Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

January 8th, 2009
January 7th, 2009
January 6th, 2009
January 5th, 2009
January 3rd, 2009
January 2nd, 2009
January 1st, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT
City of Lodi meter reader Alex Acosta explains the process he goes through to read electric meters, at Vineyard Christian Middle School on Tuesday afternoon. Lodi Electric Utility wants to implement an energy cost adjustment, which would set energy prices to fluctuate with the cost of bulk power. (Whitney Ramirez/News-Sentinel)

Cost adjustment coming?

Lodi's power rates may fluctuate with nation's energy market

By Matt Brown
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Updated: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 7:07 AM PDT

If you live in Lodi, your electric bill could soon rise and fall depending on the whims of the nation's energy market.

The fluctuation could mean a 4 percent increase in your residential electric bill next year.

Lodi Electric Utility wants to implement an energy cost adjustment, which would automatically set different electric rates each month depending on the price of power. Rates would go up or down monthly with the energy market.

The utility currently uses a market cost adjustment, which requires the City Council to vote to raise rates based on power cost.

The council is expected to decide on the rate adjustment at its meeting tonight. If approved, the adjustment would go into effect in July's billing cycle.

Initially, rates are expected to decrease during the summer, Utility Director George Morrow said. Rates could be 1 to 2 cents per kilowatt hour lower from July to October but 1 to 3 cents higher from November to May, resulting in a 4 percent overall increase at the end of the year, according to the utility's 2007-08 projections.

Mayor Bob Johnson said the cost adjustment is fair because rates have the possibility to go down as well as up.

"If someone gets a penny or two raise on their bill with the possibility of it going down, I think it makes sense," he said.

Morrow said the adjustment would be revenue neutral, meaning the utility would regain what it spends on power. Without the adjustment, the utility could lose up to $3 million from its reserves to power costs.

"This type of thing gives you some financial improvement," Morrow said. "It allows you to recover costs for power supply."

• Anaheim
• Redding
• Roseville
• Los Angeles
• Imperial Irrigation District
• Lassen Municipal Utility District
• Pasadena
Source: City of Lodi.

Morrow said an automatic monthly rate adjustment gives the utility stability and is recommended by bond rating agencies, such as Fitch Ratings. Other municipal utilities with a similar rate adjustment include Roseville, Redding and Los Angeles.

The rate adjustment would be reviewed by the Budget and Finance Committee each month and there would be no discount offered to low-income customers.

Industrial customers could see the largest rate increase if the council adopts the automatic adjustment. Industrial rates could rise 7 percent next year, according to the utility's power cost projections.

Some industrial customers think this is too high. Bob Wheeler, plant manager at General Mills, expressed his concern in a letter to the council.

"I would ask that increases be stepped up on an annual basis of a smaller amount rather than the proposed 7.7 percent," Wheeler wrote. "It would be much easier on industrial customers such as us if you stepped up the cost when necessary to a smaller amount, say 5 percent this year and then another adjustment next year."

Industrial customers in Lodi already pay less for power than industrial customers elsewhere. Lodi's industrial rates are 25 percent lower than Pacific Gas and Electric's industrial rates while its residential rates are 3 percent lower.

Councilwoman Susan Hitchcock said the greater increase for industries is fair given their already discounted rates.

"I don't think that residential customers should be subsidizing industrial customers at that rate," she said.

Councilman Larry Hansen, who is a board member of Lodi's power cooperative Northern California Power Agency, supports the automatic rate adjustment.

"By doing this, you avoid that sudden one-time large percentage increase in the rates," he said. "In terms of our bonding agencies, folding this into it gives them more confidence that we are a solid entity."

Residents have mixed feelings about the cost adjustment.

Susan Beal said she wouldn't mind fluctuating electric rates.

"It seems like a crap shoot," she said. "One month the rates could be up. The next month they could be down."

Mike Mikbel said he was not optimistic that rates would go down.

"It doesn't matter what they do," he said. "My rates will still be too high."

Tonight's meeting is at 7 p.m. at Carnegie Forum 305 W. Pine St.

Contact reporter Matt Brown at mattb@lodinews.com.

Reader Feedback

Lodian wrote on May 22, 2007 4:51 PM:

" I refuse to run my AC in the summer. If my teens get hot, I make them suck on ice cubes or just hose them down. "

OTH wrote on May 22, 2007 11:28 AM:

" My bill last month was the highest it's been without air conditioning. Haven't done anything different. They raise the rates my air conditioner will go into mothballs. "

po'ed wrote on May 22, 2007 10:20 AM:

" ONCE AGAIN WE HAVE, SAY "SWERVE" ARE YOU A TRANSPLANT, BORN WITH A SILVER SPOON IN MOUTH?? GET REAL IF YOU'VE GOT THE MONIES PAY FOR ALL CITIZINS TO CON'T TO LIVE IN L.L.L. THE PRICE TO LIVE HERE GETS US NOTHING BUT BROKE.IT HAS TO STOP. UNLESS YOU'RE CC YOU ARE BROKE OR NEAR BROKE BECAUSE OF ALL THE BULL IN THIS TOWN ANYMORE. "

