Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes


February 9th, 2010
February 8th, 2010
February 6th, 2010
February 5th, 2010
February 4th, 2010
February 3rd, 2010
February 2nd, 2010
ADVERTISEMENT

Help stop NAFTA before it abolishes the USA


Wednesday, February 7, 2007 7:02 AM PST

Comments (28 comment(s))

Meet NAFTA version 2.0 — the plan to establish a North American Union is one of the most important topics confronting our country, as it threatens to abolish the USA and the freedom that it represents.

On March 23, 2005, Prime Minister Paul Martin, President Bush and President Vicente Fox, the respective leaders of Canada, USA and Mexico, met in Waco, Texas, to discuss plans to merge our three countries into a North American Union (NAU), calling their agreement the "Security and Prosperity Partnership" (SPP).

In spite of our government's rhetoric to enforce a border, even build a fence, the SPP calls for the removal of our borders. It envisions a common economic system under a common currency, the amero, a common law, common enforcement of the law, common emergency domestic response for "common problems," and I would expect, a common military. Being a treaty, it would require senatorial approval only if our leaders uphold and defend the constitution of the United States.

Instead, plans are being made to circumvent congress. Canada's Macleans magazine, in Meet NAFTA 2.0, has revealed a North American Competitiveness Council (NACC), which plans to implement the NAU by stealth. Its membership includes Lockheed Martin's Ron Covais, who stated, "We've decided not to recommend any things that would require legislative changes." He means government financing. Covais is a former pentagon advisor to Dick Cheney.

NAFTA plans to circumvent budgetary debate by giving away concession rights to the foreign construction companies, after the land is secured by eminent domain. Hence, the construction companies will bear their own responsibility for generating funds and profit on the highways. Such a diabolical plan can only be blocked by members of the house and senate, whose oath of office demands their action. The general public can contact both Congressman McNerney and our senators, demanding they stop NAFTA Superhighway and the NAU.

Daniel Hutchins
Acampo

Reader Feedback

Mary wrote on Feb 18, 2007 11:55 AM:

" We must stop the NAFTA Superhighway and the North American Union. Contact your Federal Representative and Senators to Support Jerome Corsi and Rep Ron Paul's resolution HCR 40 to get us out of the Superhighway and the NAU. Also support Rep. Ron Paul for President of the United States. "

Report Abuse

Daniel wrote on Feb 13, 2007 6:23 PM:

" The highway is tangible. 1,200 feet wide. A tract laid out through eminent domain, without a border stop at the Rio Grande, but until Kansas City, where customs will be staffed by joint Mexican-American-Canadian customs agents. It will transport military troops and working-class personnel, in the flesh. It will facilitate physical communications through a North American Union, having one law and one currency. "

Report Abuse

Daniel wrote on Feb 10, 2007 10:43 AM:

" State legislatures from Utah, Arizona, and Utah are debating or have passed resolutions urging the USA to withdraw from the SPP. Resolutions can be drawn up from any level of govt, expressing an opinion to our federal representatives. "

Report Abuse

Daniel wrote on Feb 10, 2007 10:38 AM:

" Dave: That's pretty much right. Please spread the word. "

Report Abuse

Daniel wrote on Feb 10, 2007 10:36 AM:

" ShadesOfKnight: Politians who are members of secret societies probably won't stop it. Others probably don't know about it. The only way to stop this insanity is by public education, and their making demands of their leaders. "

Report Abuse

Daniel wrote on Feb 10, 2007 10:35 AM:

" From BC: The WTO is another problem, having the same pedigree as NAFTA. "

Report Abuse

Daniel wrote on Feb 10, 2007 10:31 AM:

" Nylodian: I appreciate your response. You are talking big $$$. Watch out for so-called "groups," who are created to conceal their true devotion to some parent organization. I guarantee that if there were a citizen petition to not require passports, that would not receive equal time in journalism. "

Report Abuse

Daniel wrote on Feb 10, 2007 10:28 AM:

" John H: In America, we have a very small number of politicians who understand the problem and are campaigning to fight against it, eg. Tom Tancredo from Colorado, and Ron Paul from Texas. If you can understand that your country's problems are not a result of accidental, stumbling idiotic politicans who don't know any better, and that conditions are according to plan, then you are on track toward identification of the problem. Their greatest enemy is public identification. I suggest looking at www.jbs.org. "

Report Abuse

Daniel wrote on Feb 10, 2007 10:21 AM:

" John and John H. (same?): Not only do our leaders not care, but they were talent-scouted out of secret societites, and trained for high office. Clinton was talent-scouted by Chinese leadership, who significantly-funded his election, at a time when American campaign donatios were practically stopped. Therefore, Clinton's white house was devoted to China. The Bush-Bush-Bush chain you mentioned is all Skull and Bones (out of Yale University). "

Report Abuse

Daniel wrote on Feb 10, 2007 10:15 AM:

" John H. I appreciate your response from Canada. This column must be showing in Canada, because of its reference to your leadership and journalism. I don't know where MacLeans came from, but I'd check. In the USA, our finest journalism is published The New American. Our leadership and press devotes quite a bit of energy to ignore it, deny it, and discredit its publishers. It was the first to publish govt advance knowledge of 9/11. "

Report Abuse

John H wrote on Feb 9, 2007 9:30 PM:

" I am a Canadian, who snowbirds in Florida during the winter. LUV America, but I am one Canadian among many that do not see this as a direction to go. Unfortunately we in Canada have the same problems. Unconcerned politicians and a Press that does not provide information to the Public. If we can get just one country to back off the other will have no place to go. "

Report Abuse

John wrote on Feb 8, 2007 6:55 PM:

