Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Story Tools

Email this story | Print this story

Indexes

July 19th, 2008
July 18th, 2008
July 17th, 2008
July 16th, 2008
July 15th, 2008
July 14th, 2008
July 12th, 2008
ADVERTISEMENT

Two Lodi residents refused entry back into U.S.

FBI wants to talk to uncle, cousin of Hamid Hayat

By Scripps-McClatchy Western Service
Updated: Monday, August 28, 2006 6:59 PM PDT

SACRAMENTO — The federal government has barred two relatives of a Lodi man convicted of supporting terrorists from returning to the country after a lengthy stay in Pakistan, placing the U.S. citizens in an extraordinary legal limbo.

Muhammad Ismail, a 45-year-old naturalized citizen born in Pakistan, and his 18-year-old son, Jaber Ismail, who was born in the United States, have not been charged with a crime. However, they are the uncle and cousin of Hamid Hayat, a 23-year-old Lodi cherry packer who was convicted in April of supporting terrorists by attending a Pakistani training camp.

Federal authorities said Friday that the men, both Lodi residents, would not be allowed back into the country unless they agreed to FBI interrogations in Pakistan. An attorney representing the family said agents have asked whether the younger Ismail trained in terrorist camps in Pakistan.

The men and three relatives had been in Pakistan for more than four years and tried to return to the United States on April 21 as a federal jury in Sacramento deliberated Hayat's fate. But they were pulled aside during a layover in Hong Kong and told there was a problem with their passports, said Julia Harumi Mass, their attorney.

The father and son were forced to pay for a flight back to Islamabad because they were on the government's "no-fly" list, Mass said. Muhammad Ismail's wife, teenage daughter and younger son, who were not on the list, continued on to the United States.

Neither Muhammad nor Jaber Ismail holds dual Pakistani citizenship, Mass said.

"We haven't heard about this happening -- U.S. citizens being refused the right to return from abroad without any charges or any basis," said Mass, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union.

McGregor Scott, the U.S. attorney for California's eastern district, confirmed Friday that the men were on the no-fly list and were being kept out of the country until they agreed to talk to federal authorities.

"They've been given the opportunity to meet with the FBI over there and answer a few questions, and they've declined to do that," Scott said.

Mass said Jaber Ismail had answered questions during an FBI interrogation at the U.S. Embassy in Islamabad soon after he was forced back to Pakistan. She said the teenager had run afoul of the FBI when he declined to be interviewed again without a lawyer and refused to take a lie-detector test.

The Ismails had been in Pakistan partly so Jaber could study the Quran, Mass said. She said that neither he nor his father had anything to do with terrorism.

"They want to come home and have an absolute right to come home," said Mass, who has filed a complaint with the Department of Homeland Security and a petition with the Transportation Security Administration.

"They can't be compelled to waive their constitutional rights under threat of banishment," Mass said. "The government is conditioning the return to their home on cooperation with law enforcement."

Aviation watch lists were created in 1990 to keep terrorists off planes and track drug smugglers and other fugitives. But since al Qaeda's attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, the government has expanded the lists significantly. Members of the public cannot find out if, or why, they are on a no-fly list.

Michael Barr, director of the aviation safety and security program at USC, said the Ismail case appears to be unusual in the realm of federal terrorism investigations.

"You become what is called a stateless person, and that would be very unprecedented," Barr said.

He said U.S. law enforcement agents have understandably been "overly cautious" in recent years. "If they're going to err, they're going to err on the side of caution," Barr said. "What's happened in a lot of these things is that you're guilty until proven innocent."

Jaber Ismail was one of several people mentioned by his cousin, Hayat, during a videotaped interview with the FBI in Sacramento in June 2005 that prompted Hayat's arrest.

Hayat himself had just returned from a two-year trip to Pakistan. His flight, too, had been diverted because Hayat was on the no-fly list as a result of conversations he had with an informant who had infiltrated the mosque in Lodi that Hayat attended.

Prosecutors said Hayat told FBI interrogators that he had trained at a terrorist camp in Pakistan, although defense attorneys argued that the videotaped confession was contradictory and suggested that agents had manipulated the interview.

When agents asked him who else had gone to training camps, Hayat said, "I can't say 100 percent, but I have a lot of, you know, names in my head," according to a transcript of the interview.

Hayat said Jaber Ismail "went, like, two years ago." Asked if his cousin had gone to the same camp he had attended, Hayat said, "I'm not sure, but I'll say he went to a camp."

Hayat later said that Ismail and another relative "didn't talk to me about going to camps or anything. But you know I'm sure they went to the camp ... 'cause they memorize the Holy Quran."

