Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- Will terrorists be given Miranda warnings? (69)
- President Obama's first year (67)
- Lodi Unified School District president issues warning to speakers over cuts (64)
- Local business leaders say tourism, Costco, Home Depot may play roles in city's future (59)
- Islamic symbol in mosaic — what is all the fuss? (49)
- Writer comments on Neely column (42)
- The Home Depot hopes to join Costco at Reynolds Ranch (40)
- Police: Train victim was a Lodi teen (32)
- We need to conduct respectful conversations (30)
- Tasered suspect claims he is Yosemite Sam (25)
No big box limits planned in Lodi; Supercenter vote to come this fall
While city leaders in Stockton, Galt and Elk Grove have moved this summer to limit the size of future big box stores, their counterparts in Lodi have no plans to do the same.
Instead, the city will likely decide next month whether to allow a new 226,000 square-foot Wal-Mart Supercenter at the corner of Kettleman Lane and Lower Sacramento Road — across from the existing Wal-Mart.
In considering the project, city leaders say they're following the will of the public. Lodi voters in November 2004 shot down a proposal to curb the size of retail stores, by a 57 percent to 42 percent margin.
"We had a vote ... Am I supposed to second guess the citizenry?" said Mayor Bob Johnson, noting he would "absolutely not" support size limits on future big box stores.
The City Council, including Johnson, approved an earlier version of the Supercenter plans in 2005. But a San Joaquin County Superior Court judge overturned that approval, citing the need for more study of the project's effects.
Critics of the Supercenter plans have remained quiet during the past few months, waiting for Wal-Mart consultants to complete the new reports. Those will address the Supercenter's effect on Lodi's economy, agriculture and its draw on the city's electric utility.
Aaron Rios, Wal-Mart's Central Valley spokesman, could not be reached for comment.