" Bush and his Daddy are solidly behind this diabolical plan to globalize North America. Prescott Bush, great-granddad of George was one of the founders of the IMF; no wonder Daddy and son are behind the NAU. George could care less about illegal immigrants, and Corporate America is behind this solidly. "

Report Abuse

nylodian wrote on Feb 8, 2007 8:33 AM:

" There are Canadian and US tourist groups who are protesting that passports will now be needed to get into Canada. This blows my mind, because it's one more step towards a more secure and better monitored border. Another example how priorities are all about $$$. "

Report Abuse

I care too... wrote on Feb 8, 2007 6:21 AM:

" I wasn't aware of this until several days ago. I can't imagine how many other Americans are unaware. In my opinion, this is no different than the EU coming together. If we allow the govt. to form the NAU, it just makes 3 less seperate steps to get North America to join the EU someday. Once that happens - we are all "more or less" under one power. Isn't that what we've all been taught will happen someday??? Just a thought. "

Report Abuse

From BC wrote on Feb 8, 2007 2:43 AM:

" NAFTA 2.0?! NAFTA 1.0 barely works as it is! It took for ever to solve the Soft Wood problem which would have been solved MUCH more quickly and civilly under the WTO alone. And the soft wood lumber problem was taken to the WTO anyways! "

Report Abuse

sam wrote on Feb 7, 2007 7:46 PM:

" Boomer, you are so right. "

Report Abuse

Daniel wrote on Feb 7, 2007 7:28 PM:

" Judy Cross: Would you like to make contact? "

Report Abuse

Daniel wrote on Feb 7, 2007 7:26 PM:

" Boomer: Nope-denial. We're talking real asphalt and eminent domain, 10-12 lanes wide, each direction. At first, I thought you were going to mention a small segment that is already open and collecting tolls. "

Report Abuse

Rico wrote on Feb 7, 2007 6:36 PM:

" While it is true that Nafta 2.0 threatens to abolish the USA, I suggest that the "freedom that it represents" was abolished long ago by its leaders and sleepwalking public. Canadians don't want any part of this union. "

Report Abuse

Boomer wrote on Feb 7, 2007 6:28 PM:

" Daniel - The NAFTA Superhighway already exsists, you are just looking in the wrong spot. You think the Superhighway will be a large freeway, with on and off ramps every few miles. The NAFTA Superhighway is really the internet, yes, the very thing we are using right now. The internet allows for Billions of dollars in transactions to flow between multinational corporations every day. "

Report Abuse

Mike wrote on Feb 7, 2007 4:57 PM:

" Yeah right Paul, Third world Mexico and Canada where you cannnot question the Zionist holohoax. "

Report Abuse

boofugg wrote on Feb 7, 2007 4:34 PM:

" Goodbye America, it's been nice knowin' ya. "

Report Abuse

Bob Fuller wrote on Feb 7, 2007 3:54 PM:

" Paul wrote: "I don't think any Canadian or Mexican in their right mind would want to be part of any Union with the USA." US citizens in their right minds aren't exactly thrilled with this idea, either. The problem, Paul, is that the globalists who are stealthily crafting the North American Union couldn't care less what right thinking people in the U.S., Mexico, or Canada think. They intend to take self-governance away from all of us, and replace it with slavery. The question is, will we let them? "

Report Abuse

A Concerned Citizen wrote on Feb 7, 2007 3:40 PM:

" Everyone has seen this coming, been talking about it, but yet are helpless to do anything about it. I think it's time for American citizens to exercise our right to replace the thugs in power. WE HAVE THAT RIGHT. Let's Roll!!! "

Report Abuse

Dave wrote on Feb 7, 2007 3:14 PM:

" I really don't think the people who are pushing this stuff are really all that concerned about your cultural sensitivities, Paul. It's all about the dough ray me. The main idea is to turn us all into slaves, tilling on their plantation, like back in the not so distant past. Nobody ever much cared what the slaves thought, back in the day. No one that 'mattered' anyway. "

Report Abuse

Judy Cross wrote on Feb 7, 2007 2:41 PM:

" I'm in Vancouver, B.C. Canada and it is true, few citizens of any of the three countries want this coming amalgamation. It is be done by stealth and extra-legally. There has been no discussion of it in our Parliament. I recieved an email from a site in Britain that sees the same thing coming down the track there. The net is global, pushed by the multi-nationals and will see a new serfdom come into being. "

Report Abuse

ShadesOfKnight wrote on Feb 7, 2007 1:33 PM:

" Does anyone really think that the Government would stop this? Every person who could possibly stop this is already in a position to make an obscene amount of money from it, and of course their lives are not going to change for the worse just because we suddenly have a national identity like Mexico's. We're going to continue to be raped by those in power until the barricades rise and the people do something about it. "

Report Abuse

Paul wrote on Feb 7, 2007 1:14 PM:

" I don't think any Canadian or Mexican in their right mind would want to be part of any Union with the USA. We have different values, and our economies are in much different shape to that of the US. "

Report Abuse

Comments on this story are now closed.

Special Sections

Sentinel Silver 2010

Photo Reprints

Find Ads




Services

Contact Us

Office

125 N. Church St.
P.O. Box 1360
Lodi, CA 95241
(209) 369-2761
Fax: (209) 369-1084

Newsroom

E-mail

(209) 369-7035
Fax: (209) 369-6706

Subscriptions

Subscribe

Problems with your subscription?
(209) 333-1400

Advertising

E-mail

(209) 369-2761
Fax: (209) 369-1084

Classifieds

Place an ad E-mail

(209) 333-1111
Fax: (209) 369-1084