Hayat faces up to 39 years in prison when he is sentenced. A hearing is scheduled for Nov. 17 to discuss his lawyers' motion for a new trial on a number of grounds, including juror misconduct.

On Friday, Hayat's father, ice cream truck driver Umer Hayat, 48, was formally sentenced at U.S. District Court in Sacramento.

In a deal with prosecutors, the elder Hayat pleaded guilty in June to charges of lying to customs agents about $28,000 he was carrying during a trip to his native Pakistan. He avoided a retrial on more serious charges of lying to the FBI about his son's training in Pakistan. He was sentenced to the 330 days in jail that he already served.

Speaking publicly for the first time, Umer Hayat said outside the courthouse that he "got screwed" and "hates terrorists." He said he had fabricated his own videotaped FBI confession -- in which he described visiting a militant camp in Pakistan where his son had allegedly trained -- because agents refused to believe the truth and because he was tired.

He said he had borrowed his description of masked terrorists firing guns, swinging swords and pole vaulting in a basement from "the newspaper and the TV," as well as from a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles video game belonging to his children. He said his ice cream truck bears a photo of one of the turtles, advertising a $1.25 ice cream bar.

"I make a story, that's all," Hayat said.

Scott, the U.S. attorney, said he would "take anything Umer Hayat says with a grain of salt. He seems capable of saying whatever needs to be said at any particular time, whether it's the truth or not."

First published: Monday, August 28, 2006

Reader Feedback

Jason wrote on Sep 10, 2006 6:51 PM:

" Why cant they bring them back into the US then question them....its not like they are any threat while they are being watched? "

antonio wrote on Sep 4, 2006 9:53 AM:

" better safe than sorry. in glad something is being done to try to keep it safe for everyone. "

Akmed Akbar al Hakeem wrote on Aug 31, 2006 11:17 AM:

" You bloggers who are apologists for and defenders of the crazed murderous side of muslim fanaticism, I hope you get killed first so we will be able to clearly identify the terrorists from the "peaceful, loving muslims". It is obvious you dont want to know. "

Annoyed wrote on Aug 30, 2006 2:20 PM:

" I Think it's good that the US is finally being careful about letting people re-enter into our country. Especially since they probably were training over there. I mean do we really want another event like 9/11?? "

Human on Earth. wrote on Aug 30, 2006 3:38 AM:

" Why do we treat each other like "Animals?" There are idiots in every society in every race. Do we judge the entire race by the actions of a few crazy people? I am Mulsim, and I am against terrorism and violence just like you. we are all better than this. I see the greatest people in America judging others with pain in their hearts. I share the same pain with you, all Muslims do, no one wishes anyone to suffer, or to hurt. We breath, eat, sleep, love, feel just like you. "

TSA Employee wrote on Aug 30, 2006 2:53 AM:

" WTF? You stated Law Enforcement Should "catch the bad guys, but make sure they are the bad guys." Then you should be happy to know, they are doing exactly that, they ARE doing their jobs! I say Right On! I dont know what some of your backgrounds are, but you are Twisted if you want to allow these "trained" people here in the U.S. let alone Lodi. Notice they were refused entry in April? When Hayat was convicted. Pleanty of time to carry out another 9/11 before November. Keep Them There! "

My pet dog deserves rights too.... wrote on Aug 29, 2006 7:37 PM:

" Gee... Then we mise well just open our borders to anyone and everyone, no matter what country they reside in and take that chance that they are not terrorist involved. The stupid thing is, our government is worried about the hispanics crossing the border, when all they do is want to work, not act in terrorism. Priorities first! "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Aug 29, 2006 6:36 PM:

" Lawyer- who do you think that kid is really loyal to? USA or Pakistan? Just like the immigrants of our grandparents or parents generation, they call it the "home country." Same goes true for all the illegals being born here now from Mexico. What are they, Mexifornians? Send'm home & keep'm out! "

Newcomer wrote on Aug 29, 2006 5:50 PM:

" 1. THEY ARE U.S. CITIZENS--restricting their reentry is itself illegal. Conditioning their renentry to sit down with authoritis is fine, but if they assert the Fifth, then you can't legally keep them out 2. If they've committed a crime they should be prosecuted, but resticting a citizens right to reneter their country will probably bar further prosecution for any actual crime. 3. They may be suspecious but that itself is not a crime. "

Lawyer wrote on Aug 29, 2006 5:24 PM:

