Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

November 30th, 2008
November 29th, 2008
November 28th, 2008
November 27th, 2008
November 26th, 2008
November 25th, 2008
November 24th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT

Lodi aims for seat at commuter rail table

By Matt Brown
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Updated: Thursday, September 13, 2007 6:39 AM PDT

As plans for a commuter rail service through the Central Valley take shape, city officials want to make sure the train stops in Lodi. In order to do that, they say Lodi needs a seat at the decision-making table.

The San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission is exploring a commuter rail line from Merced to Sacramento. The line would take one of two Union Pacific tracks: Through Downtown Lodi, or five miles west of the city.

City officials say that a commuter rail stop in Downtown would revitalize the Sacramento Street rail corridor, while a western depot would encourage unwanted sprawl toward Flag City.

Mayor Bob Johnson has petitioned the San Joaquin Council of Governments, which controls the rail commission, to get a Lodi representative on the commission. The council's Executive Committee meets Friday to consider Lodi's request.

Johnson, a New Yorker who grew up riding public transport, said it is important that Lodi have a voice in the process.

"I think everyone should have an opportunity to participate in this exciting process," he said. "Without sounding too provincial, it's an opportunity for us to put in a new transportation medium that we don't have now."


(Jennifer M. Howell/News-Sentinel)

SJCOG's executive committee, which appoints commissioners to the rail commission, deliberated on giving Lodi a place on the commission in April. Without taking action, the board did not respond in Lodi's favor.

The committee said there were no plans to expand the eight-member rail commission, and they worried that commissioners with specific agendas wouldn't represent the best interests of the region. SJCOG Chairman Victor Mow said it is important for the commissioners to think regionally.

"As a regional board, we would like to think we take off our city hat and go to the meetings with a regional perspective," said Mow, who is also a county supervisor.

Johnson said he would act in the region's best interest if appointed to the commission.

"Why do they think we can't think regionally?" he said. "Of course we would think regionally."

Mow said he is looking forward to hearing Lodi's motives for wanting to be on the commission.

"I don't fault them for wanting to be involved," he said. "But is the rail commission failing Lodi that they feel they need to be a member?"

The Executive Committee makes recommendations to the full SJCOG board. Friday's meeting is a follow-up to the committee's discussion in April. The committee could recommend adding Lodi to the rail commission, SJCOG Executive Director Andrew Chesley said, adding that it would involve changing the board's joint powers agreement.

Rail commissioners, who are also cityand county-elected officials, are appointed to four-year terms, Chesley said, and they are replaced if they are not re-elected. Commissioners are appointed based on how well they would represent the region's transportation interests, Chesley said.

"There is value in having representatives on the commission who recognize the big-picture issues in putting rail into place," he said.

In the past, Lodi has been represented on the commission by former councilman Phil Pennino and former county supervisor Jack Sieglock.

The rail commission is favoring the route to the west of Lodi for its Central Valley commuter service, according to a SJRRC study released in July. Similar to SJCOG's Altamont Commuter Express, which links Stockton with the Bay Area, the service would operate four to six trains in each direction each day.

The SJRRC is made up of six San Joaquin County and City elected officials plus two representatives from other agencies. The commission owns and operates the Altamont Commuter Express. Commissioners are appointed by the San Joaquin Council of Governments Executive Committee. The current makeup of the board:
• Chairman Michael Restuccia, city of Ripon
• Vice Chair John Harris, city of Manteca
• Brent Ives, city of Tracy
• Kristy Sayles, city of Lathrop
• Larry Ruhstaller, San Joaquin County
• Steve Bestolarides, city of Stockton
• Scott Haggerty, Alameda County
• Thomas Blalock, Bay Area Rapid Transit
Source: San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission.

The Union Pacific tracks through Lodi are near capacity with 34 freight trains and four Amtrak trains each day, while the western line has 16 freight trains each day, the study said. Moving the freight trains to the western line would involve complicated switching procedures.

If a commuter rail line stopped in Downtown Lodi, condominiums, lofts and mixed-use developments would spring up in Downtown, City Manager Blair King envisioned. People would be able to live in Downtown, walk to the train station and commute to work in Sacramento.

"It would lead to a more compact urban form," he said.

