have neighbors that live in these horrible looking homes & do nothing about it. The COL has been called several times regarding horrible smells & just piles of garbage everywhere & the do nothing. It's like they are afraid of the guy. "

Comments on this story are now closed.