Indexes
The following stories have received the most reader comments during the last 7 days.
- The country's mess is our fault (168)
- Obama is not a moderate (130)
- Sarah Palin's book hits the shelves: Locals react (72)
- Lodi City Council plans to cap number of taco trucks at 22 (50)
- Public health care is a Christian option (33)
- The haves should help the have-nots (30)
- Tokay in, traveling to unbeaten No. 3 Grant for football playoffs (25)
- Government-run health care is a bad idea (20)
- Young woman fatally shot at Acampo home (17)
- Sierra Adventure store to close after four years in Downtown Lodi (16)
California's population bomb is not just ticking, it's exploding
When I look back on my 20-year body of columns, I see dozens of articles I wrote about California's population explosion.
Lord knows I have done my part to raise awareness among the citizens regarding the consequences of unchecked population growth.
In 2003, in a quixotic effort, I ran for Governor of California in the Gray Davis recall election. My platform stressed how damaging a dramatic population explosion is to our quality of life. Everything is negatively impacted: schools, hospitals, construction, crime and the environment.
Talk about flailing at windmills. No one listened — especially people in the state and federal government who have the power to act.
I've said repeatedly: "More people equals more problems." Every hour, California's population increases by 60 people — that's one a minute. Each of those people will have needs to fulfill. How, I wonder, are we going to do it?
I argued for meaningful controls of legal and illegal immigration. Levy meaningful fines on employers who hire illegal aliens. Take away the job magnet that lures people from Mexico and Central America.
Reduce the hundreds of thousands of non-immigrant visas doled out without a second thought. Students and workers who come to California on those so-called temporary visas become permanent residents. As the saying goes, nothing is more permanent than a temporary worker.
Build a fence. Critics claim it can't be done. But of course it can. What better way to deter illegal immigration? Immigration is one of the variables in the population dimension that can and should be controlled.
Stress the wisdom of family planning. Don't have more children than you can nurture into productive citizens.
But now, according the projections issued this week by the California Department of Finance, we have reached the moment of truth. State demographers predict that California's population will hit 60 million by 2050. That represents nearly a 75 percent increase during the next four-and-a-half decades.
Demography is a fascinating discipline. Unlike physics or chemistry, it is not an exact science. Whether there will be 57 or 63 million residents over the next four decades, no one can truly predict.
But once the wheels of demographic change start rolling, it's hard to reverse them. Expect to be steamrolled. Whether California ends up with the lower or the higher number in the range, chaos will rule.
Contemplate the impact that growth will have on our lovable, livable Lodi. San Joaquin County's 2000 population was estimated at 569,083 and is projected to increase 213.5 percent by 2050. Lodi's current population is roughly 60,000. If it grows at the same rate as the rest of the county, we'll have nearly 200,000 residents by mid-century.
Other scary numbers are population increases of 3.5 million predicted for L.A. County, 1.1 million for Orange County, 1.7 million for San Diego County and 4.7 million for Riverside County. Riverside's population, the "winner" in the demographic race to disaster, will triple by 2050.
Whichever the exact number for the state's population or for Lodi's turns out to be, the question is: How will people live?
Naturally, to preserve our dwindling available land, much talk centers around the concept of "smart growth" — building up instead of building out.
This idea has been kicking around for 10 years with no sign of success. Smart growth's best hope for catching on will occur when not a single blade of grass remains to pave over.
In a curious twist, those most adversely affected by population growth may be taxed to fund infrastructure improvements. They, however, are tax adverse.
On the other hand, those residents who will soon make up the majority of the state's population, Latinos, favor tax increases.
The irony is that, according to the Public Policy Institute of California, 63 percent of Latinos are not registered to vote.
The best California can hope for now is that the state will become so unbearable a place to live that people here will move away and others will stop coming.
Joe Guzzardi, an instructor at the Lincoln Technical Academy, refuses to give up his fight for common sense in population issues.

Reader Feedback
False Logic, cont. wrote on Jul 19, 2007 11:34 AM:
False logic wrote on Jul 19, 2007 11:33 AM:
Leonard wrote on Jul 18, 2007 11:09 AM:
Brian wrote on Jul 18, 2007 8:36 AM:
to: Ivan wrote on Jul 17, 2007 9:24 PM:
rv wrote on Jul 17, 2007 3:58 PM:
Leonard wrote on Jul 17, 2007 10:09 AM:
Dale wrote on Jul 17, 2007 7:27 AM:
Ivan Dixon wrote on Jul 17, 2007 6:37 AM:
Seriously! wrote on Jul 17, 2007 6:23 AM:
No. 1 wrote on Jul 16, 2007 7:50 PM:
I Was @ Burger King on Cherokee wrote on Jul 16, 2007 5:55 PM:
E. wrote on Jul 16, 2007 12:00 PM:
GrapeNut wrote on Jul 16, 2007 11:59 AM:
Ivan Dixon wrote on Jul 16, 2007 10:13 AM:
Prescott wrote on Jul 16, 2007 9:43 AM:
Prescott wrote on Jul 16, 2007 9:42 AM:
Prescott wrote on Jul 16, 2007 9:42 AM:
Brian wrote on Jul 16, 2007 8:39 AM:
Hey Brian wrote on Jul 15, 2007 5:42 PM:
judy wrote on Jul 15, 2007 5:16 PM:
Brian wrote on Jul 15, 2007 7:59 AM:
Morgan Barrington wrote on Jul 14, 2007 10:13 PM:
yes wrote on Jul 14, 2007 3:18 PM:
It's Obvious That... wrote on Jul 14, 2007 9:36 AM:
Comments on this story are now closed.