" Whoa Nellie! Lemme see... you want the AMERICAN BORN kid to give up his citizenship and go back? To where, AMERICA? "

rv wrote on Aug 29, 2006 5:03 PM:

" let me guess, he writes a column for the lodi news sentinel. "

I agree... wrote on Aug 29, 2006 4:57 PM:

" This is true, people should stop being in denial. The true love they have always resorts back to their own Country. "

vietnam vet wrote on Aug 29, 2006 3:59 PM:

" keep them out you people who defend the terrorists are sadly mistaken these people dont care about anybody but themselves and there movement they dont give a rip about you or your loved ones there out for themselves and thats it their dangerous people and you shouldnt take them lightly they will do whatever their crazy leaders tell them to do whithout regard for anyone else "

OTH wrote on Aug 29, 2006 3:38 PM:

" I think these gentleman are being painted wih a broad brush. According to the article the one man refused to be questioned without a lawyer and had refused to take a lie detector test. I would refuse to be questioned by the FBI without a lawyer. "

rich wrote on Aug 29, 2006 2:35 PM:

" They are not ignorant of there rights. Its that there rights are being violated and what can they do complain. COMPLAIN TO WHO, its the govt. who is not letting them in. Now you tell me if they sit and get questioned u dont think they are afraid of being twisted in there words like hayat "

Mike wrote on Aug 29, 2006 1:48 PM:

" Because of the censorship on these blogs I will no longer post to any of them. As I am deployed overseas with my Unit at this time I don't have the means to go to my hometown paper in person to complain. I did send a letter to the editor stating the same. "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Aug 29, 2006 1:42 PM:

" WTF & Lawyer: "W" has declared a war on terror. If my government wants to interview me when I come back into this country when traveling abroad, especially to a questionable area like Pakistan, you better be ready to sit for a few questions. And in my opinon, if you don't like it, give up your citizenship and go back. We do not want another 9/11 or Oklahoma City. "

Weezer wrote on Aug 29, 2006 1:41 PM:

" I hate terrorism but this news article is a totally different matter. US citizens' rights are being violated. Suspects or not, they have the right to go back to "their" country of citizenship. It appears to me now that they're ignorant of their rights. "

Whoa Nellie! wrote on Aug 29, 2006 1:39 PM:

" Am I the only Lodi resident who sees another piece of the puzzle here? Uncle Sam is playing hardball now. They were nice to the ice cream guy and let him out for making up stories, even though he sent his son to Pakistan with $28K "for family." These relatives were doing what back there?? More training maybe?? "

someone wrote on Aug 29, 2006 1:07 PM:

" nice! "

OTH wrote on Aug 29, 2006 10:26 AM:

" The sad part of this is do these men know their rights as American citizens? "

Lawyer wrote on Aug 29, 2006 10:01 AM:

" You cannot legally keep a U.S. citizen out of the country for not interviewing with the F.B.I. If they had green cards, go for it. But U.S. citizens have a right, under law, to come back home. I can't believe they got them to pay for the trip back to Islamabad. "

wtf wrote on Aug 29, 2006 9:26 AM:

" By all means, law enforcement should catch the bad guys - but they should make sure the people they catch *are* the bad guys and not just convenient scape goats to make their job easier and make them look good. I still have a problem with the fact that this entire "case" rests on the word of an informant who was paid $300,000 and in exchange so that *he* wouldn't be deported because he (the informant) was busted for mail fraud. "

wtf wrote on Aug 29, 2006 9:22 AM:

" It seems some of the posters didn't read the story. These men are U.S. citizens and their Constitutional rights as U.S. citizens are being violated. I've seen too many tapes of coerced confessions to law enforcement that I would take what certain of these agencies' say with a grain of salt. "

USA wrote on Aug 29, 2006 8:47 AM:

" Keep them out for good! The government really needs to keep tabs on these people who are allowed to come over and live here. I only see future terrorist problems, because it's too easy to come over here and do whatever you want. "

Wanda wrote on Aug 29, 2006 8:36 AM:

" Good, I hope they have to stay there. This is given Lodi a bad name. "

WY wrote on Aug 29, 2006 7:27 AM:

" PERFECT!!!! SEE YA!!! "

JulioH wrote on Aug 29, 2006 12:16 AM:

" We need to keep these people out of our community. This is quickly becoming a matter of public safety. I no longer feel safe letting my kids go to places where there are large crowds like the Grape Festival or the Oooh Aaaah festival. "

EMS wrote on Aug 28, 2006 10:55 PM:

" It's about damn time "

Comments on this story are now closed.

Weather

WXPort
Weather sponsored by: