Connecting You to Your Community
Lodi, California •

Indexes

November 2nd, 2009
November 7th, 2009
November 6th, 2009
November 5th, 2009
November 4th, 2009
November 3rd, 2009
November 2nd, 2009
ADVERTISEMENT

Lodi council set to debate use of motto, eminent domain ban

By Andrew Adams
News-Sentinel Staff Writer
Monday, March 27, 2006 11:19 AM PST

From God to greenbelts — and nearly everything in between, including a new tax — is on the agenda for a special Lodi City Council meeting Wednesday.

• Counciwoman JoAnne Mounce will discuss her idea to have the city honor the national motto of "In God We Trust," while exploring the idea of Lodi adopting "Livable Lovable Lodi" as its official motto.

• Council members want to talk about introducing an ordinance that would prohibit the city from using eminent domain to secure land for private development.

• Vice Mayor Bob Johnson will offer his idea of council-sponsored quarter-cent sales tax increase to support public safety funding.

• Councilman John Beckman also wants to talk greenbelts, but he thinks the council should amend the General Plan to include an urban separator between Lodi and Stockton.

Council members have suggested each idea in past months and in order not to clutter already crowded agendas for regular meetings, which often last for hours, the topics waited for discussion until a free Wednesday evening that would be reserved just for the council's pet projects.

Mounce's idea has probably garnered the most interest from residents who have squared off on the idea of even honoring the "In God We Trust" phrase as either a proper tribute to the nation's history or as an unacceptable invite to mix religion into local politics.

Mounce insists she would rather have the focus be adopting "Lovable Livable Lodi" as the city's motto instead of a protracted debate on "In God We Trust."

Ken Owen, founder and chairman of Christian Community Concern, has weighed in supporting the city honoring "In God we Trust."

In addition to his idea of a sales tax, Johnson is also suggesting the council discuss the idea of transforming part of the maintenance shop at Hutchins Street Square into a hospice house.

Johnson gleaned the idea from minutes of a meeting of the Hutchins Street Square foundation in which former square director and current board member Charlene Lange suggested the idea as it fits with the square's mission and be a benefit to the city's senior community. The project could cost around $1 million.

Council members will also hold a pubic hearing to consider levying the annual assessment to fund the Lodi Tourism and Business Improvement district. The assessment is expected to raise $177,328 for the tourism district.

Wednesday's meeting begins at 6 p.m. at Carnegie Forum, 305 W. Pine St. For more information contact the City Clerk's office at 333-6702. The meeting will not be televised.

Contact reporter Andrew Adams at andrewa@lodinews.com.

First published: Monday, March 27, 2006

Reader Feedback

VoteJohnsonOut wrote on Mar 31, 2006 7:31 AM:

" I agree, what the Langes want they get so Bob Johnson sit down and shut up. "

5th Generation Lodian wrote on Mar 29, 2006 6:19 PM:

" 4th Generation Lodian how so you know Dixon Flynn met with Kruger and King? Where you there? "

window dressing wrote on Mar 29, 2006 5:01 PM:

" Eminent domain (the ability of the City to take your property)is granted to the redevelopement agencies (RDA) by the State. The council can pass a useless law that can not be inforced. When council acts as a RDA they are following State laws that govern them not local. "

RB wrote on Mar 29, 2006 7:51 AM:

" Need that quarter cent tax increase. City employees are already making on average 50% more than citizen who pay taxes. 30 employees make more than $100k per year and another 28 make more than $90K. My favorite quote: "It's not a revenue problem, it's a spending problem. "

OTH wrote on Mar 28, 2006 2:49 PM:

" Maybe Mr Flynn would like back into city government so he can give EVERYBODY a 10% raise. Here Here "

OTH wrote on Mar 28, 2006 2:42 PM:

" What the Langes want from the city they usually get. "

4th Generation Lodian wrote on Mar 28, 2006 2:07 PM:

" Charlene Lange is not the only one trying to keep her "finger in the pie" Dixon Flynn currently meets w/ current Manager Blair King & Deputy Manager Krueger to discuss City finances. Why? "

4th Generation Lodian wrote on Mar 28, 2006 2:04 PM:

" In the City's eyes, everyone is a winner. The City makes some fast bucks, an old worn out site doesn't need fixing anymore, & the City's developer friends get rich. "

4th Generation Lodian wrote on Mar 28, 2006 2:02 PM:

" Leonard - The Grape Bowl & adjoining property sits on approx. 10-15 acres. One option is to sell excess land (parking lot) cheap to developer friend of City for housing. Other option is to claim renovation not feasible & sell entire plot to developer. "

IMO wrote on Mar 28, 2006 5:40 AM:

" why would you ask me what history books i'm reading? am i incorrect that our fore fathers were God fearing men? this town has too many churches and too few schools. parents too busy trying to get ahead to see what their children really need, them. "

Leonard wrote on Mar 28, 2006 4:50 AM:

" How are they going to build houses at the Grape Bowl? "

bdg wrote on Mar 27, 2006 8:44 PM:

" i spoke to mounce about this months ago - the only difference now is the paper is final getting it right. and i don't think she gives a crap about being mayor - she only wants to do a good job. "

4th Generation Lodian wrote on Mar 27, 2006 8:17 PM:

" Lange & her cronies are also behind the Grapebowl "renovation". The real reason for their interest is they want the City to sell them some of the land for a let's-get-richer housing scheme. "

4th Generation Lodian wrote on Mar 27, 2006 8:15 PM:

" I see former Hutchins Street Square Director Charlene Lange is still trying to spend the City's money by proposing another expensive project. The City already dumps $1M annually into this site and Hospice of San Joaquin does an excellant job. "

Jim Fox wrote on Mar 27, 2006 12:44 PM:

" "it doesn't specify who's/which God.." ah, but Owen was quick to add 'the God of the Bible' to his thoughts. Go read Article VI in the constitution, and while you're at it, add up the number of times our founders used the word God while writing it. "

Dixon wrote on Mar 27, 2006 11:24 AM:

" The ability to listen and see must be twice as important to God as the abilty to speak. Why else did he give us two ears, two eyes and one mouth? A lesson the City Council should give some thought to. "

VoteHitchcockandHansenout wrote on Mar 27, 2006 11:14 AM:

" For sobeit, Ken, and so on. How about: "Lost, Lumbering Lodi". It does seem to capture the collective wisdom of city hall "

sobeit wrote on Mar 27, 2006 10:07 AM:

" IMO--What history books have you been reading? "

IMO wrote on Mar 27, 2006 9:35 AM:

" it's what this country was founded on. it doesn't specify who's/which God. if you don't believe in God, how would it be offensive? "

Roger wrote on Mar 27, 2006 8:02 AM:

" Johnson changed his mind because he found out that the Foundation supports it. Neither Johnson or Mounce have any ethics. They'll do whatever it takes to get a vote. "

Roger wrote on Mar 27, 2006 8:01 AM:

" Joanne is changing her mind so she will have a chance of being Mayor, like Bob Johnson on the electric rate increase. If she does not go along with Hitchcock, Hansen and Beckman she doesn't stand a chance. Joanne, be known by your deeds and friends. "

Comments on this story are now closed.