However, if the train uses the western line, King said, there probably will be a new Lodi station near Flag City, which would lead to residential growth in the surrounding agricultural land. If that happens, King said, people will wonder why the city allowed such unruly sprawl.

"In 20 years, people will look back and say: 'How did this happen?' It happened because the train did not come through Downtown Lodi," King said. "The results of these decisions may not be manifested for 15-20 years, but the conception is being made now."

Contact reporter Matt Brown at mattb@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

ivehadit wrote on Sep 13, 2007 4:51 PM:

" Ever heard of pitching bales? Do you even know what they are? No, they don't put beer in them! Ever been on a farm?t&c "

To: I've had it! wrote on Sep 13, 2007 1:53 PM:

" What I'd tell ya? See T&C 1:30 post. "

T & C wrote on Sep 13, 2007 1:30 PM:

" I was born and spent many years in North Dakota. Now that many of us Dakotans have died off and the smart ones left, this town has gone to hell in a handbasket. Now you're stuck with a bunch of greedy moneymongers, Happy Days. "

Caveman wrote on Sep 13, 2007 12:12 PM:

" Happy Days-Please read what I wrote. Car 1 hr door to door. ACE, maybe 1 hr to Sac, plus any additional stops, and time using other public transportation to go out the 50 corridor, back to ACE after work and then 1 hr home. I agree that once I'm sitting in traffic, ACE may become more attractive. "

Happy Days wrote on Sep 13, 2007 11:27 AM:

" Caveman - Sure, an hour on a train versus an hour on a car in traffic. On ACE, you can have your coffee, watch a movie, read a book and then laugh at the poor dopes in their cars trying to muscle past the traffic in Elk Grove created by untamed development and the new supermall they're building. BTW (T&C) all the buses to Sac ARE FULL! And, I agree with the others - move to Stockton, but don't stay here. "

Caveman wrote on Sep 13, 2007 11:16 AM:

" For ACE to be viable from Lodi to Sacramento, it must either be ecomomically advantageous to the commuter or save them significant time. I commute/carpool to the Sacramento area every day. It takes an hour each way. If I took ACE it would take me longer. My time is more valuable. "

To: I've had it! wrote on Sep 13, 2007 10:37 AM:

" T&C really doesn't beleive what he writes. All he is doing is trying to get a rise out of guys like you, obviously this time it worked. Just ignore him. "

oh wrote on Sep 13, 2007 10:28 AM:

" We need (BART)to get the bay area commuters off the roads and to HAVE A WAY FOR KIDDS TO GET TO COLLEGES!Not commuter train to sac. or highspeed trains. "

I've had it! wrote on Sep 13, 2007 9:51 AM:

" TC Why are you even living in Lodi? I have not heard one positive comment from you. If things are so wrong here, then move! "

juih wrote on Sep 13, 2007 9:15 AM:

" Wait a second I thought lodi wanted to be a wine tourist destination, not a bedroom community for people that work elsewhere? Come on Lodi, figure out what you want to be and stick with it, this waffling is not becoming of such a pointed group as out "city leaders". A commuter rail can not stop at every berg on the track, defeats the purpose... "

T & C wrote on Sep 13, 2007 9:14 AM:

" City council, when're you going to get some riders on the Lodi Grape transit system? And you want a commuter rail here? It'll be on the main tracks to Sacramento near I-5,, and not downtown, you already know that. Don't start with the fibs and propaganda yet. Mo' money, Lodi CC slogan. "

T & C wrote on Sep 13, 2007 9:12 AM:

" Hey city council, how about getting a ticket booth here in Lodi for the AMTRAK? How long has it been now? You just see another government money grab and you're already lined up at the feeding trough. Make sure you will have facilities available to purchase a ticket without having to go to Stockton, like you have set up at AMTRAK. "

Happy Days wrote on Sep 13, 2007 7:48 AM:

" For once I agree whole-heartedly with Blair, the CC, and the rest of the City staff! Rail MUST follow a Hwy. 99 alignment, not I-5. "

ballyhoo wrote on Sep 13, 2007 7:25 AM:

" Did the city counsel conduct any research on the amount of residents who would be willing use a train for commuting? Before they decide to have a commuter train stop in Lodi, CC should hire, rather overpay, a consulting firm to research this proposal. By the way, BJ, this is Lodi and the West Coast not NYC. We like our cars and like congested traffic on our highways! "

Comments on this story are now closed.