retired, Lodi

carpenter, Woodbridge

homemaker, Galt

business owner, Lodi

Galt

retired, Lodi

cosmetology student, Lodi
Betsy Fiske, a Lodi homemaker who has actively opposed the Supercenter, said the Stockton
City Council's recent big box ban was "encouraging."
Passed on Tuesday, the decision blocks businesses larger than 100,000 square-feet and containing full-size grocery stores from being built.
"I just wonder why Lodi feels the need to go against the grain," said Fiske, a member of Lodi First, a group critical of the Supercenter plans.
City Councilwoman JoAnne Mounce, who supported the Supercenter plans in 2005, said those opposed to the project need to look at the city's "bigger picture."
"Our commercial development is vital," she said. "Our residential stock is fat. If we don't grow in this matter, we're going to have some tough times."
She noted that she would listen to a discussion on big box store limits if it was brought to the city. But as far as supporting an ordinance on that, "it depends on how well it's written."
Mounce noted that she would support higher-paying businesses than Wal-Mart, if they were to come to town.
"Where are they?" she asked. "If Lodi can entice them, oh my gosh, that'd be awesome. And I'd go to apply to get one."
The big box ordinances passed by Stockton and Elk Grove, and considered by Galt, follow similar moves by cities in the Bay Area in recent years. From Concord to Antioch to Brentwood, leaders have either rejected new Supercenters or passed bans limiting future ones.
Stockton's move was especially significant, said a former member of the now-defunct Small City Preservation Committee.
"I think it's really historic that the Stockton City Council has passed the ban because they were really the city that looked at, and allowed, any kind of development," said Robin Knowlton, owner of the Knowlton Gallery in Downtown Lodi. "I hope that it gives the city of Lodi leaders a little courage to say 'no' to the Supercenter stores."
The city expects to receive Wal-Mart's supplemental reports next week. Staffers will then review them and make them public within a few weeks, said Randy Hatch, Lodi's chief planner.
From there, the Lodi Planning Commission will likely hold a public hearing on the studies. The City Council then would hold its own hearing and make a final vote, he said.
The city has recommended Wal-Mart pay a "downtown impact fee" to offset the losses Downtown businesses could face if the Supercenter opens. At $4.50 per square foot, the fee could generate more than $1 million and be used for an array of programs, from new business loans to employee training.
Wal-Mart could also be required to compensate for the loss of agricultural land. City planners have suggested a "one for one ag easement" plan, in which Wal-Mart would preserve an equal number of acres of farmland as it eliminates, Hatch said.
Contact reporter Chris Nichols at chrisn@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback
Why? wrote on Aug 25, 2007 10:14 PM:
Just the Facts wrote on Aug 25, 2007 7:38 PM:
Chuck wrote on Aug 24, 2007 6:48 PM:
T& C wrote on Aug 24, 2007 5:37 PM:
T & C wrote on Aug 24, 2007 3:13 PM:
Lodi Businessperson wrote on Aug 24, 2007 1:49 PM:
Irony wrote on Aug 24, 2007 10:30 AM:
architect +attorney wrote on Aug 23, 2007 9:51 PM:
Why? wrote on Aug 23, 2007 9:03 PM:
To: Brian wrote on Aug 22, 2007 8:19 PM:
Lodi Voter wrote on Aug 22, 2007 1:41 PM:
WM Shopper wrote on Aug 21, 2007 3:37 PM:
Chuck wrote on Aug 21, 2007 2:11 PM:
T & C wrote on Aug 21, 2007 11:15 AM:
WM Shopper wrote on Aug 21, 2007 7:49 AM:
Brian wrote on Aug 21, 2007 7:44 AM:
Caveman wrote on Aug 20, 2007 11:33 AM:
Lodian wrote on Aug 20, 2007 7:45 AM:
got sumpin2say wrote on Aug 19, 2007 9:17 PM:
To; Brian wrote on Aug 19, 2007 10:00 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 19, 2007 9:03 AM:
Walmart okay BUT wrote on Aug 19, 2007 1:24 AM:
To Reply to blogger wrote on Aug 19, 2007 1:20 AM:
Steven wrote on Aug 18, 2007 7:45 PM:
Chuck wrote on Aug 18, 2007 7:41 PM:
T & C wrote on Aug 18, 2007 4:35 PM:
Just the Facts wrote on Aug 18, 2007 9:44 AM:
Doo Dah Homies & Riff-Raff wrote on Aug 18, 2007 8:52 AM:
Brian wrote on Aug 18, 2007 8:14 AM:
Get Over It esayjay.... wrote on Aug 18, 2007 6:59 AM:
To T & C... wrote on Aug 18, 2007 6:51 AM:
This Loyal Wal-Mart Shopper Says.... wrote on Aug 18, 2007 6:49 AM:
My Apologies To Readers Who... wrote on Aug 18, 2007 6:42 AM:
It's A No Brainer! wrote on Aug 18, 2007 6:38 AM:
keep lodi safe wrote on Aug 18, 2007 1:28 AM:
to To Katie wrote on Aug 17, 2007 11:41 PM:
Roger I. wrote on Aug 17, 2007 10:16 PM:
Sam wrote on Aug 17, 2007 9:47 PM:
T & C wrote on Aug 17, 2007 9:03 PM:
T & C wrote on Aug 17, 2007 8:59 PM:
Oscar wrote on Aug 17, 2007 8:07 PM:
ReplyToBlogger wrote on Aug 17, 2007 7:09 PM:
Ivan Dixon wrote on Aug 17, 2007 6:54 PM:
moo wrote on Aug 17, 2007 6:44 PM:
Commonsense wrote on Aug 17, 2007 5:52 PM:
GovAgent wrote on Aug 17, 2007 5:14 PM:
sam wrote on Aug 17, 2007 4:52 PM:
To Katie wrote on Aug 17, 2007 4:28 PM:
I agree wrote on Aug 17, 2007 4:25 PM:
esayjay wrote on Aug 17, 2007 3:34 PM:
blogger wrote on Aug 17, 2007 3:32 PM:
esayjay wrote on Aug 17, 2007 3:32 PM:
Dias wrote on Aug 17, 2007 3:26 PM:
Washington wrote on Aug 17, 2007 3:09 PM:
Oscar wrote on Aug 17, 2007 1:52 PM:
reality wrote on Aug 17, 2007 1:51 PM:
Oscar wrote on Aug 17, 2007 1:49 PM:
I wrote on Aug 17, 2007 12:23 PM:
oooph wrote on Aug 17, 2007 11:58 AM:
ALL FOR IT wrote on Aug 17, 2007 10:25 AM:
oooph wrote on Aug 17, 2007 8:47 AM:
Patricia wrote on Aug 17, 2007 8:27 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 17, 2007 7:59 AM:
Taxpayer & Citizen wrote on Aug 17, 2007 7:52 AM:
T & C wrote on Aug 17, 2007 7:47 AM:
Mark wrote on Aug 17, 2007 7:43 AM:
Wow wrote on Aug 17, 2007 7:28 AM:
Does Walmart deserve to grow here? wrote on Aug 17, 2007 7:12 AM:
Does Walmart deserve to grow here? wrote on Aug 17, 2007 7:08 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.