Lodian wrote on May 19, 2007 1:49 PM:

" I can read the anger in your eyes. "

Lodian wrote on May 18, 2007 5:49 PM:

" I can read the anger in your eyes. "

T & C wrote on May 18, 2007 12:15 PM:

" Not to mention Mr. Morrow's new right-hand man at probably $120,000+ a year. 20,000 for city manager. 15,000 for city attorney. 60,000+ benefits and expenses for blairbot's press secretary.4% cost of living raises for non-union unrepresented management level workers? There's gold in them thar' hills! All this management and still same poor, old results. We're still broke and still spending like the boom days. "

disgusted wrote on May 18, 2007 10:04 AM:

" electric rates going up again! gee thanks. once again city of lodi robbing it's citizens to pay for their mistakes or is it time for pay raises again? business as usual. "

Lodian wrote on May 18, 2007 8:19 AM:

" Thanks for the cucumber you sent me Psychologist. I don't feel as uptight anymore. "

LC wrote on May 17, 2007 12:31 PM:

" whats up with Mr Morrow I don't believe anything he says since when was a year shorter than a year I have been shaking my head at his numbers for a long time I'm really starting to believe he just makes them up I also would like to see where he gets his numbers on what it is costing us my bill is never below $250 and I use a gas stove to heat and hardly ever use the AC I do everything I can to lower it but nothing changes somebody needs to look at his numbers "

T & C wrote on May 17, 2007 9:35 AM:

" I noticed there was no public opinion or forum on this issue and it was a done deal before it even hit council. I turned my webcast off when the sound went out so many times as important statements were being made. They need to keep our rates up there to line General Mills' pockets with hundreds of millions in profits so they won't move on us. When a city is more dedicated to a "BIG SIX" corporate profit making outfit than to its own citizens, that's pretty bad, especially in a little town like this. "

GovAgent wrote on May 17, 2007 4:36 AM:

" This is sad that the city of lodi is trying to justify raising the rates! in the beginning we always had lower rates, and what other areas had didnt matter, our rates were still low. The city government is putting reckless spending on the backs of its citizens. Hey lets put the city employee retirement fund into general fund! sound similiar to something else? "

RAT wrote on May 16, 2007 6:47 PM:

" While on the subject of meters. Mr Hansen is worried about some on water mters and some not. Solution don't read the water meters until all meters are installed in 18 yrs. Use that 60k ayear that would be paid for a meter reader and buy everyone hitech meters in 18 years that won't need anyone to read. OOPS I forgot about the extra money meter will produce and the CC won't even have to vote for rate increases it is all automatic just like the electrical meters. "

RAT wrote on May 16, 2007 6:19 PM:

" It'sot so much about the rate as it is not being told the truth. Mayor Johnson knows the rates are going up he has seen the long term contract to purchace power. He knows that power is going up yet he dares to say it is afair deal because it could go down. Mr. Hansen knows it is goingup because he says it is better in small amounts so the customers won't scream as loud. Mr. Wheeler knows because he is already putting out road blocks to protect GM. "

T & C wrote on May 16, 2007 5:54 PM:

" I'll be watching the CC meeting tonight to see who those are on the council that speak only for themselves and not us citizens. What better way to raise summer rates than an "adjustment"? What the heck is an adjustment? Don't you mean money for the new position and the raises for the "good ole' boyz" regime that already bankrupted us and can't squeeze us anymore, except with water and electric without a vote? How about a vote? Cowards. "

T 7 C wrote on May 16, 2007 5:50 PM:

" Just went to Laughlin two weeks ago on a junket with Harrah"s and flew out of Stockton and had a nice 4-night stay before it got too hot. Allegiant airlines deserves the kudos also with their great service and organization when you arrive. It was 110 Sunday night when we arrived and cooled down to the 80's the rest of the way. Please cancel my appointment for this week! Still like Lake Tahoe, but next month it'll be Harrah's New Orleans. Thanks for your concern. Thanks, Lodian, great comeback. "

Observer wrote on May 16, 2007 5:46 PM:

" Come on Lodian, you take yourself way too serious. I enjoy the banter between the Psychologist and T&C. Even T&C seems to be getting into the act which is a pleasant turn of events. This may come as a real shock to you but most people I know don't even know this site exists and those that do think it's a joke. "

Lodian wrote on May 16, 2007 3:33 PM:

" Psychologist, treat thyself! "

Lodian wrote on May 16, 2007 3:33 PM:

" Psychologist thinks way to highly of his/her humor/jabs. Sorry, not clever enough. Try again. "

Bobinlodi wrote on May 16, 2007 2:34 PM:

" What ever happened to the gas-fired cogeneration plant at General Mills? It was built to lower electrical costs and sell the surplus. Still, it boils down to the fact that most electricity is made from natural gas, and whoever can leverage the best price and generate it with the lowest overhead will prevail. I hope G.M. is not selling to PG&E and buying from LEUD! "

Psychologist wrote on May 16, 2007 1:27 PM:

" I'm sorry I wasn't immediately available to you T&C. I do have other patients that I was tending to. You've been doing so well lately I don't want this electrical rate to cause a relapse. Your medication was fine, you just needed to top it off with a Starbuck's latte. Just the fact your asking for help is wonderful. One of the first steps to recovery is knowing you need help. Now, let's also get started on that next vacation. How about Laughlin, Nevada. That's a nice change from Vegas. "

angry wrote on May 16, 2007 1:11 PM:

" Lodi is as crooked as all the rest. When are you going to start charging us for the air we breathe? Got that one figured out already? "

Swerve wrote on May 16, 2007 12:27 PM:

" All you guys are a bunch of whiners! You should feel blessed to live in this great city. We are lucky to have the city leaders to adminsitrate the excellent services for us citizens. I will be happy to pay the higher rates for the superior environment in which we live. "

RAT wrote on May 16, 2007 12:16 PM:

" Lodi electric is still not coming clean.They admit it is only 3% now and it was 10% 2 months ago. Fact is residential customers of Lodi pay a lot more than PG&E customers pay per kilowat. The Sentinel should compare a Lodi bill and a PG&E That is pretty easy and set things straight. "

judy wrote on May 16, 2007 10:15 AM:

" I agree completely with Lodi User. Just more sneakiness by CC. Lodi - hold onto your electric meters and try to get access to your water meters! After you pay your City of Lodi utility bills, you won't even be thinkin' about going to McDonald's 'cause you won't have the money. "

not happy! wrote on May 16, 2007 9:45 AM:

" I would like the city to explain why our meter is checked only when its convenient to the meter readers, since we moved out of our last home 4 months ago our electrical bill has not changed, to find out that the meter has not been read, they just average it out, our bill is the same now then when we lived there.. go figure "

to psychologist wrote on May 16, 2007 9:28 AM:

" Please help me. I'm very depressed today. Just hearing the news of an electric rate makes me very angry. I rolled up three of those medications today and smoked all three but all they did was make me hungry and cloudy headed. If you can help me with this issue, I promise I'll be very, very good to you and for you. God Bless You! t7c "

T & C wrote on May 16, 2007 9:24 AM:

" Here we go again, with Bob Wheeler from General Mills crying broke, along with the same old partners Lodi Iron works, Cottage Bakery and the plastics plants, among others. They're making higher profits than ever every year and it's time for them to give back to the citizens their fair share in electric rates. Are they threatening to leave town Again? That's about the 20th time isn't it? I hear one of the plastics plants is leaving soon anyway. Details at your PG&E office. Go ask. Downtown. "

M wrote on May 16, 2007 9:16 AM:

" I strongly disagree with the idea of eliminating the current discounts for seniors who have a limited income. This would be the second blow the City Council has dealt to seniors who live in Lodi. Earlier in the year the City Council got rid of the low income discount for the water, sewer, and trash service. I know the measure wasn't passed by the voters, but I believe that that City Attorney provided the City Council inaccurate information on how to handle the entire situation. "

T & C wrote on May 16, 2007 9:16 AM:

" Why didn't Hansen, Hitchcock and the NCPA figure that out before they made that power buy in 2005 that broke Lodi and the LEUD? We keep paying the NCPA and they're the culprits that advised us when we went broke. Hansen is still in their pockets and should spend that much time governing Lodi, not being a lobbyist for the NCPA. "

M wrote on May 16, 2007 9:14 AM:

" I strongly disagree with the idea of eliminating the current discounts for seniors who have a limited income. This would be the second blow the City Council has dealt to seniors who live in Lodi. Earlier in the year the City Council got rid of the low income discount for the water, sewer, and trash service. I know the measure wasn't passed by the voters, but I believe that that City Attorney provided the City Council inaccurate information on how to handle the entire situation. "

T & C wrote on May 16, 2007 9:10 AM:

" I'm just reading my Lodi Utility News that came with this months' billing and it plainly states that Lodi's electric rates have not increased in 17 months. I'd like someone from LEUD or management to explain that to me. I was at the PG&E office last week and informed we are paying much more than PG&E because LEUD gives electricity to the "good ole' boyz" businesses for less than what they pay to deliver it. No more corporate robbery to line their pockets. Citizens and needy first. "

WTF wrote on May 16, 2007 9:08 AM:

" "F'd in ole Lodi again" "

OTH wrote on May 16, 2007 8:41 AM:

" Mr Wheeler why should private citizens subsidize the rates of a multi-billion company? "

The Problem Is Abuse... wrote on May 16, 2007 8:30 AM:

" Residents are unable to have clear evidence that rates should increse..."thereby Paying More" when there is no addition cost of adjustment required. This makes EXTRA REVENUE for the city.. at our expense. Anytime you allow an agency to increasre the price on their end, with no verification on our end leaves us at their mercy. "

Lodi User wrote on May 16, 2007 7:10 AM:

" This just sounds like another sneaky way of increasing the consumer's cost. Just like gas once the price increases it never goes down. We will still be paying for the ineptitude of our city government. "

Comments on this story are now closed.